| |
Main
Date: 15 Sep 2006 14:07:21
From: annika1980
Subject: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
OK, so she shot a "Carl Eller" today .... "Big #81."
Let's look at her stats for the week.
EAGLES - - 0
BIRDIES - 1 (chip-in?)
PARS - 21
BOGEYS -13
DOUBLE BOGEYS - 1
DRIVING ACCURACY 75.0 (Tiger wishes he could hit it that straight)
DRIVING DISTANCE 263.8 (Longer than Bellomy)
PUTTS PER ROUND 33.5 (Frostback numbers)
PUTTS PER GIR 2.050 ("Pelz, we have a problem!")
GREENS IN REG 55.6 (With her PPGIR stat, it's probably good that she
doesn't hit more than 55.6% of the greens.)
|
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 16:08:55
From: EdSmithers
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
> DRIVING DISTANCE 263.8 (Longer than Bellomy)
I don't follow Wie's game very much, but seem to remember hearing that
she was a 300+ driver. Am I mistaken about that?
Ed
|
| | |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 09:53:48
From: Craig
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
>
> I don't follow Wie's game very much, but seem to remember hearing that
> she was a 300+ driver. Am I mistaken about that?
>
Everyones a 300+ driver occasionally. Doing it regularly under PGA Tour
conditions is a different kettle of fish. I remember she played a
practice round with young Aussie Jason Day and he was quite appreciative
of the fact that twice out of fourteen she managed to out drive him. I
think he may have let her though in the hope of a bit of 19th hole action!
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 15:46:18
From: Fairway
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
The whole affair is a disgrace for golf. A bit strange though so see
the other names in the last few places: John Daly, Justin Leonard, Lee
Janzen, Todd Hamilton. F
|
| |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 00:29:36
From: Tranny
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
annika1980 wrote:
> OK, so she shot a "Carl Eller" today .... "Big #81."
> Let's look at her stats for the week.
>
> EAGLES - - 0
> BIRDIES - 1 (chip-in?)
> PARS - 21
> BOGEYS -13
> DOUBLE BOGEYS - 1
>
> DRIVING ACCURACY 75.0 (Tiger wishes he could hit it that straight)
> DRIVING DISTANCE 263.8 (Longer than Bellomy)
> PUTTS PER ROUND 33.5 (Frostback numbers)
> PUTTS PER GIR 2.050 ("Pelz, we have a problem!")
> GREENS IN REG 55.6 (With her PPGIR stat, it's probably good that she
> doesn't hit more than 55.6% of the greens.)
Pretty ugly! Good job we can't say that about her legs, tits and arse.
Tran
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 21:41:16
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
annika1980 <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
: OK, so she shot a "Carl Eller" today .... "Big #81."
: Let's look at her stats for the week.
:
: EAGLES - - 0
: BIRDIES - 1 (chip-in?)
: PARS - 21
: BOGEYS -13
: DOUBLE BOGEYS - 1
:
: DRIVING ACCURACY 75.0 (Tiger wishes he could hit it that straight)
: DRIVING DISTANCE 263.8 (Longer than Bellomy)
I HEELED IT, DAMMIT!
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 16:56:41
From: EdSmithers
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
jeffc wrote:
They always include 3 woods and irons off the
> tee, but you never know how it plays into the average. I know she can hit
> it plenty farther than that.
I thought driving distance was only calculated on true driving holes,
places where the players usually can and do use a big club.
Ed
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 22:46:45
From: jeffc
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
"EdSmithers" <spirosdarlotts@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158451001.493772.184610@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> jeffc wrote:
> They always include 3 woods and irons off the
>> tee, but you never know how it plays into the average. I know she can
>> hit
>> it plenty farther than that.
>
>
> I thought driving distance was only calculated on true driving holes,
> places where the players usually can and do use a big club.
Yeah, except that plenty of them don't. Tiger is a prime example. What's
the use of calculating his driving distance in the British Open when he used
his driver precisely 1 time out of 72 tee shots? And that one time was
probably not counted in the driving average.
|
| |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 19:29:39
From: jeffc
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
Her main problem was missing too many 6-8 footers. I also wish the distance
numbers were more meaningful. They always include 3 woods and irons off the
tee, but you never know how it plays into the average. I know she can hit
it plenty farther than that.
|
| | |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 16:39:33
From: adam henry
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:29:39 GMT, "jeffc" <jeffc226@yahoo.com > wrote:
>Her main problem was missing too many 6-8 footers. I also wish the distance
>numbers were more meaningful. They always include 3 woods and irons off the
>tee, but you never know how it plays into the average. I know she can hit
>it plenty farther than that.
>
why not crawl out from under her skirt and get some oxygen for a
change?
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 22:46:55
From: jeffc
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
"adam henry" <ahole@here.com > wrote in message
news:77oog2tm0q4js8kdr1pcb3f2pcb3ll9ej3@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:29:39 GMT, "jeffc" <jeffc226@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Her main problem was missing too many 6-8 footers. I also wish the
>>distance
>>numbers were more meaningful. They always include 3 woods and irons off
>>the
>>tee, but you never know how it plays into the average. I know she can hit
>>it plenty farther than that.
>>
> why not crawl out from under her skirt and get some oxygen for a
> change?
Whatever.
|
| |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 17:08:42
From: EdSmithers
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
jeffc wrote:
> Yeah, except that plenty of them don't. Tiger is a prime example. What's
> the use of calculating his driving distance in the British Open when he used
> his driver precisely 1 time out of 72 tee shots? And that one time was
> probably not counted in the driving average.
I'm not sure that Tiger's 06 British is actually very common, though.
My initial question was spurred by the impression I'd gotten from
various press things about how she was as big a hitter as most of the
PGA players, often over 300 yards. Just a foul-up on my part.
I'd guess driving stats are useless in the case you just describe. Why
on earth does anyone bother keeping them then, I wonder.
Ed
|
| | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 01:27:54
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Michelle's stats at the 84 Lumber
|
On 17 Sep 2006 17:08:42 -0700, "EdSmithers" <spirosdarlotts@yahoo.com >
wrote:
>I'm not sure that Tiger's 06 British is actually very common, though.
>My initial question was spurred by the impression I'd gotten from
>various press things about how she was as big a hitter as most of the
>PGA players, often over 300 yards. Just a foul-up on my part.
But picking different strategies, targets, and clubs for a hole isn't
that unusual.
>I'd guess driving stats are useless in the case you just describe. Why
>on earth does anyone bother keeping them then, I wonder.
Driving stats are part of the show biz for us. Players keep their
own stats for what is useful for them.
|
|
