| |
Main
Date: 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51
From: The Hammer
Subject: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup. To be held in
the Spring/Summer 2007.
You have the cronies and the non-cronies, now affectionately to be
known as the CumWads.
Site to be announced, dates to be announced. This is no troll, this
event is in the works, IF there is interest. An event with more
special surprises ever before at an RSG event. But I need a good
response. At least 20 folks to make it worth the monumental amount of
time I will put into this. There will be tee shirts, more souvenirs
than you will be able to carry home, dinners each nights, comedy
skits, roasts, you name it. This will be the chance for all the
cronies/CumWads who have fought it out since the inception of this
group to flame it out where it really counts, on the golf course. And
afterwards, in person, not with some PC to hide behind. The event will
be fun. We will make fun of ourselves. We will make fun of our games.
And maybe a few bitter enemies leave as friends.
Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
I am proud to say I am a CumWad. I am proud to say that I will die as
a CumWad. I am proud to say I will be the captain for the CumWads.
And I am proud to announce Dene as the assistant captain of the
CumWads.
So which one of you chikcen shit cronies is going to step to the plate
and be a captain. The CumWads will be waiting! And who will the
assistant captain be? You cronies get to work and let me know..
I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
this has suggested Arizona in April. Couldn't think of a better place
myself.
So please respond if interested. If there is sufficient response, I
will get to work on this with a firm itinerary by late 2007. And then
I will need a deposit from all attendees, as a good faith effort that
you will attend. And then it will happen and once and for all we will
see who rules here, be it the Cronies or the CumWads.
The Hammer
|
|
| |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 21:12:24
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Carbon wrote:
>
> >> To offer the fair and balanced perspective.... "Bush Caused Katrina!"
>
> Of course Bush didn't cause Katrina. But his handling of the aftermath has
> been a total failure. He shows up for photo ops, stutters his way through
> some speech someone else wrote, and disappears. Meanwhile New Orleans is
> still a wasteland. This whole debacle is a black eye for the Bush
> presidency, whether you choose to admit or not.
>
To be fair, he did the same thing in NYC and that's still a big hole in
the ground as well.
And he also promised to go after those responsible. That didn't last
long.
Remember this White House press conference on 3/13/02?
Read what he says there and see how that's worked out.
===========================
Q Mr. President, in your speeches now you rarely talk or mention
Osama bin Laden. Why is that? Also, can you tell the American people
if you have any more information, if you know if he is dead or alive?
Final part -- deep in your heart, don't you truly believe that until
you find out if he is dead or alive, you won't really eliminate the
threat of --
THE PRESIDENT: Deep in my heart I know the man is on the run, if he's
alive at all. Who knows if he's hiding in some cave or not; we haven't
heard from him in a long time. And the idea of focusing on one person
is -- really indicates to me people don't understand the scope of the
mission.
Terror is bigger than one person. And he's just -- he's a person
who's now been ginalized. His network, his host government has been
destroyed. He's the ultimate parasite who found weakness, exploited
it, and met his match. He is -- as I mentioned in my speech, I do
mention the fact that this is a fellow who is willing to commit
youngsters to their death and he, himself, tries to hide -- if, in
fact, he's hiding at all.
So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much
time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you. I'm more worried about
making sure that our soldiers are well-supplied; that the strategy is
clear; that the coalition is strong; that when we find enemy bunched up
like we did in Shahikot Mountains, that the military has all the
support it needs to go in and do the job, which they did.
And there will be other battles in Afghanistan. There's going to be
other struggles like Shahikot, and I'm just as confident about the
outcome of those future battles as I was about Shahikot, where our
soldiers are performing brilliantly. We're tough, we're strong,
they're well-equipped. We have a good strategy. We are showing the
world we know how to fight a guerrilla war with conventional means.
Q But don't you believe that the threat that bin Laden posed won't
truly be eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, as I say, we haven't heard much from him. And I
wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure.
And, again, I don't know where he is. I -- I'll repeat what I said.
I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I
was concerned about him, when he had taken over a country. I was
concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and
calling the shots for the Taliban.
But once we set out the policy and started executing the plan, he
became -- we shoved him out more and more on the gins. He has no
place to train his al Qaeda killers anymore. And if we -- excuse me
for a minute -- and if we find a training camp, we'll take care of
it. Either we will or our friends will. That's one of the things --
part of the new phase that's becoming apparent to the American people
is that we're working closely with other governments to deny sanctuary,
or training, or a place to hide, or a place to raise money.
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 09:18:00
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
long&left wrote:
> why should I waste my time? Everyone here knows that Eric and you are
> just dancing the jig to stir up the shit and create a bit of chaos. Must
> be fun for you but I have better things to do. I say again: I don't give
> a flying fuck if Eric has 3 degrees or 300 degrees. He's an asshole and
> so are you...stick that in your escrow accounthey idiot, you don't have $5k to spare
I make 5k every 13 days. When a business deal is finalized in
November, then it will be every 10 days. Also, we just sold two homes
and made tidy profits on both. So....yes I have the money. Your
mother probably does too.
>so don't bore us with your
>bravado. Eric has already backpedaled on his earlier boast about his
>degree status so why are you sticking up for his degrees?
Because of your big tuff words said last Sunday night.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"and he admitted earlier today that that was not quite true, that only
two were summa cum laude...AND, he won't produce any documentation
about
any of his supposed degrees without a "bet". Yeah right, like he's to
be
trusted.
Now me on the other hand, I have $5k to spare, so here's my deal with
you big mouth. My $5k against an equal value share in your boat. Eric
provides verifiable information from the institutions that he obtained
his degrees from that he he is in fact degreed suuma cum laude in each
of his noted fields. If he does, you can have my $5k. I'll put it in an
account of your choice tomorrow (9/11/06) via certified check with the
caveat that the degree information as noted above is required for
withdrawal of the funds.
I'll enjoy driving your boat next year partner...
Dave"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I called you on your supposed bet and it's been nothing but
backpeddling ever since. You have reinforced my initial impressions of
you....you're nothing but a wannabe. Given this, I'm implementing
these words to myself...."don't answer a fool according to his folly."
Translation. Alligator mouth...canary ass.
No cards for you.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 09:56:00
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> long&left wrote:
(snip)
> I make 5k every 13 days. When a business deal is finalized in
> November, then it will be every 10 days. Also, we just sold two homes
> and made tidy profits on both. So....yes I have the money. Your
> mother probably does too.
what does my Mother have to do with this. It's not my fault that my
Mother has money. I don't happen to need any of it because I make 3 or 4
times what you do, month in and month out. And I play golf 3 or 4 days a
week. And, btw, I have no college degree. Left home when I was 15 and
barely graduated from high school because I was working for a living.
But I've been in places and situations that you wouldn't even dream
about having to be in. People like you don't bother or intimidate me.
I've had to deal with people like you for years and I know exactly what
you're about and how to deal with you. Go try to bully someone else hot shot
>
(all of your other BS snipped too)
Dave
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:09:32
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
long&left wrote:
> >
> > Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
> > only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
> > serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
> > table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
> >
> > -Greg
> >
>
> you've got nothing. Eric's digging a hole for himself as we "speak". HE
> doesn't even know what degrees he has...we don't need any authorization
> to figure that out
So you think I'm bluffing. Either call my bet or walk away from the
table. If you develop some stones, tell me the escrow account where I
can send the 5k.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 16:28:54
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: long&left wrote:
:
: > >
: > > Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
: > > only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
: > > serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
: > > table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
: > >
: > > -Greg
: > >
: >
: > you've got nothing. Eric's digging a hole for himself as we "speak". HE
: > doesn't even know what degrees he has...we don't need any authorization
: > to figure that out
:
: So you think I'm bluffing. Either call my bet or walk away from the
: table. If you develop some stones, tell me the escrow account where I
: can send the 5k.
I'd take your bet, but I now know the outcome, and I don't
want to steal your money. But you should bail on this NOW,
Greg.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:47:53
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>
>>> Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
>>> only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
>>> serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
>>> table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>>
>> you've got nothing. Eric's digging a hole for himself as we "speak". HE
>> doesn't even know what degrees he has...we don't need any authorization
>> to figure that out
>
> So you think I'm bluffing. Either call my bet or walk away from the
> table. If you develop some stones, tell me the escrow account where I
> can send the 5k.
>
> -Greg
>
why should I waste my time? Everyone here knows that Eric and you are
just dancing the jig to stir up the shit and create a bit of chaos. Must
be fun for you but I have better things to do. I say again: I don't give
a flying fuck if Eric has 3 degrees or 300 degrees. He's an asshole and
so are you...stick that in your escrow account
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 23:27:28
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> :
> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
> :
> :> Eric. You at least *might* not know the result in advance. Eric
> :> does and refuses to play. Which ought to be sending you some
> :> crystal clear signals...
> :
> : All I have is Eric's word and written authorization to verify the
> : nursing degree, which I have yet to act upon. (Requires my time/effort
> : for zero gain).
>
> Send it to me, I'll do it. Loser buys the other a beverage in the
> event we ever actually meet.
Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 14:42:32
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > :
: > : Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > :
: > :> Eric. You at least *might* not know the result in advance. Eric
: > :> does and refuses to play. Which ought to be sending you some
: > :> crystal clear signals...
: > :
: > : All I have is Eric's word and written authorization to verify the
: > : nursing degree, which I have yet to act upon. (Requires my time/effort
: > : for zero gain).
: >
: > Send it to me, I'll do it. Loser buys the other a beverage in the
: > event we ever actually meet.
:
: Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
: only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
: serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
: table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
So you admit it's not *really* about your time and effort. Why
did you say that, then?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 07:05:45
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>> :
>> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> :
>> :> Eric. You at least *might* not know the result in advance. Eric
>> :> does and refuses to play. Which ought to be sending you some
>> :> crystal clear signals...
>> :
>> : All I have is Eric's word and written authorization to verify the
>> : nursing degree, which I have yet to act upon. (Requires my time/effort
>> : for zero gain).
>>
>> Send it to me, I'll do it. Loser buys the other a beverage in the
>> event we ever actually meet.
>
> Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
> only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
> serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
> table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
>
> -Greg
>
you've got nothing. Eric's digging a hole for himself as we "speak". HE
doesn't even know what degrees he has...we don't need any authorization
to figure that out
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 09:19:59
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:05:45 -0700, long&left <nospam@diespammers.com >
wrote:
>Dene wrote:
>> Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
>> only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
>> serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
>> table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
>>
>> -Greg
>>
>
>you've got nothing. Eric's digging a hole for himself as we "speak". HE
>doesn't even know what degrees he has...we don't need any authorization
>to figure that out
Poor Greg. He's stupid enough to believe in Eric, and they're both
making fools of themselves trying to spin out of this one.
Incidentally, there IS money on the table between Eric and Bigoldcat.
>>From: bigoldcat2@yahoo.com
>>Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
>>Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
>>Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:47:24 -0700
<clip >
>>I said I called the bet, I told the Liar where to send the money. I
>>don't rant back and forth like Liar, Dene, and Ben,who i am very
>>disappointed in. They can keep running their mouths as long as they
>>like, fact is, bet called PUT UP LIAR. I want to see those three
>>degrees and those three summa cum laudes like you said.
Let's see the cancelled check Eric. You're supposed to make it out to
The Alzheimers Foundation of America. Hell, he's saving you some
bucks by making it deductible.
But...it'll never happen, because you'll renege.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 21:53:17
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
wannabe wrote:
> only after he got tired of the same bullshit that I got tired of.
> Posturing, dancing, jiving, questioning, trying to change the rules,
> worried about "I'm not going to get paid", and every other excuse that
> you and Eric could come up with. I made a perfectly legitimate bet. It
> was simple, where the money would be put was noted. And you started with
> the "what about this, and what about that". All that you had to do is
> nod your head "yes, I accept the bet" and we would have been off and
> running.
>
> But, no...you never intended to accept any bets. Your only purpose here
> is to shit disturb and create chaos. You're like the bully on the play
> ground when I was in the 6th grade. Constantly picking with your foul
> language and personal insults, constantly pressuring, poking your finger
> in everyones chest. Well, my bully in the 6th grade quit picking on me
> because one day he went to far and I popped him in the face. Knocked him
> on his ass with a bloody nose.
>
> Please remember, there were only 5 or 6 people who didn't want to play
> golf with you at RSG-NW. Since then you have been a bully to many others
> here that have had no personal problems with you. Now there are lots
> more than 5 or 6 people that would never play golf with you, me
> included. I hope that your personal life is better than your persona on
> RSG, because if it's not, well, then I feel very sorry for you
> Dave
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz................................
-Greg
Ps. Do something brave and plonk me....please.
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 07:03:32
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> wannabe wrote:
>
>> only after he got tired of the same bullshit that I got tired of.
>> Posturing, dancing, jiving, questioning, trying to change the rules,
>> worried about "I'm not going to get paid", and every other excuse that
>> you and Eric could come up with. I made a perfectly legitimate bet. It
>> was simple, where the money would be put was noted. And you started with
>> the "what about this, and what about that". All that you had to do is
>> nod your head "yes, I accept the bet" and we would have been off and
>> running.
>>
>> But, no...you never intended to accept any bets. Your only purpose here
>> is to shit disturb and create chaos. You're like the bully on the play
>> ground when I was in the 6th grade. Constantly picking with your foul
>> language and personal insults, constantly pressuring, poking your finger
>> in everyones chest. Well, my bully in the 6th grade quit picking on me
>> because one day he went to far and I popped him in the face. Knocked him
>> on his ass with a bloody nose.
>>
>> Please remember, there were only 5 or 6 people who didn't want to play
>> golf with you at RSG-NW. Since then you have been a bully to many others
>> here that have had no personal problems with you. Now there are lots
>> more than 5 or 6 people that would never play golf with you, me
>> included. I hope that your personal life is better than your persona on
>> RSG, because if it's not, well, then I feel very sorry for you
>> Dave
>
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz................................
>
> -Greg
>
> Ps. Do something brave and plonk me....please.
>
ah, now you've got nothing to say. You certainly had a bunch to say to
me a couple of days ago. Truth hurts a bit does it?
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 20:42:01
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> :
> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
> :> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> :> :
> :> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
> :> :
> :> :> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
> :> :> : bet.
> :> :>
> :> :> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
> :> :> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
> :> :> away. Period.
> :> :
> :> : Your third mis-read in one week.
> :>
> :> No, I was right each time. The money was put up; Eric made additional
> :> demands. Period.
> :>
> :> Why did Eric choose to walk away from easy money?
> :
> : I beginning to think you're just deliberately wasting my time, but
> : giving you the benefit of the doubt just one more time, whose money did
> : Eric walk away from?
>
> bigoldcat. Google it up.
He retracted. Google it up.
