| |
Main
Date: 06 Oct 2006 14:29:02
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: OT political
|
I guess I'm not the only one who figures Mark Foley is in rehab to keep him
away from the media.
|
|
| |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 18:48:33
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: OT political
|
AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
> I guess I'm not the only one who figures Mark Foley is in rehab to keep him
> away from the media.
It worked for young Kennedy didn't it?
|
| | |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 23:33:15
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: OT political
|
In article <6rGdnQCt8NvcQLvYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@comcast.com >
Bert Robbins <screw@you.com > wrote:
Was he a pedophile dirtbag too?
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 19:44:43
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: OT political
|
tiggerspalewife wrote:
> In article <6rGdnQCt8NvcQLvYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@comcast.com>
> Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
>
> Was he a pedophile dirtbag too?
>
>
I don't know, is he? Do you have information about Rep. Patrick Kennedy
that you would like to share with the rest of us?
We do know his father is an accused murderer and his cousin is an
accused rapist.
|
| | | | |
Date: 07 Oct 2006 00:07:06
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: OT political
|
In article <Fb2dnZVESNn2d7vYnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com >
Bert Robbins <screw@you.com > wrote:
Bert. That says it all. Pissed that you missed out on Foley? Well, hope
you can get over it. Your 15 seconds has now expired.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 20:48:12
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: OT political
|
tiggerspalewife wrote:
> In article <Fb2dnZVESNn2d7vYnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>
> Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
>
> Bert. That says it all. Pissed that you missed out on Foley? Well, hope
> you can get over it. Your 15 seconds has now expired.
>
>
Why don't you come out of the closet and post under your real name?
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 07 Oct 2006 17:10:04
From: Nomen Nescio
Subject: Re: OT political
|
In article <EaednWNl5PrRZLvYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@comcast.com >
Bert Robbins <screw@you.com > wrote:
You're like so many jackasses that message the boards. You're more
worried about a guy's address that what he just said, telling most of us
that you have no comeback other than whining about something. *You can
keep ***you*** day job?* Bet yours isn't teaching English.
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 07 Oct 2006 12:12:06
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: OT political
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> In article <EaednWNl5PrRZLvYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@comcast.com>
> Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
>
> You're like so many jackasses that message the boards. You're more
> worried about a guy's address that what he just said, telling most of us
> that you have no comeback other than whining about something. *You can
> keep ***you*** day job?* Bet yours isn't teaching English.
>
You are correct my day job is not teaching English. But, I am not afraid
to stand by what I say on USENET. Why are you afraid to be known by your
real name?
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 07 Oct 2006 20:40:06
From: Nomen Nescio
Subject: Re: OT political
|
In article <h8KdnSkzCv5LTLrYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com >
Bert Robbins <screw@you.com > wrote:
Stick to boats little man. You seem to get your insignificant little ass
kicked on that ng the same as here. Don't like the nomen remailer? Well
then put up or shut up. Post your name, street address, and your real
email address and I'll do the same. What's wrong? Afraid to give up your
real email address! Afraid to put all your info out there like you want
everyone else to do? Hardly standing by anything you write or say then
are you. Just another puff of noise on the internet. Afraid of somebody
knowing your real address? We could think of a million reasons why. You
have been called out, and likely-shut down again. Do it loser. Just to
say you have at least stood up for one thing in your life other than
being a big flapping piehole behind a keyboard. NO wonder you won't post
your info. You're a pain in the ass no matter where you go.
Bet you cheat at golf too. Winter rules all year long? A foot wedge here
and there? Forget a stroke or two now and then? How about mulligans there
sport? One more in a long list of losers. Your parents probably tried but
then again, apples don't fall far from the tree and losers breed bigger
losers.
(PS Enjoyed your thread about netstat too btw and Network Associates?
Whew, got your ass kicked there too right?)
I think you probably want to stop right where you are. But first,
remember, you've been called out. post your info big man or shut the fuck
up-something you've heard all your life.
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=2IxmLRIAAABzBvkmKNS8noz4
06Mqa3ao8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 07 Oct 2006 14:38:24
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: OT political
|
In article <EaednWNl5PrRZLvYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@comcast.com >
Bert Robbins <screw@you.com > wrote:
:-) Because it bugs the shit out of little pissants like yourself who
piss and moan like a little girl and then posts with some rinky dink
address that's phoney (sorry to bring up the obvious there but you must
have missed that somehow).
