| |
Main
Date: 01 Nov 2006 11:55:21
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
Things are getting desperate for the GOP. I only caught part of it. The
content was decent (but generic, obviously), but the delivery was
horrible. Honestly, can we send the man to a public speaking class?
Sometimes it's hard to tell whether it's Bush or Steve Bridges.
Btw, I didn't laugh harder than when I found out Barbara Streisand had
a drink thrown at her during concert Bush skit. Just sing and leave out
the political opinions (although I wouldn't walk across the street to
see her sing).
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Nov 2006 19:49:38
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
William A. T. Clark wrote:
> >
> There is great irony in Kerry being attacked for a slip in delivery by a
> man who should apologize to us all every time he tries to use the
> English language. Not to mention his total inability to articulate any
> idea beyond "one, two, buckle my shoe". It's laughable, it really is.
>
I'm not one for apologies, but I'm willing to wait in line behind the
families of the 2600+ dead soldiers Bush sent to Iraq. They should get
the first apologies.
|
| | |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 21:15:32
From: Daisy
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
On 1 Nov 2006 19:49:38 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>
>William A. T. Clark wrote:
>> >
>> There is great irony in Kerry being attacked for a slip in delivery by a
>> man who should apologize to us all every time he tries to use the
>> English language. Not to mention his total inability to articulate any
>> idea beyond "one, two, buckle my shoe". It's laughable, it really is.
>>
>
>
>I'm not one for apologies, but I'm willing to wait in line behind the
>families of the 2600+ dead soldiers Bush sent to Iraq. They should get
>the first apologies.
First off I am not an American and I don't live in the USA. I am a
New Zealander, and our governmetn has never supported the Iraq war.
We do, however, send humanitarian aid to Afghanistan but do not get
involved with any military intervention there.
That said, and I happen to agree with it despite not necessarily
agreeing with the current ruling party, I have never been supportive
of any foreign intervention in the Middle East. And that goes for all
of them: Israel, Palestine, Iran, Lebanon, Iran and Iraq.
'The problen began originally in the settlements both after World War
I and then again after WW2 when the so-called "world powers" divided
up the winners and losers and many of the Middle Eastern states were
lumped among the losers.
Intervention was always a lose-lose situation. History should tell
everyone this. The last conqueror of Afghanistan was Alexander the
great in the 4th centure BC and no one has achieved this since. This
has to tell you something.
My advice to Americans is this: get out of an area you know
absolutely nothing about and even less about how these people want to
govern themselves. They are NOT your problem. The fact that they
have a lot of oil may be but that's another question.
My guess is that oil is at the bottom (or top?) of the whole
situation. In which case Iran and Iraq and all of the other oil-rich
states should be left aong eto enrich themselves -and not you!
Daisy
Carthage demands an explanation for this insolence!
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 13:01:16
From: Alan Murphy
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
"Daisy" <DaisyL@emailaccount.com > wrote in message
news:jrtlk21ameggsmtlig74j69aimkj90berg@4ax.com...
> On 1 Nov 2006 19:49:38 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
>
> My guess is that oil is at the bottom (or top?) of the whole
> situation. In which case Iran and Iraq and all of the other oil-rich
> states should be left aong eto enrich themselves -and not you!
>
> Daisy
>
I thought that Bush admitted as much during this interview.
Check the excerpt below:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15473.htm
Alan
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 12:54:54
From: JJK
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
"Daisy" wrote:
<snip >
> My guess is that oil is at the bottom (or top?) of the whole
> situation.
<snip >
No doubt about that.
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 20:29:33
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show- Dumb and Dumber
|
In article <jrtlk21ameggsmtlig74j69aimkj90berg@4ax.com >
Daisy <DaisyL@emailaccount.com > wrote:
Dumb and dumber. They needed both Foley and Haggard the evangelical to
join and they would have had two windbags full of hot air and two more
willing to share that same hot air.
|
| |
Date: 01 Nov 2006 22:41:03
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
In article <1162410921.693844.180890@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com >,
"BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com > wrote:
> Things are getting desperate for the GOP. I only caught part of it. The
> content was decent (but generic, obviously), but the delivery was
> horrible. Honestly, can we send the man to a public speaking class?
> Sometimes it's hard to tell whether it's Bush or Steve Bridges.
>
> Btw, I didn't laugh harder than when I found out Barbara Streisand had
> a drink thrown at her during concert Bush skit. Just sing and leave out
> the political opinions (although I wouldn't walk across the street to
> see her sing).
There is great irony in Kerry being attacked for a slip in delivery by a
man who should apologize to us all every time he tries to use the
English language. Not to mention his total inability to articulate any
idea beyond "one, two, buckle my shoe". It's laughable, it really is.
William Clark
|
| | |
Date: 04 Nov 2006 16:11:57
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Democrats cannot be trusted to govern
|
William A. T. Clark wrote:
> In article <dLadnTU5zP29f9HYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
>
> > Head Shot wrote:
> > > William A. T. Clark wrote:
> > >> How truly pathetic. It is not this country I dislike, but idiots like
> > >> you that want to subject us all to your brand of totalitarianism.
> >
> > If you don't like it here, in the US of a, there are almost 200 other
> > countries in the world that you may choose to go to. If you need a plane
> > ticket let us know and we will take up a collection for you.