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Member
> http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 21:37:49
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>> :
>> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> :> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>> :> :
>> :> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> :> :
>> :> :> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
>> :> :> : bet.
>> :> :>
>> :> :> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
>> :> :> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
>> :> :> away. Period.
>> :> :
>> :> : Your third mis-read in one week.
>> :>
>> :> No, I was right each time. The money was put up; Eric made additional
>> :> demands. Period.
>> :>
>> :> Why did Eric choose to walk away from easy money?
>> :
>> : I beginning to think you're just deliberately wasting my time, but
>> : giving you the benefit of the doubt just one more time, whose money did
>> : Eric walk away from?
>>
>> bigoldcat. Google it up.
>
> He retracted. Google it up.
>
>> --
>> Chris Bellomy
>> C-List Charter Member
>> http://clist.org/
>
only after he got tired of the same bullshit that I got tired of.
Posturing, dancing, jiving, questioning, trying to change the rules,
worried about "I'm not going to get paid", and every other excuse that
you and Eric could come up with. I made a perfectly legitimate bet. It
was simple, where the money would be put was noted. And you started with
the "what about this, and what about that". All that you had to do is
nod your head "yes, I accept the bet" and we would have been off and
running.
But, no...you never intended to accept any bets. Your only purpose here
is to shit disturb and create chaos. You're like the bully on the play
ground when I was in the 6th grade. Constantly picking with your foul
language and personal insults, constantly pressuring, poking your finger
in everyones chest. Well, my bully in the 6th grade quit picking on me
because one day he went to far and I popped him in the face. Knocked him
on his ass with a bloody nose.
Please remember, there were only 5 or 6 people who didn't want to play
golf with you at RSG-NW. Since then you have been a bully to many others
here that have had no personal problems with you. Now there are lots
more than 5 or 6 people that would never play golf with you, me
included. I hope that your personal life is better than your persona on
RSG, because if it's not, well, then I feel very sorry for you
Dave
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 04:23:25
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > :
: > : Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > :> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > :> :
: > :> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > :> :
: > :> :> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
: > :> :> : bet.
: > :> :>
: > :> :> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
: > :> :> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
: > :> :> away. Period.
: > :> :
: > :> : Your third mis-read in one week.
: > :>
: > :> No, I was right each time. The money was put up; Eric made additional
: > :> demands. Period.
: > :>
: > :> Why did Eric choose to walk away from easy money?
: > :
: > : I beginning to think you're just deliberately wasting my time, but
: > : giving you the benefit of the doubt just one more time, whose money did
: > : Eric walk away from?
: >
: > bigoldcat. Google it up.
:
: He retracted. Google it up.
Only if by "retracted" you mean "reiterated," which he did
just today:
"I said I called the bet, I told the Liar where to send the money. I
don't rant back and forth like Liar, Dene, and Ben,who i am very
disappointed in. They can keep running their mouths as long as they
like, fact is, bet called PUT UP LIAR. I want to see those three
degrees and those three summa cum laudes like you said."
Looks like free money if Eric earned those honors, if he
can just bring himself to name the schools involved.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:05:36
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The_Professor wrote:
> The Hammer wrote:
> >
> > I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms. Waiting for one
> > missing peace of docmentation and then will prove you all wrong.
>
> Why bother? The reality is that they are not sure enough of themselves
> to put up the $5K. They put up the $5K, you put up your $5K and then
> you let someone order the transcripts.
>
> The fact that they won't put up the $5K means they beleive you,
> regardless of the middle school style spin.
good point Professor
The spin is amazing. I can furnish transcripts, showing quite clearly
three distinct degrees with my high at the top of t heclass status,
and they will not accept scans. They will not accept guys like BIll-0
or Annika viewing the transcripts. They express these paranoic
notions of doctoring and forgery. As if someone like Bill-o, a st
guy and highly educated himself (PHd if I am not mistaken) , could not
detector be suspicious of a forgery in a minute.
The cronies with all this spin not only make themselves look stupid and
paranoid, but they insult perfectly decent people here, who have the
sense to know the real thing or a potential forgery when they see it.
The proof of all this is in the works. how embarassing it will be for
all, when I can prove without any degree of equivocation three discrete
degrees, all at the top of my classes. And not mail order degrees, as
BK has said repeatedly. Keep tuned to this station, it is in the works
as i have said.
you guys make it all so fun. Thanks for the entertainment. A golf
newsgroup.........right!!!
The Hammer
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 23:13:25
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote:
<snip >
Why have you turned down free money, Eric?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 13:41:12
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
>
> I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms. Waiting for one
> missing peace of docmentation and then will prove you all wrong.
Why bother? The reality is that they are not sure enough of themselves
to put up the $5K. They put up the $5K, you put up your $5K and then
you let someone order the transcripts.
The fact that they won't put up the $5K means they beleive you,
regardless of the middle school style spin.
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 13:19:08
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Big_Fan wrote:
> MnMikew wrote:
> > "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1158256308.242289.154660@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms.
> >
> > Yawn.
> > > Waiting for one> missing peace of docmentation and then will prove you all
> > > > wrong.
> >
> > That would be piece there professor.
> >
> > > Since all have failed to ante up, I will do this on my shcedule and on
> > > my terms. I am in no hurry to prove anything, because I certainly am
> > > not in a rush to prove anything to the likes of you, but it will
> > > happen.
> > >
> > Double yawn.
> >
> > > Same stupid logic, once again showing that a degree in Sociology is worth
> > > > about as much as a degree in Butt Wiping Technology.
> >
> > Lemmie guess, you have that degree too?
> >
> > >
> > > Stay tuned, oh belching and slobbering one. In the mean time, find
> > > something else to obsess about. You do wonders to my ego with all the
> > > attention I am getting here. Do you have a life?
> >
> > The irony.
>
> Irony? Considering this previous post, your post is loaded with it as
> well, considering the tone and the typos. :-)
>
> From: MnMikew - view profile
> Date: Thurs, Sep 14 2006 11:02 am
>
> Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
Mike the Asswipe can't ignore. He gets wood sucking up to the cronies.
Little does he know that even the cronies think he is an asswipe.
The guy ain't worth pissing on.
The Hammer
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:07:48
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158265148.442198.102920@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Big_Fan wrote:
>> MnMikew wrote:
>> > "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1158256308.242289.154660@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> > >
>> > > I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms.
>> >
>> > Yawn.
>> > > Waiting for one> missing peace of docmentation and then will prove
>> > > you all
>> > > > wrong.
>> >
>> > That would be piece there professor.
>> >
>> > > Since all have failed to ante up, I will do this on my shcedule and
>> > > on
>> > > my terms. I am in no hurry to prove anything, because I certainly am
>> > > not in a rush to prove anything to the likes of you, but it will
>> > > happen.
>> > >
>> > Double yawn.
>> >
>> > > Same stupid logic, once again showing that a degree in Sociology is
>> > > worth
>> > > > about as much as a degree in Butt Wiping Technology.
>> >
>> > Lemmie guess, you have that degree too?
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Stay tuned, oh belching and slobbering one. In the mean time, find
>> > > something else to obsess about. You do wonders to my ego with all
>> > > the
>> > > attention I am getting here. Do you have a life?
>> >
>> > The irony.
>>
>> Irony? Considering this previous post, your post is loaded with it as
>> well, considering the tone and the typos. :-)
>>
>> From: MnMikew - view profile
>> Date: Thurs, Sep 14 2006 11:02 am
>>
>> Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
>
> Mike the Asswipe can't ignore. He gets wood sucking up to the cronies.
> Little does he know that even the cronies think he is an asswipe.
>
> The guy ain't worth pissing on.
>
> The Hammer
>
Unlike you I dont give a flying fuck what anyone here thinks of me. I'm glad
I'm not worth pissing on. You are though, ask anyone here.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 20:37:02
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote:
: Mike the Asswipe can't ignore. He gets wood sucking up to the cronies.
: Little does he know that even the cronies think he is an asswipe.
:
: The guy ain't worth pissing on.
$((CRONIES++))
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 13:07:22
From: Big_Fan
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158256308.242289.154660@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms.
>
> Yawn.
> > Waiting for one> missing peace of docmentation and then will prove you all
> > > wrong.
>
> That would be piece there professor.
>
> > Since all have failed to ante up, I will do this on my shcedule and on
> > my terms. I am in no hurry to prove anything, because I certainly am
> > not in a rush to prove anything to the likes of you, but it will
> > happen.
> >
> Double yawn.
>
> > Same stupid logic, once again showing that a degree in Sociology is worth
> > > about as much as a degree in Butt Wiping Technology.
>
> Lemmie guess, you have that degree too?
>
> >
> > Stay tuned, oh belching and slobbering one. In the mean time, find
> > something else to obsess about. You do wonders to my ego with all the
> > attention I am getting here. Do you have a life?
>
> The irony.
Irony? Considering this previous post, your post is loaded with it as
well, considering the tone and the typos. :-)
From: MnMikew - view profile
Date: Thurs, Sep 14 2006 11:02 am
Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
|
| | |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 21:20:33
From: Roger Pattee
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 14 Sep 2006 13:07:22 -0700, "Big_Fan" <bigpufan@aol.com > typed:
(snipped)
>
>Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
------------
It's RSG, they can't.
You see, RSG is where working with computers and other boring mundane
jobs, has become an outlet from life to many. RSG has become a crutch
vehicle for social dysfunction.
Some here play golf and frequent this newsgroup for that past
time/hobby/sport. But you don't see them involved in the usual light
that RSG has become. Oh, some get involved once in a while as a
"break", but you usually don't see them as involved in these daily
antics like you do some.
I admire the 'foreign' visitors/posters. They have better social
interaction then the usual inhabitants.
Most who 'live' here (the prolific posters), have social dysfunction.
It's all spelled out in their postings. If they only knew how childish
they look to the world, they would 'act' better, but they don't. Many
think this is a private posting area or they forget that it isn't.
You see, this is their only way of being able to disrespect someone
without suffering the consequences which come from such displayed
actions.
If you will, this is their computer version of 'Lord of the Flies'.
RSG is their Island..the BEAST they fight against..is life, as normal
people know it.
Those involved in the daily, continued, spats aren't here for golf
content, they are here because this has become a society for them that
has no rules, except what they make up for their "sides".
Obviously "their way" (the usual RSG antics) is considerably much
safer for them to vent their personal and perceived vendettas, pent up
frustration, act out their social dysfunction.
Ask yourself this..would normal people continue such childish actions
on and on?
RSG is not to be read for golf or golf content. It is a place to read
about social dysfunction.
RSG has lost it's golf theme long ago.
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 01:39:11
From: The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Roger Pattee" <motordawg1@comcast.net > wrote in message
news:ed4pg2551ohlvq3npqr33bg39it9gt5gab@4ax.com...
> On 14 Sep 2006 13:07:22 -0700, "Big_Fan" <bigpufan@aol.com> typed:
>
> (snipped)
>
>>
>>Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
> ------------
> It's RSG, they can't.
Yeah, Roger and you cannot keep from getting into these threads and
criticizing those that are fighting. How many times have you jimped into
these threads with an admonition to "get a life!"? It is RSG and it was
before you got here and will be for some time to come.
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Sep 2006 19:58:57
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Roger Pattee wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2006 13:07:22 -0700, "Big_Fan" <bigpufan@aol.com> typed:
>
> (snipped)
>
>> Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
> ------------
> It's RSG, they can't.
agreed, sort of
>
> You see, RSG is where working with computers and other boring mundane
> jobs, has become an outlet from life to many. RSG has become a crutch
> vehicle for social dysfunction.
agreed, sort of
>
> Some here play golf and frequent this newsgroup for that past
> time/hobby/sport. But you don't see them involved in the usual light
> that RSG has become. Oh, some get involved once in a while as a
> "break", but you usually don't see them as involved in these daily
> antics like you do some.
that's how I started. Taking a break from work which is in front of a
computer. So what?
>
> I admire the 'foreign' visitors/posters. They have better social
> interaction then the usual inhabitants.
wouldn't know
>
> Most who 'live' here (the prolific posters), have social dysfunction.
> It's all spelled out in their postings. If they only knew how childish
> they look to the world, they would 'act' better, but they don't. Many
> think this is a private posting area or they forget that it isn't.
what have you got against Howard Brazee?
>
> You see, this is their only way of being able to disrespect someone
> without suffering the consequences which come from such displayed
> actions.
ain't UseNet great!
>
> If you will, this is their computer version of 'Lord of the Flies'.
I guess so
>
> RSG is their Island..the BEAST they fight against..is life, as normal
> people know it.
come on Roger, get real...
>
> Those involved in the daily, continued, spats aren't here for golf
> content, they are here because this has become a society for them that
> has no rules, except what they make up for their "sides".
I love golf and play most every day, but also get in "spats" here.
Doesn't make me weird.
>
> Obviously "their way" (the usual RSG antics) is considerably much
> safer for them to vent their personal and perceived vendettas, pent up
> frustration, act out their social dysfunction.
OK, so WTF are YOU doing here typing this BS?
>
> Ask yourself this..would normal people continue such childish actions
> on and on?
yep, same as you
>
> RSG is not to be read for golf or golf content. It is a place to read
> about social dysfunction.
there's lot so golf related content here, you just need to sift to find it.
>
> RSG has lost it's golf theme long ago.
wrong, for most. When was the last time you posted something golf
related? For me it was about 2 hours ago.
--
Dave
You are meant to play the ball as it lies, a fact that may help to touch
on your own objective approach to life. ~Grantland Rice
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:51:48
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> long&left wrote:
> > Mike Dalecki wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> >>
> >> Furthermore, let's get someone of impeccable credentials to check on
> >> the veracity of his claims? Where's the harm?
> >>
> >> Where, indeed?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Mike, just out of curiousity, because at this point that's all I care
> > about this situation, can one claim to have graduated summa cum laude by
> > only the fact that they were in the top certain percentage of their
> > class, say the top 10%, even though the institution that they are
> > graduating from does not officially bestow the honor of SCL? My take on
> > SCL, and I'm certainly no expert, is that there are institutions,
> > usually those in the higher learning category, that bestow this honor as
> > a matter of course, but say for instance if you graduated with an
> > Associate degree from East BumF**k Jr College they would not bestow such
> > an honor. Would it be normal for the person that graduated with said
> > Associate degree in the top 10% of their class to consider themselves to
> > have graduated CSL? And, even more importantly, would anyone else have
> > to consider them to have graduated CSL?
> > Dave
>
> It varies by institution. And as far as getting onesself named "summa
> cum laude" simply because of being in the top x percent of a class,
> well, I've never heard of that.
>
> Generally these will be honors that are bestowed by the institution, not
> honors that are simply claimed by an individual without confirmation.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
> RSG-Wisconsin 2006: June 23-25 Info: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/
> RSG-Wisconsin 2006 Pics: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/pics/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay tuned moron!
