| |
Main
Date: 26 Feb 2007 15:40:25
From: Dene
Subject: Way to play, BK
|
In the thread, "what is wrong with RSG," a fella named "ShowMe"
posts, claiming to a be long time lurker, then proceeds to criticize
me about my catty comments toward BK. My response to "ShowMe" allows
BK to supposedly "see" my post (though he has several usenet
accounts), then take his typical potshot behind a killfile.
Nothing new here. Typical canary-ass M.O.
Here's the interesting part. If you look at ShowMe's profile. His
very first post is on BA.TEST entitled "test one bk", dated today,
approximately 52 mins. ago.
BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
Nothing....absolutely nothing. I don't expect anyone to take sides.
I'm as culpable in these pissing matches as he is. I would just ask
that you understand what BK is about. He needs internet people around
him so that he can manipulate this little cyber fiefdom he's created
for himself. Such a world requires good guys and bad guys. I'm one
of the bad guys. So has been a long list of others.....really good
company.
Sad way to spend one's retirement.
-Greg
|
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 23:11:35
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 10:42 pm, "bill-o" <assimil...@borg.org > wrote:
> On 27-Feb-2007, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>
> > Nope just playing with you like a cat on a string. You're so predictable.
>
> You mean like a cat with a dictator, don't you?
>
> http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/003999.html
>
> --
> bill-o
>
> A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
> two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
That's funny!!!
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 21:34:02
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 5:32 pm, "Showme" <Sho...@youbet.net > wrote:
Hi Frank!
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 18:29:10
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 5:32 pm, "Showme" <Sho...@youbet.net > is too afwaid to show
himself.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 18:26:57
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 6:13 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172608489.242795.208290@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Hitler
>
> Ha ha!!! I win, Godwin's law in invoked. I knew I could out argue you.
> I'm no lightweight like Bobby. It's feels soooooo good to win.
>
> Just for that I'm going to play nine holes after work tomorrow. Doesn't it
> make it worse when the person who beats you rubs it in like that? God if I
> wasn't me, I'd hate me. Maybe you should listen to Bellomy about that.
Hate? I'm in awe. I bow beneath your supreme intellect.........and
weather.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 17:02:48
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 4:09 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Dene <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : On Feb 27, 1:45 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> :> :>
> :> :> Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
> :> :
> :> : Tell that to your cowardly crony.
> :>
> :> I thought I just did! Oh, wait, I get my cronies mixed up.
> :
> : I'm not your crony
>
> You are if I say you are. :-p
>
> : and I'm certainly not a coward.
>
> I SAID I WAS MIXED UP.
Which obviously mixed me up.
> Seriously, though, Bobby doesn't have any problem saying anything
> to anyone at any time... which, in case you haven't noticed, is
> one reason you keep sniping at each other. The guy speaks his
> mind, period. Doesn't use proxies. Doesn't need them. Not a coward.
>
> No kidding, you whiffed on this one.
Lobbing behind a killfile is cowardly.
> :> : I'm all for mutual ignore, even
> :> : amnesty. However, that doesn't give him a license to respond to Rob
> :> : with potshots directed at me and not expect some reks in return.
> :>
> :> OK, both of you, please STFU already, we get it, you don't like
> :> each other. Can we move on to hating Stemmer now? (I notice you're
> :> moving alone quite well in that department.)
> :
> : I don't hate anyone in RSG.
>
> Well, start hating Stemmer, it's why he's here.
Nah....he has a sense of humor.
> :> : Ps. Didn't you see the memo. You're suppose to ignore me. ;>
> :>
> :> Conspiracies just ain't what they used to be.
> :
> : No recent calls for a UIP????
>
> I'm thinking of calling one on myself. I've gotten boring.
Indeed you have but forgive you.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 19:32:49
From: Showme
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172624568.360045.71560@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 27, 4:09 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>> Dene <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> : On Feb 27, 1:45 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>> :> :>
>> :> :> Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
>> :> :
>> :> : Tell that to your cowardly crony.
