| |
Main
Date: 26 Mar 2007 07:00:44
From:
Subject: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
Woods are designed differently than irons. With an iron, you should
essentially be hitting "down" on the ball. That's not really the case
with the woods, so it may cause problems if you set up to the ball in
exactly the fashion that I described above. Here's the solution.
First, get in to your normal setup position, as I describe above.
You've got the driver in hand, you're bent over at the hips, you're
back is perfectly straight, and you're ready to take a good swing.
Now, all you have to do is stand up a bit straighter. You should have
already determined the correct distance between your feet and the
ball. You just stand up a bit more straight, and reach out with you
arms to bring the head of the driver back to the ball.
You will need to experiment with the amount that you need to adjust
(it shouldn't be much). Your chest may move about 1 - 3 inches. It
doesn't seem like very much, but the change will be very noticeable.
Just remember that nothing else in your swing or setup changes. Your
lower body doesn't adjust because you have already determined the
correct distance between your feet and the ball. It's just a matter of
standing up a bit straighter, and then reaching out a bit more with
the arms to compensate.
http://golfswingt.blogspot.com/#
|
|
| |
Date: 29 Mar 2007 09:07:22
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 28, 8:34 pm, frank ross <f...@net.net > wrote:
> The_Professor wrote:
> > On 28, 6:58 pm, frank ross <f...@net.net> wrote:
> > I am very sorry for all the people who have played in that tournament.
> > Better?
>
> No, it's not better. That wasn't an apology to those who run the
> tournament, or to all of the entrants over the years.
>
> The spin is off prof. You're just not socially very bright.
OK. I feel sorry for the people who run the tournament and all those
who have played in it over the years. Even better?
I do OK working with other people to get things done. It's not like
I'm some loser who thinks social behavior involves nothing more
gossiping with like losers about what other people do. I do, and am
good at doings. You gossip and are good at gossiping. I'm happy in my
skin.
|
| |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 18:44:35
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 28, 5:34 pm, francis ross <f...@net.net > wrote:
> No, it's not better. That wasn't an apology to those who run the
> tournament, or to all of the entrants over the years.
>
> The spin is off prof. You're just not socially very bright.
>
> Frank Ross
Now that's rich....an anom., crony kiss-ass, stalker talking about
social graces.
-Greg
Ps. Hi Francis. (Thought I would greet you in advance. Now it's
easier to immediately delete your inevitable, retarded response
without having to read a word).
|
| | |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 20:55:35
From: frank ross
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
Dene wrote:
> On 28, 5:34 pm, francis ross <f...@net.net> wrote:
>
>> No, it's not better. That wasn't an apology to those who run the
>> tournament, or to all of the entrants over the years.
>>
>> The spin is off prof. You're just not socially very bright.
>>
>> Frank Ross
>
> Now that's rich....an anom., crony kiss-ass, stalker talking about
> social graces.
>
> -Greg
>
> Ps. Hi Francis. (Thought I would greet you in advance. Now it's
> easier to immediately delete your inevitable, retarded response
> without having to read a word).
>
What's rich is that someone with a Phd. would need a nerd like you to
protect him. You two need to get a room so you don't have to lick his
ass in public. LOL
Frank Ross
|
| |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 18:03:20
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 28, 6:58 pm, frank ross <f...@net.net > wrote:
> Robert Hamilton wrote:
>
> > frank ross wrote:
>
> >> Dene wrote:
>
> >>> Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
> >>> me.
>
> >>> -Greg
>
> >> You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
> >> BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
> >> in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
> >> you better?
>
> >> Frank Ross
>
> > You playing in RSGNW? IMHO, regardless of what anyone says, its because you
> > aren't enough of a drunk for them either.
>
> Let's get this one straight. "Them" refers to the hosts of RSGNW. So,
> their criteria is to be enough of a drunk for an invitation? You might
> want to apologize to a whole lot of people who have played in that
> tournament. But you won't. You let your ass overload your mouth again.
I am very sorry for all the people who have played in that tournament.
Better?
|
| | |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 20:34:39
From: frank ross
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
The_Professor wrote:
> On 28, 6:58 pm, frank ross <f...@net.net> wrote:
>> Robert Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>> frank ross wrote:
>>>> Dene wrote:
>>>>> Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
>>>>> me.