I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms. Waiting for one
missing peace of docmentation and then will prove you all wrong.
Since all have failed to ante up, I will do this on my shcedule and on
my terms. I am in no hurry to prove anything, because I certainly am
not in a rush to prove anything to the likes of you, but it will
happen.
And your suggestion that I will doctor a certificate or transcript
shows absolute paranoia. That I would even take the time to do that is
hilarious. You are not worth spitting on the pavement for, let alone
taking a ride to a Kinkos as you suggest and doing some"doctoring".
How you would you like it if I falsely suggested that the clubheads
and shafts you use for the busines you SPAM here for are copies and/or
counterfeits. Could you prove 100% they are not. Same stupid logic,
once again showing that a degree in Sociology is worth about as much
as a degree in Butt Wiping Technology.
Stay tuned, oh belching and slobbering one. In the mean time, find
something else to obsess about. You do wonders to my ego with all the
attention I am getting here. Do you have a life?
l
The Hammer
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 15:00:17
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158256308.242289.154660@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms.
Yawn.
> Waiting for one> missing peace of docmentation and then will prove you all
> > wrong.
That would be piece there professor.
> Since all have failed to ante up, I will do this on my shcedule and on
> my terms. I am in no hurry to prove anything, because I certainly am
> not in a rush to prove anything to the likes of you, but it will
> happen.
>
Double yawn.
> Same stupid logic, once again showing that a degree in Sociology is worth
> > about as much as a degree in Butt Wiping Technology.
Lemmie guess, you have that degree too?
>
> Stay tuned, oh belching and slobbering one. In the mean time, find
> something else to obsess about. You do wonders to my ego with all the
> attention I am getting here. Do you have a life?
The irony.
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 07:53:55
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> Dene wrote:
>
> > Mike Dalecki wrote:
> >
> >
> >>How about this as a theory instead? That his history here makes his
> >>level of trust nearly zero (if not zero), and without an ironclad way of
> >>verifying what he says is true, one would be a fool to accept some
> >>pieces of paper he might even now be having ginned up at the local Kinkos.
> >
> >
> > So Bill-O, or any 3rd party, is too stupid to tell the difference?
>
> Can he? You don't know that. I don't know if I could tell--in fact, I
> suspect I could gin up a pretty neat-looking phony diploma if I had a
> mind to. Criminy, there are diploma mills everywhere--all you need do
> is check your email for spam--and anyone with a bit of skill in
> Photoshop or similar, along with some fancy paper, can make up a diploma.
> Or didn't you know that?
Sure I thought of it. And while Eric's at it, he could make us up a
bunch of $1000 bills.
Got anymore paranoid delusions?
> >>And as for the arguments that no school will release info on a student's
> >>records, that's a laugh. How do you think employers verify educational
> >>credentials?
> >
> >
> > They can only do it with authorization, Swifty. Obvious you have
> > little experience in this regard, given the Ivory Tower world you live
> > in.
>
> Of COURSE they only do it with authorization. Didn't I make that clear
> before? That's why it's so simple--all Eric needs do is provide that
> authorization.
Read what you wrote. You made it sound as though an employer can
verify, just with a phone call. You mentioned verification in a later
paragragh but not in context to verifying a resume.
> I looked back, and I guess i did make it clear. Here's the exact quote,
> in fact: "all Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that
> information. Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand
> academia."
>
> So now I have to wonder--are you just sitting back taking potshots at
> people without even giving so much as a single thought to what you write
> before you press the send button?
Hmmm.....I had the same thought about you when you jumped in with your
theory.
> > Why do you think schools, when they issue transcripts to
> >
> >>students, print "Issued to student" on the transcript so that anyone who
> >>looks at it knows it may or may not have been altered after such issuance?
> >>
> >>No, there's only one way to verify, and that's to have the school at
> >>which the credentials were earned verify. That's easy enough to do--all
> >>Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that information.
> >>Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand academia.
> >
> >
> > Bingo! Which is precisely why an employer cannot verify unless he/she
> > has authorization. For laughs, I tried it and was told I needed to fax
> > them written verification. Didn't surprise me a bit. Ever heard of
> > privacy laws?
>
> Second time: All Eric need do is authorize. I said it, and it was
> written in English. Why did you not get it?
>
> He's the one making a big deal about it, so there should be no reason
> why he wouldn't be more than happy to do so.
>
> Right? Right.
Wrong...wrong. Why should he. It's as absurb as me doubting that you
have a doctorate degree.
> > Makes me wonder why he should bother without a price.
>
> He brought it up, didn't he? A price? Are you kidding?
He's not...the kidders are those who are trying to spin it or chump out
on a bet.
> > He knows the
> > truth. Why should he go through the process of verfication for the
> > likes of you. If I was Eric, I'd be making the exact same choices he
> > has. Ben nailed the situation exactly. You're just too dishonest to
> > admit it.
>
> Dishonest? How do you get that?
>
> Never mind. Given your penchant for hyperbole, for innuendo, for
> smear, your answer wouldn't mean anything.
Don't like the taste of your own Rx, Doc.
> > Yep....I said it......dishonest.
>
> Wow. Greggy says dishonest. That must make it true, then. Except for
> one small problem: There was no dishonesty.
Stating that Eric is lying about his degrees is lie. Your spin is even
more dishonest.
> Criminy, you're as bad as the administration in Washington: If you
> shout it loud enough, and often enough, that makes it true.
>
> Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!
>
> Saddam is in league with Al Qaeda!
>
> Dishonest!
>
> See the pattern?
>
> I knew you could!
Yeah....and add that Eric is a liar just because you say so. See the
pattern.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 15:13:37
From: Bear
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 14 Sep 2006 07:53:55 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>
>Mike Dalecki wrote:
>> Dene wrote:
>>
>> > Mike Dalecki wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>How about this as a theory instead? That his history here makes his
>> >>level of trust nearly zero (if not zero), and without an ironclad way of
>> >>verifying what he says is true, one would be a fool to accept some
>> >>pieces of paper he might even now be having ginned up at the local Kinkos.
>> >
>> >
>> > So Bill-O, or any 3rd party, is too stupid to tell the difference?
>>
>> Can he? You don't know that. I don't know if I could tell--in fact, I
>> suspect I could gin up a pretty neat-looking phony diploma if I had a
>> mind to. Criminy, there are diploma mills everywhere--all you need do
>> is check your email for spam--and anyone with a bit of skill in
>> Photoshop or similar, along with some fancy paper, can make up a diploma.
>
>> Or didn't you know that?
>
>Sure I thought of it. And while Eric's at it, he could make us up a
>bunch of $1000 bills.
>Got anymore paranoid delusions?
No but I'm pretty sure Eric does....
You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 05:33:33
From: Tex
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> Criminy, you're as bad as the administration in Washington: If you
> shout it loud enough, and often enough, that makes it true.
>
> Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!
>
> Saddam is in league with Al Qaeda!
>
> Dishonest!
>
> See the pattern?
To offer the fair and balanced perspective....
"Bush Caused Katrina!"
OH? what about this year? I guess Bush gets credit for a light
hurricane season now??
(p.s. I know, I know, he did this year to help the GOP in the election
year)
<g >
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:06:35
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1158237213.416632.261530@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mike Dalecki wrote:
>> Criminy, you're as bad as the administration in Washington: If you
>> shout it loud enough, and often enough, that makes it true.
>>
>> Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!
>>
>> Saddam is in league with Al Qaeda!
>>
>> Dishonest!
>>
>> See the pattern?
>
> To offer the fair and balanced perspective....
> "Bush Caused Katrina!"
>
> OH? what about this year? I guess Bush gets credit for a light
> hurricane season now??
> (p.s. I know, I know, he did this year to help the GOP in the election
> year)
>
> <g>
>
Funny how the leftys do most of the shouting. "Bush was in on 911". And of
course they believe it.
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 02:19:43
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:06:35 -0500, MnMikew wrote:
> "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158237213.416632.261530@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> To offer the fair and balanced perspective.... "Bush Caused Katrina!"
Of course Bush didn't cause Katrina. But his handling of the aftermath has
been a total failure. He shows up for photo ops, stutters his way through
some speech someone else wrote, and disappears. Meanwhile New Orleans is
still a wasteland. This whole debacle is a black eye for the Bush
presidency, whether you choose to admit or not.
> Funny how the leftys do most of the shouting. "Bush was in on 911". And
> of course they believe it.
I don't. That would be giving Bush and his handlers too much credit.
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 05:28:52
From: Tex
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Tex wrote:
> > Dene wrote:
> > > Tex wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
> > > > college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
> > >
> > > The only difference is the amount of money.
> >
> > True. Your wife sells it for 2 boats and a house, and a crack whore
> > sells it for $5. Both are equal, they just charge a different amount.
> >
>
> Further proof that you are a pig.
No Greggie, just firing back after you decided to throw down. If you
don't like mud, don't throw it.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 22:01:16
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> :
> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
> :
> :> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
> :> : bet.
> :>
> :> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
> :> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
> :> away. Period.
> :
> : Your third mis-read in one week.
>
> No, I was right each time. The money was put up; Eric made additional
> demands. Period.
>
> Why did Eric choose to walk away from easy money?
I beginning to think you're just deliberately wasting my time, but
giving you the benefit of the doubt just one more time, whose money did
Eric walk away from? Copy or link me to the post.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 18:08:34
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > :
: > : Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > :
: > :> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
: > :> : bet.
: > :>
: > :> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
: > :> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
: > :> away. Period.
: > :
: > : Your third mis-read in one week.
: >
: > No, I was right each time. The money was put up; Eric made additional
: > demands. Period.
: >
: > Why did Eric choose to walk away from easy money?
:
: I beginning to think you're just deliberately wasting my time, but
: giving you the benefit of the doubt just one more time, whose money did
: Eric walk away from?
bigoldcat. Google it up.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 21:40:02
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Eric. You at least *might* not know the result in advance. Eric
> does and refuses to play. Which ought to be sending you some
> crystal clear signals...
All I have is Eric's word and written authorization to verify the
nursing degree, which I have yet to act upon. (Requires my time/effort
for zero gain).
I'm tired of your silly spin, Chris, so please (for once) read
carefully! Let's use the number 460 in honor of your pet go-fer. I'll
bet you $4.60, $46.00, $460.00, or $4600....take your pick, that if
someone calls Eric's 5k bet, then he will verify his degrees as SCL, OR
pay the bet if he's lying.
Verification is easy. 3rd party review of documents plus written
authorization to the colleges to release/verify.
The bet I wouldn't make is that the loser, especially your hero Bobby
Knight, would actually pay.
Oh....I'm still waiting for you to cite the post where Eric actually
backs away from money on the table. Apparently your reading skills are
superior to mine and Ben's. If you can cite it, I will quickly admit
my mistake.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 18:11:40
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
:
: > Eric. You at least *might* not know the result in advance. Eric
: > does and refuses to play. Which ought to be sending you some
: > crystal clear signals...
:
: All I have is Eric's word and written authorization to verify the
: nursing degree, which I have yet to act upon. (Requires my time/effort
: for zero gain).
Send it to me, I'll do it. Loser buys the other a beverage in the
event we ever actually meet.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 21:29:08
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Ben. wrote:
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
> > : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
> > : bet. And the silence of the challengers, notably bigoldcat, BK and
> > : Dave/long&left is deafening.
> >
> > Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
> > considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
> > away. Period.
>
> Don't be silly, Chris. You can spin it whichever way you want, but
> Eric has offered to personally take his goods to Bill-O who apparently
> enjoys blanket trust in this group. The response? Crickets. He
> offered to put his share of the bet in escrow w/ Bret. Crickets. At
> one point you even offered to assist in some manner. Crickets. Greg
> has offered the same w/ Dave/long&left AND bigoldcat. LOUD crickets.
>
> FTR, I agree with his accusers - he writes like a stoned 9th grade goth
> - very disorganized, misspellings, completely manic. And it is
> questionable why he won't just say where the hell he graduated
> from...downright stupid. I wouldn't mind divulging that info about
> myself if challenged. Tex had a good point - who stashes their
> degree(s) in boxes in a bunch of trash in the basement?
>
> HOWEVER, he has offered to reveal his creds to a seemingly
> disinterested third party. Why no takers? 'Cause they're afraid he
> just might have graduated SCL from an accredited program - it is
> possible. Not entirely likely, but the possibility exists, and not one
> of the accsuers has the stones to take the bet. Not one. Two reasons
> why:
>
> - Mouths are bigger than their wallets
> - They deep down believe he may have what he says he has
>
> Whatebber. Eric, if you happen to be reading this - why don't you just
> say what school(s) they were? Where's the harm?
Post of the year! A fine GDI moment.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 21:26:32
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> How about this as a theory instead? That his history here makes his
> level of trust nearly zero (if not zero), and without an ironclad way of
> verifying what he says is true, one would be a fool to accept some
> pieces of paper he might even now be having ginned up at the local Kinkos.
So Bill-O, or any 3rd party, is too stupid to tell the difference?
> And as for the arguments that no school will release info on a student's
> records, that's a laugh. How do you think employers verify educational
> credentials?
They can only do it with authorization, Swifty. Obvious you have
little experience in this regard, given the Ivory Tower world you live
in.
Why do you think schools, when they issue transcripts to
> students, print "Issued to student" on the transcript so that anyone who
> looks at it knows it may or may not have been altered after such issuance?
>
> No, there's only one way to verify, and that's to have the school at
> which the credentials were earned verify. That's easy enough to do--all
> Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that information.
> Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand academia.
Bingo! Which is precisely why an employer cannot verify unless he/she
has authorization. For laughs, I tried it and was told I needed to fax
them written verification. Didn't surprise me a bit. Ever heard of
privacy laws?
> So there's a much better theory about how and why this is all playing
> out the way it is. As for whether I think he has three degrees, all
> summa cum laude, well, I don't. And if he wants to prove me wrong, he
> can do so quite easily--simply tell us the schools, the dates, and so
> on, and have me call them and verify.
You need written authorization.
> Very simple. Very easy. No "scanning," no 3rd party, no nothing.
>
> Makes you wonder why this very easy thing cannot be done, doesn't it?
Makes me wonder why he should bother without a price. He knows the
truth. Why should he go through the process of verfication for the
likes of you. If I was Eric, I'd be making the exact same choices he
has. Ben nailed the situation exactly. You're just too dishonest to
admit it.
Yep....I said it......dishonest.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:02:44
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1158207992.116256.186030@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mike Dalecki wrote:
>
>> How about this as a theory instead? That his history here makes his
>> level of trust nearly zero (if not zero), and without an ironclad way of
>> verifying what he says is true, one would be a fool to accept some
>> pieces of paper he might even now be having ginned up at the local
>> Kinkos.
