| |
Main
Date: 28 Feb 2007 12:43:41
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: RSG Cage Match
|
Things are pretty lively on here between some people, so maybe we
could arrange a few cage matches between people at the next RSG
outing? I don't really follow who is arguing with who (gram
check?), but I read a lot of the posts and there seem to be some
lingering issues. Which two posters would you most like to see in the
ring?
|
|
| |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 07:09:13
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Apr 25, 4:00 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> >Oh yeah, right. Like there's actually meat in a Quarter Pounder.
>
> >Randy
>
> Damn, Randy. You're responding to a post from ch 1? :-)
Slow modem.
Back in the day whenever someone online asked me my handicap I'd say,
"Slow modem."
|
| |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 08:50:41
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 12:59 am, "bill-o" <assimil...@borg.org > wrote:
> > When someone first watches Da Ringer swing the first thought is, "Oh
> > shit, I got a bet with this guy?" Then you watch him putt and it's
> > like, "Double the bet!"
>
> He should play Laville! Talk about grudge matches! :-P
>
They'd never finish. It would be like:
"Is this good?" "No."
"Is this good?" "No."
"Is this good?" "No."
|
| | |
Date: 06 Mar 2007 16:17:05
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4--2007, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
> They'd never finish. It would be like:
> "Is this good?" "No."
> "Is this good?" "No."
> "Is this good?" "No."
And, before every four footer, "watch me miss this one!"
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 21:38:29
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 6:13 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
>
> >> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
>
> > Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
> > bad.
>
> That assumes you can afford the speeding ticket, right Annika?
It's those damned KY troopers you gotta watch out for.
Illinois too, but that's a different story.
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/29864876
I still can't believe I got nabbed in Kentucky. After all their
chicken that I've eaten!
I mean, I'm sittin there with a whole box of Krispy Kreme doughnuts on
the front seat and the pig still writes me a ticket. Just my fucking
luck ... I catch the one cop in the world who doesn't like doughnuts.
To make matters worse, the ticket cost me something like $150. Twenty
dollar fine and $130 "court costs." What court costs? I send them
the money and they cash the check. How fuckin hard is that?
I guess somebody's gotta pay for all them purty white fences.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:37:32
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172986709.614016.76870@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> On 3, 6:13 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
>>
>> > Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
>> > bad.
>>
>> That assumes you can afford the speeding ticket, right Annika?
>
> It's those damned KY troopers you gotta watch out for.
> Illinois too, but that's a different story.
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/29864876
>
> I still can't believe I got nabbed in Kentucky. After all their
> chicken that I've eaten!
> I mean, I'm sittin there with a whole box of Krispy Kreme doughnuts on
> the front seat and the pig still writes me a ticket. Just my fucking
> luck ... I catch the one cop in the world who doesn't like doughnuts.
> To make matters worse, the ticket cost me something like $150. Twenty
> dollar fine and $130 "court costs." What court costs? I send them
> the money and they cash the check. How fuckin hard is that?
> I guess somebody's gotta pay for all them purty white fences.
>
I'm suprised the picture didn't cost you an extra $50.00 press release fee.
Be happy you got away with the check cashing surcharge.
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 15:32:16
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 5:13 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172863782.734473.309420@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 2, 12:10 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> > wrote:
>
> >> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
>
> > Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
> > bad.
>
> That assumes you can afford the speeding ticket, right Annika?
C'mon, give Anni a break! He's used to the cultured and sophisticated
City of Chattanooga. Cincy is such a come down from that it can
sometimes be hard for a blue blooded chooch man to take!
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:51:01
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Dene wrote:
> On 2, 9:40 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>
> > Wow.
> >
> > I guess--in your mind--you're reiterating some sort of challenge to me.
> >
> > My golf skillset is what it is. Others have witnessed it and reported
> > on it. Whether you believe them or not is of no interest to me. And
> > certainly, your belief won't change it.
> >
> > If your life is so shallow, so incomplete, that only this kind of rabid,
> > foaming-at-the-mouth blustering will make your life worth living, well,
> > I feel sorry for you. A good therapist might help.
> >
> > I'll reiterate: Playing golf with you is not attractive to me, and I'm
> > not going out of my way to do it.
> >
> > I'll pass.
> >
> > Mike
>
> You were presumptious, Rob. Above is the real Mike Dalecki, unless
> you're buying a club from him.
>
> -Greg
Yup, that's him.
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:49:18
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Dene wrote:
> On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
>
> > but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> > always have on you regardless.
>
> Nor would he post it.
>
> -Greg
ahh! But I would, regardless!
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:57:47
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 9:40 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com > wrote:
> Wow.
>
> I guess--in your mind--you're reiterating some sort of challenge to me.
>
> My golf skillset is what it is. Others have witnessed it and reported
> on it. Whether you believe them or not is of no interest to me. And
> certainly, your belief won't change it.
>
> If your life is so shallow, so incomplete, that only this kind of rabid,
> foaming-at-the-mouth blustering will make your life worth living, well,
> I feel sorry for you. A good therapist might help.
>
> I'll reiterate: Playing golf with you is not attractive to me, and I'm
> not going out of my way to do it.
>
> I'll pass.
>
> Mike
You were presumptious, Rob. Above is the real Mike Dalecki, unless
you're buying a club from him.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:53:16
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net > wrote:
> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> always have on you regardless.
Nor would he post it.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:47:20
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 21:53:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
>
>> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
>> always have on you regardless.