>>>>> -Greg
>>>> You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
>>>> BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
>>>> in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
>>>> you better?
>>>> Frank Ross
>>> You playing in RSGNW? IMHO, regardless of what anyone says, its because you
>>> aren't enough of a drunk for them either.
>> Let's get this one straight. "Them" refers to the hosts of RSGNW. So,
>> their criteria is to be enough of a drunk for an invitation? You might
>> want to apologize to a whole lot of people who have played in that
>> tournament. But you won't. You let your ass overload your mouth again.
>
> I am very sorry for all the people who have played in that tournament.
> Better?
>
No, it's not better. That wasn't an apology to those who run the
tournament, or to all of the entrants over the years.
The spin is off prof. You're just not socially very bright.
Frank Ross
|
| |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 10:28:37
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
OK, you got the setup, but where is the punchline?
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 19:27:56
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 7:32 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> On Tue, 27 2007 00:11:21 GMT, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
>
> >> Mike Dalecki is a good person, who has a lot of people on this news
> >> group that will tell you that he's been of assistance to them.
>
> >> Neither of you can come close to that standing, and I'm sure that's a
> >> comfort to you.
>
> >Oh dear. How terrible. I guess if you don't buy into his "image" as expert
> >clubmaker, you're a bad person. So be it. I don't need an online "image" to
> >make my life worthwhile.
>
> It doesn't make you a bad person, but a rather bullheaded one. You
> already have and online image. Blowhard.
Maybe. I've always been willing to admit when I am wrong though. Now
you brogught up YKW, not me, but he is wrong in thinking graphite
shafts have spines. They do not. This is a fact. He is wrong in
thinking you can make a mid/low kick TT XL Lite into a high kick DG
with some sort of trimming. He made a fool analysis of DGSL shafts
when they came out and he recently made a fool statement about taper
tip shafts. Think he will admit he is wrong on these things?
Anyhoo, thanks for the entertainment. It's pretty boring sitting her
waiting for a gel to run, but I have my USB guitar too. Makes the time
pass a little easier. Got in some tgolf today too. Picked up a partner
after the first few holes who was a bit of a toad. We weren't playing
for anything, just for fun, why not join up? I played average for me
on the front, shooting 43, but got into a zone on the back for a 39,
which would have been lower if the greens were puttab le, but they
weren't. Anyhoo the guy was getting stressed that I was playing better
than him on the back. A phenomenon that always amazes me!
|
| | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 02:39:38
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26 2007 19:27:56 -0700, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>On 26, 7:32 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 2007 00:11:21 GMT, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Bobby Knight wrote:
>>
>> >> Mike Dalecki is a good person, who has a lot of people on this news
>> >> group that will tell you that he's been of assistance to them.
>>
>> >> Neither of you can come close to that standing, and I'm sure that's a
>> >> comfort to you.
>>
>> >Oh dear. How terrible. I guess if you don't buy into his "image" as expert
>> >clubmaker, you're a bad person. So be it. I don't need an online "image" to
>> >make my life worthwhile.
>>
>> It doesn't make you a bad person, but a rather bullheaded one. You
>> already have and online image. Blowhard.
>
>
>Maybe. I've always been willing to admit when I am wrong though.
I would have to see that, but then you would have to think you were
wrong to do so. :-)
> Now you brogught up YKW, not me,
Rob! You didn't mention him by name, but by implication related to
his sig. Holy crap. Are you going to deny that?
> but he is wrong in thinking graphite
>shafts have spines. They do not. This is a fact. He is wrong in
>thinking you can make a mid/low kick TT XL Lite into a high kick DG
>with some sort of trimming. He made a fool analysis of DGSL shafts
>when they came out and he recently made a fool statement about taper
>tip shafts. Think he will admit he is wrong on these things?
>
If he thought he was, yes.
>Anyhoo, thanks for the entertainment. It's pretty boring sitting her
>waiting for a gel to run, but I have my USB guitar too. Makes the time
>pass a little easier.
Isn't that a hoot? We entertain each other. Other than LLLLLLarrry,
you're my favorite poster.
>Got in some tgolf today too. Picked up a partner
>after the first few holes who was a bit of a toad. We weren't playing
>for anything, just for fun, why not join up? I played average for me
>on the front, shooting 43, but got into a zone on the back for a 39,
>which would have been lower if the greens were puttab le, but they
>weren't. Anyhoo the guy was getting stressed that I was playing better
>than him on the back. A phenomenon that always amazes me!
