| |
Main
Date: 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31
From: Manco
Subject: You heard it here first.
|
Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
|
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 18:22:51
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
> Well that's not true. I haven't been able to wipe the smile off my face
> since Woods lost yesterday. It'll go away eventually. Ciao baby. I was
> just here to mock idol worshippers like yourself. Easy to like a winner
> Bubby. Take care.
Easy to hate someone of color, huh Kev?
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 18:05:37
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 6:37 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On Apr 8, 7:29 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> > But it irritates me when someone says Jesus is the reason he
>
> > won - and by implication the reason everybody else lost).
>
> Just once I'd like to hear an announcer ask, "So why did Jesus let you
> down all those other times?"
Totally. "So I gave it my best shot today, but Jesus dropped the
ball. I mean, I showed up, I went through my paces, I put my game
face one and the J-Man was nowhere to be found. You'd think he has
nothing better to do than bask in my glory, but sometimes you get
screwed."
FTR, I like Johnson, too - he seems like a good guy, but the J-bombs
are completely unnecessary in accepting a green jacket for getting
your little white golf ball into the hole in fewer strokes than the
next guy. Completely inappropriate.
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 12:48:10
From: greers
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 7:37 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On Apr 8, 7:29 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> > But it irritates me when someone says Jesus is the reason he
>
> > won - and by implication the reason everybody else lost).
>
> Just once I'd like to hear an announcer ask, "So why did Jesus let you
> down all those other times?"
When someone makes a statement like Zach did, they usually are giving
thanks in a general way like he thanked all his supporters and
sponsors, etc. For being given the overall talent, health,
perserverance and opportunity to make the PGA and for at least one
chance to play in such a prestigious tournament, let alone win it.
And that he believes his faith has helped him mentally and spiritually
in his chosen profession.
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 07:33:30
From: Steve H.
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 9, 1:24 am, "Manco" <manco_doll...@net2blah.com > wrote:
> Birdie Bill wrote:
>
> > I thought so at one time. Then I found out that the rumored name
> > change was just a rumor. He IS still Eldrick. Unless he changed it
> > in the last few years.
>
> Actually his legal name is Tiger. Eldrick was never a name in use. BTW, what
> parent would ever name their son Eldrick? A slave name perhaps?
Uh, if any name's a slave name in their case, it's "Woods," however
according to Earl, his mother came up with the name. It's just an old
name that's been out of fashion for a while. Since she's Thai, and
the name sounds anglo-saxon, she probably got it from a source such as
this:
http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Eldrick
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 06:25:42
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 9, 12:24 am, "Manco" <manco_doll...@net2blah.com > wrote:
> Birdie Bill wrote:
>
> > I thought so at one time. Then I found out that the rumored name
> > change was just a rumor. He IS still Eldrick. Unless he changed it
> > in the last few years.
>
> Actually his legal name is Tiger. Eldrick was never a name in use. BTW, what
> parent would ever name their son Eldrick? A slave name perhaps?
I have no objections to the name Eldrick. Tiger is his nickname. I
am unaware of any law that makes a nickname a "legal name" just
because it has been commonly used for a long time. Perhaps
you can quote the law that does that.
Back in 97 or so, when Tiger first started playing as a pro, there was
talk that he had his name legally changed to Tiger. I assumed that
was true until it was pointed out to me that it never actually
happened.
Google it for yourself if you don't believe it.
I don't care if his name is Tiger, Eldrick, or Smurdly.
|
| | |
Date: 10 Apr 2007 00:57:30
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On 9 Apr 2007 06:25:42 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com >
wrote:
>I have no objections to the name Eldrick. Tiger is his nickname. I
>am unaware of any law that makes a nickname a "legal name" just
>because it has been commonly used for a long time. Perhaps
>you can quote the law that does that.
He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
that that name is a legal name of his.
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Apr 2007 16:31:58
From: Don Kirkman
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Howard Brazee wrote in article
<36ol13tldta181fu7r8ht0bvnf12897im6@4ax.com >:
>On 9 Apr 2007 06:25:42 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>>I have no objections to the name Eldrick. Tiger is his nickname. I
>>am unaware of any law that makes a nickname a "legal name" just
>>because it has been commonly used for a long time. Perhaps
>>you can quote the law that does that.