>
>Nor would he post it.
>
>-Greg
>
>
>
I don't understand that. Why not post it? Would either guy be
embarrassed about the outcome? If there is a score shouldn't it be
public knowledge? Does the PGA tour not post the scores of the guys
who shoot 86 so as to not embarrass them?
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 13:21:22
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Sat, 03 2007 07:47:20 -0500, John van der Pflum
<nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:
>On 2 2007 21:53:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
>>> always have on you regardless.
>>
>>Nor would he post it.
>>
>>-Greg
>>
>>
>>
>
>I don't understand that. Why not post it? Would either guy be
>embarrassed about the outcome? If there is a score shouldn't it be
>public knowledge? Does the PGA tour not post the scores of the guys
>who shoot 86 so as to not embarrass them?
Come on John. The meaning here was that Mike has an ego handicap and
wouldn't post a bad score, so as to keep it low. You pointed out in
an earlier post that Greg is still throwing barbs at Newell, and that
he should let it go. This is the same crap...a chance to snipe at
Mike. Watch his response to this post. Whee...another chance to
snipe at someone for Greg. He's just a skulker.
The fact is that Dalecki doesn't want to ever have a match with Rob,
and Rob characterizes that as fear of him. It isn't fear, it's
repugnance.
--
___,
\o
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 18:02:38
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Sat, 03 2007 07:47:20 -0500, John van der Pflum
> <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org> wrote:
>
> >On 2 2007 21:53:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> >>> always have on you regardless.
> >>
> >>Nor would he post it.
> >>
> >>-Greg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I don't understand that. Why not post it? Would either guy be
> >embarrassed about the outcome? If there is a score shouldn't it be
> >public knowledge? Does the PGA tour not post the scores of the guys
> >who shoot 86 so as to not embarrass them?
>
> Come on John. The meaning here was that Mike has an ego handicap and
> wouldn't post a bad score, so as to keep it low. You pointed out in
> an earlier post that Greg is still throwing barbs at Newell, and that
> he should let it go. This is the same crap...a chance to snipe at
> Mike. Watch his response to this post. Whee...another chance to
> snipe at someone for Greg. He's just a skulker.
>
> The fact is that Dalecki doesn't want to ever have a match with Rob,
> and Rob characterizes that as fear of him. It isn't fear, it's
> repugnance.
Actually, my comment has nothing whatsoever to do with GHIN. A lot of people here do not want
the 94 they shoot posted because it "makes them look bad". I personally don't care. You shoot
what you shoot. What's there to be ashamed of?
The repugnance is mutual, and has been for some time, which should be obvious to even you, but
for me that's no reason to not play some golf. Competing with someone you really don't like can
be a lot of fun. I've done it may times and in things other than golf, making a lot of friends
in the process.
I can honestly say at this point I would not play a round of golf with Dalecki either though.
In the contest of this thread, I was only referring to past challeneges.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 05:44:57
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3--2007, Robert Hamilton <DBID@att.net > wrote:
> I can honestly say at this point I would not play a round of golf with
> Dalecki either though.
> In the contest of this thread, I was only referring to past challeneges.
I can honestly say I would play, and have played, with both of you. I guess
it won't ever be in the same 4some though. :-(
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 17:55:19
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:
: On Sat, 03 2007 07:47:20 -0500, John van der Pflum
: <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:
:
: >On 2 2007 21:53:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
: >
: >>On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
: >>
: >>> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
: >>> always have on you regardless.
: >>
: >>Nor would he post it.
: >>
: >>-Greg
: >>
: >>
: >>
: >
: >I don't understand that. Why not post it? Would either guy be
: >embarrassed about the outcome? If there is a score shouldn't it be
: >public knowledge? Does the PGA tour not post the scores of the guys
: >who shoot 86 so as to not embarrass them?
:
: Come on John. The meaning here was that Mike has an ego handicap and
: wouldn't post a bad score, so as to keep it low. You pointed out in
: an earlier post that Greg is still throwing barbs at Newell, and that
: he should let it go. This is the same crap...a chance to snipe at
: Mike. Watch his response to this post. Whee...another chance to
: snipe at someone for Greg. He's just a skulker.
:
: The fact is that Dalecki doesn't want to ever have a match with Rob,
: and Rob characterizes that as fear of him. It isn't fear, it's
: repugnance.
Maybe you know more about Mike's state of mind than mine, but
it doesn't seem like repugnance to me so much as it does indifference.
The whole discussion about Mike's cap is silly, though. Those of
have seen him play most recently agree that he's a legitimate
low handicapper. Those who express skepticism are the ones who
haven't seen him play. I would say to them, "Hey guys, you're
among golfers here, we know a 3 when we see one just as you would."
THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:08:08
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 4:17 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net > wrote:
>
> > When someone first watches Da Ringer swing the first thought is, "Oh
> > shit, I got a bet with this guy?" Then you watch him putt and it's
> > like, "Double the bet!"
>
> Here we go with his crap again. So be it. I told John that I wasn't
> going to post anything about our match after the second hole and he
> said we didn't have to play it out and that was fine with me. John
> turned out to be a decent guy and at that point I didn't care.
Da Ringer's name is John? Who knew?
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 18:19:38
From: newellsatwsu
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 3:57 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> Nice try, Scott. Koenig and Rev were not part of the "six"....and you
> know it. Rev didn't attend.
