| |
Main
Date: 28 Aug 2006 18:15:26
From: gp
Subject: Old School vs. Modern Swings
|
How many of you guys still use/advocate Jack Nicklaus' rolling of the ankles & great footwork golfswing versus & the "leg drive" swings of yesteryear that you see when you watch Shell's Wonderful World of Golf from the '60's, '70's and part of the '80's, versus the more rotary (quiet lower body) swings that seem to be en vogue when you watch Adam Scott, El Tigre, Charlie Howell 3 and others when CBS plays swingvision. I'm in the process of making a (slight) change where I'll use Jack's rolling ankle / fancy footwork method. I hit great shots on the course Sunday when I tried Jack's way. It was risky too 'cause I'm not used to this move, nor have I had adequate practice with it...but I did find, iIt helps ensure good weight shift and good balance.
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Aug 2006 19:42:09
From: dsc
Subject: Re: Old School vs. Modern Swings
|
gp wrote: > How many of you guys still use/advocate Jack Nicklaus' rolling of the > ankles & great footwork golfswing versus & the "leg drive" swings of > yesteryear that you see when you watch Shell's Wonderful World of Golf > from the '60's, '70's and part of the '80's, versus the more rotary > (quiet lower body) swings that seem to be en vogue when you watch Adam > Scott, El Tigre, Charlie Howell 3 and others when CBS plays > swingvision. > > I'm in the process of making a (slight) change where I'll use Jack's > rolling ankle / fancy footwork method. I hit great shots on the course > Sunday when I tried Jack's way. It was risky too 'cause I'm not used > to this move, nor have I had adequate practice with it...but I did > find, iIt helps ensure good weight shift and good balance. Jack claims that his rolling of the right ankle is anti-left device. If that is true... I should give it a try... :)
|
|