| |
Main
Date: 09 Nov 2006 17:16:45
From: larry
Subject: Who really won Tuesday?
|
******************************************************************
TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?
I notice that the newspaper and broadcast pundits are telling us who
the winners and losers are in Tuesday's startling elections. Well ...
I might as well get in the game here with everyone else.
The envelope please.
And the winners in this year's midterm elections are:
Islamic Fascists
(Accepting the award for the Islamic Fascists will be Osama bin Laden)
The focal point of the war against Islamic fascism was Iraq. The
jihadists were sending their fighters to Iraq, there to be killed in
gratifying numbers by American and coalition troops. What was once
American resolve is now American weakness. The people have listened
to the politicians -- one group that wanted to finish the job, another
that didn't -- and gave the nod to the quitters. Today America is
weaker in the eyes of those who would destroy us. Not a cause for
celebration.
Slackards
(Accepting the award will be Shirley Sternfaulter, a young mother of
three who wants the government to pay for her child care.)
A huge percentage of the people who went to the polls on Tuesday went
there to vote for a living. They feel that the purpose of government
is to make sure that the basic necessities of their lives are paid
for, while they spend their own money on the newest technology in
flat-screen televisions, gadget-filled cell phones and subscriptions
to People Magazine.
Illegal Aliens
(Putting down his leaf blower to accept the award is Pedro
Lopez-Garcia-Menendez-Gonzalez, who pays no taxes in the U.S., and
sends 80% of each paycheck back to Vera Cruz to take care of his wife
and children.)
Yesterday President Bush as much as said that amnesty would be the
order of the day. Now that those pesky Republicans have been kicked
out of the majority in the House of Representatives, the president and
the Senate will have clear sailing on their plan for amnesty for the
20 million plus illegal aliens now residing in this country. Oh ..
and the border? Nothing will be done to stop the Mexican invasion, so
as soon as Pedro has his paperwork ia and the kids will be on a
bus.
Those who want a weaker America
(Accepting the award will be Dominique ie François René Galouzeau
de Villepin, sometimes known as Dominique de Villepin, the Prime
Minister of France. Dominique was the leader of the Axis of Weasels
before he became Prime Minister.)
A poll earlier this year said that something like 58% of Europeans
wanted a weaker America. They got their wish on Tuesday. Who is
going to be there to pull their candied asses out of the oven when
they finally wake up and realize the great strides that have been made
in the Islamification of Europe? Hello Eurabia.
The first blow to be struck in the weakening of America will be for
the Democrats to get rid of John Bolton as the Ambassador to the
United Nations. They'll replace him with someone who will not stand
up to UN corruption and the forces who want to weaken us.
The Libertarian Party?
(I would be happy to accept this reward, but the don't like me all
that much because I believe that we need to defend this country from
both the Islamic fascists and the Mexican invasion.)
Tuesday's vote showed that a lot of conservatives and libertarians in
this country are completely fed up with the Republican Party. If ever
there was a time for the emergence of a third party that would adhere
to conservative and libertarian values -- without an obsessive
allegiance to religious fundamentalists -- now is the time. The
Libertarian Party could be just that party. We'll see if they're up
to the task.
The leftist media.
(Accepting the award for The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times,
The Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, The Boston Globe, Time
Magazine, Newsweek Magazine and too many more to mention will be Dan
Rather)
Ninety percent or more of these people vote Democrat. They engaged in
a six-year campaign of demonization of George Bush. It worked.
Washington Lawyers
(Accepting the Award will be the President of the D.C. Bar
Association)
Get ready for two years of investigations, subpoenas, hearings...you
name it. Everything will be investigated, then investigated again.
But the Republicans did it to themselves...every last bit of it.
COMMON GROUND WITH BUSH
A headline today says that President Bush is going to meet with Nancy
Pelosi in search of common ground. In search of common ground? That
shouldn't be too hard at all. After all, they already have so much in
common! Let's take a look at just a few of their issues they have in
common.
Illegal immigration. The new Democrat-controlled House and Senate
can't wait to pass Bush's amnesty program. Every one of the 12
million illegal aliens in the United States along with 12 million more
now in Mexico are getting ready to sign up. Putting the Democrats in
charge was the best thing that ever happened to Bush's illegal
immigration agenda.