Rev was signed up, but had to WD at the last minute due to employment,
financial and post-school obligations. There were actually a few
folks that specifically signed up for the tourney that year to meet
Todd. Regardless of his attendance status, he did not want to play
with you at RSGNW based on the comments/accusations you made about him
post RSGNW04 (which was the beginning of making your own bed
re:RSGNW). He was also the first name I "outed" when this fit hit the
shan with you in December 05.
Koenig's status with you in regards to RSGNW at that time should seem
quite obvious regardless of the chronology you want to spin on it.
> "Bringing up my name in a false context" is rich. Reminds me of your
> deliberate use of these words....the "TITPB ceremony" in RSG, while I
> was gone.
I apologized for the poor context of the word "ceremony" because it
was nothing but a joke (played on me much more than you) with a bowl
and a fake rubber turd. The context of your specific name TITPB was
well known and well referenced here in RSG before the tournament joke
that I did not design or execute. This shouldn't have been much of a
surprise to you based on our storied past and drama.
> Regardless, my regrets/remorse and your lack thereof, have been fully
> hashed in RSG.
You're wrong about my lack thereof. You think I wanted it to come to
this? I am truly sorry it came to this. I'm sorry you felt compelled
to threaten me with lawsuit about a tournament that is supposedly dead
to you. I'm sorry that others have witmessed this drama on the group
and have made their judgements about you, me and the other RSG
participants and tournaments. I didn't produce RSGNW so that I could
play god with people's feelings and have the foresight that I'd have
to make these kind of decisions. I did it so that my friends could
come together once a year to have some fun playing golf in a little
different format that your typical gross/net medal score method.
That's all.
> Finally, I have no idea if you will be at RSG-Cincy. Just know that I
> will not object to being paired with you. I will not respond to
> pettiness with pettiness.
Agreed.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:57:01
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 3:36 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net > wrote:
> On 2, 3:11 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2, 2:52 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net> wrote:
> > > You weren't going to tell her about any threatening civil suits
> > > either?
>
> Again, I repeat (wasting my breath), you weren't going to tell her
> about any threatening civil suits either? Wow, I would have thought
> if you were that confident in the feasibility about something as major
> as bringing a lawsuit against someone, you might consult or discuss
> the subject with your spouse. Probably better just to blame the
> weather.
>
> > Uh.....Scott. I know you want to hijack this thread to accentuate
> > your hero status but these are the facts about your "six"....
>
> > 1. There were 5 (Snedden, Strauss, Rider, Buege, and a 5th whom I
> > don't recall right now).
>
> I have no ego in this in terms of my status in RSG. And you can argue
> the literal to number to wiggle yourself around in creating your
> little spins however you want. BTW, you also missed The Rev, Koenig,
> and me (not cause I didn't want to play golf with you, but because I
> didn't want you polluting other's participation).
>
> > Finally....this fact is without question. This is about RSG-
> > Cincy....not your tournament.
>
> If it's about RSG Cincy then why do you have to bring up RSGNW?
>
> > When are you going to accept this?
>
> Maybe when you take any responsibility or remorse for your actions
> instead of blaming everyone else for your social status in RSG. Or
> maybe it could be as simple as to quit bringing up my name and/or
> tourney in a false context.
Nice try, Scott. Koenig and Rev were not part of the "six"....and you
know it. Rev didn't attend. k was on record in saying he wasn't
part of it. He may have piled on afterward but he wasn't one of the
six, five, or three. You exaggerated these the position of these
people to suit your agenda.
"Bringing up my name in a false context" is rich. Reminds me of your
deliberate use of these words....the "TITPB ceremony" in RSG, while I
was gone. Another example of you trying to impress others.
Regardless, my regrets/remorse and your lack thereof, have been fully
hashed in RSG. My position about the matter has not changed, nor is
it likely. I have no relationship with you, the "five", or your
tournament, so rehashing prior events is an exercise of futility.
Please accept this.
Finally, I have no idea if you will be at RSG-Cincy. Just know that I
will not object to being paired with you. I will not respond to
pettiness with pettiness.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:36:11
From: newellsatwsu
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 3:11 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 2, 2:52 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net> wrote:
> > You weren't going to tell her about any threatening civil suits
> > either?
Again, I repeat (wasting my breath), you weren't going to tell her
about any threatening civil suits either? Wow, I would have thought
if you were that confident in the feasibility about something as major
as bringing a lawsuit against someone, you might consult or discuss
the subject with your spouse. Probably better just to blame the
weather.
> Uh.....Scott. I know you want to hijack this thread to accentuate
> your hero status but these are the facts about your "six"....
>
> 1. There were 5 (Snedden, Strauss, Rider, Buege, and a 5th whom I
> don't recall right now).
I have no ego in this in terms of my status in RSG. And you can argue
the literal to number to wiggle yourself around in creating your
little spins however you want. BTW, you also missed The Rev, Koenig,
and me (not cause I didn't want to play golf with you, but because I
didn't want you polluting other's participation).
> Finally....this fact is without question. This is about RSG-
> Cincy....not your tournament.
If it's about RSG Cincy then why do you have to bring up RSGNW?
> When are you going to accept this?
Maybe when you take any responsibility or remorse for your actions
instead of blaming everyone else for your social status in RSG. Or
maybe it could be as simple as to quit bringing up my name and/or
tourney in a false context.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:11:05
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 2:52 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net > wrote:
> On 2, 1:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > As it stands, my wife has no knowledge about the "Newell
> > Nonsense."
