| |
Main
Date: 17 Sep 2006 19:46:43
From: David
Subject: WTG Casey
|
Paul Casey trounced Micheel today. It is really not looking good
for the US this week.
David
|
|
| |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 13:25:47
From: multi
Subject: Re: WTG Casey
|
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:46:43 +0200, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de > wrote:
> Paul Casey trounced Micheel today. It is really not looking good
>for the US this week.
If I were Lehman, I wouldn't let Micheel play at all this week.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 22:33:18
From: Tranny
Subject: Re: WTG Casey
|
multi wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:46:43 +0200, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> Paul Casey trounced Micheel today. It is really not looking good
>> for the US this week.
>
> If I were Lehman, I wouldn't let Micheel play at all this week.
Tosser!
He has to play!
Tran
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 14:14:51
From: multi
Subject: Re: WTG Casey
|
On 17 Sep 2006 22:33:18 +0200, Tranny <tranny@notrolll.com > wrote:
>multi wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:46:43 +0200, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>> Paul Casey trounced Micheel today. It is really not looking good
>>> for the US this week.
>>
>> If I were Lehman, I wouldn't let Micheel play at all this week.
>
>Tosser!
>He has to play!
Ten bucks says he doesn't play a single match.
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 23:31:16
From: Tranny
Subject: Re: WTG Casey
|
multi wrote:
> On 17 Sep 2006 22:33:18 +0200, Tranny <tranny@notrolll.com> wrote:
>
>> multi wrote:
>>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:46:43 +0200, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>> Paul Casey trounced Micheel today. It is really not looking good
>>>> for the US this week.
>>> If I were Lehman, I wouldn't let Micheel play at all this week.
>> Tosser!
>> He has to play!
>
> Ten bucks says he doesn't play a single match.
$20 says he's not even gonna be there!
|
| |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 11:16:08
From: Fairway
Subject: Re: WTG Casey
|
David wrote:
> Paul Casey trounced Micheel today. It is really not looking good
> for the US this week.
These guys are tough, they are getting the storm straight in their
face, but it will only make them tougher. F
|
| |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 12:42:32
From: Buford Ressup
Subject: Re: Wie - the new Kournikova
|
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:10:12 -0700, long&left wrote:
> EdSmithers wrote:
>> Big_Fan wrote:
>> if you don't
>>> think she's a top ten player in the world, then you aren't paying
>>> attention.
>>
>> I hear you. I love her. Love her game. Can't wait for her to apply to
>> be on the LPGA and play regularly. I'd love to see her succeed to
>> whatever level her game can take her to.
>>
>> Talentwise, you are right on the money. Nobody is going to argue with
>> you on that.
>>
>> I can't wait for her to actually become a top ten player once she's a
>> member of the tour and plays something like a full schedule. She's a
>> monster. Why she won't apply for the tour is beyond me. Pressel did. Am
>> I wrong about that?
>>
>> Ed
>>
>
> Pressel did when she was 17 years old and had almost graduated from high
> school. She was almost 2 years older than MW when she got on the tour
Not even close. Morgan got her tour card in December 2005. She didn't
turn 18 until May 2006, so she was, what, 17 1/2 years old?
Michelle will turn 17 in a few weeks, so Morgan was 7 months or so
older than Michelle is now when she got her card.
The LPGA's Q-School tournament starts next weekend. I'm pretty sure
Michelle didn't apply for it, since it would have been huge news if she
had and the LPGA had rejected her. If Michelle wanted her card, I think
she could have gone through Q-School for it. Morgan played in it before
she knew whether they would actually let her earn the card or not.
Michelle could have done the same thing.
I don't think Michelle was interested.
|
|