>> :>
>> :> I thought I just did! Oh, wait, I get my cronies mixed up.
>> :
>> : I'm not your crony
>>
>> You are if I say you are. :-p
>>
>> : and I'm certainly not a coward.
>>
>> I SAID I WAS MIXED UP.
>
> Which obviously mixed me up.
>
>> Seriously, though, Bobby doesn't have any problem saying anything
>> to anyone at any time... which, in case you haven't noticed, is
>> one reason you keep sniping at each other. The guy speaks his
>> mind, period. Doesn't use proxies. Doesn't need them. Not a coward.
>>
>> No kidding, you whiffed on this one.
>
> Lobbing behind a killfile is cowardly.
What does that mean? He doesn't want to read your posts. The only ones he
says he sees is returns from others, and I can't see any that were returned
to you straightaway.
>
>> :> : I'm all for mutual ignore, even
>> :> : amnesty. However, that doesn't give him a license to respond to Rob
>> :> : with potshots directed at me and not expect some reks in return.
You've admitted that you barge in to defend Rob, who I don't know but think
can takecare of himself.
The potshots are initiated by you there, and looking back will show that.
If you hadn't started it it would have never happened.
> :>
>> :> OK, both of you, please STFU already, we get it, you don't like
>> :> each other. Can we move on to hating Stemmer now? (I notice you're
>> :> moving alone quite well in that department.)
>> :
>> : I don't hate anyone in RSG.
>>
Then why are you hateful to several of them?
>> Well, start hating Stemmer, it's why he's here.
>
> Nah....he has a sense of humor.
>
>> :> : Ps. Didn't you see the memo. You're suppose to ignore me. ;>
>> :>
>> :> Conspiracies just ain't what they used to be.
>> :
>> : No recent calls for a UIP????
>>
>> I'm thinking of calling one on myself. I've gotten boring.
>
> Indeed you have but forgive you.
>
> -Greg
Just stop.
Showme.
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 14:01:37
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 1:45 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> :>
> :> Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
> :
> : Tell that to your cowardly crony.
>
> I thought I just did! Oh, wait, I get my cronies mixed up.
I'm not your crony and I'm certainly not a coward.
> : I'm all for mutual ignore, even
> : amnesty. However, that doesn't give him a license to respond to Rob
> : with potshots directed at me and not expect some reks in return.
>
> OK, both of you, please STFU already, we get it, you don't like
> each other. Can we move on to hating Stemmer now? (I notice you're
> moving alone quite well in that department.)
I don't hate anyone in RSG.
> : Ps. Didn't you see the memo. You're suppose to ignore me. ;>
>
> Conspiracies just ain't what they used to be.
No recent calls for a UIP????
Dang! There goes that exit strategy.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 00:09:08
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: On Feb 27, 1:45 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
: > :>
: > :> Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
: > :
: > : Tell that to your cowardly crony.
: >
: > I thought I just did! Oh, wait, I get my cronies mixed up.
:
: I'm not your crony
You are if I say you are. :-p
: and I'm certainly not a coward.
I SAID I WAS MIXED UP.
Seriously, though, Bobby doesn't have any problem saying anything
to anyone at any time... which, in case you haven't noticed, is
one reason you keep sniping at each other. The guy speaks his
mind, period. Doesn't use proxies. Doesn't need them. Not a coward.
No kidding, you whiffed on this one.
: > : I'm all for mutual ignore, even
: > : amnesty. However, that doesn't give him a license to respond to Rob
: > : with potshots directed at me and not expect some reks in return.
: >
: > OK, both of you, please STFU already, we get it, you don't like
: > each other. Can we move on to hating Stemmer now? (I notice you're
: > moving alone quite well in that department.)
:
: I don't hate anyone in RSG.
Well, start hating Stemmer, it's why he's here.
: > : Ps. Didn't you see the memo. You're suppose to ignore me. ;>
: >
: > Conspiracies just ain't what they used to be.
:
: No recent calls for a UIP????
I'm thinking of calling one on myself. I've gotten boring.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 10:58:37
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
news:2T3t55vsIfg4N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
> : No recent calls for a UIP????