>
> So Bill-O, or any 3rd party, is too stupid to tell the difference?
>
>> And as for the arguments that no school will release info on a student's
>> records, that's a laugh. How do you think employers verify educational
>> credentials?
>
> They can only do it with authorization, Swifty. Obvious you have
> little experience in this regard, given the Ivory Tower world you live
> in.
>
> Why do you think schools, when they issue transcripts to
>> students, print "Issued to student" on the transcript so that anyone who
>> looks at it knows it may or may not have been altered after such
>> issuance?
>>
>> No, there's only one way to verify, and that's to have the school at
>> which the credentials were earned verify. That's easy enough to do--all
>> Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that information.
>> Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand academia.
>
> Bingo! Which is precisely why an employer cannot verify unless he/she
> has authorization. For laughs, I tried it and was told I needed to fax
> them written verification. Didn't surprise me a bit. Ever heard of
> privacy laws?
>
>> So there's a much better theory about how and why this is all playing
>> out the way it is. As for whether I think he has three degrees, all
>> summa cum laude, well, I don't. And if he wants to prove me wrong, he
>> can do so quite easily--simply tell us the schools, the dates, and so
>> on, and have me call them and verify.
>
> You need written authorization.
>
>> Very simple. Very easy. No "scanning," no 3rd party, no nothing.
>>
>> Makes you wonder why this very easy thing cannot be done, doesn't it?
>
> Makes me wonder why he should bother without a price. He knows the
> truth. Why should he go through the process of verfication for the
> likes of you. If I was Eric, I'd be making the exact same choices he
> has. Ben nailed the situation exactly. You're just too dishonest to
> admit it.
>
> Yep....I said it......dishonest.
>
Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 00:52:25
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Mike Dalecki wrote:
>
>
>>How about this as a theory instead? That his history here makes his
>>level of trust nearly zero (if not zero), and without an ironclad way of
>>verifying what he says is true, one would be a fool to accept some
>>pieces of paper he might even now be having ginned up at the local Kinkos.
>
>
> So Bill-O, or any 3rd party, is too stupid to tell the difference?
Can he? You don't know that. I don't know if I could tell--in fact, I
suspect I could gin up a pretty neat-looking phony diploma if I had a
mind to. Criminy, there are diploma mills everywhere--all you need do
is check your email for spam--and anyone with a bit of skill in
Photoshop or similar, along with some fancy paper, can make up a diploma.
Or didn't you know that?
>
>
>>And as for the arguments that no school will release info on a student's
>>records, that's a laugh. How do you think employers verify educational
>>credentials?
>
>
> They can only do it with authorization, Swifty. Obvious you have
> little experience in this regard, given the Ivory Tower world you live
> in.
Of COURSE they only do it with authorization. Didn't I make that clear
before? That's why it's so simple--all Eric needs do is provide that
authorization.
I looked back, and I guess i did make it clear. Here's the exact quote,
in fact: "all Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that
information. Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand
academia."
So now I have to wonder--are you just sitting back taking potshots at
people without even giving so much as a single thought to what you write
before you press the send button?
>
> Why do you think schools, when they issue transcripts to
>
>>students, print "Issued to student" on the transcript so that anyone who
>>looks at it knows it may or may not have been altered after such issuance?
>>
>>No, there's only one way to verify, and that's to have the school at
>>which the credentials were earned verify. That's easy enough to do--all
>>Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that information.
>>Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand academia.
>
>
> Bingo! Which is precisely why an employer cannot verify unless he/she
> has authorization. For laughs, I tried it and was told I needed to fax
> them written verification. Didn't surprise me a bit. Ever heard of
> privacy laws?
Second time: All Eric need do is authorize. I said it, and it was
written in English. Why did you not get it?
He's the one making a big deal about it, so there should be no reason
why he wouldn't be more than happy to do so.
Right? Right.
>>So there's a much better theory about how and why this is all playing
>>out the way it is. As for whether I think he has three degrees, all
>>summa cum laude, well, I don't. And if he wants to prove me wrong, he
>>can do so quite easily--simply tell us the schools, the dates, and so
>>on, and have me call them and verify.
>
>
> You need written authorization.
Really?
>>Very simple. Very easy. No "scanning," no 3rd party, no nothing.
>>
>>Makes you wonder why this very easy thing cannot be done, doesn't it?
>
>
> Makes me wonder why he should bother without a price.
He brought it up, didn't he? A price? Are you kidding?
> He knows the
> truth. Why should he go through the process of verfication for the
> likes of you. If I was Eric, I'd be making the exact same choices he
> has. Ben nailed the situation exactly. You're just too dishonest to
> admit it.
Dishonest? How do you get that?
Never mind. Given your penchant for hyperbole, for innuendo, for
smear, your answer wouldn't mean anything.
> Yep....I said it......dishonest.
Wow. Greggy says dishonest. That must make it true, then. Except for
one small problem: There was no dishonesty.
Criminy, you're as bad as the administration in Washington: If you
shout it loud enough, and often enough, that makes it true.
Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!
Saddam is in league with Al Qaeda!
Dishonest!
See the pattern?
I knew you could!
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2006: June 23-25 Info: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/
RSG-Wisconsin 2006 Pics: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/pics/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 21:15:20
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> : Tex wrote:
> :
> :>
> :> Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
> :> college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
> :
> : The only difference is the amount of money.
>
> That, and the golf match has two bettors, while the Eric ruse
> has only one.
Uh....re-read. Had Eric not been able to produce, then Bobby or
kitty-boy would have received 5k.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 18:07:51
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > : Tex wrote:
: > :
: > :>
: > :> Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
: > :> college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
: > :
: > : The only difference is the amount of money.
: >
: > That, and the golf match has two bettors, while the Eric ruse
: > has only one.
:
: Uh....re-read. Had Eric not been able to produce, then Bobby or
: kitty-boy would have received 5k.
It's a known outcome for Eric. That's not a bet.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 09:33:58
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1158207319.985863.23790@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>> : Tex wrote:
>> :
>> :>
>> :> Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
>> :> college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
>> :
>> : The only difference is the amount of money.
>>
>> That, and the golf match has two bettors, while the Eric ruse
>> has only one.
>
> Uh....re-read. Had Eric not been able to produce, then Bobby or
> kitty-boy would have received 5k.
>
> -Greg
>
Highly unlikely.
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 21:13:59
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Tex wrote:
> Dene wrote:
> > Tex wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
> > > college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
> >
> > The only difference is the amount of money.
>
> True. Your wife sells it for 2 boats and a house, and a crack whore
> sells it for $5. Both are equal, they just charge a different amount.
>
Further proof that you are a pig.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 20:35:14
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
> : bet. And the silence of the challengers, notably bigoldcat, BK and
> : Dave/long&left is deafening.
>
> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
> away. Period.
Don't be silly, Chris. You can spin it whichever way you want, but
Eric has offered to personally take his goods to Bill-O who apparently
enjoys blanket trust in this group. The response? Crickets. He
offered to put his share of the bet in escrow w/ Bret. Crickets. At
one point you even offered to assist in some manner. Crickets. Greg
has offered the same w/ Dave/long&left AND bigoldcat. LOUD crickets.
FTR, I agree with his accusers - he writes like a stoned 9th grade goth
- very disorganized, misspellings, completely manic. And it is
questionable why he won't just say where the hell he graduated
from...downright stupid. I wouldn't mind divulging that info about
myself if challenged. Tex had a good point - who stashes their
degree(s) in boxes in a bunch of trash in the basement?
HOWEVER, he has offered to reveal his creds to a seemingly
disinterested third party. Why no takers? 'Cause they're afraid he
just might have graduated SCL from an accredited program - it is
possible. Not entirely likely, but the possibility exists, and not one
of the accsuers has the stones to take the bet. Not one. Two reasons
why:
- Mouths are bigger than their wallets
- They deep down believe he may have what he says he has
Whatebber. Eric, if you happen to be reading this - why don't you just
say what school(s) they were? Where's the harm?
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 07:46:43
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 13 Sep 2006 20:35:14 -0700, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>
>Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
>> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
>> : bet. And the silence of the challengers, notably bigoldcat, BK and
>> : Dave/long&left is deafening.
>>
>> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
>> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
>> away. Period.
>
>Don't be silly, Chris. You can spin it whichever way you want, but
>Eric has offered to personally take his goods to Bill-O who apparently
>enjoys blanket trust in this group. The response? Crickets. He
>offered to put his share of the bet in escrow w/ Bret. Crickets. At
>one point you even offered to assist in some manner. Crickets. Greg
>has offered the same w/ Dave/long&left AND bigoldcat. LOUD crickets.
>
>FTR, I agree with his accusers - he writes like a stoned 9th grade goth
>- very disorganized, misspellings, completely manic. And it is
>questionable why he won't just say where the hell he graduated
>from...downright stupid. I wouldn't mind divulging that info about
>myself if challenged. Tex had a good point - who stashes their
>degree(s) in boxes in a bunch of trash in the basement?
>
>HOWEVER, he has offered to reveal his creds to a seemingly
>disinterested third party. Why no takers? 'Cause they're afraid he
>just might have graduated SCL from an accredited program - it is
>possible. Not entirely likely, but the possibility exists, and not one
>of the accsuers has the stones to take the bet. Not one. Two reasons
>why:
>
>- Mouths are bigger than their wallets
>- They deep down believe he may have what he says he has
>
>Whatebber. Eric, if you happen to be reading this - why don't you just
>say what school(s) they were? Where's the harm?
You've failed to see that there have been so many zigs and zags that
everything has been obfuscated. I don't believe that Eric has three,
separate, degrees...all with honors. I said so in December, and he
backed down.
If I made what you considered an outlandish claim, and you called me
on it...who should have to be convinced? Well, if I cared what you
thought, it would be you, not a third party.
There was never any intention for me to take a bet, so how could I
back down? I still say that he doesn't have three separate degrees,
all Magna Cum Laude.
If he doesn't care if I call him a liar...which I do, and not only
for this caper...then screw him. He's been proven to reverse his
statements more than once here.
If and when, he divulges his educational background the way he
suggests, it still will not be perfectly clear. There will be a
catch, or arguable facet. I expect that, and then there would be
another wave of bullshit.
The bottom line is that if he wants to prove that he didn't lie in his
first statement (three degrees, all summa cum laude) prove it.
Otherwise STFU.
Greg's involvement is just a continuation of his jumping in the middle
of a situation so someone would pay attention to him. Imagine having
to hang your face in Eric's crotch for that???
What schools, what years? If they won't release the info, then why
not say?
I'm done with it, and I surmise that long&left and bigoldcat are st
enough to see it the same way.
___,
\o
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 08:03:22
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
(snip)
>
> I'm done with it, and I surmise that long&left and bigoldcat are st
> enough to see it the same way.
> ___,
> \o
>
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 04:03:19
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Ben. <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
:
: > : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
: > : bet. And the silence of the challengers, notably bigoldcat, BK and
: > : Dave/long&left is deafening.
: >
: > Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
: > considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
: > away. Period.
:
: Don't be silly, Chris. You can spin it whichever way you want,
No spin, there was $5k on the table, Eric added more requirements.
It was only after he started playing move-the-goalposts that the
money said, "Fuck this."
Eric could end this anytime if he wanted to. That he declines is
itself revealing.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 22:55:49
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Ben. wrote:
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
>
>>: CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
>>: bet. And the silence of the challengers, notably bigoldcat, BK and
>>: Dave/long&left is deafening.
>>
>>Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
>>considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
>>away. Period.
>
>
> Don't be silly, Chris. You can spin it whichever way you want, but
> Eric has offered to personally take his goods to Bill-O who apparently
> enjoys blanket trust in this group. The response? Crickets. He
> offered to put his share of the bet in escrow w/ Bret. Crickets. At
> one point you even offered to assist in some manner. Crickets. Greg
> has offered the same w/ Dave/long&left AND bigoldcat. LOUD crickets.
>
> FTR, I agree with his accusers - he writes like a stoned 9th grade goth
> - very disorganized, misspellings, completely manic. And it is
> questionable why he won't just say where the hell he graduated
> from...downright stupid. I wouldn't mind divulging that info about
> myself if challenged. Tex had a good point - who stashes their
> degree(s) in boxes in a bunch of trash in the basement?
>
> HOWEVER, he has offered to reveal his creds to a seemingly
> disinterested third party. Why no takers?
How about this as a theory instead? That his history here makes his
level of trust nearly zero (if not zero), and without an ironclad way of
verifying what he says is true, one would be a fool to accept some
pieces of paper he might even now be having ginned up at the local Kinkos.
And as for the arguments that no school will release info on a student's
records, that's a laugh. How do you think employers verify educational
credentials? Why do you think schools, when they issue transcripts to
students, print "Issued to student" on the transcript so that anyone who
looks at it knows it may or may not have been altered after such issuance?
No, there's only one way to verify, and that's to have the school at
which the credentials were earned verify. That's easy enough to do--all
Eric needs do is authorize the school to release that information.
Anyone who thinks that can't be done doesn't understand academia.
So there's a much better theory about how and why this is all playing
out the way it is. As for whether I think he has three degrees, all
summa cum laude, well, I don't. And if he wants to prove me wrong, he
can do so quite easily--simply tell us the schools, the dates, and so
on, and have me call them and verify.
Very simple. Very easy. No "scanning," no 3rd party, no nothing.
Makes you wonder why this very easy thing cannot be done, doesn't it?
<snip >
> Whatebber. Eric, if you happen to be reading this - why don't you just
> say what school(s) they were? Where's the harm?
Furthermore, let's get someone of impeccable credentials to check on the
veracity of his claims? Where's the harm?
Where, indeed?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2006: June 23-25 Info: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/
RSG-Wisconsin 2006 Pics: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/pics/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 07:56:39
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
(snip)
>
> Furthermore, let's get someone of impeccable credentials to check on the
> veracity of his claims? Where's the harm?
>
> Where, indeed?
>
>
>
>
Mike, just out of curiousity, because at this point that's all I care
about this situation, can one claim to have graduated summa cum laude by
only the fact that they were in the top certain percentage of their
class, say the top 10%, even though the institution that they are
graduating from does not officially bestow the honor of SCL? My take on
SCL, and I'm certainly no expert, is that there are institutions,
usually those in the higher learning category, that bestow this honor as
a matter of course, but say for instance if you graduated with an
Associate degree from East BumF**k Jr College they would not bestow such
an honor. Would it be normal for the person that graduated with said
Associate degree in the top 10% of their class to consider themselves to
have graduated CSL? And, even more importantly, would anyone else have
to consider them to have graduated CSL?
Dave
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 12:09:13
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
long&left wrote:
> Mike Dalecki wrote:
> (snip)
>
>>
>> Furthermore, let's get someone of impeccable credentials to check on
>> the veracity of his claims? Where's the harm?