>He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
>that that name is a legal name of his.
AFAIK anybody can use any name they want to (including surname) as long
as it's not used fraudulently or illegally. Don't most of us here and
elsewhere routinely use our nicknames in everyday business? Even my
bank accounts aren't in my "legal" name.
--
Don Kirkman
|
| | | | |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 01:50:20
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:31:58 -0700, Don Kirkman
<donsno2@wavecable.com > wrote:
>>He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
>>that that name is a legal name of his.
>
>AFAIK anybody can use any name they want to (including surname) as long
>as it's not used fraudulently or illegally.
So it's legally his because it is not illegally his.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 16:29:41
From: Don Kirkman
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Howard Brazee wrote in article
<glfo13dp9mqj9kfff83rts3erdaiaj4clm@4ax.com >:
>On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:31:58 -0700, Don Kirkman
><donsno2@wavecable.com> wrote:
>>>He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
>>>that that name is a legal name of his.
>>AFAIK anybody can use any name they want to (including surname) as long
>>as it's not used fraudulently or illegally.
>So it's legally his because it is not illegally his.
Well, maybe. My wife used her nickname for her personal business
beginning years ago when she was in school, but more recently she went
to court and had a judge approve it as her legal name.
--
Don Kirkman
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Apr 2007 01:52:33
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Howard Brazee <howard@brazee.net > wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2007 06:25:42 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I have no objections to the name Eldrick. Tiger is his nickname. I
>>am unaware of any law that makes a nickname a "legal name" just
>>because it has been commonly used for a long time. Perhaps
>>you can quote the law that does that.
>
> He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
> that that name is a legal name of his.
By that logic, one of my legal names is "cash."
The problem with posting just to watch yourself post is that
sometimes you're bound to put out a spectacularly stupid one.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 16:42:17
From: Aress Gee
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Chris Bellomy <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > writes:
> Howard Brazee <howard@brazee.net> wrote:
> > On 9 Apr 2007 06:25:42 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>I have no objections to the name Eldrick. Tiger is his nickname. I
> >>am unaware of any law that makes a nickname a "legal name" just
> >>because it has been commonly used for a long time. Perhaps
> >>you can quote the law that does that.
> >
> > He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
> > that that name is a legal name of his.
>
> By that logic, one of my legal names is "cash."
>
> The problem with posting just to watch yourself post is that
> sometimes you're bound to put out a spectacularly stupid one.
Can't you leave Pflum out of this?
--
+++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mr. People who use golf as some sort of status
Aress symbol are destined to go unfulfilled.
Gee -- Golf's Most Beloved Figure
+++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
| | | | | |
Date: 10 Apr 2007 02:07:45
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Aress Gee <invalid@not_real_address.com > wrote:
> Chris Bellomy <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> writes:
>
>> Howard Brazee <howard@brazee.net> wrote:
>> > On 9 Apr 2007 06:25:42 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>I have no objections to the name Eldrick. Tiger is his nickname. I
>> >>am unaware of any law that makes a nickname a "legal name" just
>> >>because it has been commonly used for a long time. Perhaps
>> >>you can quote the law that does that.
>> >
>> > He signs checks made out to "Tiger Woods", so I suppose that indicates
>> > that that name is a legal name of his.
>>
>> By that logic, one of my legal names is "cash."
>>
>> The problem with posting just to watch yourself post is that
>> sometimes you're bound to put out a spectacularly stupid one.
>
> Can't you leave Pflum out of this?
I didn't say "the problem with being a post just to watch yourself
be a post." Though I admit it was close to that.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 05:05:37
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 9, 12:38 am, "Kevin Webb" <ktweb...@knology.net > wrote:
> Hello, BigPurdueFan!
> You wrote on 8 Apr 2007 16:25:30 -0700:
>
> B> On Apr 8, 6:51 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
> ??>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktweb...@knology.net> ??>> wrote:
>
> ??>>
> ??>>> Hello, Manco!
> ??>>> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
> ??>>
> M>>>> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
> ??>>
> ??>>> Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame.