>
> You weren't going to tell her about any threatening civil suits
> either?
>
> > Consequently, there was never a need to tell her about it.
>
> Yeah, you wouldn't want to have to explain to her why not only 1/4
> of the field in RSGNW, but also a good majorirty of the active
> posters
> in this newsgroup think many of your past actions here have managed
> to fall below even RSG's low standard of social tolerance.
Uh.....Scott. I know you want to hijack this thread to accentuate
your hero status but these are the facts about your "six"....
1. There were 5 (Snedden, Strauss, Rider, Buege, and a 5th whom I
don't recall right now).
2. Rider and Buege went on record within RSG disputing your claim
that they refused to play with me. They expressed concerns and
preferences but made no demands. You exaggerated their position.
3. These 5....or 3....do not represent 1/4 of the field. Was there
not at least 24 participants?
Finally....this fact is without question. This is about RSG-
Cincy....not your tournament. 2004 represents the final year I
attended your tournament. That will always be the case, regardless if
you grow a conscience between now and then.
When are you going to accept this?
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 14:52:23
From: newellsatwsu
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 1:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> As it stands, my wife has no knowledge about the "Newell
> Nonsense."
You weren't going to tell her about any threatening civil suits
either?
> Consequently, there was never a need to tell her about it.
Yeah, you wouldn't want to have to explain to her why not only 1/4
of the field in RSGNW, but also a good majorirty of the active
posters
in this newsgroup think many of your past actions here have managed
to fall below even RSG's low standard of social tolerance.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 14:15:51
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 1:56 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Dene <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : John....I have a serious question for you. If my wife and I were to
> : sign up, would there be any repeat of the "Newell Nonsense?"
>
> I'll speak out of turn for a sec: I'm sure there would be people who
> would choose to skip Cincy this year if you were there. I don't know
> if it's many and I don't particularly care. There probably ought to
> be people who would skip Cincy if they knew *I* would be there,
> because I'm sneaky long and all. Hey to Annika.
>
> Anyway, if I can get there, I will, whether you're there or not.
>
Thanks Chris. Your principles have always been obvious, despite the
fact you're a lollypop liberal. : >
I hope your opening sentence is untrue, mostly for John's sake. I
don't think this situation is particularily fair to him but life is
full of dilemmas. The right decision usually is not the easiest
decision. I can only promise that I will do my best to get along with
all at the tournament and not assume ill-will, unless it obviously
manifests itself. That's how I conducted myself at previous
tournaments.
I would enjoy meeting you. You would definitely enjoy meeting my wife
and vice versa.. She thought Annika was cute......
So much for her taste in men.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 13:50:47
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 1:17 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net > wrote:
> Here we go with his crap again. So be it. I told John that I wasn't
> going to post anything about our match after the second hole and he
> said we didn't have to play it out and that was fine with me. John
> turned out to be a decent guy and at that point I didn't care. If he
> had turned out to be a Dalecki, I would have played it out for sure
> and posted blow by blow...and that's what Dalecki is afraid of.
>
> Why can't mighty Mike speak for himself on these things?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'm sure he will....the next time he's amused about somebody's
response to you.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 13:39:27
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 1:21 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net > wrote:
> For sure. If you will be around the week of the GEA event then we will
> be on one way or another. If I can't make RSG Cincy, we'll play around
> the 24th!
> Looking forward to it. Right now I'll plan for RSG Cincy unless the
> grant comes though.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
That's the final straw. I regretted not meeting Rob at the Rhoid.
RSG-Cincy would provide an opportunity.
John....I have a serious question for you. If my wife and I were to
sign up, would there be any repeat of the "Newell Nonsense?" Namely,
if somebody or somebodies objected to my presence, will you yield to
them? As it stands, my wife has no knowledge about the "Newell
Nonsense." She was not enthusiastic about ever returning to RSG-NW,
partially because of her knee, but also the nasty weather.
Consequently, there was never a need to tell her about it. (Why ruin
her positive view of Newell, Rider and Buege). However, she loves to
travel, play warm weather golf, and compete. I love
Stableford.....and again, I'd enjoy meeting you, Rob, and whoever.
What say you, John?
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 17:55:09
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 13:39:27 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>
>John....I have a serious question for you. If my wife and I were to
>sign up, would there be any repeat of the "Newell Nonsense?" Namely,
>if somebody or somebodies objected to my presence, will you yield to
>them? As it stands, my wife has no knowledge about the "Newell
>Nonsense." She was not enthusiastic about ever returning to RSG-NW,
>partially because of her knee, but also the nasty weather.
>Consequently, there was never a need to tell her about it. (Why ruin
>her positive view of Newell, Rider and Buege). However, she loves to
>travel, play warm weather golf, and compete. I love
>Stableford.....and again, I'd enjoy meeting you, Rob, and whoever.
>
>What say you, John?
>
>-Greg
Wow. OK. Here we go.
Scott is a good good friend of mine and I have a deep fondness for him
and Kelly. He, and a number of other (at times controversial) RSGers,
were with me on a golf trip that literally changed my life. Those
people, to me, are closer than my own blood brothers and sisters. I
would do anything for those people. No questions asked.
As I said back when this whole debate was raging on, I fully stand
behind any host to do whatever the hell he wants to do with his event.
