| |
Main
Date: 20 Aug 2006 17:07:56
From: multi
Subject: If Tiger goes ten majors without a win again
|
He'll still be ahead of Jack's pace. Jack won his 13th major on his
53rd attempt as a pro. Tiger has played 40 majors as a pro.
|
|
| |
Date: 20 Aug 2006 18:52:33
From: pkehoe@telus.net
Subject: Re: If Tiger goes ten majors without a win again
|
It would be interesting to see if *one* of these stars of the
contemporary game could grow a pair of balls and actually challenge the
great Mr. Woods... he's strolling to that magical number of 18, playing
masterful golf all the while it must be said... at least he's making it
look like a stroll, aided by the imploding corpses of his peers come
crunch time certainly...
P
multi wrote:
> He'll still be ahead of Jack's pace. Jack won his 13th major on his
> 53rd attempt as a pro. Tiger has played 40 majors as a pro.
|
| | |
Date: 21 Aug 2006 02:51:12
From: jeffc
Subject: Re: If Tiger goes ten majors without a win again
|
<pkehoe@telus.net > wrote in message
news:1156125153.475863.149180@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
> It would be interesting to see if *one* of these stars of the
> contemporary game could grow a pair of balls and actually challenge the
> great Mr. Woods...
Yeah, that's the problem. They don't have balls. You're brilliant.
|
| |
Date: 20 Aug 2006 23:13:23
From: pkehoe@telus.net
Subject: Re: If Tiger goes ten majors without a win again
|
jeffc,
well... ok... play as if they had them... how's that?
: >
P
jeffc wrote:
> <pkehoe@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:1156125153.475863.149180@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
> > It would be interesting to see if *one* of these stars of the
> > contemporary game could grow a pair of balls and actually challenge the
> > great Mr. Woods...
>
> Yeah, that's the problem. They don't have balls. You're brilliant.
|
| | |
Date: 21 Aug 2006 06:27:58
From: W
Subject: Re: If Tiger goes ten majors without a win again
|
its shrinkage :-)
<pkehoe@telus.net > wrote in message
news:1156140803.874012.54010@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> jeffc,
> well... ok... play as if they had them... how's that?
>
> :>
>
> P
>
> jeffc wrote:
>> <pkehoe@telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:1156125153.475863.149180@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>> > It would be interesting to see if *one* of these stars of the
>> > contemporary game could grow a pair of balls and actually challenge the
>> > great Mr. Woods...
>>
>> Yeah, that's the problem. They don't have balls. You're brilliant.
>
|
| | |
Date: 21 Aug 2006 19:46:14
From: Chris
Subject: Re: If Tiger goes ten majors without a win again
|
<pkehoe@telus.net > wrote in message
news:1156140803.874012.54010@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> jeffc,
> well... ok... play as if they had them... how's that?
>
> :>
>
> P
Don't forget, the analysts predicted the final score to be 10-12 under
(there were more that a half dozen players at that number). You can't
always predict that Tiger will bust things open. It's not that the field
falls apart, they just are somewhat predictable.
|
|