>
> I'm thinking of calling one on myself. I've gotten boring.
>
I'll second that. :-)
|
| | | | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 20:21:57
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
MnMikew <mnmiikkew@aol.com > wrote:
:
: "Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
: news:2T3t55vsIfg4N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
: > : No recent calls for a UIP????
: >
: > I'm thinking of calling one on myself. I've gotten boring.
: >
: I'll second that. :-)
Look, if you don't ignore me, I'll just keep replying!
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 21:10:09
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
news:2T3t55vsIfg4N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> Well, start hating Stemmer, it's why he's here.
>
Hey don't make me start stalking you too. I can only carry on one girly cat
fight at a time.
|
| | | | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 02:42:30
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Steve S <none@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
: "Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
: news:2T3t55vsIfg4N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
: > Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > Well, start hating Stemmer, it's why he's here.
:
: Hey don't make me start stalking you too. I can only carry on one girly cat
: fight at a time.
Bitch. Slut.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | | | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 07:02:57
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
news:0T3t5f4dIhuiN34@redshark.goodshow.net...
> Steve S <none@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
> : "Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
> : news:2T3t55vsIfg4N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
> :> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> :> Well, start hating Stemmer, it's why he's here.
> :
> : Hey don't make me start stalking you too. I can only carry on one girly
> cat
> : fight at a time.
>
> Bitch. Slut.
>
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Member
> http://clist.org/
Condider your hair pulled and you eyes scratched.
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 13:08:01
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 12:51 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2007 12:34:49 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >The US fought on all fronts and won. Germany would have won too had
> >Hitler (the Nazi) made several critical errors, with the British
> >withdrawal, North Africa, and of course the Russian winter.
>
> Germany needed some way to end the war. Certainly they could not
> conquer the world. It's not obvious how they could conquer both
> Europe and the USSR.
>
> A war needs a final objective - a "mission accomplished" that is
> acceptable to those involved.
I read a book on the subject which outlined several key military
errors Germany made. Hitler could have wiped out the Brits at Dunkirk
but chose not to, possibly out of deep seated respect he had for
England. Next mistake was an air and sub war with them. Hitler could
have just let them be on the island, isolating them from the European
continent. The Brits weren't going to invade Europe on their own.
Declaring war against the USA was a mistake, which enabled our direct
involvement. Regarding Russia, had he started his offensive in April
or May instead of late June, he'd likely won. Another mistake...the
Holocaust, not just in terms of morality but the resources he
dedicated to exterminating Jews, Gypsies, and the Slavs.
I think had Hitler not made these critical errors, then he would have
succeeded in conquering much of Europe and Russia.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 13:05:38
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 12:51 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2007 12:34:49 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >The US fought on all fronts and won. Germany would have won too had
> >Hitler (the Nazi) made several critical errors, with the British
> >withdrawal, North Africa, and of course the Russian winter.
>
> Germany needed some way to end the war. Certainly they could not
> conquer the world. It's not obvious how they could conquer both
> Europe and the USSR.
>
> A war needs a final objective - a "mission accomplished" that is
> acceptable to those involved.
I read a book on the subject which outlined several key military
errors Germany made. Hitler could have wiped out the Brits at Dunkirk
but chose not to, possibly out of deep seated respect he had for
England. Next mistake was an air and sub war with them. Hitler could
have just let them be on the island, isolating them from the European
continent. The Brits weren't going to invade Europe on their own.
Declaring war against the USA was a mistake, which enabled our direct
involvement. Regarding Russia, had he started his offensive in April
or May instead of late June, he'd likely won. Another mistake...the
Holocaust, not just in terms of morality but the resources he
dedicated to exterminating Jews, Gypsies, and the Slavs.
I think had Hitler not made these critical errors, then he would have
succeeded in conquering much of Europe and Russia.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 12:34:49
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 12:13 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172604005.979850.84930@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 27, 11:17 am, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>
> > Likewise. You can always be counted on for a post that's crude,
> > stupid, or both.