>>
>> Where, indeed?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Mike, just out of curiousity, because at this point that's all I care
> about this situation, can one claim to have graduated summa cum laude by
> only the fact that they were in the top certain percentage of their
> class, say the top 10%, even though the institution that they are
> graduating from does not officially bestow the honor of SCL? My take on
> SCL, and I'm certainly no expert, is that there are institutions,
> usually those in the higher learning category, that bestow this honor as
> a matter of course, but say for instance if you graduated with an
> Associate degree from East BumF**k Jr College they would not bestow such
> an honor. Would it be normal for the person that graduated with said
> Associate degree in the top 10% of their class to consider themselves to
> have graduated CSL? And, even more importantly, would anyone else have
> to consider them to have graduated CSL?
> Dave
It varies by institution. And as far as getting onesself named "summa
cum laude" simply because of being in the top x percent of a class,
well, I've never heard of that.
Generally these will be honors that are bestowed by the institution, not
honors that are simply claimed by an individual without confirmation.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2006: June 23-25 Info: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/
RSG-Wisconsin 2006 Pics: http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/pics/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | | | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:38:35
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>> Mike Dalecki wrote:
>> (snip)
>>
>>>
>>> Furthermore, let's get someone of impeccable credentials to check on
>>> the veracity of his claims? Where's the harm?
>>>
>>> Where, indeed?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Mike, just out of curiousity, because at this point that's all I care
>> about this situation, can one claim to have graduated summa cum laude
>> by only the fact that they were in the top certain percentage of their
>> class, say the top 10%, even though the institution that they are
>> graduating from does not officially bestow the honor of SCL? My take
>> on SCL, and I'm certainly no expert, is that there are institutions,
>> usually those in the higher learning category, that bestow this honor
>> as a matter of course, but say for instance if you graduated with an
>> Associate degree from East BumF**k Jr College they would not bestow
>> such an honor. Would it be normal for the person that graduated with
>> said Associate degree in the top 10% of their class to consider
>> themselves to have graduated CSL? And, even more importantly, would
>> anyone else have to consider them to have graduated CSL?
>> Dave
>
> It varies by institution. And as far as getting onesself named "summa
> cum laude" simply because of being in the top x percent of a class,
> well, I've never heard of that.
>
> Generally these will be honors that are bestowed by the institution, not
> honors that are simply claimed by an individual without confirmation.
>
kinda what I thought
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 19:53:11
From: Tex
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Tex wrote:
>
> >
> > Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
> > college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
>
> The only difference is the amount of money.
True. Your wife sells it for 2 boats and a house, and a crack whore
sells it for $5. Both are equal, they just charge a different amount.
> One out of three rational paragraphs is pretty good for you. Perhaps
> the brain and liver are slowly recovering.
Perhaps, but considering you are the judge, I'd say it's not a fair
assessment.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 19:49:40
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
> : bet.
>
> Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
> considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
> away. Period.
>
Your third mis-read in one week. Where is the post that you could
possibly substantiate this claim? Better get your go-fer crony to help
on this one.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 03:25:32
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
:
: > : CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
: > : bet.
: >
: > Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
: > considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
: > away. Period.
:
: Your third mis-read in one week.
No, I was right each time. The money was put up; Eric made additional
demands. Period.
Why did Eric choose to walk away from easy money?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 19:47:06
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Tex wrote:
>
> Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
> college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
The only difference is the amount of money.
> For the money so requested, if it was me, I would expect, and balk at
> anything less, nothing but full proof, backed up by said Universities
> giving full confirmation. Meaningless paper with the name Eric
> Strulowitz offers no proof that it is 1) a real degree, 2) belongs to
> said named person.
Agreed. That's exactly what would be provided.
> All the posturing by Eric and his groupies means nothing other than
> they love the tension they think they are creating. Remember, shit
> peddlers deal the stuff and enjoy the smell they bring into the room.
One out of three rational paragraphs is pretty good for you. Perhaps
the brain and liver are slowly recovering.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 03:22:49
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: Tex wrote:
:
: >
: > Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
: > college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
:
: The only difference is the amount of money.
That, and the golf match has two bettors, while the Eric ruse
has only one.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 19:43:35
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> :
> : Chris Bellomy wrote:
> :
> :>
> :> Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
> :> meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
> :> Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
> :
> : You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
> : with a 5k bet.
>
> Yeah, with the longest list of small print provisos ever seen
> for such a simple wager.
Are you talking about Eric or me? I think my provisions were quite
reasonable to not-so-brave Dave. Is it unusual for somebody to hold
the money in a fair bet? Also, shouldn't one know all the specifics of
the bet before it's agreed to. If you disagree, then be specific.
If you're referring to Eric, his only condition was that kitty boy
e-mail him. As for BK, Bob wanted the names of the school in advance.
That would not do him a bit of good. I know the names of the schools
and they will not reveal a thing unless they have authorization,
period. Sure Eric could provide this....but why should he, especially
to an individual who doesn't have the character to ever admit he's
wrong, about anything? Reasoning with BK is a black hole.
> Oh, and btw: if he can back up his claim, and he's fishing to
> make $5000 from it, you can add "fuckin' thief" to his list of
> character qualities. It ain't a bet if the outcome is known in
> advance.
Bob's the one with the big mouth, claiming without any substance, that
Eric was lying. It's as absurd as me announcing he is a pauper, then
demanding that he substantiate it with bank statements.
And since when is winning a legitimate bet thievery?
> : So am I!
>
> Your choice. Does Theresa know?
Nice try.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 03:27:14
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: > :
: > : Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > :
: > :>
: > :> Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
: > :> meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
: > :> Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
: > :
: > : You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
: > : with a 5k bet.
: >
: > Yeah, with the longest list of small print provisos ever seen
: > for such a simple wager.
:
: Are you talking about Eric or me?
Eric. You at least *might* not know the result in advance. Eric
does and refuses to play. Which ought to be sending you some
crystal clear signals...
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 19:16:38
From: Tex
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Bear wrote:
> > On 13 Sep 2006 15:50:35 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Chris Bellomy wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
> > >> meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
> > >> Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
> > >
> > >You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
> > >with a 5k bet.
> > >
> > >So am I!
> >
> > Wow making a bet on usenet for ridiculous money for something trivial.
> > When was the last time a bet like this became reality?!?!
> >
> > Internet tough guys gotta love'em.
>
> FYI, bets have been made and paid in this forum.
>
> Two events come to mind with the winner being Ken Pitts.
Comparison of a golf match bet for $10 versus the supposed claim of
college degrees for $5K is only capable from the mind of Dene.
For the money so requested, if it was me, I would expect, and balk at
anything less, nothing but full proof, backed up by said Universities
giving full confirmation. Meaningless paper with the name Eric
Strulowitz offers no proof that it is 1) a real degree, 2) belongs to
said named person.
All the posturing by Eric and his groupies means nothing other than
they love the tension they think they are creating. Remember, shit
peddlers deal the stuff and enjoy the smell they bring into the room.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 17:35:41
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
> >
> > Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
> > meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
> > Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
>
> You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
> with a 5k bet.
>
> So am I!
>
> -Greg
CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
bet. And the silence of the challengers, notably bigoldcat, BK and
Dave/long&left is deafening.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 02:15:30
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Ben. <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
:
: Dene wrote:
: > Chris Bellomy wrote:
: >
: > >
: > > Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
: > > meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
: > > Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
: >
: > You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
: > with a 5k bet.
: >
: > So am I!
: >
: > -Greg
:
: CB - They do seem to be pretty adament about being able to win this
: bet.
Yeah, that explains the ever-shifting preconditions before Eric
considers it a valid wager. The money was put up and he walked
away. Period.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Sep 2006 15:49:38
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158701420.862747.188510@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> > not everyone out there can have high double digit IQ's...
> >
> You'd be lucky to have high single digit. Don't you have someone elses leg
> you should be humping? Run along lil benny, go play with your Phish friends.
Well written! Ladies and gentleman, three sentences from Mike!!! I am
not 100% positive, but I think that's what we call a breakthrough.
Well done, short bus, keep 'em coming!
Next lesson: "The Paragraph*"
Stay tuned, this is gonna be exciting!
* - for your reference, Mike: http://tinyurl.com/y0qb
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:27:22
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Good Morning Roderick,
Nothing you said or have said is worth replying to.
Nice try.
-Greg
Bear wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2006 22:15:10 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bear wrote:
> >> On 14 Sep 2006 10:33:29 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Bear wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
> >> >> You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
> >> >> why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
> >> >
> >> >Of course, nobody knows (nor do I care) who you are.
> >>
> >> And you know this how?
> >
> >This I do know, Yogi. It's no secret who I am and what I'm about.
>
> This is true. you act like a Turd and when called on it act like a
> even bigger smellier version of one.
>
> >OTOH, you hide behind a name and take potshots. So...I'm suppose to
> >take you seriously.
>
> Let see I use a nickname that I have had since I was twelve and quite
> regularly post my real name. Here I'll give you my name Roderick J. G.
> Gray. I was born in Edinburgh Scotland and currently reside in Comox
> on Vancouver Island. You happy now? Need more info?
>
> >
> >> Yet you make all of us know what kind of asshole you are. Thanks for
> >> sharing.
> >> >
> >> >As for my wonderful life, I'm on my way out the door to play the
> >> >Reserve with some friends. Ever heard of it?
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >
> >The Reserve was the home of the Jeld Wen Classic, a major tournament
> >with the Senior Tour.
>
> Big hairy deal.
> >
> >> The only reserve around here is occupied by some Northern Coast Salish
> >> who have some of the best Native artists anywhere.
> >> http://www.ihosgallery.com/index.html My fav. is Andy Everson but I
> >> don't know if he golfs.
> >>
> >> So do you treat your friends the same way you treat strangers?!?
> >
> >I call it as I see it. Always have, in real life and on the internet.
>
> What a load of shit. If you spoke to people on the street the way you
> communicate here you'd be spitting chicklets regularly. You came back
> to RSG to cause shit because those bad guys hurt your feelings. You
> post zip about golf and just insult anyone that you or Eric thinks
> wronged them. Your Momma would be oh so proud to see what you spew.
>
>
> >> You are going to have to post pics of your "friends" to actually prove
> >> that you have any. I'll bet you a gazillion dollars you have none.
> >
> >I defer to Matt "Ocho" Aamold. He was a guest of mine with this
> >exclusive golfing group called "the Slice of Life." We play most of
> >the local courses around the Portland, SW Washington area. We play a
> >stableford game. I got 20 today.
>
> OOOO I am soooo impressed. A group that has such an imaginative name.
> Any group that will have someone that acts like you will exclusive and
> probably has a high turn over rate.
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 15:45:48
From: Bear
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 15 Sep 2006 08:27:22 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>
>Nothing you said or have said is worth replying to.
>
>Nice try.
>
Whatever dude. You read it and your response was expected.
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:45:25
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Good Morning Roderick,
>
> Nothing you said or have said is worth replying to.
>
> Nice try.
>
> -Greg
>
kinda the way we feel about you I'm guessing
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 16:44:16
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bear wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2006 15:50:35 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Chris Bellomy wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
> >> meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
> >> Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
> >
> >You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
> >with a 5k bet.
> >
> >So am I!
>
> Wow making a bet on usenet for ridiculous money for something trivial.
> When was the last time a bet like this became reality?!?!
>
> Internet tough guys gotta love'em.
FYI, bets have been made and paid in this forum.
Two events come to mind with the winner being Ken Pitts.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 15:50:35
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
> meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
> Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
with a 5k bet.
So am I!
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 14:30:20
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> > No, that wasn't quite what I was going for. I was just trying to
> > recall if you had _ever_ penned a post of more than ten words, or at
> > most, two sentences. A cursory glance at the first page on Google
> > archives of your <cough cough> contributions confirms my suspicion -
> > you're a man of very few, generally simple words:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/jqzg8
> >
> > Seriously, click on any of this guy's posts back to '03 - this guy
> > makes Slingblade look like Robert Frost! Ummm hmmm, you're not my
> > daddy. LOL!!!
> >
> Your profile is equally as entertaining. Phish? LOL.
I never said your profile is "entertaining"! I guess reading
comprehension must be added to the list. Don't fret it, short bus, not
everyone out there can have high double digit IQ's...
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Sep 2006 12:51:09
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158701420.862747.188510@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> not everyone out there can have high double digit IQ's...
>
You'd be lucky to have high single digit. Don't you have someone elses leg
you should be humping? Run along lil benny, go play with your Phish friends.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 22:15:10
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bear wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2006 10:33:29 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bear wrote:
> >>
> >> You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
> >> You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
> >> why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
> >
> >Of course, nobody knows (nor do I care) who you are.
>
> And you know this how?
This I do know, Yogi. It's no secret who I am and what I'm about.
OTOH, you hide behind a name and take potshots. So...I'm suppose to
take you seriously.
> Yet you make all of us know what kind of asshole you are. Thanks for
> sharing.
> >
> >As for my wonderful life, I'm on my way out the door to play the
> >Reserve with some friends. Ever heard of it?
>
> Nope.
The Reserve was the home of the Jeld Wen Classic, a major tournament
with the Senior Tour.
> The only reserve around here is occupied by some Northern Coast Salish
> who have some of the best Native artists anywhere.
> http://www.ihosgallery.com/index.html My fav. is Andy Everson but I
> don't know if he golfs.
>
> So do you treat your friends the same way you treat strangers?!?
I call it as I see it. Always have, in real life and on the internet.
> You are going to have to post pics of your "friends" to actually prove
> that you have any. I'll bet you a gazillion dollars you have none.
I defer to Matt "Ocho" Aamold. He was a guest of mine with this
exclusive golfing group called "the Slice of Life." We play most of
the local courses around the Portland, SW Washington area. We play a
stableford game. I got 20 today.
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 15:11:11
From: Bear
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 14 Sep 2006 22:15:10 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>
>Bear wrote:
>> On 14 Sep 2006 10:33:29 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bear wrote:
>> >>
>> >> You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
>> >> You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
>> >> why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
>> >
>> >Of course, nobody knows (nor do I care) who you are.
>>
>> And you know this how?
>
>This I do know, Yogi. It's no secret who I am and what I'm about.
This is true. you act like a Turd and when called on it act like a
even bigger smellier version of one.
>OTOH, you hide behind a name and take potshots. So...I'm suppose to
>take you seriously.
Let see I use a nickname that I have had since I was twelve and quite
regularly post my real name. Here I'll give you my name Roderick J. G.
Gray. I was born in Edinburgh Scotland and currently reside in Comox
on Vancouver Island. You happy now? Need more info?
>
>> Yet you make all of us know what kind of asshole you are. Thanks for
>> sharing.