> ??>>> Poor Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
> ??>>
> ??>>> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
> ??>>
> ??>> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>
> "Give him a break. Research shows Kevin spends all of his time on the
> NASCAR boards"
>
> Ah....Woods blew it. Glorious.
How's Dale Jr going these days? You git an autograph yet?
|
| | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 07:29:13
From: Kevin Webb
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Hello, BigPurdueFan!
You wrote on 9 Apr 2007 05:05:37 -0700:
B > On Apr 9, 12:38 am, "Kevin Webb" <ktweb...@knology.net> wrote:
?? >> Hello, BigPurdueFan!
?? >> You wrote on 8 Apr 2007 16:25:30 -0700:
?? >>
B >>> On Apr 8, 6:51 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
?? >>>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb"
<ktweb...@knology.net > ??>>
?? >>>> wrote:
?? >>
?? >>>>> Hello, Manco!
?? >>>>> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
?? >>>>
M >>>>>> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
?? >>>>
?? >>>>> Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame.
?? >>>>> Poor Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
?? >>>>
?? >>>>> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
?? >>>>
?? >>>> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
?? >>
?? >> "Give him a break. Research shows Kevin spends all of his time on the
?? >> NASCAR boards"
?? >>
?? >> Ah....Woods blew it. Glorious.
"How's Dale Jr going these days? You git an autograph yet?"
If someone's signature meant anything to me it wouldn't be Joonyer's that I
would covet. Now you, my guess would be you have a Woods poster on the
ceiling above your bunk bed and a crusty rag in your free hand. Your boy
gagged Purdue. Suck it up. He'll probably win the next 10 and all will be
right in your world and your man love fantasy's will be renewed again.
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 22:11:52
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 6:35 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:32:23 -0000, Chris Bellomy
>
>
>
>
>
> <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> >Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktweb...@knology.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>Hello, Manco!
> >>>You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
>
> >>> M> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>
> >>>Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
> >>>Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
>
> >>>A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>
> >> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>
> >Emphasis on "was."
>
> Exactly. That's why I didn't say "is".
I thought so at one time. Then I found out that the rumored name
change was just a rumor. He IS still Eldrick. Unless he changed it
in the last few years.
|
| | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 15:29:44
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On 8 Apr 2007 22:11:52 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com >
wrote:
>On Apr 8, 6:35 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:32:23 -0000, Chris Bellomy
>> >> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>>
>> >Emphasis on "was."
>>
>> Exactly. That's why I didn't say "is".
>
>I thought so at one time. Then I found out that the rumored name
>change was just a rumor. He IS still Eldrick. Unless he changed it
>in the last few years.
This is the only thing I could find online, from Answers.com;
In August of 1996, Woods decided to quit college in order to play
professional golf.
Four months later in December, Woods celebrated his twenty-first
birthday. He marked the occasion with a legal name change, from
Eldrick to Tiger. Woods had been called Tiger by his father even as a
youngster. The nickname stuck, and Woods had always been known to his
friends, and to the press, as Tiger.
However, I've also seen it reported that this didn't happen....????
--
___,
\o
|
| | | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 16:57:54
From: FredK
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
It is easy to simply file the paperwork for an alias, as opposed to changing
your name.
"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net > wrote in message
news:esmk13pdmt0djn80h9lnnhqnq6c4vggj46@4ax.com...
> On 8 Apr 2007 22:11:52 -0700, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 8, 6:35 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:32:23 -0000, Chris Bellomy
>
>>> >> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>>>
>>> >Emphasis on "was."
>>>
>>> Exactly. That's why I didn't say "is".
>>
>>I thought so at one time. Then I found out that the rumored name
>>change was just a rumor. He IS still Eldrick. Unless he changed it
>>in the last few years.
>
> This is the only thing I could find online, from Answers.com;
>
> In August of 1996, Woods decided to quit college in order to play
> professional golf.
>
> Four months later in December, Woods celebrated his twenty-first
> birthday. He marked the occasion with a legal name change, from
> Eldrick to Tiger. Woods had been called Tiger by his father even as a
> youngster. The nickname stuck, and Woods had always been known to his
> friends, and to the press, as Tiger.
>
> However, I've also seen it reported that this didn't happen....????