>
> > -Greg
>
> Not really, I'm actually quite unpredictable as quite a few people here can
> attest. I'm also thick skinned enough that I don't get pulled into every
> girly cat fight that goes on. Unlike you, who is usually at the center of
> every cat fight.
If so, then what are you doing in this cat fight?
As for thick skin, if usenet feature videocams, you'd know quickly how
little of this I take seriously.
> You're like Germany in WWII, fighting on all fronts. <<teetering
> precariously close to Godwin's Law>>
The US fought on all fronts and won. Germany would have won too had
Hitler (the Nazi) made several critical errors, with the British
withdrawal, North Africa, and of course the Russian winter.
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 21:13:29
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172608489.242795.208290@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Hitler
Ha ha!!! I win, Godwin's law in invoked. I knew I could out argue you.
I'm no lightweight like Bobby. It's feels soooooo good to win.
Just for that I'm going to play nine holes after work tomorrow. Doesn't it
make it worse when the person who beats you rubs it in like that? God if I
wasn't me, I'd hate me. Maybe you should listen to Bellomy about that.
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 13:51:33
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On 27 Feb 2007 12:34:49 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>The US fought on all fronts and won. Germany would have won too had
>Hitler (the Nazi) made several critical errors, with the British
>withdrawal, North Africa, and of course the Russian winter.
Germany needed some way to end the war. Certainly they could not
conquer the world. It's not obvious how they could conquer both
Europe and the USSR.
A war needs a final objective - a "mission accomplished" that is
acceptable to those involved.
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 11:26:43
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 5:12 am, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Dene <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> :> Obsession: never pretty.
> :>
> :> --
> :> Chris Bellomy
> :> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
> :
> : Nor are proxies or lobbing potshots while hiding behind a kill-
> : file.....so he says.
>
> ...from the safety of his black helicopter!
>
> Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
Tell that to your cowardly crony. I'm all for mutual ignore, even
amnesty. However, that doesn't give him a license to respond to Rob
with potshots directed at me and not expect some reks in return.
I sure would love to talk about golf but I can only dream about it
until our trip to Az. next month. I'm looking out my office window
and watching it snow. Where's the global warming???
-Greg
Ps. Didn't you see the memo. You're suppose to ignore me. ; >
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 21:45:56
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: On Feb 27, 5:12 am, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
: > Dene <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
: >
: > : On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
: > :> Obsession: never pretty.
: > :>
: > :> --
: > :> Chris Bellomy
: > :> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
: > :
: > : Nor are proxies or lobbing potshots while hiding behind a kill-
: > : file.....so he says.
: >
: > ...from the safety of his black helicopter!
: >
: > Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
:
: Tell that to your cowardly crony.
I thought I just did! Oh, wait, I get my cronies mixed up.
: I'm all for mutual ignore, even
: amnesty. However, that doesn't give him a license to respond to Rob
: with potshots directed at me and not expect some reks in return.
OK, both of you, please STFU already, we get it, you don't like
each other. Can we move on to hating Stemmer now? (I notice you're
moving alone quite well in that department.)
: Ps. Didn't you see the memo. You're suppose to ignore me. ; >
Conspiracies just ain't what they used to be.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 11:20:06
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 11:17 am, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172594028.574056.188860@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Stalking me, Stemmer?
>
> Nope just playing with you like a cat on a string. You're so predictable.
Likewise. You can always be counted on for a post that's crude,
stupid, or both.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 15:13:37
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172604005.979850.84930@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 27, 11:17 am, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>
> Likewise. You can always be counted on for a post that's crude,
> stupid, or both.
>
> -Greg
>
Not really, I'm actually quite unpredictable as quite a few people here can
attest. I'm also thick skinned enough that I don't get pulled into every
girly cat fight that goes on. Unlike you, who is usually at the center of
every cat fight.
You're like Germany in WWII, fighting on all fronts. <<teetering
precariously close to Godwin's Law >>
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 08:33:48
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 27, 3:20 am, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172552262.416410.101950@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> >> Obsession: never pretty.