He is God. I unequivocally reject the characterization that it was
"Newell Nonsense". It was the host doing what he thought was best for
his event. I'll stand by ANY RSG host -- Scott, Thor, Mike Dalecki,
Bob Patterson, Randy, Eric, Stemmer, -- TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT TO
DO WITH THEIR EVENT. Period. End of story.
I would be furious if any personal feuds spilled over during my event.
If I had an inkling something like that was going to happen I would
take whatever steps I deemed necessary to make sure things didn't get
out of hand or violent -- including removing someone from the event.
In a heartbeat. I might give them a second chance the next year if
they still wanted to come. I understand that not everyone gets along
and that's fine but suck it up, be a man, and be civil. If you're an
asshole don't let everyone know. Pretend to be a decent human being.
RSG Cincinnati does not have a Code of Conduct and I'd be really
annoyed to have to write one. I expect everyone to come, play golf,
drink a few drinks (alcoholic or not), tell some stories, and leave
with some new ones. If you want to have a lively debate about
something, fine. But be civil and respectful of the other person's
idiotic views.
I do my best to honor one or two pairing requests. I have yet to have
any "Don't pair me with this guy" requests but I know that some people
prefer to not be paired with other or whose personalities clash so I
do my best to keep them apart if I can, especially in the tournament
rounds where things are a bit more serious.
Anyone on RSG is welcome to come to my event and I do my best as a
host to make sure that everyone has a good time. The only person who
I would have a strong negative towards would be Eric. I think his
words go far beyond the petty bickering and Monty Python-esque "Yes it
is, no it isn't" arguing that takes place most of the time in RSG. He
and I would have to have a serious personal discussion before I would
feel comfortable about him playing.
Would I feel some apprehension if you, Koenig, Annika, Rob, Scott,
Bobby Knight, George Hibbard, Randy, and Larry all decided to come to
my event, knowing the past history between these folks? Of course I
would. Would I expect those people to behave like adults? Absolutely.
I believe the medium of RSG itself lends itself to fighting. Tell me
honestly, would you -- or BK -- or Larry -- or Annika -- or -- Ken
Pitts -- or Rob -- or whoever -- really say some of the things you've
said, and act the fool, if your "enemy" was sitting across the table
from you having a beer or diet coke? Maybe I'm being naive but I
think you'd all be a lot more civil in person. Annika and Ken Pitts
are two of the best examples of this dichotomy. Online it's easy to
see how they can rub people the wrong way and get them up in arms. But
in real life both of them are quiet, kind[1], complimentary, and great
be around. Hell, if Koenig and Bellomy can get together, play golf
and agree to disagree anyone can do it.
[1] Except for Annika peeing my the RSG Cincinnati Jug.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | |
Date: 25 Apr 2007 15:52:33
From: \R&B\
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote
>
> As I said back when this whole debate was raging on, I fully stand
> behind any host to do whatever the hell he wants to do with his event.
> He is God. [snip] I'll stand by ANY RSG host -- Scott, Thor, Mike
> Dalecki,
> Bob Patterson, Randy, Eric, Stemmer, -- TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT TO
> DO WITH THEIR EVENT. Period. End of story.
We'll see if you still believe that when I impose a weight minimum for the
next RSG-ATLANTA, skinny boy.
Randy
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 23:47:33
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 3:56 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 4 2007 09:13:47 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >On 4, 9:05 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
> >I'd be quite happy if the previous nonsense were never mentioned
> >again.
>
> >-Greg
>
> Does this mean that you are going to lead by example and never mention
> it[1] again?
>
> [1] Anything having to do with RSG NW 2005 and 2006.
> --
>
> jvdp
> RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
I think that can be managed.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:21:00
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote in message
> are two of the best examples of this dichotomy. Online it's easy to
> see how they can rub people the wrong way and get them up in arms. But
> in real life both of them are quiet, kind[1], complimentary, and great
> be around. Hell, if Koenig and Bellomy can get together, play golf
> and agree to disagree anyone can do it.
>
> [1] Except for Annika peeing my the RSG Cincinnati Jug.
> --
I believe i may be the exception to the rule that one rarely says something
in real life that they may post here. I'm not really that reserved and
that's my charm......at least to me it is....Others may disagree[1]
[1] Other may be defined as a majority.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:56:06
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: John....I have a serious question for you. If my wife and I were to
: sign up, would there be any repeat of the "Newell Nonsense?"
I'll speak out of turn for a sec: I'm sure there would be people who
would choose to skip Cincy this year if you were there. I don't know
if it's many and I don't particularly care. There probably ought to
be people who would skip Cincy if they knew *I* would be there,
because I'm sneaky long and all. Hey to Annika.
Anyway, if I can get there, I will, whether you're there or not.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 13:21:29
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 11:10 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 07:26:51 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 1, 8:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
> >> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>
> >> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
> >> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
> >> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
> >> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>
> >> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
> >> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
> >> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
> >> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>
> >> Whadaya say???????
>
> >Unlike others around here, I'm more than game for a challenge. I will
> >have to check my calendar though. I am to teach some sort of workshops
> >as part of a pending grant, and might not be able to make RSG
> >Cincinnati, but there is a GEA outing in Cincinnati that I also would
> >like to try to make. If the grnt doesn't come though I should be able
> >to make it for RSG Cincinnati. The downside of the GEA outing (for
> >you, I presume) is that it is the same weekend as some golf related
> >gathering in Wisconsin. I should be able to make one of the two
> >though.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't go to RSGWI. I can usually only do two events
> each year -- mine and Ohio -- unless I cash in some serious
> wife/family points. This year I'm heading back to RSGNW with those
> points so RSGWI is out. I've heard the courses up there are great,
> though, so I want to make it some day.