I'm having real problems with consistency. How does 38-50 strike you?
Without the doubles and triples, it could have been a decent round.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 17:24:14
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 4:13 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net > wrote:
> frank ross wrote:
> > Dene wrote:
>
> > > Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
> > > me.
>
> > > -Greg
>
> > You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
> > BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
> > in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
> > you better?
>
> > Frank Ross
>
> You playing in RSGNW? IMHO, regardless of what anyone says, its because you
> aren't enough of a drunk for them either.
Now this I did read. Enjoyed the laugh....thanks Rob and Francis.
You'd think these clowns could come up with better material. I'm
excluded from a tournament I had no interest in attending.
Makes me wanna cry. Hold me, Rob...hold me.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 18:39:42
From: Tom K
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
<jwwaywdkcssc@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1174917644.220662.303000@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Woods are designed differently than irons. With an iron, you should
> essentially be hitting "down" on the ball. That's not really the case
> with the woods, so it may cause problems if you set up to the ball in
> exactly the fashion that I described above. Here's the solution.
> First, get in to your normal setup position, as I describe above.
> You've got the driver in hand, you're bent over at the hips, you're
> back is perfectly straight, and you're ready to take a good swing.
> Now, all you have to do is stand up a bit straighter. You should have
> already determined the correct distance between your feet and the
> ball. You just stand up a bit more straight, and reach out with you
> arms to bring the head of the driver back to the ball.
> You will need to experiment with the amount that you need to adjust
> (it shouldn't be much). Your chest may move about 1 - 3 inches. It
> doesn't seem like very much, but the change will be very noticeable.
> Just remember that nothing else in your swing or setup changes. Your
> lower body doesn't adjust because you have already determined the
> correct distance between your feet and the ball. It's just a matter of
> standing up a bit straighter, and then reaching out a bit more with
> the arms to compensate.
> http://golfswingt.blogspot.com/#
Larry... is that you?
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 14:30:38
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 1:22 pm, fearless frank ross <f...@net.net > wrote:
Oh Francis.....I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
(Who needs a KF. This is much more fun).
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 14:15:02
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 12:46 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >It's pretty cut and dried to me. If it's OK for one person to put in
> >some sort of link at the end of a post it's OK for another. What BK
> >thinks is another thing of course, which is comforting to me.
>
> So it's comforting to you and Greg that a new poster comes along with
> a site that is obviously spam?
>
> It absolutely IS ok for anyone to use a sig, especially a long time
> poster. Read the charter.
The charter is irrelevant. Even if it was, it should be modified to
eliminate all spam, regardless of it's place in the post.
> It certainly is NOT for one to drop by and give a link to one of the
> most blatant spams seen . Did you even go to the site? If so, do
> you think it's not spam?
Both links are spam.
> We've had our skirmishes before, but I've always had respect for
> you. It's a given that Greg is a small person....but this is beneath
> you.
BK's strategy of trying to isolate me is amusing. He tried to pull
the same crap with private e-mails when he was mad at you and Eric.
He lives for this nonsense. Tis a sad existence, relying on the
internet for his social life.
> Mike Dalecki is a good person, who has a lot of people on this news
> group that will tell you that he's been of assistance to them.
He's here to sell his wares. There is a ked difference in Mike's
attitude toward his customers and those who don't worship the ground
he walks on, especially those who question his keting strategy.
> Neither of you can come close to that standing, and I'm sure that's a
> comfort to you.
Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
me.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 16:22:25
From: frank ross
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
Dene wrote:
> Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
> me.
>
> -Greg
>
You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
you better?
Frank Ross
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 00:13:31
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
frank ross wrote:
> Dene wrote:
>
> > Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
> > me.
> >
> > -Greg
> >
>
> You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
> BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
> in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
> you better?
>
> Frank Ross
You playing in RSGNW? IMHO, regardless of what anyone says, its because you
aren't enough of a drunk for them either.
|
| | | | |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 18:58:38
From: frank ross
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
Robert Hamilton wrote:
>
> frank ross wrote:
>
>> Dene wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
>>> me.
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>>
>> You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
>> BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
>> in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
>> you better?