>
> >> --
> >> Chris Bellomy
> >> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
>
> > Nor are proxies or lobbing potshots while hiding behind a kill-
> > file.....so he says.
>
> > -Greg
>
> Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
Stalking me, Stemmer?
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 14:17:30
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172594028.574056.188860@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Stalking me, Stemmer?
>
Nope just playing with you like a cat on a string. You're so predictable.
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 06:42:02
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On 27-Feb-2007, "Steve S" <none@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> Nope just playing with you like a cat on a string. You're so predictable.
You mean like a cat with a dictator, don't you?
http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/003999.html
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 20:57:42
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Obsession: never pretty.
>
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
Nor are proxies or lobbing potshots while hiding behind a kill-
file.....so he says.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 13:12:11
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
: > Obsession: never pretty.
: >
: > --
: > Chris Bellomy
: > C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
:
: Nor are proxies or lobbing potshots while hiding behind a kill-
: file.....so he says.
...from the safety of his black helicopter!
Let it go, dude. Find something better to do.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 06:20:52
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172552262.416410.101950@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>> Obsession: never pretty.
>>
>> --
>> Chris Bellomy
>> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
>
> Nor are proxies or lobbing potshots while hiding behind a kill-
> file.....so he says.
>
> -Greg
>
>
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
|
| |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 03:14:54
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Obsession: never pretty.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 18:58:29
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 26, 5:51 pm, "Ben." <komb...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Aww....nice to see your little proxy-pal give you a laugh. Does he
> > change your Depends too?
>
> Wow, classy, Greg. Talk about LCD...
Sure. I looked long and hard at them but ended up with a plasma. ; >
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 17:51:28
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> Aww....nice to see your little proxy-pal give you a laugh. Does he
> change your Depends too?
Wow, classy, Greg. Talk about LCD...
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 02:51:10
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On 26 Feb 2007 17:51:28 -0800, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>On Feb 26, 7:14 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Aww....nice to see your little proxy-pal give you a laugh. Does he
>> change your Depends too?
>
>Wow, classy, Greg. Talk about LCD...
I'm 70 now, and in pretty good health. What bothers me about this
kind of "humor" is that there are probably some on this ng who have an
incontinent parent. I've had friends in that situation and It
certainly isn't anything to joke about. If you do, you'd better hope
that you age very well.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 17:14:18
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 26, 4:52 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> LOL
Aww....nice to see your little proxy-pal give you a laugh. Does he
change your Depends too?
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 19:36:28
From: glfnaz
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172538858.337118.68690@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 4:52 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>
>> LOL
>
> Aww....nice to see your little proxy-pal give you a laugh. Does he
> change your Depends too?
>
> -Greg
>
>
Thats a low blow, Greg.
Get it?
But honestly, enough.
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 16:51:57
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 26, 4:24 pm, BAR <scre...@you.com > wrote:
> Dene wrote:
> > In the thread, "what is wrong with RSG," a fella named "ShowMe"
> > posts, claiming to a be long time lurker, then proceeds to criticize
> > me about my catty comments toward BK. My response to "ShowMe" allows
> > BK to supposedly "see" my post (though he has several usenet
> > accounts), then take his typical potshot behind a killfile.
>
> > Nothing new here. Typical canary-ass M.O.
>
> > Here's the interesting part. If you look at ShowMe's profile. His
> > very first post is on BA.TEST entitled "test one bk", dated today,
> > approximately 52 mins. ago.
>
> > BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
> > does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
> > Nothing....absolutely nothing. I don't expect anyone to take sides.
> > I'm as culpable in these pissing matches as he is. I would just ask
> > that you understand what BK is about. He needs internet people around
> > him so that he can manipulate this little cyber fiefdom he's created
> > for himself. Such a world requires good guys and bad guys. I'm one
> > of the bad guys. So has been a long list of others.....really good
> > company.
>
> > Sad way to spend one's retirement.