>
> Divotdigger forwarded me the GEA thread. It would be fun to go so
> I'll try and keep an eye on it. The one downside both of those
> courses he plans on playing are not walker friendly. Legendary Run
> absolutely will not let you walk the back 9 and Stonelick has some
> good hikes between greens and tees (haven't played there but have
> traded emails with the owner about a possible RSG-CIN date there).
>
>
>
> >In any event we will have to travel up to Ohio to visit my wife's
> >family at some time, so we should be able to get together sometime!
> >Maybe if Randy does an RSG Atlanta as well? Should be plenty of
> >opportunity.
>
> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
For sure. If you will be around the week of the GEA event then we will
be on one way or another. If I can't make RSG Cincy, we'll play around
the 24th!
Looking forward to it. Right now I'll plan for RSG Cincy unless the
grant comes though.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 10:53:34
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:24 am, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_b...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On 3, 12:33 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3, 9:44 am, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_b...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Scott has nothing to regret, except maybe knowing you.
> > > I don't mean that as an insult to you, either.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Gee....why would a rational human being be insulted by a comment like
> > that?
>
> > I'll put it this way, Bill. Suppose I were to say this....
>
> > "I have no regrets about being in RSG, except that you're part of it.
> > I don't mean that as an insult to you either."
>
> > Feeling warm and fuzzy?? :>
>
> > -Greg
>
> Well, let me try to clear that up for you. I think a lot of people
> in RSG consider you to be an asshat, based on some of the
> shit that you have stirred up. In my opinion, those people
> have nothing to regret in avoiding your company.
>
> However, that does not mean that I think you ARE an
> asshat. Probably in your own mind, you are not. There
> are probably some people here in RSG that like you, too,
> and I'm sure you have friends outside RSG.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
An asshat? Is that better or worse than an asshole? Or the same?
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:34:28
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1173034414.882335.311770@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> An asshat? Is that better or worse than an asshole? Or the same?
>
The same, just the other end of the apparatus.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 09:04:35
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 8:45 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 4, 3:21 am, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > i.e."God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change?"
> > Sounds good to me.
>
> > -Greg
>
> You forgot the second line of the prayer:
> "But grant me the opportunity to bring it up on a Newsgroup at least a
> couple of times a year."
Your buddy Bob brings it up often, safely from behind a claimed
killfile.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 08:58:13
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 6:24 am, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_b...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On 3, 12:33 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3, 9:44 am, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_b...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Scott has nothing to regret, except maybe knowing you.
> > > I don't mean that as an insult to you, either.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Gee....why would a rational human being be insulted by a comment like
> > that?
>
> > I'll put it this way, Bill. Suppose I were to say this....
>
> > "I have no regrets about being in RSG, except that you're part of it.
> > I don't mean that as an insult to you either."
>
> > Feeling warm and fuzzy?? :>
>
> > -Greg
>
> Well, let me try to clear that up for you. I think a lot of people
> in RSG consider you to be an asshat, based on some of the
> shit that you have stirred up. In my opinion, those people
> have nothing to regret in avoiding your company.
>
> However, that does not mean that I think you ARE an
> asshat. Probably in your own mind, you are not. There
> are probably some people here in RSG that like you, too,
> and I'm sure you have friends outside RSG.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
That's a fair analysis.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 08:45:15
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 3:21 am, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> i.e."God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change?"
> Sounds good to me.
>
> -Greg
You forgot the second line of the prayer:
"But grant me the opportunity to bring it up on a Newsgroup at least a
couple of times a year."
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:40:48
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1173026715.515148.130840@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> On 4, 3:21 am, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>> i.e."God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change?"
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> -Greg
>
> You forgot the second line of the prayer:
> "But grant me the opportunity to bring it up on a Newsgroup at least a
> couple of times a year."
>
>
>
That's the funniest thing I've seen it weeks, other than my golf swing.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 06:24:50
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 12:33 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 3, 9:44 am, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_b...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Scott has nothing to regret, except maybe knowing you.
> > I don't mean that as an insult to you, either.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Gee....why would a rational human being be insulted by a comment like
> that?
>
> I'll put it this way, Bill. Suppose I were to say this....
>
> "I have no regrets about being in RSG, except that you're part of it.
> I don't mean that as an insult to you either."
>
> Feeling warm and fuzzy?? :>
>
> -Greg
Well, let me try to clear that up for you. I think a lot of people
in RSG consider you to be an asshat, based on some of the
shit that you have stirred up. In my opinion, those people
have nothing to regret in avoiding your company.
However, that does not mean that I think you ARE an
asshat. Probably in your own mind, you are not. There
are probably some people here in RSG that like you, too,
and I'm sure you have friends outside RSG.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 00:21:13
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 9:50 pm, "bill-o" <assimil...@borg.org > wrote:
> On 3--2007, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > I want to give Scott a chance to elaborate on his regret. It's more
> > for his sake than it is for me.
>
> What Scott or anyone else does is beyond your control so deal with what you
> can control, you, move on.
>
> --
> bill-o
>
> A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
> two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
i.e."God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change?"