>
> --
> ___,
> \o
>
|
| | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 05:24:17
From: Manco
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Birdie Bill wrote:
>
> I thought so at one time. Then I found out that the rumored name
> change was just a rumor. He IS still Eldrick. Unless he changed it
> in the last few years.
Actually his legal name is Tiger. Eldrick was never a name in use. BTW, what
parent would ever name their son Eldrick? A slave name perhaps?
|
| |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 02:36:29
From: George Orwell
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
In article <LrdSh.908$Lm.774@trndny05 >
"Manco" <manco_dollars@net2blah.com > wrote:
>
> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
bbbwaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 20:07:56
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT, "Manco" <manco_dollars@net2blah.com >
wrote:
>Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>
Or not. :-)
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 16:52:36
From: No cameras and shut up
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 3:49 pm, "Manco" <manco_doll...@net2blah.com > wrote:
> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
What are u going to do for your next trick. Please call me
collect
with your next prediction...So I can bet my ass off against
it...Please
look AT MY PREDICTION .....I think you will be
impressed...here....
Not this year Tiger - Or Phil - muy mal so far !
flag
4 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
this group will make your email
Yes Amir ....There is a Windstorm and a Camel
View profile
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: "Yes Amir ....There is a Windstorm and a Camel"
<chokenjo...@yahoo.com >
Date: 6 Apr 2007 11:34:54 -0700
Local: Fri, Apr 6 2007 12:34 pm
Subject: Not this year Tiger - Or Phil - muy mal so far !
Tiger 4 over ? whew. He didnt look all that good yesterday --
ending the round
with 2 bogey. Hey married and gonna be with child ..it ain't easy out
there. As
for Phil ..one never knows...does one. Fore ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 16:37:54
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 7:29 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> But it irritates me when someone says Jesus is the reason he
> won - and by implication the reason everybody else lost).
Just once I'd like to hear an announcer ask, "So why did Jesus let you
down all those other times?"
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 16:25:30
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 6:51 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktweb...@knology.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Hello, Manco!
> >You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
>
> > M> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>
> >Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
> >Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
>
> >A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>
> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
Give him a break. Research shows Kevin spends all of his time on the
NASCAR boards.
|
| | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 23:38:15
From: Kevin Webb
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Hello, BigPurdueFan!
You wrote on 8 Apr 2007 16:25:30 -0700:
B > On Apr 8, 6:51 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
?? >> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktweb...@knology.net>
?? >> wrote:
?? >>
?? >>> Hello, Manco!
?? >>> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
?? >>
M >>>> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
?? >>
?? >>> Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame.
?? >>> Poor Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
?? >>
?? >>> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
?? >>
?? >> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
"Give him a break. Research shows Kevin spends all of his time on the
NASCAR boards"
Ah....Woods blew it. Glorious.
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 19:23:12
From: DanL
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
"Manco" <manco_dollars@net2blah.com > wrote in message
news:LrdSh.908$Lm.774@trndny05...
> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
Tiger keeps his record perfect. Never won a major when trailing after three
rounds. Another 'patented' Tiger charge today.....
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 16:02:09
From: bungalow_steve@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Apr 8, 3:56 pm, "EdSmithers" <spirosdarlo...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> > A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>
> I must take a mulligan on my pick. I predicted Black Jesus would win
> going away, but what I did not know was that eventual winner Z Johnson
> had both his dead grandfather and White Jesus walking along with him.
>
> I'd think White Jesus had other things he could focus on today, but if
> Z says it's so, who's to say.
>
> Ed
Yea, thought Zack was a nice guy, until he revealed he is a religious
nutjob, oh well
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 15:56:18
From: EdSmithers
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
I must take a mulligan on my pick. I predicted Black Jesus would win
going away, but what I did not know was that eventual winner Z Johnson
had both his dead grandfather and White Jesus walking along with him.
I'd think White Jesus had other things he could focus on today, but if
Z says it's so, who's to say.
Ed
|
| | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 23:29:47
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
>I must take a mulligan on my pick. I predicted Black Jesus would win
>going away, but what I did not know was that eventual winner Z Johnson
>had both his dead grandfather and White Jesus walking along with him.
>
>I'd think White Jesus had other things he could focus on today, but if
>Z says it's so, who's to say.