>
> Look in the mirror. You are wasting your life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I often do, Bert. I'm pretty! ; >
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 16:44:39
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Feb 26, 4:29 pm, "Showme" <Sho...@youbet.net > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172533225.006740.246520@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > In the thread, "what is wrong with RSG," a fella named "ShowMe"
> > posts, claiming to a be long time lurker, then proceeds to criticize
> > me about my catty comments toward BK. My response to "ShowMe" allows
> > BK to supposedly "see" my post (though he has several usenet
> > accounts), then take his typical potshot behind a killfile.
>
> > Nothing new here. Typical canary-ass M.O.
>
> > Here's the interesting part. If you look at ShowMe's profile. His
> > very first post is on BA.TEST entitled "test one bk", dated today,
> > approximately 52 mins. ago.
>
> > BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
> > does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
>
> No, he didn't enlist me to do anything. I used an alias because I do post
> here occasionally and didn't
> want snide reks from you to my regular username.
> Like the one you responded to my Showme post.
>
> > Nothing....absolutely nothing. I don't expect anyone to take sides.
> > I'm as culpable in these pissing matches as he is. I would just ask
> > that you understand what BK is about. He needs internet people around
> > him so that he can manipulate this little cyber fiefdom he's created
> > for himself. Such a world requires good guys and bad guys. I'm one
> > of the bad guys. So has been a long list of others.....really good
> > company.
>
> > Sad way to spend one's retirement.
>
> > -Greg
>
> The sad thing is that you aren't retired and post as much as you do. You
> 're a sniper and that's about all.
> Time for dinner and no time for sleeze bags...bye now.
Bye!
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 18:29:33
From: Showme
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172533225.006740.246520@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> In the thread, "what is wrong with RSG," a fella named "ShowMe"
> posts, claiming to a be long time lurker, then proceeds to criticize
> me about my catty comments toward BK. My response to "ShowMe" allows
> BK to supposedly "see" my post (though he has several usenet
> accounts), then take his typical potshot behind a killfile.
>
> Nothing new here. Typical canary-ass M.O.
>
> Here's the interesting part. If you look at ShowMe's profile. His
> very first post is on BA.TEST entitled "test one bk", dated today,
> approximately 52 mins. ago.
>
> BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
> does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
No, he didn't enlist me to do anything. I used an alias because I do post
here occasionally and didn't
want snide reks from you to my regular username.
Like the one you responded to my Showme post.
> Nothing....absolutely nothing. I don't expect anyone to take sides.
> I'm as culpable in these pissing matches as he is. I would just ask
> that you understand what BK is about. He needs internet people around
> him so that he can manipulate this little cyber fiefdom he's created
> for himself. Such a world requires good guys and bad guys. I'm one
> of the bad guys. So has been a long list of others.....really good
> company.
>
> Sad way to spend one's retirement.
>
> -Greg
The sad thing is that you aren't retired and post as much as you do. You
're a sniper and that's about all.
Time for dinner and no time for sleeze bags...bye now.
|
| | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 00:52:00
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:29:33 -0600, "Showme" <Showme@youbet.net >
wrote:
>
>"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
<clip >
>> BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
>> does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
>
>No, he didn't enlist me to do anything. I used an alias because I do post
>here occasionally and didn't
> want snide reks from you to my regular username.
>Like the one you responded to my Showme post.
>
If he had any sense he'd check the headers. Different news readers,
different servers. He's not too bright.
>> Sad way to spend one's retirement.
>>
>> -Greg
>
>The sad thing is that you aren't retired and post as much as you do. You
>'re a sniper and that's about all.
<clip >
>
LOL
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 20:31:27
From: David Geesaman
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:29:33 -0600, "Showme" <Showme@youbet.net>
> wrote:
>
>> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
> <clip>
>>> BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
>>> does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
>> No, he didn't enlist me to do anything. I used an alias because I do post
>> here occasionally and didn't
>> want snide reks from you to my regular username.
>> Like the one you responded to my Showme post.
>>
>
> If he had any sense he'd check the headers. Different news readers,
> different servers. He's not too bright.
Free trials don't cost much.
