| |
Main
Date: 27 Aug 2006 22:23:09
From: puttster
Subject: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
Tiger and Cink in a "Hole-by-hole" playoff. What is that?
|
|
| |
Date: 27 Aug 2006 19:18:10
From: Lawrence Leichtman
Subject: Re: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
In article <hXoIg.6431$dl.3371@tornado.texas.rr.com >,
"puttster" <op@me.com > wrote:
> Tiger and Cink in a "Hole-by-hole" playoff. What is that?
Sudden death I guess.
|
| | |
Date: 27 Aug 2006 19:24:52
From: Otto
Subject: Re: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
Depends on how you look at it.
Winners tend to view it as "Sudden Victory."
Otto
"Lawrence Leichtman" <larry@mail-block.com > wrote in message
news:larry-F5EE40.19181027082006@news.east.cox.net...
> In article <hXoIg.6431$dl.3371@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
> "puttster" <op@me.com> wrote:
>
>> Tiger and Cink in a "Hole-by-hole" playoff. What is that?
>
> Sudden death I guess.
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Aug 2006 00:12:35
From: puttster
Subject: Re: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
Ahh, yes - aka Sudden death.
I haven't heard "Sudden Victory," for a while. is it back, now called
"Hole-by-hole?" When will it end?
"Otto" <ottondebREMove#$@^%!@*&@bellsouth.net > wrote in message
news:TQpIg.15862$w7.11587@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> Depends on how you look at it.
>
> Winners tend to view it as "Sudden Victory."
>
> Otto
>
>
>
> "Lawrence Leichtman" <larry@mail-block.com> wrote in message
> news:larry-F5EE40.19181027082006@news.east.cox.net...
> > In article <hXoIg.6431$dl.3371@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
> > "puttster" <op@me.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tiger and Cink in a "Hole-by-hole" playoff. What is that?
> >
> > Sudden death I guess.
>
>
|
| | | | |
Date: 28 Aug 2006 00:21:11
From: Darrell Jefress
Subject: Re: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
"puttster" <op@me.com > wrote in message
news:TxqIg.6450$dl.1489@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
>
> Ahh, yes - aka Sudden death.
> I haven't heard "Sudden Victory," for a while.
I think it was Curt Gowdy who first made that term well-known, back in the
early 70s. It really didn't catch on, as most regular folks still would use
the "sudden death" version. It may not be the best description, but it's the
one that has carried the day and worked its way into common usage.
DJJ
|
| | | | | |
Date: 27 Aug 2006 17:25:39
From: long&left
Subject: Re: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
Darrell Jefress wrote:
> "puttster" <op@me.com> wrote in message
> news:TxqIg.6450$dl.1489@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
>>
>>Ahh, yes - aka Sudden death.
>>I haven't heard "Sudden Victory," for a while.
>
>
> I think it was Curt Gowdy who first made that term well-known, back in the
> early 70s. It really didn't catch on, as most regular folks still would use
> the "sudden death" version. It may not be the best description, but it's the
> one that has carried the day and worked its way into common usage.
>
> DJJ
>
>
ah, Curt Gowdy...fish in a pen on American Sportsman. The "big one"
never got away from ole Curt Gowdy :) oops, sorry for the OT
|
| |
Date: 27 Aug 2006 15:33:00
From: multi
Subject: Re: "Hole-by-hole" playoff?
|
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:23:09 GMT, "puttster" <op@me.com > wrote:
>Tiger and Cink in a "Hole-by-hole" playoff. What is that?
Sudden death, as opposed to total strokes over X holes, like at the
2000 PGA.
|
|