Zach felt Jesus on his side. I guess Jesus made everybody else lose.
(I went to a year at Drake, lived in Iowa a bunch of years and follow
Zach. But it irritates me when someone says Jesus is the reason he
won - and by implication the reason everybody else lost).
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 17:46:06
From: Kevin Webb
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Hello, Manco!
You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
M > Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
|
| | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 22:51:09
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktwebb68@knology.net >
wrote:
>Hello, Manco!
>You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
>
> M> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>
>Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
>Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
>
>A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>
A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
___,
\o
|
| | | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 23:30:17
From: Kevin Webb
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Hello, Bobby!
You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:51:09 GMT:
?? >> Hello, Manco!
?? >> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
?? >>
M >>> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
?? >>
?? >> Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
?? >> Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
?? >>
?? >> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
?? >>
BK > A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
BK > ___,
BK > \o
??
|
| | | | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 15:17:20
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 23:30:17 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktwebb68@knology.net >
wrote:
>Hello, Bobby!
>You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:51:09 GMT:
>
> ??>> Hello, Manco!
> ??>> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
> ??>>
> M>>> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
> ??>>
> ??>> Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
> ??>> Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
> ??>>
> ??>> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
> ??>>
> BK> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>
>I didn't say I was a golf fan. :)
>
You didn't have to. :-)
>Eldrick, Eldred, Asshole. It's all the same to me.
You forgot to put Kevin in that lineup.
>
--
___,
\o
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 10:40:18
From: Kevin Webb
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Hello, Bobby!
You wrote on Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:17:20 GMT:
?? >> Hello, Bobby!
?? >> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:51:09 GMT:
?? >>
?? >>>> Hello, Manco!
?? >>>> You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
?? >>>>
M >>>>> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
?? >>>>
?? >>>> Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame.
?? >>>> Poor Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
?? >>>>
?? >>>> A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
?? >>>>
BK >>> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
?? >> I didn't say I was a golf fan. :)
?? >>
BK > You didn't have to. :-)
?? >> Eldrick, Eldred, Asshole. It's all the same to me.
BK > You forgot to put Kevin in that lineup.
?? >>
Aww, you went and made me smile Bob. Thanks bud.
Well that's not true. I haven't been able to wipe the smile off my face
since Woods lost yesterday. It'll go away eventually. Ciao baby. I was
just here to mock idol worshippers like yourself. Easy to like a winner
Bubby. Take care.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 16:36:51
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:40:18 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktwebb68@knology.net >
wrote:
>
>Aww, you went and made me smile Bob. Thanks bud.
>
>Well that's not true. I haven't been able to wipe the smile off my face
>since Woods lost yesterday. It'll go away eventually. Ciao baby. I was
>just here to mock idol worshippers like yourself. Easy to like a winner
>Bubby. Take care.
>
Spoken like a true race fan.
--
___,
\o
|
| | | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 23:32:23
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktwebb68@knology.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Hello, Manco!
>>You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
>>
>> M> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>>
>>Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
>>Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
>>
>>A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>>
> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
Emphasis on "was."
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 23:35:30
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:32:23 -0000, Chris Bellomy
<puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
>Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktwebb68@knology.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello, Manco!
>>>You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
>>>
>>> M> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>>>
>>>Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
>>>Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
>>>
>>>A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>>>
>> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>
>Emphasis on "was."
Exactly. That's why I didn't say "is".
___,
\o
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 00:16:07
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: You heard it here first.
|
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:32:23 -0000, Chris Bellomy
> <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:46:06 -0500, "Kevin Webb" <ktwebb68@knology.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello, Manco!
>>>>You wrote on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:49:31 GMT:
>>>>
>>>> M> Tiger will go -3 the last 3 holes and force a playoff with Johnson.
>>>>
>>>>Awwwwwwwwwww. The chosen one can't get it done. Such a shame. Poor
>>>>Eldred's ball couldn't walk on water on 15.
>>>>
>>>>A great, great Sunday to be a golf fan.
>>>>
>>> A golf fan would know that his name was Eldirick.
>>
>>Emphasis on "was."
>
> Exactly. That's why I didn't say "is".
I know how crafty you are, you crafty thing. :)
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
|