>
> Oh, dear, oh, dear. The same tired old "if you don't agree with me, then
> leave the country" trash. People like Hitler and Mussolini came to power
> pushing that kind of philosophy.
Perhaps Chavez needs a scolding from you...he's publically saying "get
out" if you don't agree with him....and yet, jackasses like you think
Bush is evil. What a world!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061104/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/venezuela
Tex
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Nov 2006 22:39:39
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Democrats cannot be trusted to govern
|
In article <1162685517.913625.303290@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com >,
"Tex" <marktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> William A. T. Clark wrote:
> > In article <dLadnTU5zP29f9HYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> > Bert Robbins <screw@you.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Head Shot wrote:
> > > > William A. T. Clark wrote:
> > > >> How truly pathetic. It is not this country I dislike, but idiots like
> > > >> you that want to subject us all to your brand of totalitarianism.
> > >
> > > If you don't like it here, in the US of a, there are almost 200 other
> > > countries in the world that you may choose to go to. If you need a plane
> > > ticket let us know and we will take up a collection for you.
> >
> > Oh, dear, oh, dear. The same tired old "if you don't agree with me, then
> > leave the country" trash. People like Hitler and Mussolini came to power
> > pushing that kind of philosophy.
>
> Perhaps Chavez needs a scolding from you...he's publically saying "get
> out" if you don't agree with him....and yet, jackasses like you think
> Bush is evil. What a world!
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061104/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/venezuela
>
> Tex
Couldn't agree more. If that is what Chavez says, then he is as dumb and
contemptible as the rest of the xenophobes. Do you find it surprising
when people suggest balance? Some us are not card carrying neocons,
sworn to defend "my leader' right or (frequently) wrong.
William Clark
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Nov 2006 21:33:25
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Democrats cannot be trusted to govern
|
Tex wrote:
> William A. T. Clark wrote:
>> Oh, dear, oh, dear. The same tired old "if you don't agree with me,
>> then leave the country" trash. People like Hitler and Mussolini came
>> to power pushing that kind of philosophy.
>
> Perhaps Chavez needs a scolding from you...he's publically saying "get
> out" if you don't agree with him....and yet, jackasses like you think
> Bush is evil. What a world!
Even though Slick Willy was a liar, philanderer, and now with an
impeachment on his record; that does not distract from Bushtard being a
coke head that thinks God speaks to him. I am not so sure one of those two
is worse than the other. Both parties should be ashamed of what they keep
feeding to the American public as an Executive Office offering.
--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson
|
| |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 06:14:54
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
>The president continued. "I say, 'If they control oil resources, then they pull oil off the market in order to run the price up, and they will do so unless we abandon Israel, for example, or unless we abandon allies.'"
---------------------
Gee, I wonder where they'd get that idea to control a country and pull
their oil off the market to make oil prices go up?
That is exactly what we are doing there and exactly what I try to
explain to Tex every time he stupidly asks, "If it's about oil, where
is all our new oil?" Glad his President could confirm it for him.
|
| |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 18:47:17
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
Tex wrote:
> You know, if you were as smart as you'd like all of us to think you
> are, you would have bought Oil futures back when Bush got elected.
> You'd never need the Internet again and your fat lazy shit for brains
> ass would sitting in Hawaii...
So how much did you buy, Cowboy?
Oh that's right, none. It woulda cut into your drinkin money.
|
| |
Date: 03 Nov 2006 13:48:15
From: Tex
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Gee, I wonder where they'd get that idea to control a country and pull
> their oil off the market to make oil prices go up?
>
> That is exactly what we are doing there and exactly what I try to
> explain to Tex every time he stupidly asks, "If it's about oil, where
> is all our new oil?" Glad his President could confirm it for him.
You are never under control.
So now we "control" the Oil and yet we pay high prices, then lower
prices?
I suppose Bush planted the false story about a bomb at a refinery
today?
Just so the price would go back up?
I suppose Bush made the rebels in Nigeria go nutso again?
Just so the price would go back up?
You know, if you were as smart as you'd like all of us to think you
are, you would have bought Oil futures back when Bush got elected.
You'd never need the Internet again and your fat lazy shit for brains
ass would sitting in Hawaii...
Instead, your stupid shit self just complains it's someone elses fault,
and you are stuck in BumFuck, Tennessee
Oh tell us again what happened in the past...you are good at that. If
you were really good, you'd know what the future will bring.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 04 Nov 2006 03:39:56
From: Tex
Subject: Re: OT: Bush on The Rush Limbaugh Show
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Tex wrote:
> > You know, if you were as smart as you'd like all of us to think you
> > are, you would have bought Oil futures back when Bush got elected.
> > You'd never need the Internet again and your fat lazy shit for brains
> > ass would sitting in Hawaii...
>
> So how much did you buy, Cowboy?
> Oh that's right, none. It woulda cut into your drinkin money.
I'm not the one out predicting the future and telling everyone that
Bush does everything for Oil. That's your song and dance.
However, my portfolio does contain alot of "big Oil"....much like Gore,
Kerry, Dean, etc...
Afterall, you'd have to be stupid not to have a little money invested
in a product that everyone needs, wants, and continues to buy.
Tex
|
|