>>
>> Frank Ross
>
> You playing in RSGNW? IMHO, regardless of what anyone says, its because you
> aren't enough of a drunk for them either.
>
>
Let's get this one straight. "Them" refers to the hosts of RSGNW. So,
their criteria is to be enough of a drunk for an invitation? You might
want to apologize to a whole lot of people who have played in that
tournament. But you won't. You let your ass overload your mouth again.
Frank Ross
|
| | | | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 00:38:05
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On Tue, 27 2007 00:13:31 GMT, Robert Hamilton <DBID@att.net >
wrote:
>
>
>frank ross wrote:
>
>> Dene wrote:
>>
>> > Actually, I take great comfort in the fact that BK doesn't approve of
>> > me.
>> >
>> > -Greg
>> >
>>
>> You read my posts deenie. Anyway, others do, and you can't stop that.
>> BK is just at the top of a long list that don't approve of you. Playing
>> in the RSGNW this year? Hey, isn't that where you live? Who would know
>> you better?
>>
>> Frank Ross
>
>You playing in RSGNW? IMHO, regardless of what anyone says, its because you
>aren't enough of a drunk for them either.
>
There you go again. Making friends, left and right.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 13:31:08
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 1:04 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 26, 8:02 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 26 2007 07:57:40 -0700, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
> > >On 26, 9:05 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
> > >> On 26 2007 07:00:44 -0700, jwwaywdkc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > >> >Woods are designed differently than irons. <clip>
>
> > >> Duh.
>
> > >> That should give us all we need to know about the web site that this
> > >> SPAMMER is touting.
>
> > >> >http://xxxxxxxxxxgolfswingt.blogspot.com/#
>
> > >No kidding. About 5 years ago or so some newbie started making clubs
> > >in his basement; talked himself up as some sort of pro clubmaker
> > >(which has produced some real humor for me since) and always has his
> > >commercial clubmaker website listed at the end of the post, and he's
> > >still posting. In comparison, a blog ain't so bad, being the same
> > >difference postwise.
>
> > Big difference here Rob, and you know it. You just can't pass up an
> > opportunity to be an asshole.
> > ___,
>
> BK's right Rob....there is a big difference. The newbie you mentioned
> puts his commercial link within a signature whereas jwway put his link
> at the end of the post.
>
> Because of that misa-line-ment, one is a crony and the other is a
> spammer.
>
> And of course, you're an asshole for speaking the truth, i.e. pointing
> out that the emperor is naked.
>
> -Greg- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
It's pretty cut and dried to me. If it's OK for one person to put in
some sort of link at the end of a post it's OK for another. What BK
thinks is another thing of course, which is comforting to me.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 20:46:43
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26 2007 13:31:08 -0700, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>On 26, 1:04 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>> BK's right Rob....there is a big difference. The newbie you mentioned
>> puts his commercial link within a signature whereas jwway put his link
>> at the end of the post.
>>
>> Because of that misa-line-ment, one is a crony and the other is a
>> spammer.
>>
>> And of course, you're an asshole for speaking the truth, i.e. pointing
>> out that the emperor is naked.
>>
>> -Greg- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>It's pretty cut and dried to me. If it's OK for one person to put in
>some sort of link at the end of a post it's OK for another. What BK
>thinks is another thing of course, which is comforting to me.
So it's comforting to you and Greg that a new poster comes along with
a site that is obviously spam?
It absolutely IS ok for anyone to use a sig, especially a long time
poster. Read the charter.
It certainly is NOT for one to drop by and give a link to one of the
most blatant spams seen . Did you even go to the site? If so, do
you think it's not spam?
We've had our skirmishes before, but I've always had respect for
you. It's a given that Greg is a small person....but this is beneath
you.
Mike Dalecki is a good person, who has a lot of people on this news
group that will tell you that he's been of assistance to them.
Neither of you can come close to that standing, and I'm sure that's a
comfort to you.
___,
\o
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 00:11:21
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> Mike Dalecki is a good person, who has a lot of people on this news
> group that will tell you that he's been of assistance to them.
>
> Neither of you can come close to that standing, and I'm sure that's a
> comfort to you.
