| |
Main
Date: 04 Sep 2006 11:09:30
From: Bucky
Subject: well that didn't take long
|
Down by 3 strokes to start the final round. Tied after 3 holes. Wow.
Argh, I can't believe they're not showing this on TV yet (at least on
the west coast). What were they thinking???
|
|
| |
Date: 04 Sep 2006 13:02:03
From: pete z
Subject: Re: well that didn't take long
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2006 11:09:30 -0700, "Bucky" <uw_badgers@email.com> wrote:
>
> >Down by 3 strokes to start the final round. Tied after 3 holes. Wow.
> >
> >Argh, I can't believe they're not showing this on TV yet (at least on
> >the west coast). What were they thinking???
>
> ABC-TV 3-6pm EST.
> ___,
> \o
>
|
| |
Date: 04 Sep 2006 14:40:09
From: sfb
Subject: Re: well that didn't take long
|
They are thinking that soap operas draw better ratings.
"Bucky" <uw_badgers@email.com > wrote in message
news:1157393370.802301.73820@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Down by 3 strokes to start the final round. Tied after 3 holes. Wow.
>
> Argh, I can't believe they're not showing this on TV yet (at least on
> the west coast). What were they thinking???
>
|
| |
Date: 04 Sep 2006 11:35:31
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: well that didn't take long
|
Bucky wrote:
> Down by 3 strokes to start the final round. Tied after 3 holes. Wow.
>
> Argh, I can't believe they're not showing this on TV yet (at least on
> the west coast). What were they thinking???
Even quicker than that was the inevitable emergence of the obligatory
spoilers.
|
| |
Date: 04 Sep 2006 13:26:15
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: well that didn't take long
|
On 4 Sep 2006 11:09:30 -0700, "Bucky" <uw_badgers@email.com > wrote:
>Down by 3 strokes to start the final round. Tied after 3 holes. Wow.
>
>Argh, I can't believe they're not showing this on TV yet (at least on
>the west coast). What were they thinking???
ABC-TV 3-6pm EST.
___,
\o
|
|