More government spending. Through the first 6 years of his
presidency, President Bush has proved time and time again that the
solution to all of society's ills is more government spending. In
fact, he has spent so much money and expanded government so fast, his
presidency is rivaled only by FDR's New Deal.
Raising the minimum wage. No problem! Bush has said in the past that
he has no problem signing an increase in the minimum wage. Here's my
question though, why only raise it 1 or 2 dollars an hour? How about
making the minimum wage $20 an hour? Surely that would be a living
wage! Oh...it would kill too many jobs? Wait a minute...isn't that
the argument for not raising it at all. Liberals are so confused.
Nancy Pelosi will have so much in common in President Bush, she just
doesn't know it yet. The only thing she needs to work on is getting
him to cut and run in Iraq.
Larry
|
|
| |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 19:59:43
From: aeiouy
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
"larry" <larry@deldata.com > wrote in message
news:jmk7l2lltbs6ed8sukrm4bfsq19ulbuu9l@4ax.com...
>
>
> ******************************************************************
>
> TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?
>
The Dems and the rest of the voters who believe that the Republicans have
been running the country into the ground for the past several years
Democracy's a bitch ain't it
|
| |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 18:06:01
From: Rob Davis
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
Geez ... I gotta' hand it to you Larry. No matter how often you're
proven wrong, no matter how many times your "facts" are proven to be
exagerations or outright lies, you still come back with more. Now
chicken little says the sky is falling ... we all better run and hide 8^).
At least you're consistent ... everyone who disagrees with you is at
least an idiot/nutcase, if not downright evil (no matter how often
you're wrong).
Rob
larry wrote:
>
> ******************************************************************
>
> TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?
>
>
> Larry
|
| |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 09:18:08
From: boo-radley
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
Since this is golf group, go stick a putter up you ass!
You're American Nazis LOST!
larry wrote:
> ******************************************************************
>
> TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?
>
> I notice that the newspaper and broadcast pundits are telling us who
> the winners and losers are in Tuesday's startling elections. Well ...
> I might as well get in the game here with everyone else.
>
> The envelope please.
>
> And the winners in this year's midterm elections are:
>
> Islamic Fascists
>
> (Accepting the award for the Islamic Fascists will be Osama bin Laden)
>
> The focal point of the war against Islamic fascism was Iraq. The
> jihadists were sending their fighters to Iraq, there to be killed in
> gratifying numbers by American and coalition troops. What was once
> American resolve is now American weakness. The people have listened
> to the politicians -- one group that wanted to finish the job, another
> that didn't -- and gave the nod to the quitters. Today America is
> weaker in the eyes of those who would destroy us. Not a cause for
> celebration.
>
> Slackards
>
> (Accepting the award will be Shirley Sternfaulter, a young mother of
> three who wants the government to pay for her child care.)
>
> A huge percentage of the people who went to the polls on Tuesday went
> there to vote for a living. They feel that the purpose of government
> is to make sure that the basic necessities of their lives are paid
> for, while they spend their own money on the newest technology in
> flat-screen televisions, gadget-filled cell phones and subscriptions
> to People Magazine.
>
> Illegal Aliens
>
> (Putting down his leaf blower to accept the award is Pedro
> Lopez-Garcia-Menendez-Gonzalez, who pays no taxes in the U.S., and
> sends 80% of each paycheck back to Vera Cruz to take care of his wife
> and children.)
>
> Yesterday President Bush as much as said that amnesty would be the
> order of the day. Now that those pesky Republicans have been kicked
> out of the majority in the House of Representatives, the president and
> the Senate will have clear sailing on their plan for amnesty for the
> 20 million plus illegal aliens now residing in this country. Oh ..
> and the border? Nothing will be done to stop the Mexican invasion, so
> as soon as Pedro has his paperwork ia and the kids will be on a
> bus.
>
> Those who want a weaker America
>
> (Accepting the award will be Dominique ie Fran=E7ois Ren=E9 Galouzeau
> de Villepin, sometimes known as Dominique de Villepin, the Prime
> Minister of France. Dominique was the leader of the Axis of Weasels
> before he became Prime Minister.)
>
> A poll earlier this year said that something like 58% of Europeans
> wanted a weaker America. They got their wish on Tuesday. Who is
> going to be there to pull their candied asses out of the oven when
> they finally wake up and realize the great strides that have been made
> in the Islamification of Europe? Hello Eurabia.
