| |
Main
Date: 18 Sep 2006 20:21:18
From: Ben.
Subject: Ben Roethlisberger
|
And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
|
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 10:30:59
From: zumafan
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Ben. wrote:
> > And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
> > 104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
>
> Two words: Chuck Batch.
Charlie played well against Miami last week, Ben was definitely off
target last night. I suspect that if next week's opponent wasn't the
Bengals that Ben might have gotten an extra week (2 with the bye).
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 05:49:12
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
Ben. wrote:
> And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
> 104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
Two words: Chuck Batch.
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 05:02:47
From: Larry Bud
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
Ben. wrote:
> And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
> 104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
Why post a football question in a golf newsgroup?
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 23:01:31
From: Dave Clary
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
On 18 Sep 2006 20:21:18 -0700, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
>104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
That was misquoted. It was actually 100.4ºF.
Dave Clary/Corpus Christi, Tx
Home: http://davidclary.com
Kinky for Texas Gov
"Why The Hell Not"
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 14:22:20
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
Larry Bud wrote:
> Ben. wrote:
> > And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
> > 104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
>
> Why post a football question in a golf newsgroup?
I didn't, I posted it right here in RSG, Larry Bud. DUH!
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 14:21:22
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Ben. wrote:
> > And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
> > 104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
>
> Two words: Chuck Batch.
They beat Miami w/ him - though that isn't saying much apparently this
year. But how bad must they think Batch is to have started, and kept
Roethlisberger in the game? And ultimately, would they have lost 12-0?
What the hell difference would it make?
Anyway, he looked dreadful. Deathly ill earlier in the day, fresh off
of an appendectomy, not sure I understand the call; Starting him? A
correctable mistake. Leaving him in with the way he was playing?
Stupidity.
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 11:05:54
From: RockPile
Subject: Re: Ben Roethlisberger
|
zumafan wrote:
> annika1980 wrote:
> > Ben. wrote:
> > > And why not start a QB two weeks after abdominal surgery and who had a
> > > 104* fever earlier in the day? Sounds like a good plan, coach!!
> >
> > Two words: Chuck Batch.
>
> Charlie played well against Miami last week, Ben was definitely off
> target last night. I suspect that if next week's opponent wasn't the
> Bengals that Ben might have gotten an extra week (2 with the bye).
Yeah, nothing like having to rely on Lions' cast off quarterbacks!
|
|