Sounds good to me.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 11:57:09
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
> Scott has nothing to regret, except maybe knowing you.
> I don't mean that as an insult to you, either.- Hide quoted text -
>
What the? I don't even know the history of this issues (or these
issues), but I'm pretty sure that's an insult.
"You're an asshole. I don't mean that as an insult."
(Ok, done sticking my nose in others' business.)
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 10:33:37
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 9:44 am, "Birdie Bill" <bighorn_b...@hotmail.com > wrote:
>
> Scott has nothing to regret, except maybe knowing you.
> I don't mean that as an insult to you, either.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Gee....why would a rational human being be insulted by a comment like
that?
I'll put it this way, Bill. Suppose I were to say this....
"I have no regrets about being in RSG, except that you're part of it.
I don't mean that as an insult to you either."
Feeling warm and fuzzy?? : >
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 09:44:12
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 11:22 am, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 3, 4:38 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2 2007 21:24:09 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >On 2, 6:19 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> > >> > Regardless, my regrets/remorse and your lack thereof, have been fully
> > >> > hashed in RSG.
>
> > >> You're wrong about my lack thereof. You think I wanted it to come to
> > >> this? I am truly sorry it came to this. I'm sorry you felt compelled
> > >> to threaten me with lawsuit about a tournament that is supposedly dead
> > >> to you. I'm sorry that others have witmessed this drama on the group
> > >> and have made their judgements about you, me and the other RSG
> > >> participants and tournaments. I didn't produce RSGNW so that I could
> > >> play god with people's feelings and have the foresight that I'd have
> > >> to make these kind of decisions. I did it so that my friends could
> > >> come together once a year to have some fun playing golf in a little
> > >> different format that your typical gross/net medal score method.
> > >> That's all.
>
> > >Frankly, I see more victim talk than I do an actual apology/remorse.
> > >But....perhaps I'm seeing the situation through red glasses, so I'll
> > >ask this specific question. Knowing what you know now, what would
> > >have done differently, starting in December? You need not address the
> > >"ceremony." I accept your explanation. I'm curious what you would
> > >do differently in December.
>
> > >Answering my own question, I would have not criticized your tournament
> > >in RSG a month prior. Also, I would have not sent you an e-mail (any
> > >e-mails) about suing you. Had I consulted with Bowen or Buege first,
> > >instead of my attorney, I'd learned that the "ceremony" was never a
> > >ceremony.....just a gag. When I read about it in RSG, I honestly had
> > >visions of you standing up in front of 25 or more people and
> > >slandering me, my reputation, into the ground. Fortunately, you
> > >didn't do that.
>
> > >Ironically, I do believe that you were somewhat of a victim. I think
> > >the so-called six are more to blame, along with me, than you the
> > >host. But.... had you stood your ground with them, like John will,
> > >there never would have been a problem, especially since we couldn't
> > >come despite my intitial hopes. Again, Theresa has no knowledge of
> > >these events and yet has no desire to attend to this day. She
> > >reiterated that tonight when we discussed John's event. She hates
> > >cold weather golf and she didn't think much of k or Todd.....drunk
> > >or sober.
>
> > >Like it or not, they changed your tournament.
>
> > >-Greg
>
> > <sigh> Come on, man, let it go.
>
> > Stop opening up the old wounds and comparing a future unwritten ("What
> > John will do.......") to hindsight ("what would you have done
> > differently.....").
>
> > You said here, or at least gave the impression, that you want it
> > forget about it and not be involved in pettiness but then I wake up
> > this morning to see you bringing it up again. You say that you are
> > "over it" but you talking about it.
>
> > Which do you want? To bring it up again and again or move on
> > --
>
> > jvdp
> > Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I want to give Scott a chance to elaborate on his regret. It's more
> for his sake than it is for me. RSG-NW is dead to me but if Scott
> were able to accept my regrets and vice versa, then it would make it
> easier for both of us to be in the same tournament, should he and I
> attends your's. It's not a requirement, nor a prerequisite...it's
> simply an opportunity to move forward the best way possible. We will
> always disagree about certain things but if I sense he has regrets
> beyond the personal consequences of his decisions, then we have
> something in common....something to build on.
>
> -Greg- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Scott has nothing to regret, except maybe knowing you.
I don't mean that as an insult to you, either.
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 09:22:52
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 4:38 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 21:24:09 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 2, 6:19 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> >> > Regardless, my regrets/remorse and your lack thereof, have been fully
> >> > hashed in RSG.
>
> >> You're wrong about my lack thereof. You think I wanted it to come to
> >> this? I am truly sorry it came to this. I'm sorry you felt compelled
> >> to threaten me with lawsuit about a tournament that is supposedly dead
> >> to you. I'm sorry that others have witmessed this drama on the group
> >> and have made their judgements about you, me and the other RSG
> >> participants and tournaments. I didn't produce RSGNW so that I could
> >> play god with people's feelings and have the foresight that I'd have
> >> to make these kind of decisions. I did it so that my friends could
> >> come together once a year to have some fun playing golf in a little
> >> different format that your typical gross/net medal score method.
> >> That's all.
>
> >Frankly, I see more victim talk than I do an actual apology/remorse.
> >But....perhaps I'm seeing the situation through red glasses, so I'll
> >ask this specific question. Knowing what you know now, what would
> >have done differently, starting in December? You need not address the
> >"ceremony." I accept your explanation. I'm curious what you would
> >do differently in December.