>> >
>> >As for my wonderful life, I'm on my way out the door to play the
>> >Reserve with some friends. Ever heard of it?
>>
>> Nope.
>
>The Reserve was the home of the Jeld Wen Classic, a major tournament
>with the Senior Tour.
Big hairy deal.
>
>> The only reserve around here is occupied by some Northern Coast Salish
>> who have some of the best Native artists anywhere.
>> http://www.ihosgallery.com/index.html My fav. is Andy Everson but I
>> don't know if he golfs.
>>
>> So do you treat your friends the same way you treat strangers?!?
>
>I call it as I see it. Always have, in real life and on the internet.
What a load of shit. If you spoke to people on the street the way you
communicate here you'd be spitting chicklets regularly. You came back
to RSG to cause shit because those bad guys hurt your feelings. You
post zip about golf and just insult anyone that you or Eric thinks
wronged them. Your Momma would be oh so proud to see what you spew.
>> You are going to have to post pics of your "friends" to actually prove
>> that you have any. I'll bet you a gazillion dollars you have none.
>
>I defer to Matt "Ocho" Aamold. He was a guest of mine with this
>exclusive golfing group called "the Slice of Life." We play most of
>the local courses around the Portland, SW Washington area. We play a
>stableford game. I got 20 today.
OOOO I am soooo impressed. A group that has such an imaginative name.
Any group that will have someone that acts like you will exclusive and
probably has a high turn over rate.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 02:14:18
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
:
: >
: > Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
: > meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
: > Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
:
: You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
: with a 5k bet.
Yeah, with the longest list of small print provisos ever seen
for such a simple wager.
Oh, and btw: if he can back up his claim, and he's fishing to
make $5000 from it, you can add "fuckin' thief" to his list of
character qualities. It ain't a bet if the outcome is known in
advance.
: So am I!
Your choice. Does Theresa know?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 23:38:06
From: Bear
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 13 Sep 2006 15:50:35 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>
>Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
>>
>> Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
>> meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
>> Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
>
>You conveniently forgot one fact. He's willing to back up his claim
>with a 5k bet.
>
>So am I!
Wow making a bet on usenet for ridiculous money for something trivial.
When was the last time a bet like this became reality?!?!
Internet tough guys gotta love'em.
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 14:55:11
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Ben. wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>
> > >
> > > He's lower than ant piss.
> > >
> > > -Greg
> > >
> >
> > yawn...
>
> Chump....Where's that $5000 mouth, nickel nuts?
......and the whereabouts of the people who could be defending him?
Perhaps they know a chump when they see one too.
lonelynleftout?
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 19:53:27
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> > I'm not going to say you are the dumbest psoter on RSG, Mike, but....
> >
> ...but as long as you are here I can only hope for second.
No, that wasn't quite what I was going for. I was just trying to
recall if you had _ever_ penned a post of more than ten words, or at
most, two sentences. A cursory glance at the first page on Google
archives of your <cough cough > contributions confirms my suspicion -
you're a man of very few, generally simple words:
http://tinyurl.com/jqzg8
Seriously, click on any of this guy's posts back to '03 - this guy
makes Slingblade look like Robert Frost! Ummm hmmm, you're not my
daddy. LOL!!!
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 10:54:49
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158634407.078334.63590@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>
>> > I'm not going to say you are the dumbest psoter on RSG, Mike, but....
>> >
>> ...but as long as you are here I can only hope for second.
>
> No, that wasn't quite what I was going for. I was just trying to
> recall if you had _ever_ penned a post of more than ten words, or at
> most, two sentences. A cursory glance at the first page on Google
> archives of your <cough cough> contributions confirms my suspicion -
> you're a man of very few, generally simple words:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/jqzg8
>
> Seriously, click on any of this guy's posts back to '03 - this guy
> makes Slingblade look like Robert Frost! Ummm hmmm, you're not my
> daddy. LOL!!!
>
Your profile is equally as entertaining. Phish? LOL.
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:14:30
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> Poor Greg. He's stupid enough to believe in Eric, and they're both
> making fools of themselves trying to spin out of this one.
The stupid one is you. Eric stated that kitty-boy needs to e-mail him
with his name, address, and phone number. No reply....no e-mail.
Perhaps you're idiot enough to trust an anonymous poster but my friend
Eric is not.
There's a more poignant fact at play too. You're the one who has
called Eric a liar and yet you cowardly rely on goldcat to put up the
money.
I'm hearing crickets.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 16:28:05
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Bobby Knight wrote:
:
: > Poor Greg. He's stupid enough to believe in Eric, and they're both
: > making fools of themselves trying to spin out of this one.
:
: The stupid one is you. Eric stated that kitty-boy needs to e-mail him
: with his name, address, and phone number.
Why would he state that? The money is his if he just posts
where he got his degrees. Or, it would have been, if in fact
he had the degrees he claimed he did. Now, of course, he has
essentially conceded the point. He ought to send his $5k to
the Alzheimer's Foundation, but I doubt he will.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 07:34:39
From:
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:05:45 -0700, long&left <nospam@diespammers.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Dene wrote:
>
> >> Not a chance. It's Eric's call, when and if he decides to verify. The
> >> only reason I have the authorization was in case not-so-brave Dave was
> >> serious about his challenge. Since there is no serious $$ on the
> >> table, the authorization sits on my desk instead of my fax machine.
> >>
> >> -Greg
> >>
> >
> >you've got nothing. Eric's digging a hole for himself as we "speak". HE
> >doesn't even know what degrees he has...we don't need any authorization
> >to figure that out
>
> Poor Greg. He's stupid enough to believe in Eric, and they're both
> making fools of themselves trying to spin out of this one.
>
> Incidentally, there IS money on the table between Eric and Bigoldcat.
>
> >>From: bigoldcat2@yahoo.com
> >>Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
> >>Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
> >>Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:47:24 -0700
>
> <clip>
>
> >>I said I called the bet, I told the Liar where to send the money. I
> >>don't rant back and forth like Liar, Dene, and Ben,who i am very
> >>disappointed in. They can keep running their mouths as long as they
> >>like, fact is, bet called PUT UP LIAR. I want to see those three
> >>degrees and those three summa cum laudes like you said.
>
> Let's see the cancelled check Eric. You're supposed to make it out to
> The Alzheimers Foundation of America. Hell, he's saving you some
> bucks by making it deductible.
>
> But...it'll never happen, because you'll renege.
>
> ___,
> \o
>
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:33:29
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bear wrote:
>
> You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
> You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
> why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
Of course, nobody knows (nor do I care) who you are.
As for my wonderful life, I'm on my way out the door to play the
Reserve with some friends. Ever heard of it?
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 17:55:09
From: Bear
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 14 Sep 2006 10:33:29 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>
>Bear wrote:
>>
>> You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
>> You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
>> why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
>
>Of course, nobody knows (nor do I care) who you are.
And you know this how?
Yet you make all of us know what kind of asshole you are. Thanks for
sharing.
>
>As for my wonderful life, I'm on my way out the door to play the
>Reserve with some friends. Ever heard of it?
Nope.
The only reserve around here is occupied by some Northern Coast Salish
who have some of the best Native artists anywhere.
http://www.ihosgallery.com/index.html My fav. is Andy Everson but I
don't know if he golfs.
So do you treat your friends the same way you treat strangers?!?
You are going to have to post pics of your "friends" to actually prove
that you have any. I'll bet you a gazillion dollars you have none.
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 12:16:43
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Bear wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2006 10:33:29 -0700, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Bear wrote:
>>> You are a one trick pony ain't ya?
>>> You claim you have such a wonderful life out there in the real world
>>> why don't you go live it and stop being a wanker on RSG.
>> Of course, nobody knows (nor do I care) who you are.
>
> And you know this how?
>
> Yet you make all of us know what kind of asshole you are. Thanks for
> sharing.
>> As for my wonderful life, I'm on my way out the door to play the
>> Reserve with some friends. Ever heard of it?
>
> Nope.
> The only reserve around here is occupied by some Northern Coast Salish
> who have some of the best Native artists anywhere.
> http://www.ihosgallery.com/index.html My fav. is Andy Everson but I
> don't know if he golfs.
>
> So do you treat your friends the same way you treat strangers?!?
>
> You are going to have to post pics of your "friends" to actually prove
> that you have any. I'll bet you a gazillion dollars you have none.
oops, you're going to lose a gazillion dollars because everyone knows
that Greggie Dene and Eric are fast friends :)
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 22:08:58
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
:
: Ben. wrote:
: > long&left wrote:
: >
: > > >
: > > > He's lower than ant piss.
: > > >
: > > > -Greg
: > > >
: > >
: > > yawn...
: >
: > Chump....Where's that $5000 mouth, nickel nuts?
:
: ......and the whereabouts of the people who could be defending him?
: Perhaps they know a chump when they see one too.
Meanwhile, you have a guy who can neither spell nor write for
meaning worth a damn still claiming to be a three-time Summa
Cum Laude. Just to lend some perspective.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 14:47:35
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
long&left wrote:
> >
> > He's lower than ant piss.
> >
> > -Greg
> >
>
> yawn...
Chump....Where's that $5000 mouth, nickel nuts?
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 13:06:48
From: Big_Fan
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> The Hammer wrote:
> > The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup. To be held in
> > the Spring/Summer 2007.
> >
> > You have the cronies and the non-cronies, now affectionately to be
> > known as the CumWads.
> >
> > Site to be announced, dates to be announced. This is no troll, this
> > event is in the works, IF there is interest. An event with more
> > special surprises ever before at an RSG event. But I need a good
> > response. At least 20 folks to make it worth the monumental amount of
> > time I will put into this. There will be tee shirts, more souvenirs
> > than you will be able to carry home, dinners each nights, comedy
> > skits, roasts, you name it. This will be the chance for all the
> > cronies/CumWads who have fought it out since the inception of this
> > group to flame it out where it really counts, on the golf course. And
> > afterwards, in person, not with some PC to hide behind. The event will
> > be fun. We will make fun of ourselves. We will make fun of our games.
> > And maybe a few bitter enemies leave as friends.
> >
> > Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> > when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
> >
> > I am proud to say I am a CumWad. I am proud to say that I will die as
> > a CumWad. I am proud to say I will be the captain for the CumWads.
> > And I am proud to announce Dene as the assistant captain of the
> > CumWads.
> >
> > So which one of you chikcen shit cronies is going to step to the plate
> > and be a captain. The CumWads will be waiting! And who will the
> > assistant captain be? You cronies get to work and let me know..
> >
> > I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
> > will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
> > this has suggested Arizona in April. Couldn't think of a better place
> > myself.
> >
> > So please respond if interested. If there is sufficient response, I
> > will get to work on this with a firm itinerary by late 2007. And then
> > I will need a deposit from all attendees, as a good faith effort that
> > you will attend. And then it will happen and once and for all we will
> > see who rules here, be it the Cronies or the CumWads.
> >
> > The Hammer
>
> I'm interested. In fact, I'm the one pushing for an Arizona date the
> 1st week of April. Regardless if the formal tourney occurs, guys will
> be getting together to play golf around then.
>
> As for the Cup, I think....
>
> 1. None of the Cronies will commit. It's beneath them.
> 2. If they did, they'd lose big time.
> 3. If I'm wrong about number one, the event does have the potential of
> breaking down some barriers and perhaps create a better newsgroup as a
> result. I'd like to see that, even more than the fulfillment of number
> two.
>
> -Greg
>
> Ps. Too bad shortnsoft backed out of the bet. I had every intention
> of donating the 5k to this event. I still would, if he changes his
> mind, assuming of course that I win the bet.
If the Cronies don't make it, you can invite the Farking Ashholes. Bret
can be the captain....... :-)
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 11:40:09
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : I'd want to play Bellomy.
>
> We can do that without this.
Just fun and games, Chris.....unless I lost.
> : Trouble is....somebody would be saying 50
> : F-in yards for a full year.....and that person would be me.
>
> Yeah, but would you help me find my ball in the woods?
You mean the desert....nope. Tis rattler season in April. The one and
only time I saw one was around the first of April. Expulsion of
bladder contents almost occured.
One local rule I'd advise implementing is the desert rule. IOW, ball
goes into the desert, it's treated like a hazard instead of lost ball.
Save time and ambulance fees.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 13:30:41
From: the Moderator
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158091851.583321.291460@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup. To be held in
> the Spring/Summer 2007.
>
> You have the cronies and the non-cronies, now affectionately to be
> known as the CumWads.
>
This sounds like a hockey game. You go to see a fist fight and a golf
tournament breaks out.
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 21:36:25
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Steve Gavette wrote:
> "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158091851.583321.291460@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
> > will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
> > this has suggested Arizona in April.
>
> If this comes to pass, I'd like to play. Early April would probably be best.
> Rates at most courses drop April 1, the 'birds are gone by then, and it's
> not very hot yet.
Your analysis is correct Steve. I'm fortunate to have a vacation home
near Tucson. I love playing right after spring break.
Weather...prices....and empty golf courses, especially in the
afternoons (which are typically 85 degrees).
Heaven!
Anyway, stay tuned.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 21:18:45
From: Steve Gavette
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158091851.583321.291460@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
> will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
> this has suggested Arizona in April.
If this comes to pass, I'd like to play. Early April would probably be best.
Rates at most courses drop April 1, the 'birds are gone by then, and it's
not very hot yet.
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 20:14:07
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
>
> But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
> envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
> work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
> I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
> together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
> and coming.
>
> Can you imagine the likes of:
>
> Hamilton vs Dalecki
> Hammer vs Vander Pflum
> Stricker vs Bellomy
> Annika vs Tex
> Brazee vs Colleyville
> Bill-O vs Glfnaz
> Dene vs Newell
> Larry vs Brown
>
>
> It can happen and what a blast it would be.
>
> The Hammer
I'd want to play Bellomy. Trouble is....somebody would be saying 50
F-in yards for a full year.....and that person would be me.
But hey.....I'm pretty good with a 7 wood, especially the 4th shot to
the green.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 03:29:53
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: I'd want to play Bellomy.
We can do that without this.
: Trouble is....somebody would be saying 50
: F-in yards for a full year.....and that person would be me.
Yeah, but would you help me find my ball in the woods?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 20:07:42
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Ben. wrote:
> Dene wrote:
>
> > Ps. Too bad shortnsoft backed out of the bet.
>
> He's too busy figuring out how to use a killfile...
Too funny. His killfile is another example of his empty talk.
Ya know....it's no secret that I'm not fond of a couple of people in
here, one in particular, but at least the person in question isn't a
pansy-ass like this not-too-brave-Dave. I'd take a dozen of him over
this wimp.