Dave
|
| | | | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 01:35:13
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:31:27 -0500, David Geesaman
<dgeesamanIHateSpam@yahoo.com > wrote:
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:29:33 -0600, "Showme" <Showme@youbet.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
>> <clip>
>>>> BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
>>>> does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
>>> No, he didn't enlist me to do anything. I used an alias because I do post
>>> here occasionally and didn't
>>> want snide reks from you to my regular username.
>>> Like the one you responded to my Showme post.
>>>
>>
>> If he had any sense he'd check the headers. Different news readers,
>> different servers. He's not too bright.
>
>Free trials don't cost much.
>
>Dave
Using Outlook Express is the no-no. Too dangerous.
___,
\o
|
| | | | | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 11:18:55
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net > wrote in message
news:hj27u2ho13kcuughot7871gift3o27nl3h@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:31:27 -0500, David Geesaman
> <dgeesamanIHateSpam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Bobby Knight wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:29:33 -0600, "Showme" <Showme@youbet.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> <clip>
>>>>> BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
>>>>> does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
>>>> No, he didn't enlist me to do anything. I used an alias because I do
>>>> post
>>>> here occasionally and didn't
>>>> want snide reks from you to my regular username.
>>>> Like the one you responded to my Showme post.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If he had any sense he'd check the headers. Different news readers,
>>> different servers. He's not too bright.
>>
>>Free trials don't cost much.
>>
>>Dave
>
> Using Outlook Express is the no-no. Too dangerous.
>
For rookies perhaps.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 17:36:07
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:18:55 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew@aol.com >
wrote:
>
>"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net> wrote in message
>> Using Outlook Express is the no-no. Too dangerous.
>>
>For rookies perhaps.
>
For anyone that thinks that Microsoft doesn't have big issues.
--
___,
\o
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 11:48:55
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net > wrote in message
news:9uq8u2p5t9fn67g8tbiak089f7tj0brcj3@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:18:55 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net> wrote in message
>
>>> Using Outlook Express is the no-no. Too dangerous.
>>>
>>For rookies perhaps.
>>
> For anyone that thinks that Microsoft doesn't have big issues.
> --
I've yet to run into one of these big issues after using OE for ten years.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 27 Feb 2007 13:26:49
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:48:55 -0600, MnMikew wrote:
> "Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:9uq8u2p5t9fn67g8tbiak089f7tj0brcj3@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:18:55 -0600, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>>"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net> wrote in message
>>
>>>> Using Outlook Express is the no-no. Too dangerous.
>>>>
>>>For rookies perhaps.
>>>
>> For anyone that thinks that Microsoft doesn't have big issues. --
>
> I've yet to run into one of these big issues after using OE for ten
> years.
How can you judge OE as a newsreader if it's the only one you really know?
|
| |
Date: 26 Feb 2007 19:24:26
From: BAR
Subject: Re: Way to play, BK
|
Dene wrote:
> In the thread, "what is wrong with RSG," a fella named "ShowMe"
> posts, claiming to a be long time lurker, then proceeds to criticize
> me about my catty comments toward BK. My response to "ShowMe" allows
> BK to supposedly "see" my post (though he has several usenet
> accounts), then take his typical potshot behind a killfile.
>
> Nothing new here. Typical canary-ass M.O.
>
> Here's the interesting part. If you look at ShowMe's profile. His
> very first post is on BA.TEST entitled "test one bk", dated today,
> approximately 52 mins. ago.
>
> BK enlisted a proxy to fight his pissing match towards me. Now what
> does all this mean in the grand scheme of things.
> Nothing....absolutely nothing. I don't expect anyone to take sides.
> I'm as culpable in these pissing matches as he is. I would just ask
> that you understand what BK is about. He needs internet people around
> him so that he can manipulate this little cyber fiefdom he's created
> for himself. Such a world requires good guys and bad guys. I'm one
> of the bad guys. So has been a long list of others.....really good
> company.
>
> Sad way to spend one's retirement.
Look in the mirror. You are wasting your life.
|
|