If you can't handle it, killfile me. I'll try to cope. Better yet, allow
me to do the same. How do they say that???????? PLONK?
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 07 Oct 2006 12:17:16
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: OT political
|
tiggerspalewife wrote:
> In article <EaednWNl5PrRZLvYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@comcast.com>
> Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
>
> :-) Because it bugs the shit out of little pissants like yourself who
> piss and moan like a little girl and then posts with some rinky dink
> address that's phoney (sorry to bring up the obvious there but you must
> have missed that somehow).
> If you can't handle it, killfile me. I'll try to cope. Better yet, allow
> me to do the same. How do they say that???????? PLONK?
>
>
It doesn't "bugs the shit out of little pissants."
I just have fund tweaking people like you that can't stand beside their
words. Why are you hiding behind anonymous re-mailers? Most likely
because you really are a racist asshole and you don't want your golf
buddies knowing about the hood and sheet you keep in the trunk of your car.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 20:46:30
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: OT political
|
tiggerspalewife wrote:
> In article <Fb2dnZVESNn2d7vYnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>
> Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
>
> Bert. That says it all. Pissed that you missed out on Foley? Well, hope
> you can get over it. Your 15 seconds has now expired.
>
You can keep you day job.
|
| |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 22:12:11
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: OT political
|
AKA Gray Asphalt <goodidea1950@hotmail.spam.com > wrote:
: I guess I'm not the only one who figures Mark Foley is in rehab to keep him
: away from the media.
Hey to Walter Jenkins.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 14:41:16
From: larry
Subject: Re: On Improving Lag
|
On 6 2006 14:20:24 -0700, "Ersatz" <rog@repairman.com > wrote:
>
>larry wrote:
>> On 6 2006 03:14:56 -0700, "SKIPPER" <blakestah@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Dave Lee wrote:
>> >> I ran across a comment the other day regarding improving lag - specifically
>> >> with someone with a lot of golf and swings under their belt.
>> >>
>> >> The statement was (in summary) that outstanding fundamental mechanics such
>> >> as turn, weight shift, etc. are helpful in achieving good lag. But for
>> >> someone with a lot of golf under their belt, the habit of whatever your lag
>> >> is will absolutely dominate your swing. Significant lag improvement will
>> >> require the difficult process of relearning some very ingrained, and
>> >> difficult to control directly, habits no matter how much other swing
>> >> fundamentals are improved.
>> >>
>> >> From my experience that seems correct. Other
>> >> comments/observations/experiences on this?
>> >
>> >I've found it is very tough if you stay the same at
>> >address.
>> >
>> >If you push the ball back in your stance about an inch
>> >you hit down on the ball more and adjust in a shorter
>> >period, a week or two.
>>
>> We create lag by first creating a deep wrist cock on top. We get that
>> by gripping with very loose pressure--and with our two hands tightly
>> together and oriented to allow that to happen. The club is held
>> primarily in the last three fingers of your left hand. It swivels
>> there.
>>
>> Then we backswing rapidly enough that the club falls or flops into the
>> deep wrist cock from momentum, NOT from consciously cocking our
>> wrists--
>>
>> Then we start the downswing with lower body-- the hips making a
>> lateral shift toward the target as we shift our weight to the front
>> leg--AS our hips then our shoulders start to turn toward the
>> target--leaving our hands and the club behind due to their inertia.
>>
>> As our shoulders turn back to about address, our hands come down
>> toward our hips- and ideally when your hands reach your back leg the
>> wrist cock is still full-- the entire release happens as our hands
>> move across the front of our body.
>>
>> The whole secret is the loose grip pressure and starting down with
>> legs instead of arms or shoulders. You cannot consciously affect
>> either the retention of the wrist cock during the downswing or the
>> release--if you hope to hit the ball straight enough to keep it in the
>> short grass. It must happen centrifugally.
>>
>> Jim Flick and essentially all good teachers advise practicing the
>> sequence of moves with the club horizontal, like a baseball bat.
>>
>> Larry
>
>Nice try Larry, politics are taboo, but now it appears golf topics are
>trashed also.