>
Oh dear. How terrible. I guess if you don't buy into his "image" as expert
clubmaker, you're a bad person. So be it. I don't need an online "image" to
make my life worthwhile.
|
| | | | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 00:32:52
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On Tue, 27 2007 00:11:21 GMT, Robert Hamilton <DBID@att.net >
wrote:
>
>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>
>> Mike Dalecki is a good person, who has a lot of people on this news
>> group that will tell you that he's been of assistance to them.
>>
>> Neither of you can come close to that standing, and I'm sure that's a
>> comfort to you.
>>
>
>Oh dear. How terrible. I guess if you don't buy into his "image" as expert
>clubmaker, you're a bad person. So be it. I don't need an online "image" to
>make my life worthwhile.
It doesn't make you a bad person, but a rather bullheaded one. You
already have and online image. Blowhard.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 12:23:04
From: AKA gray asphalt
Subject: change topic: hip angle
|
I read something interesting (to me, ok duh) anyway, in a medical phamplet
on back problems. It stated that everyone has an optimal bend angle for
comfort and gave an exercise to find the angle that you can bend at the
waist and have the most comfort.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 21:01:05
From: George Hibbard
Subject: Re: change topic: hip angle
|
"AKA gray asphalt" <goodidea1950@hotmail.spam.com > wrote in message
news:T4VNh.104848$p17.29526@newsfe11.phx...
>
> I read something interesting (to me, ok duh) anyway, in a medical phamplet
> on back problems. It stated that everyone has an optimal bend angle for
> comfort and gave an exercise to find the angle that you can bend at the
> waist and have the most comfort.
>
>
I haven't seen the article but I have experienced it for myself, and teach
the need for each golfer to find his. While I was playing with an
orthopedic surgeon one day and topped one below my feet he quickly jumped
into point out to me that the extreme bend I had to take to reach down to
the ball was "past my critical angle" and without being prepared to overcome
the physical limitation of that angle during the release when my hips would
have been turned the most, it was inevitable I would HAVE to stand up and
straighten that angle. The body simply cannot support some positions -
especially when you come upon the necessity to override nature unawares.
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 11:04:47
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 8:02 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> On 26 2007 07:57:40 -0700, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 26, 9:05 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
> >> On 26 2007 07:00:44 -0700, jwwaywdkc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >> >Woods are designed differently than irons. <clip>
>
> >> Duh.
>
> >> That should give us all we need to know about the web site that this
> >> SPAMMER is touting.
>
> >> >http://xxxxxxxxxxgolfswingt.blogspot.com/#
>
> >No kidding. About 5 years ago or so some newbie started making clubs
> >in his basement; talked himself up as some sort of pro clubmaker
> >(which has produced some real humor for me since) and always has his
> >commercial clubmaker website listed at the end of the post, and he's
> >still posting. In comparison, a blog ain't so bad, being the same
> >difference postwise.
>
> Big difference here Rob, and you know it. You just can't pass up an
> opportunity to be an asshole.
> ___,
BK's right Rob....there is a big difference. The newbie you mentioned
puts his commercial link within a signature whereas jwway put his link
at the end of the post.
Because of that misa-line-ment, one is a crony and the other is a
spammer.
And of course, you're an asshole for speaking the truth, i.e. pointing
out that the emperor is naked.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 07:57:40
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 9:05 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> On 26 2007 07:00:44 -0700, jwwaywdkc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >Woods are designed differently than irons. <clip>
>
> Duh.
>
> That should give us all we need to know about the web site that this
> SPAMMER is touting.
>
> >http://xxxxxxxxxxgolfswingt.blogspot.com/#
>
No kidding. About 5 years ago or so some newbie started making clubs
in his basement; talked himself up as some sort of pro clubmaker
(which has produced some real humor for me since) and always has his
commercial clubmaker website listed at the end of the post, and he's
still posting. In comparison, a blog ain't so bad, being the same
difference postwise.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 16:02:41
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26 2007 07:57:40 -0700, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>On 26, 9:05 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>> On 26 2007 07:00:44 -0700, jwwaywdkc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >Woods are designed differently than irons. <clip>
>>
>> Duh.
>>
>> That should give us all we need to know about the web site that this
>> SPAMMER is touting.