He's lower than ant piss.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 09:28:10
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
> I said I called the bet, I told the Liar where to send the money. I
> don't rant back and forth like Liar, Dene, and Ben,who i am very
> disappointed in. They can keep running their mouths as long as they
> like, fact is, bet called PUT UP LIAR. I want to see those three
> degrees and those three summa cum laudes like you said.
I understand that Bi-cat is a PHD.
Professional Hair Dresser.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 10:47:24
From:
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
long&left wrote:
> Bobby Knight wrote:
> (snip)
> >
> > I'm done with it, and I surmise that long&left and bigoldcat are st
> > enough to see it the same way.
> > ___,
> > \o
> >
|
| | |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 21:00:49
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Ben. wrote:
>> Dene wrote:
>>
>>> Ps. Too bad shortnsoft backed out of the bet.
>> He's too busy figuring out how to use a killfile...
>
> Too funny. His killfile is another example of his empty talk.
>
> Ya know....it's no secret that I'm not fond of a couple of people in
> here, one in particular, but at least the person in question isn't a
> pansy-ass like this not-too-brave-Dave. I'd take a dozen of him over
> this wimp.
>
> He's lower than ant piss.
>
> -Greg
>
yawn...
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Sep 2006 14:10:28
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> Well, I will tell you what Bret. if money is the ONLY thing holding
> you back, I will pay for our room and the rental car is on me.
> Regardless of our little online scraps, I like you and would consider
> it a privalege to help you in having a memorable weekend. So what is
> your excuse now! We are talking next year, surely you could scrape
> together the bucks, we would enjoy having you and you would enjoy it
> too. And if we room together, I can assure you that you can roll
> over in your bed and you will be safe.
Barring some unforeseen circumstances such as hitting the lottery, the
outlook for next year doesn't look much better than this year. And if
I do ever make another trip, I'll be rooming with Mrs. Annika.
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 15:33:13
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> > You know the guy who must proclaim publicly "I don't care what anyone
> > thinks about me"? He's the guy who couldn't care more about what
> > people think about him. Otherwise he wouldn't feel the need to point
> > it out. Yell it louder, Mikey, we believe you!
> >
> Little Benny giving out life lessons, how rich.
I'm not going to say you are the dumbest psoter on RSG, Mike, but....
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 17:57:43
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158618793.692561.250480@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>
>> > You know the guy who must proclaim publicly "I don't care what anyone
>> > thinks about me"? He's the guy who couldn't care more about what
>> > people think about him. Otherwise he wouldn't feel the need to point
>> > it out. Yell it louder, Mikey, we believe you!
>> >
>> Little Benny giving out life lessons, how rich.
>
> I'm not going to say you are the dumbest psoter on RSG, Mike, but....
>
...but as long as you are here I can only hope for second.
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 17:01:18
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
annika1980 wrote:
> The Hammer wrote:
> > BTW, are you coming to the Crony/CumWad cup. Or are you afraid too of
> > the potential embarassment. Or are you afraid as an individual to show
> > because your other cronies may not be coming? Or are you one the
> > many blowhards here that talk like you are some big guy, but in real
> > life some loser and can't even afford to go. If it is $$$, I will
> > gladly help pay your way! And so will some of the others!
> >
> > god bless you Chris
> >
> >
> > The Hammer
>
> A slight correction.
> I am the one who is broke and can't afford to travel. Chris is the one
> who doesn't give a shit.
Well, I will tell you what Bret. if money is the ONLY thing holding
you back, I will pay for our room and the rental car is on me.
Regardless of our little online scraps, I like you and would consider
it a privalege to help you in having a memorable weekend. So what is
your excuse now! We are talking next year, surely you could scrape
together the bucks, we would enjoy having you and you would enjoy it
too. And if we room together, I can assure you that you can roll
over in your bed and you will be safe. Could you say the same for
some of the cronies, if they roomed with you. Ouch, the thought alone
is too much to bear!
Chris don't give a shit, who does give a shit really. I don't give a
shit. I don't care who wins or loses. It is about a fun weekend,
and at some great courses I am sure. This group is supposed to be
about golf. And then when you issue some challenge, suddlenly no
golfers.
The Hammer
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 17:29:12
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158278478.658329.309300@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Well, I will tell you what Bret. if money is the ONLY thing holding
> you back, I will pay for our room and the rental car is on me.
OUR room? Bret, run away...........
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 19:53:57
From: greg
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, The Rainman of RSG wrote:
> Cumwads good, shitstains bad.
> This is not my newsgroup.
> This is definitly not my newsgroup!
> Cumwads good, shitstains bad!
>
> The Hammer
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 11:26:02
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:06:24 GMT, "The poster formerly known as
Colleyville Alan" <nospam@nospam.net > wrote:
>"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>news:1T3fabu0Ipn7N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
>> The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> : The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup.
>>
>> I do not think that word means what you think it means.
>
>Hammer not knowing the meaning of a word? Inconceivable!
>
Stop rhyming -- I mean it!!!!
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 18:49:02
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
John van der Pflum <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com > wrote:
: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:06:24 GMT, "The poster formerly known as
: Colleyville Alan" <nospam@nospam.net > wrote:
:
: >"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
: >news:1T3fabu0Ipn7N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
: >> The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
: >> : The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup.
: >>
: >> I do not think that word means what you think it means.
: >
: >Hammer not knowing the meaning of a word? Inconceivable!
:
: Stop rhyming -- I mean it!!!!
Anybody want a peanut?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 14:54:49
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:49:02 GMT, Chris Bellomy
<puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
>John van der Pflum <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com> wrote:
>: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:06:24 GMT, "The poster formerly known as
>: Colleyville Alan" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>:
>:>"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>:>news:1T3fabu0Ipn7N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
>:>> The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>:>> : The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup.
>:>>
>:>> I do not think that word means what you think it means.
>:>
>:>Hammer not knowing the meaning of a word? Inconceivable!
>:
>: Stop rhyming -- I mean it!!!!
>
>Anybody want a peanut?
You just fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
|
| | | | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 01:44:41
From: The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"John van der Pflum" <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com > wrote in message
news:2vkgg2plu3ie6485dle2ckac7bb25vq7lv@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:49:02 GMT, Chris Bellomy
> <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>
>>John van der Pflum <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com> wrote:
>>: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:06:24 GMT, "The poster formerly known as
>>: Colleyville Alan" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>>:
>>:>"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>>:>news:1T3fabu0Ipn7N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
>>:>> The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>:>> : The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup.
>>:>>
>>:>> I do not think that word means what you think it means.
>>:>
>>:>Hammer not knowing the meaning of a word? Inconceivable!
>>:
>>: Stop rhyming -- I mean it!!!!
>>
>>Anybody want a peanut?
>
> You just fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
The most famous is never reply to a post by LLLarry, but only slightly less
well-known is this: never read a post by Eric and expect it to make sense!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 08:40:41
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:44:41 GMT, "The poster formerly known as
Colleyville Alan" <nospam@nospam.net > wrote:
>"John van der Pflum" <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com> wrote in message
>news:2vkgg2plu3ie6485dle2ckac7bb25vq7lv@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:49:02 GMT, Chris Bellomy
>> <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>John van der Pflum <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com> wrote:
>>>: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:06:24 GMT, "The poster formerly known as
>>>: Colleyville Alan" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>>>:
>>>:>"Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>>>:>news:1T3fabu0Ipn7N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
>>>:>> The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>:>> : The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup.
>>>:>>
>>>:>> I do not think that word means what you think it means.
>>>:>
>>>:>Hammer not knowing the meaning of a word? Inconceivable!
>>>:
>>>: Stop rhyming -- I mean it!!!!
>>>
>>>Anybody want a peanut?
>>
>> You just fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
>
>The most famous is never reply to a post by LLLarry, but only slightly less
>well-known is this: never read a post by Eric and expect it to make sense!
>Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...
>
Isn't someone supposed to keel over and die at this point?
--
jvdp
Kelly Newell -- bikini -- 1st tee -- Friday, September 15
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 01:36:01
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote:
: The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 17:38:25
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Dene wrote:
> Ps. Too bad shortnsoft backed out of the bet.
He's too busy figuring out how to use a killfile...
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 18:46:32
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
long&left wrote:
> Dene wrote:
> > long&left wrote:
> (snip)
> > I make 5k every 13 days. When a business deal is finalized in
> > November, then it will be every 10 days. Also, we just sold two homes
> > and made tidy profits on both. So....yes I have the money. Your
> > mother probably does too.
>
> what does my Mother have to do with this. It's not my fault that my
> Mother has money. I don't happen to need any of it because I make 3 or 4
> times what you do, month in and month out. And I play golf 3 or 4 days a
> week. And, btw, I have no college degree. Left home when I was 15 and
> barely graduated from high school because I was working for a living.
> But I've been in places and situations that you wouldn't even dream
> about having to be in. People like you don't bother or intimidate me.
> I've had to deal with people like you for years and I know exactly what
> you're about and how to deal with you. Go try to bully someone else hot shot
So you make $40k / month? And you play golf three or four days a week?
Now the latter I believe. The former requires the reader to suspend
ALL disbelief. You're not the type, Dave, and we know it.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:50:02
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> BTW, are you coming to the Crony/CumWad cup. Or are you afraid too of
> the potential embarassment. Or are you afraid as an individual to show
> because your other cronies may not be coming? Or are you one the
> many blowhards here that talk like you are some big guy, but in real
> life some loser and can't even afford to go. If it is $$$, I will
> gladly help pay your way! And so will some of the others!
>
> god bless you Chris
>
>
> The Hammer
A slight correction.
I am the one who is broke and can't afford to travel. Chris is the one
who doesn't give a shit.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:35:53
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Why have you turned down free money, Eric?
>
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Member
> http://clist.org/
Not turning down free money. I am all for a legitimate bet. I will
gladly place my 5K in some type of escrow arrangement or give the money
to somebody I trust. I am waiting to see others volunteer the same,
without spin and this incessant game playing. . Seems your idol and
others back off when it comes to putting up the big bucks.
I am ready to put up 5K, when will your cronies be ready to ante up?.
They won't. because there is some doubt that they have let their
toilet mouths overflow and they just might be out of 5K. I am ready to
put up my 5K. I can't lose, the evidence will be unequivocal.
you are just loving all this. you all are. A golf
newsgroup......right! So, we can dedicate another 500 posts if you
want. When the evidence comes out, there are going to be some
embarassed cronies. And then you can get on your crony mailing list
and do damage control for hours. You can spin the unequivocal results,
and call it fraudulent, doctored, or whatever. You can attack me,
call me psycho nurse, on meds, whatever. Or you can call into
question the credibility of whomever physically views the documents.
Have at it Bro. This is sheer entertainment to me. I know what
credentials I have. I don't care whether you or your mailing list
cronies believe it or not. Your utter obsession with this and
willingness to allege doctoring, forgery, and then making bets and
pulling out makes this more entertaining than any night on the town
could ever be!
hey, I am going out to dinner now. gonna suck down a few Ritas. And
then have a few laughs at you all when the Tequila kicks in. You
guys stick to this board and your private mailaing list and gossip
about this and make fun all night. Have at it if it gives your lives
some meaning. I am honored to be the fadder! You honor me with all
the attention you give me. And you honor this group, by giving it some
badly needed material. The golf stuff is frankly boring. If you golf
and have a few friends outside this group, you don;t need to talk golf
with mostly strangers or experience it vicariosly.
BTW, are you coming to the Crony/CumWad cup. Or are you afraid too of
the potential embarassment. Or are you afraid as an individual to show
because your other cronies may not be coming? Or are you one the
many blowhards here that talk like you are some big guy, but in real
life some loser and can't even afford to go. If it is $$$, I will
gladly help pay your way! And so will some of the others!
god bless you Chris
The Hammer
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 02:13:07
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote:
:
: Chris Bellomy wrote:
: > The Hammer <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote:
: >
: > <snip>
: >
: > Why have you turned down free money, Eric?
:
: Not turning down free money. I am all for a legitimate bet. I will
: gladly place my 5K in some type of escrow arrangement or give the money
: to somebody I trust. I am waiting to see others volunteer the same,
: without spin and this incessant game playing.
No you're not. All you have to do to collect your money
is produce the names of the institutions that awarded you
SCL honors. That's it. Couldn't be simpler.
Game playing? That's what one would call demands for
personal contact info, posturing about the alleged need
for such information, calling into question the serious-
ness of anyone not willing to jump through your hoops,
etc. You should know all about game playing.
There's no need for you to put money in escrow or any
such nonsense if you indeed have three degrees Summa
Cum Laude. And, as pointed out repeatedly, "legitimate
bets" do not involve one bettor knowing the result in
advance. What you're proposing is either theft (if you
won those honors) or an endless game of "nobody wants
to step up to the plate and meet my ever-changing con-
ditions" (if you didn't). Based on how this is going so
far, the reasons for believing you didn't grow longer
each day.
Do you have *any* degrees, at all?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 15:53:07
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158265148.442198.102920@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Big_Fan wrote:
> >> MnMikew wrote:
> >> > "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:1158256308.242289.154660@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> > >
> >> > > I will prove these credentials my way and on my terms.
> >> >
> >> > Yawn.
> >> > > Waiting for one> missing peace of docmentation and then will prove
> >> > > you all
> >> > > > wrong.
> >> >
> >> > That would be piece there professor.
> >> >
> >> > > Since all have failed to ante up, I will do this on my shcedule and
> >> > > on
> >> > > my terms. I am in no hurry to prove anything, because I certainly am
> >> > > not in a rush to prove anything to the likes of you, but it will
> >> > > happen.
> >> > >
> >> > Double yawn.
> >> >
> >> > > Same stupid logic, once again showing that a degree in Sociology is
> >> > > worth
> >> > > > about as much as a degree in Butt Wiping Technology.
> >> >
> >> > Lemmie guess, you have that degree too?
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Stay tuned, oh belching and slobbering one. In the mean time, find
> >> > > something else to obsess about. You do wonders to my ego with all
> >> > > the
> >> > > attention I am getting here. Do you have a life?
> >> >
> >> > The irony.
> >>
> >> Irony? Considering this previous post, your post is loaded with it as
> >> well, considering the tone and the typos. :-)
> >>
> >> From: MnMikew - view profile
> >> Date: Thurs, Sep 14 2006 11:02 am
> >>
> >> Why dosent everyone grow up and drop this idiotic issue.
> >
> > Mike the Asswipe can't ignore. He gets wood sucking up to the cronies.
> > Little does he know that even the cronies think he is an asswipe.
> >
> > The guy ain't worth pissing on.
> >
> > The Hammer
> >
> Unlike you I dont give a flying fuck what anyone here thinks of me. I'm glad
> I'm not worth pissing on. You are though, ask anyone here.
you are not worth pissing on. I am glad you recognize that. You are
not worth shitting on either.