>Rog
I don't usually even click on the comments from the regulars here. I
KNOW their post will be brainless nitpicks and a total waste of time
for me and everyone. Just do what I do and if the poster is a
regular, skip it.
I participate in half a dozen other forums-- and this is by far the
worst, RSG has become totally useless--because of the lurking
regulars. Apparently for a dozen or so sickos this is their ONLY
daily entertainment. Sad.
Larry
|
| | |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 21:54:45
From: Ernie
Subject: Re: On Improving Lag
|
In article <c4jdi2hdm0m402smvv4g3ufhide2gpdrbg@4ax.com >,
larry <larry@delmardata.com > wrote:
> On 6 2006 14:20:24 -0700, "Ersatz" <rog@repairman.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >larry wrote:
> >> On 6 2006 03:14:56 -0700, "SKIPPER" <blakestah@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Dave Lee wrote:
> >> >> I ran across a comment the other day regarding improving lag -
> >> >> specifically
> >> >> with someone with a lot of golf and swings under their belt.
> >> >>
> >> >> The statement was (in summary) that outstanding fundamental mechanics
> >> >> such
> >> >> as turn, weight shift, etc. are helpful in achieving good lag. But for
> >> >> someone with a lot of golf under their belt, the habit of whatever your
> >> >> lag
> >> >> is will absolutely dominate your swing. Significant lag improvement
> >> >> will
> >> >> require the difficult process of relearning some very ingrained, and
> >> >> difficult to control directly, habits no matter how much other swing
> >> >> fundamentals are improved.
> >> >>
> >> >> From my experience that seems correct. Other
> >> >> comments/observations/experiences on this?
> >> >
> >> >I've found it is very tough if you stay the same at
> >> >address.
> >> >
> >> >If you push the ball back in your stance about an inch
> >> >you hit down on the ball more and adjust in a shorter
> >> >period, a week or two.
> >>
> >> We create lag by first creating a deep wrist cock on top. We get that
> >> by gripping with very loose pressure--and with our two hands tightly
> >> together and oriented to allow that to happen. The club is held
> >> primarily in the last three fingers of your left hand. It swivels
> >> there.
> >>
> >> Then we backswing rapidly enough that the club falls or flops into the
> >> deep wrist cock from momentum, NOT from consciously cocking our
> >> wrists--
> >>
> >> Then we start the downswing with lower body-- the hips making a
> >> lateral shift toward the target as we shift our weight to the front
> >> leg--AS our hips then our shoulders start to turn toward the
> >> target--leaving our hands and the club behind due to their inertia.
> >>
> >> As our shoulders turn back to about address, our hands come down
> >> toward our hips- and ideally when your hands reach your back leg the
> >> wrist cock is still full-- the entire release happens as our hands
> >> move across the front of our body.
> >>
> >> The whole secret is the loose grip pressure and starting down with
> >> legs instead of arms or shoulders. You cannot consciously affect
> >> either the retention of the wrist cock during the downswing or the
> >> release--if you hope to hit the ball straight enough to keep it in the
> >> short grass. It must happen centrifugally.
> >>
> >> Jim Flick and essentially all good teachers advise practicing the
> >> sequence of moves with the club horizontal, like a baseball bat.
> >>
> >> Larry
> >
> >Nice try Larry, politics are taboo, but now it appears golf topics are
> >trashed also.
> >Rog
>
> I don't usually even click on the comments from the regulars here. I
> KNOW their post will be brainless nitpicks and a total waste of time
> for me and everyone. Just do what I do and if the poster is a
> regular, skip it.
>
> I participate in half a dozen other forums-- and this is by far the
> worst, RSG has become totally useless--because of the lurking
> regulars. Apparently for a dozen or so sickos this is their ONLY
> daily entertainment. Sad.
>
> Larry
Please. I dare you. Produce a forum where anyone has any respect for
your opinions on golf.
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Oct 2006 23:08:15
From: David Laville
Subject: Re: On Improving Lag
|
On Fri, 06 2006 21:54:45 GMT, Ernie <ernie@pga.org > wrote:
>Please. I dare you. Produce a forum where anyone has any respect for
>your opinions on golf.
The Golf Channel discussion forum. Some there think Larry is a golf
genius. Shows how bad the level of golf knowledge is over there.
David Laville, G.S.E.M.
The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor
TB-8982
|
|