>>
>> >http://xxxxxxxxxxgolfswingt.blogspot.com/#
>>
>
>No kidding. About 5 years ago or so some newbie started making clubs
>in his basement; talked himself up as some sort of pro clubmaker
>(which has produced some real humor for me since) and always has his
>commercial clubmaker website listed at the end of the post, and he's
>still posting. In comparison, a blog ain't so bad, being the same
>difference postwise.
Big difference here Rob, and you know it. You just can't pass up an
opportunity to be an asshole.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 07:55:23
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 9:00 am, jwwaywdkc...@yahoo.com wrote:
No kidding. It's really important to talk big and play bad. The real
trick is making the correction during the round. Nothing produces a
bad shot like quick at the top, but it's not always easy to correct
this. Same with laying off. Of course, the other thing is to know
your game well enough, and keep your eyes open for some good side
bets. A good bunker game works best for this. Hit a couple of gruesome
bunker shots..take say 4 to get down a couple of times, get "mad", and
then make the up and down when it counts!
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 14:05:24
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26 2007 07:00:44 -0700, jwwaywdkcssc@yahoo.com wrote:
>Woods are designed differently than irons. <clip>
Duh.
That should give us all we need to know about the web site that this
SPAMMER is touting.
>http://xxxxxxxxxxgolfswingt.blogspot.com/#
--
___,
\o
|
| | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 16:24:46
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 27, 2:38 pm, "Steve H." <stra...@eudoramail.com > wrote:
> On 26, 10:39 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>
> > Rob! You didn't mention him by name, but by implication related to
> > his sig. Holy crap. Are you going to deny that?
>
> Depends what you mean by "to."
to-shay?
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 15:38:22
From: Steve H.
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 10:39 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> Rob! You didn't mention him by name, but by implication related to
> his sig. Holy crap. Are you going to deny that?
Depends what you mean by "to."
|
| | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 06:17:15
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 8:39 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> Rob! You didn't mention him by name, but by implication related to
> his sig. Holy crap. Are you going to deny that?
Yes. Many people have done such a thing.
> > but he is wrong in thinking graphite
> >shafts have spines. They do not. This is a fact. He is wrong in
> >thinking you can make a mid/low kick TT XL Lite into a high kick DG
> >with some sort of trimming. He made a fool analysis of DGSL shafts
> >when they came out and he recently made a fool statement about taper
> >tip shafts. Think he will admit he is wrong on these things?
>
> If he thought he was, yes.
No way. I know the type. They cannot admit they are wrong in a
legitimate controversy. They will always, and that's *ALWAYS* tell you
therre is somethhing you don't "understand", or that you are stupid
when they are exposed. Often attack you on the issue even....even
though they are wrong. Seen it many times.
>
> I'm having real problems with consistency. How does 38-50 strike you?
> Without the doubles and triples, it could have been a decent round.
Happens to me all the time. Get out of sync and I can shoot
anything...get the timing down and I can shoot anything.
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 13:27:52
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 27 2007 06:17:15 -0700, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>On 26, 8:39 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:
>
>> Rob! You didn't mention him by name, but by implication related to
>> his sig. Holy crap. Are you going to deny that?
>
>Yes. Many people have done such a thing.
>
>> > but he is wrong in thinking graphite
>> >shafts have spines. They do not. This is a fact. He is wrong in
>> >thinking you can make a mid/low kick TT XL Lite into a high kick DG
>> >with some sort of trimming. He made a fool analysis of DGSL shafts
>> >when they came out and he recently made a fool statement about taper
>> >tip shafts. Think he will admit he is wrong on these things?
>>
>> If he thought he was, yes.
>
>No way. I know the type. They cannot admit they are wrong in a
>legitimate controversy. They will always, and that's *ALWAYS* tell you
>therre is somethhing you don't "understand", or that you are stupid
>when they are exposed. Often attack you on the issue even....even
>though they are wrong. Seen it many times.
>>
>> I'm having real problems with consistency. How does 38-50 strike you?
>> Without the doubles and triples, it could have been a decent round.
>
>Happens to me all the time. Get out of sync and I can shoot
>anything...get the timing down and I can shoot anything.
Great editing Rob.
--
___,
\o
|
| | |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 17:47:06
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Setup In Golf Is Very Important
|
On 26, 4:38 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
>
> There you go again. Making friends, left and right.
He has a helluva time coping with people who aren't subject to
groupthink.
-Greg
|
|