>
> The first blow to be struck in the weakening of America will be for
> the Democrats to get rid of John Bolton as the Ambassador to the
> United Nations. They'll replace him with someone who will not stand
> up to UN corruption and the forces who want to weaken us.
>
> The Libertarian Party?
>
> (I would be happy to accept this reward, but the don't like me all
> that much because I believe that we need to defend this country from
> both the Islamic fascists and the Mexican invasion.)
>
> Tuesday's vote showed that a lot of conservatives and libertarians in
> this country are completely fed up with the Republican Party. If ever
> there was a time for the emergence of a third party that would adhere
> to conservative and libertarian values -- without an obsessive
> allegiance to religious fundamentalists -- now is the time. The
> Libertarian Party could be just that party. We'll see if they're up
> to the task.
>
> The leftist media.
>
> (Accepting the award for The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times,
> The Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, The Boston Globe, Time
> Magazine, Newsweek Magazine and too many more to mention will be Dan
> Rather)
>
> Ninety percent or more of these people vote Democrat. They engaged in
> a six-year campaign of demonization of George Bush. It worked.
>
> Washington Lawyers
>
> (Accepting the Award will be the President of the D.C. Bar
> Association)
>
> Get ready for two years of investigations, subpoenas, hearings...you
> name it. Everything will be investigated, then investigated again.
> But the Republicans did it to themselves...every last bit of it.
>
> COMMON GROUND WITH BUSH
>
> A headline today says that President Bush is going to meet with Nancy
> Pelosi in search of common ground. In search of common ground? That
> shouldn't be too hard at all. After all, they already have so much in
> common! Let's take a look at just a few of their issues they have in
> common.
>
> Illegal immigration. The new Democrat-controlled House and Senate
> can't wait to pass Bush's amnesty program. Every one of the 12
> million illegal aliens in the United States along with 12 million more
> now in Mexico are getting ready to sign up. Putting the Democrats in
> charge was the best thing that ever happened to Bush's illegal
> immigration agenda.
>
> More government spending. Through the first 6 years of his
> presidency, President Bush has proved time and time again that the
> solution to all of society's ills is more government spending. In
> fact, he has spent so much money and expanded government so fast, his
> presidency is rivaled only by FDR's New Deal.
>
> Raising the minimum wage. No problem! Bush has said in the past that
> he has no problem signing an increase in the minimum wage. Here's my
> question though, why only raise it 1 or 2 dollars an hour? How about
> making the minimum wage $20 an hour? Surely that would be a living
> wage! Oh...it would kill too many jobs? Wait a minute...isn't that
> the argument for not raising it at all. Liberals are so confused.
> Nancy Pelosi will have so much in common in President Bush, she just
> doesn't know it yet. The only thing she needs to work on is getting
> him to cut and run in Iraq.
>=20
> =20
> Larry
|
| | |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 15:00:26
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
boo-radley wrote:
> American Nazis LOST!
As long as StormFront is still around; all of America loses.
--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson
|
| |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 00:38:08
From: AKA gray asphalt
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
|
| |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 05:41:01
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
In article <jmk7l2lltbs6ed8sukrm4bfsq19ulbuu9l@4ax.com >,
larry <larry@deldata.com > wrote:
<snip >
Not the people you absolutely, I've-got-the-inside-dope, guaranteed were
going to win, that's for sure!
LOL
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a keting rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
|
| | |
Date: 12 Nov 2006 10:48:45
From: \R&B\
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-702352.21405909112006@news.telus.net...
> In article <jmk7l2lltbs6ed8sukrm4bfsq19ulbuu9l@4ax.com>,
> larry <larry@deldata.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Not the people you absolutely, I've-got-the-inside-dope, guaranteed were
> going to win, that's for sure!
>
> LOL
You mean like Karl (You're entitled to your math; I'm entitled to THE math)
Rove?
Randy
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Nov 2006 13:30:33
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
In article <E6Odnd7K16PG38rYnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@giganews.com >,
"\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusiness@all.com > wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-702352.21405909112006@news.telus.net...
> > In article <jmk7l2lltbs6ed8sukrm4bfsq19ulbuu9l@4ax.com>,
> > larry <larry@deldata.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Not the people you absolutely, I've-got-the-inside-dope, guaranteed were
> > going to win, that's for sure!
> >
> > LOL
>
>
> You mean like Karl (You're entitled to your math; I'm entitled to THE math)
> Rove?
