| |
Main
Date: 06 Feb 2007 17:49:31
From: Long Drive
Subject: TaylorMade r7 Superquad?
|
Caution golf related question...
I've been eye-balling the new superquad after him-hawwing about replacing my
old TP driver. Anyone have any feedback or experience with same?
|
|
| |
Date: 08 Feb 2007 19:59:23
From:
Subject: Re: TaylorMade r7 Superquad?
|
I saw one at the PGA Merchandise Show. It is a very nice club 460 cc
and light. Could have hit it, but it was an indoor range and I didn't
feel like waiting in line.
The new Burner was also interesting.
If you go to www.taylormadegolf.com and lood for Demo Days, you should
be able to find one in your area - that is if you are in a warm
climate.
Don
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:49:31 -0600, "Long Drive" <edsup@comcast.net >
wrote:
>Caution golf related question...
>
>I've been eye-balling the new superquad after him-hawwing about replacing my
>old TP driver. Anyone have any feedback or experience with same?
>
>
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 19:30:07
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: TaylorMade r7 Superquad?
|
On Feb 6, 8:50 pm, Carbon <nob...@nospam.tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:16:15 -0800, Birdie Bill wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 5:49 pm, "Long Drive" <e...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> Caution golf related question...
>
> >> I've been eye-balling the new superquad after him-hawwing about
> >> replacing my old TP driver. Anyone have any feedback or experience with
> >> same?
>
> > The only ones I've seen were firmly bolted to a display, and had a $799
> > price tag.
>
> Will I hit it four times as good as my current driver?
I'm sure they must!
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 21:36:10
From: BAR
Subject: Re: TaylorMade r7 Superquad?
|
Long Drive wrote:
> Caution golf related question...
>
> I've been eye-balling the new superquad after him-hawwing about replacing my
> old TP driver. Anyone have any feedback or experience with same?
>
>
>
Wait until they are on eBay for $199 each in about April.
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 17:16:15
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: TaylorMade r7 Superquad?
|
On Feb 6, 5:49 pm, "Long Drive" <e...@comcast.net > wrote:
> Caution golf related question...
>
> I've been eye-balling the new superquad after him-hawwing about replacing my
> old TP driver. Anyone have any feedback or experience with same?
The only ones I've seen were firmly bolted to a display, and had a
$799
price tag.
|
| | |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 21:50:23
From: Martin Levac
Subject: Re: Shaft Stiffness and Irons
|
"Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1170809842.935863.96770@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 6, 12:02 pm, "tin Levac" <v...@REMOVEvideotron.ca> wrote:
>> Do you remember the advice you were given a long time ago when you
>> started
>> playing? "Let the club do the work." When I use the driver, I'm not
>> trying
>> to send the ball far, the club will do that for me nicely with its long
>> shaft and low loft, I just want to send the ball straight.
>
> Here is what Ernest Jones has to say about that:
>
> [begin quote]
>
> Unfortunately, in seeking instruction, the hacker is frequently told:
> "Let the club do the work."
>
> The teacher knows what he has in mind, and it is correct. But he
> has used the wrong words. What he means is that you cannot
> move the clubhead faster than you can swing it. So he should
> tell you to swing the clubhead. But he says: "Let the club do
> the work."
>
> What sometimes happens is that the hacker transposes from
> one failing to another. He then tries to let the club do the work
> -- without his participation. He does not use his hands, perhaps
> because he hasn't been told about the "feel" of the swing, lets
> the club fall against the ball. It is a fluffy stroke without any
> power or authority motivating the club's action.
>
> There must be force in the swing. When the hacker learns that
> force comes through controlling the clubhead with the hands
> and fingers, he is ready to move into the class of the swinger,
> where all good golfers belong.
>
> [end quote]
>
>
That quote doesn't fit with what I wrote. I other words, you quote the very
same words I wrote in a context that is different than the one I wrote them
for.
The context I wrote them in is this: Far versus close and the function for
which the club was designed.
The context you quote them in is this: Apply force versus not.
I have difficulty deciding whether you did this on purpose to confuse the
subject or if you simply wanted to point out that the words "Let the club do
the work" can be used in a different context than my original text or if you
are simply stupid.
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 22:26:10
From: Martin Levac
Subject: Re: Shaft Stiffness and Irons
|
"tin Levac" <vac3@REMOVEvideotron.ca > wrote in message
news:f7byh.46132$3D6.1628737@weber.videotron.net...
>
> "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_bill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1170809842.935863.96770@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 6, 12:02 pm, "tin Levac" <v...@REMOVEvideotron.ca> wrote:
>>> Do you remember the advice you were given a long time ago when you
>>> started
>>> playing? "Let the club do the work." When I use the driver, I'm not
>>> trying
>>> to send the ball far, the club will do that for me nicely with its long
>>> shaft and low loft, I just want to send the ball straight.
>>
>> Here is what Ernest Jones has to say about that:
>>
>> [begin quote]
>>
>> Unfortunately, in seeking instruction, the hacker is frequently told:
>> "Let the club do the work."
>>
>> The teacher knows what he has in mind, and it is correct. But he
>> has used the wrong words. What he means is that you cannot
>> move the clubhead faster than you can swing it. So he should
>> tell you to swing the clubhead. But he says: "Let the club do
>> the work."
>>
>> What sometimes happens is that the hacker transposes from
>> one failing to another. He then tries to let the club do the work
>> -- without his participation. He does not use his hands, perhaps
>> because he hasn't been told about the "feel" of the swing, lets
>> the club fall against the ball. It is a fluffy stroke without any
>> power or authority motivating the club's action.
>>
>> There must be force in the swing. When the hacker learns that
>> force comes through controlling the clubhead with the hands
>> and fingers, he is ready to move into the class of the swinger,
>> where all good golfers belong.
>>
>> [end quote]
>>
>>
>
> That quote doesn't fit with what I wrote. I other words, you quote the
> very same words I wrote in a context that is different than the one I
> wrote them for.
>
> The context I wrote them in is this: Far versus close and the function for
> which the club was designed.
>
> The context you quote them in is this: Apply force versus not.
>
> I have difficulty deciding whether you did this on purpose to confuse the
> subject or if you simply wanted to point out that the words "Let the club
> do the work" can be used in a different context than my original text or
> if you are simply stupid.
>
My apology, Bill, I didn't mean to write "stupid". What I meant to write was
"not sufficiently intelligent to understand the text". I wouldn't want you
to think that I'm trying to insult you or anything like that.
|
|