The fact that you say I am worth pissing on coming from vermin as you
is well received and I thank you. Because if you said to the contrary,
that might infer some scintilla of acceptance from you. And I do not
want acceptance or validation from a turd tongue as you. Your
antipathy and insults are all i want and expect. Do not give me
anything less please.
Fucking loser. you are on the fringe here. Some fucking loon seeking
validation. You are not a crony, never will be. So flame on, clit
lip. Entertain me. Give me some chuckles when i check here later.
The Hammer
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 17:28:10
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158274387.799688.213490@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> you are not worth pissing on. I am glad you recognize that. You are
> not worth shitting on either.
Whew! Good thing, dont want to get all that garlic and potatos on me.
>
> The fact that you say I am worth pissing on coming from vermin as you
> is well received and I thank you. Because if you said to the contrary,
> that might infer some scintilla of acceptance from you. And I do not
> want acceptance or validation from a turd tongue as you. Your
> antipathy and insults are all i want and expect. Do not give me
> anything less please.
>
> Fucking loser. you are on the fringe here. Some fucking loon seeking
> validation. You are not a crony, never will be. So flame on, clit
> lip. Entertain me. Give me some chuckles when i check here later.
>
HAHAHHAHA, a true lithium moment.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 14:49:20
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
MnMikew wrote:
> Unlike you I dont give a flying fuck what anyone here thinks of me. I'm glad
> I'm not worth pissing on. You are though, ask anyone here.
Life lesson number 86:
You know the guy who must proclaim publicly "I don't care what anyone
thinks about me"? He's the guy who couldn't care more about what
people think about him. Otherwise he wouldn't feel the need to point
it out. Yell it louder, Mikey, we believe you!
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 17:26:02
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158270560.742087.207360@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>
>> Unlike you I dont give a flying fuck what anyone here thinks of me. I'm
>> glad
>> I'm not worth pissing on. You are though, ask anyone here.
>
> Life lesson number 86:
>
> You know the guy who must proclaim publicly "I don't care what anyone
> thinks about me"? He's the guy who couldn't care more about what
> people think about him. Otherwise he wouldn't feel the need to point
> it out. Yell it louder, Mikey, we believe you!
>
Little Benny giving out life lessons, how rich.
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:53:44
From: Bootlegg
Subject: Re: What a round!
|
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:58:16 +0000, bill-o wrote:
>
> On 13-Sep-2006, Tranny <tranny@notrolll.com> wrote:
>
>> You took a lesson from a woman? I bet your golf sucks and I'd hate to
>> see you drive a car!
>
> Denise King, no relation, is a well respected teaching pro in our area,
> hell, Sparky even took one lesson from her moons ago.
Sparky the Fire dog?
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 17:27:31
From: Dene
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup. To be held in
> the Spring/Summer 2007.
>
> You have the cronies and the non-cronies, now affectionately to be
> known as the CumWads.
>
> Site to be announced, dates to be announced. This is no troll, this
> event is in the works, IF there is interest. An event with more
> special surprises ever before at an RSG event. But I need a good
> response. At least 20 folks to make it worth the monumental amount of
> time I will put into this. There will be tee shirts, more souvenirs
> than you will be able to carry home, dinners each nights, comedy
> skits, roasts, you name it. This will be the chance for all the
> cronies/CumWads who have fought it out since the inception of this
> group to flame it out where it really counts, on the golf course. And
> afterwards, in person, not with some PC to hide behind. The event will
> be fun. We will make fun of ourselves. We will make fun of our games.
> And maybe a few bitter enemies leave as friends.
>
> Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
>
> I am proud to say I am a CumWad. I am proud to say that I will die as
> a CumWad. I am proud to say I will be the captain for the CumWads.
> And I am proud to announce Dene as the assistant captain of the
> CumWads.
>
> So which one of you chikcen shit cronies is going to step to the plate
> and be a captain. The CumWads will be waiting! And who will the
> assistant captain be? You cronies get to work and let me know..
>
> I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
> will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
> this has suggested Arizona in April. Couldn't think of a better place
> myself.
>
> So please respond if interested. If there is sufficient response, I
> will get to work on this with a firm itinerary by late 2007. And then
> I will need a deposit from all attendees, as a good faith effort that
> you will attend. And then it will happen and once and for all we will
> see who rules here, be it the Cronies or the CumWads.
>
> The Hammer
I'm interested. In fact, I'm the one pushing for an Arizona date the
1st week of April. Regardless if the formal tourney occurs, guys will
be getting together to play golf around then.
As for the Cup, I think....
1. None of the Cronies will commit. It's beneath them.
2. If they did, they'd lose big time.
3. If I'm wrong about number one, the event does have the potential of
breaking down some barriers and perhaps create a better newsgroup as a
result. I'd like to see that, even more than the fulfillment of number
two.
-Greg
Ps. Too bad shortnsoft backed out of the bet. I had every intention
of donating the 5k to this event. I still would, if he changes his
mind, assuming of course that I win the bet.
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 16:27:57
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
John van der Pflum wrote:
>
> What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
> --
I assume you mean the CumWads. In that case, the CumWads will get
splattered.
The Cronies will blow out the CumWads. Or maybe the cronies will
swallow up the CumWads and form new teams? The Snowballs against the
BlowHards.
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 14:21:57
From: Tex
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> Tex wrote:
> > The Hammer wrote:
> > > John van der Pflum wrote:
> > > > On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> > > > >when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > jvdp
> > > > Paging Mike Plowinske. You are on the tee Sept 16.
> > > > http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
> > >
> > > HA HA
> > >
> > > But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
> > > envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
> > > work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
> > > I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
> > > together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
> > > and coming.
> > >
> > > Can you imagine the likes of:
> > >
> > > Hamilton vs Dalecki
> > > Hammer vs Vander Pflum
> > > Stricker vs Bellomy
> > > Annika vs Tex
> > > Brazee vs Colleyville
> > > Bill-O vs Glfnaz
> > > Dene vs Newell
> > > Larry vs Brown
> > >
> > >
> > > It can happen and what a blast it would be.
> >
> > Dream all you wish...I have no interest.
> >
> > Tex
>
> That is Ok by me. Whether the events comes off or not, that is fine.
> I think it would be fun. A lot of us don't hold grudges and can see
> past them in the name of a fun golf outing.
It's nothing to do with "grudges"...it has everything to do with my
golf outing calendar is full through 2009.
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 16:18:38
From: long&left
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Tex wrote:
(snip)
>
> It's nothing to do with "grudges"...it has everything to do with my
> golf outing calendar is full through 2009.
>
> Tex
>
damn! I'm going to get awfully thirsty! :)
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 14:06:01
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
Tex wrote:
> The Hammer wrote:
> > John van der Pflum wrote:
> > > On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> > > >when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
> > > >
> > >
> > > What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
> > > --
> > >
> > > jvdp
> > > Paging Mike Plowinske. You are on the tee Sept 16.
> > > http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
> >
> > HA HA
> >
> > But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
> > envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
> > work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
> > I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
> > together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
> > and coming.
> >
> > Can you imagine the likes of:
> >
> > Hamilton vs Dalecki
> > Hammer vs Vander Pflum
> > Stricker vs Bellomy
> > Annika vs Tex
> > Brazee vs Colleyville
> > Bill-O vs Glfnaz
> > Dene vs Newell
> > Larry vs Brown
> >
> >
> > It can happen and what a blast it would be.
>
> Dream all you wish...I have no interest.
>
> Tex
That is Ok by me. Whether the events comes off or not, that is fine.
I think it would be fun. A lot of us don't hold grudges and can see
past them in the name of a fun golf outing.
Seems more than interesting though that this is a golf forum, and when
a challenge is offered to play golf, there are often no takers among
the cronies. Yet, start a flame war, and there are two dozer takers
among the cronies in less then one hour.
Be interested to see the response. If insufficient, we will forget
about it. If response is good, it will happen.
The Hammer
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 13:59:47
From: Tex
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> John van der Pflum wrote:
> > On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> > >when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
> > >
> >
> > What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
> > --
> >
> > jvdp
> > Paging Mike Plowinske. You are on the tee Sept 16.
> > http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> HA HA
>
> But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
> envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
> work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
> I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
> together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
> and coming.
>
> Can you imagine the likes of:
>
> Hamilton vs Dalecki
> Hammer vs Vander Pflum
> Stricker vs Bellomy
> Annika vs Tex
> Brazee vs Colleyville
> Bill-O vs Glfnaz
> Dene vs Newell
> Larry vs Brown
>
>
> It can happen and what a blast it would be.
Dream all you wish...I have no interest.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 13:50:28
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
John van der Pflum wrote:
> On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> >when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
> >
>
> What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
> --
>
> jvdp
> Paging Mike Plowinske. You are on the tee Sept 16.
> http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
HA HA
But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
and coming.
Can you imagine the likes of:
Hamilton vs Dalecki
Hammer vs Vander Pflum
Stricker vs Bellomy
Annika vs Tex
Brazee vs Colleyville
Bill-O vs Glfnaz
Dene vs Newell
Larry vs Brown
It can happen and what a blast it would be.
The Hammer
|
| | |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 19:34:20
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 12 Sep 2006 13:50:28 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com >
wrote:
>
>John van der Pflum wrote:
>> On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
>> >when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
>> >
>>
>> What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Paging Mike Plowinske. You are on the tee Sept 16.
>> http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
>HA HA
>
>But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
>envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
>work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
>I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
>together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
>and coming.
>
>Can you imagine the likes of:
>
>Hamilton vs Dalecki
>Hammer vs Vander Pflum
>Stricker vs Bellomy
>Annika vs Tex
>Brazee vs Colleyville
>Bill-O vs Glfnaz
>Dene vs Newell
>Larry vs Brown
>
>
>It can happen and what a blast it would be.
>
>The Hammer
What makes you think I would be on one team rather than another?
|
| | |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 17:45:53
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158094227.998349.321700@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> But my answer would be, the event is off. For this to be what it is
> envisioned, I would want a decent turnout. Because I will put a lot of
> work into it. And probably invest a lot of my own $$ into it, just as
> I have done in the past with previous events. We can do a casual get
> together with a few guys anytime. An event like this has been long
> and coming.
>
> Can you imagine the likes of:
>
> Hamilton vs Dalecki
> Hammer vs Vander Pflum
> Stricker vs Bellomy
> Annika vs Tex
> Brazee vs Colleyville
> Bill-O vs Glfnaz
> Dene vs Newell
> Larry vs Brown
>
>
Wow, you DO live in your own Private Idaho. Glad to see the latest chemical
cocktail is kicking in and your pulling back from your combative posture.
But WHAT is up with the current anal infatuation? Is that a side effect of
the drugs?
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 16:16:41
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com >
wrote:
>Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
>when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
>
What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
--
jvdp
Paging Mike Plowinske. You are on the tee Sept 16.
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 03:46:16
From: The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
"John van der Pflum" <jpflumjr@ughookugh.com > wrote in message
news:rb5eg2p5abu46vs314o4mmoeqgg2bnt0nq@4ax.com...
> On 12 Sep 2006 13:10:51 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
>>when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
>>
> What happens if one team has, say, only two members?
Yeah, the C-List is down to just me and Frostback.
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 13:14:50
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup. To be held in
> the Spring/Summer 2007.
>
> You have the cronies and the non-cronies, now affectionately to be
> known as the CumWads.
>
> Site to be announced, dates to be announced. This is no troll, this
> event is in the works, IF there is interest. An event with more
> special surprises ever before at an RSG event. But I need a good
> response. At least 20 folks to make it worth the monumental amount of
> time I will put into this. There will be tee shirts, more souvenirs
> than you will be able to carry home, dinners each nights, comedy
> skits, roasts, you name it. This will be the chance for all the
> cronies/CumWads who have fought it out since the inception of this
> group to flame it out where it really counts, on the golf course. And
> afterwards, in person, not with some PC to hide behind. The event will
> be fun. We will make fun of ourselves. We will make fun of our games.
> And maybe a few bitter enemies leave as friends.
>
> Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
>
> I am proud to say I am a CumWad. I am proud to say that I will die as
> a CumWad. I am proud to say I will be the captain for the CumWads.
> And I am proud to announce Dene as the assistant captain of the
> CumWads.
>
> So which one of you chikcen shit cronies is going to step to the plate
> and be a captain. The CumWads will be waiting! And who will the
> assistant captain be? You cronies get to work and let me know..
>
> I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
> will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
> this has suggested Arizona in April. Couldn't think of a better place
> myself.
>
> So please respond if interested. If there is sufficient response, I
> will get to work on this with a firm itinerary by late 2007. And then
> I will need a deposit from all attendees, as a good faith effort that
> you will attend. And then it will happen and once and for all we will
> see who rules here, be it the Cronies or the CumWads.
>
> The Hammer
Typo, I will have a firm itinerary by late 2006, not 2007 as typed
above. Sorry
The Hammer
|
| |
Date: 12 Sep 2006 13:13:48
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: The Crony/CumWad Cup
|
The Hammer wrote:
> The greatest event ever in the history of this newsgroup. To be held in
> the Spring/Summer 2007.
>
> You have the cronies and the non-cronies, now affectionately to be
> known as the CumWads.
>
> Site to be announced, dates to be announced. This is no troll, this
> event is in the works, IF there is interest. An event with more
> special surprises ever before at an RSG event. But I need a good
> response. At least 20 folks to make it worth the monumental amount of
> time I will put into this. There will be tee shirts, more souvenirs
> than you will be able to carry home, dinners each nights, comedy
> skits, roasts, you name it. This will be the chance for all the
> cronies/CumWads who have fought it out since the inception of this
> group to flame it out where it really counts, on the golf course. And
> afterwards, in person, not with some PC to hide behind. The event will
> be fun. We will make fun of ourselves. We will make fun of our games.
> And maybe a few bitter enemies leave as friends.
>
> Make your declaration now as a Crony or a CumWad. I will keep a list
> when we assign the matchups for this Ryder Cup style event.
>
> I am proud to say I am a CumWad. I am proud to say that I will die as
> a CumWad. I am proud to say I will be the captain for the CumWads.
> And I am proud to announce Dene as the assistant captain of the
> CumWads.
>
> So which one of you chikcen shit cronies is going to step to the plate
> and be a captain. The CumWads will be waiting! And who will the
> assistant captain be? You cronies get to work and let me know..
>
> I am open to possible venues. Please make your suggestions and they
> will be gladly entertained. One person I have already spoken to about
> this has suggested Arizona in April. Couldn't think of a better place
> myself.
>
> So please respond if interested. If there is sufficient response, I
> will get to work on this with a firm itinerary by late 2007. And then
> I will need a deposit from all attendees, as a good faith effort that
> you will attend. And then it will happen and once and for all we will
> see who rules here, be it the Cronies or the CumWads.
>
> The Hammer
|
|