>
> Randy
Yup, it's gone awful quiet from Larry the past few days. Perhaps someone
broke the sad news to him?
William Clark
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Nov 2006 17:40:37
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
Every time there is a legitimate election, the people win. Elections are always
a win/win situation.
Disclaimer: this is JMHO, of course. Shouldn't have to make this disclaimer,
but some people are so dense they don't realize that such statements are always
nothing more than the opinion of the person making the statement.
|
| | | | |
Date: 12 Nov 2006 18:29:06
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:40:37 GMT, Robert Hamilton <DBID@att.net >
wrote:
>Every time there is a legitimate election, the people win.
Lots of time people get what they ask for - to their loss.
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Nov 2006 15:56:33
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
In article <E6Odnd7K16PG38rYnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@giganews.com >
"\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusiness@all.com > wrote:
Helps clear it up.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15675318/site/newsweek
|
| |
Date: 09 Nov 2006 21:11:45
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
larry wrote:
> ******************************************************************
>
> TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?
>
Everybody but you, Loser Larry!
|
| |
Date: 09 Nov 2006 21:10:35
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
Tex wrote:
> annika1980 wrote:
> > I just got two words for ya, Loser Larry .... PRESIDENT PELOSI !
>
> Wrong country....Comrade Pelosi.
>
> Go start it, you'd be head ass licker. You'd not have to bend down
> either, just lick her b-hole lips.
>
> Tex
You'd just better pray that Cheney doesn't get liquored up and shoot
himself and Bush in a drunken mass suicide. Pelosi is just two bullets
away from the Presidency.
Think about that, baby.
|
| |
Date: 10 Nov 2006 04:33:28
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: Maybe I'll register as a democrat
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:15:52 -0800, Dene wrote:
> Carbon wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:10:11 -0800, Dene wrote:
>> > Carbon wrote:
>>
>> >> IQ over a hundred. It matters in a President. You get a dull normal
>> >> like Bush in there and he's going to fuck things up.
>> >
>> > Well what's your specific solution to Iraq, bright guy?
>>
>> Not invading in the first place.
>
> 20/20 hindsight brilliance, with most of America, including me,
> concurring. Bush made a big mistake. Most presidents, aside from
> Reagan, make mistakes.
The invasion wasn't just a "mistake". It was a scam and everyone knew it.
Remember the "Coalition of the Willing?" A bunch of little countries
bought with various bribes, and Great Britain, which also has extensive
oil interests in the Middle East. The rest of the G8 would have nothing to
do with Iraq.
> The real question is.....what does the USA do now?????
We're fucked. Pardon my French. There's no good solution. We've spent
hundreds of billions and cost the lives of thousands of troops, and the
lives of thousands more Iraqi citizens. We will undoubtedly leave the
place in much worse shape than we found it. All we can hope for now is to
minimize the further loss of lives and money.
|
| |
Date: 09 Nov 2006 20:17:06
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
I just got two words for ya, Loser Larry .... PRESIDENT PELOSI !
|
| |
Date: 09 Nov 2006 23:09:09
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Who really won Tuesday?
|
In article <jmk7l2lltbs6ed8sukrm4bfsq19ulbuu9l@4ax.com >,
larry <larry@deldata.com > wrote:
> ******************************************************************
>
> TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?
>
> I notice that the newspaper and broadcast pundits are telling us who
> the winners and losers are in Tuesday's startling elections. Well ...
> I might as well get in the game here with everyone else.
>
> The envelope please.
>
. . .snip, snip . .
> Raising the minimum wage. No problem! Bush has said in the past that
> he has no problem signing an increase in the minimum wage. Here's my
> question though, why only raise it 1 or 2 dollars an hour? How about
> making the minimum wage $20 an hour? Surely that would be a living
> wage! Oh...it would kill too many jobs? Wait a minute...isn't that
> the argument for not raising it at all. Liberals are so confused.
> Nancy Pelosi will have so much in common in President Bush, she just
> doesn't know it yet. The only thing she needs to work on is getting
> him to cut and run in Iraq.
>
>
> Larry
Even for you, Larry, this is some kind of a new low. You are a truly
disgusting hypocrite - you preach loyalty, and following the leader, and
then you find the cheapest sleaze on earth because you simply aren't
enough of a grown man to accept Tuesday's result. And you have the
affrontery to preach about patriotism.
Truly disgusting.
William Clark
|
|