>
> >Answering my own question, I would have not criticized your tournament
> >in RSG a month prior. Also, I would have not sent you an e-mail (any
> >e-mails) about suing you. Had I consulted with Bowen or Buege first,
> >instead of my attorney, I'd learned that the "ceremony" was never a
> >ceremony.....just a gag. When I read about it in RSG, I honestly had
> >visions of you standing up in front of 25 or more people and
> >slandering me, my reputation, into the ground. Fortunately, you
> >didn't do that.
>
> >Ironically, I do believe that you were somewhat of a victim. I think
> >the so-called six are more to blame, along with me, than you the
> >host. But.... had you stood your ground with them, like John will,
> >there never would have been a problem, especially since we couldn't
> >come despite my intitial hopes. Again, Theresa has no knowledge of
> >these events and yet has no desire to attend to this day. She
> >reiterated that tonight when we discussed John's event. She hates
> >cold weather golf and she didn't think much of k or Todd.....drunk
> >or sober.
>
> >Like it or not, they changed your tournament.
>
> >-Greg
>
> <sigh> Come on, man, let it go.
>
> Stop opening up the old wounds and comparing a future unwritten ("What
> John will do.......") to hindsight ("what would you have done
> differently.....").
>
> You said here, or at least gave the impression, that you want it
> forget about it and not be involved in pettiness but then I wake up
> this morning to see you bringing it up again. You say that you are
> "over it" but you talking about it.
>
> Which do you want? To bring it up again and again or move on
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I want to give Scott a chance to elaborate on his regret. It's more
for his sake than it is for me. RSG-NW is dead to me but if Scott
were able to accept my regrets and vice versa, then it would make it
easier for both of us to be in the same tournament, should he and I
attends your's. It's not a requirement, nor a prerequisite...it's
simply an opportunity to move forward the best way possible. We will
always disagree about certain things but if I sense he has regrets
beyond the personal consequences of his decisions, then we have
something in common....something to build on.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 05:50:51
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3--2007, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
> I want to give Scott a chance to elaborate on his regret. It's more
> for his sake than it is for me.
What Scott or anyone else does is beyond your control so deal with what you
can control, you, move on.
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 16:44:36
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 13:21:29 -0800, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>
>For sure. If you will be around the week of the GEA event then we will
>be on one way or another. If I can't make RSG Cincy, we'll play around
>the 24th!
>Looking forward to it. Right now I'll plan for RSG Cincy unless the
>grant comes though.
>
I should be in town for the GEA thing. We'll be in touch.....
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 13:17:27
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 10:51 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 1, 7:35 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> > proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> > to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>
> I don't have $50,000, but I'd probably wager $50 on Dalecki in this
> one.
> Maybe this match will last longer than your big grudge match against
> Da Ringer, which I got to witness and which was mercifully called off
> after the 2nd hole.
>
> Da Ringer vs. Dalecki might be a good competitive match, however.
>
> When someone first watches Da Ringer swing the first thought is, "Oh
> shit, I got a bet with this guy?" Then you watch him putt and it's
> like, "Double the bet!"
Here we go with his crap again. So be it. I told John that I wasn't
going to post anything about our match after the second hole and he
said we didn't have to play it out and that was fine with me. John
turned out to be a decent guy and at that point I didn't care. If he
had turned out to be a Dalecki, I would have played it out for sure
and posted blow by blow...and that's what Dalecki is afraid of.
Why can't mighty Mike speak for himself on these things?
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 11:29:42
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 12:10 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
>
> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
bad.
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 18:13:49
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172863782.734473.309420@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2, 12:10 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
>
> Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
> bad.
>
>
That assumes you can afford the speeding ticket, right Annika?
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 14:43:38
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 11:29:42 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 12:10 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>>
>> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
>
>Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
>bad.
>
That's only your old neighborhood. The people with class (like me)
live on the east side of town.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 08:56:30
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 5:16 am, High_Colo...@webtv.net (Miss Anne Thrope) wrote:
> There you all go again.........pretending that there's an ounce of
> testosterone amongst you.
>
> Silly girls.
You tell us, missy.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 08:55:36
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 8:23 am, "Ben." <komb...@yahoo.com > wrote:
>
> What I really love is how he felt the compulsory need to point out
> that he only receives your transmissions secondhand lest he be outed
> for keeping up w/ the Hamiltons. But alas, Rob, it is you that is the
> Gallus Domesticus in this scenario. If you were _actually_ as bold as
> you want us to think you are, you would simply email Mike, call him
> out, make arrangements, and THEN boast. As it stands, you have placed
> the cart latitudinally north of the Equus Caballus. You are
> comfortable that Mr. Dalecki has no desire to step foot on a golf
> course with the likes of you, so you can safely issue empty challenges
> from the comfort of your computer. It should be noted that many
> around here claim Mr. Dalecki is quite the linksman, and that you
> really aren't all that proficient w/ the crooked stick. Don't get me
> wrong, I'd love to see just one of these hollow RSG challenges come to
> fruition, but I'm not losing any sleep.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Glad you caught that about "seeing it in another response." Cowardice
defined.
Dullecki impressed Knit with an impressive round one afternoon at his
course. I attribute it to being "in the zone." It happens....even to
me. One particular Saturday morning, I had lowest score at RSG-NW,
even beating Tex by a stroke. Did that round put me in Tex's
category....nope....not even close. Let the club peddler win his own
tournament or another's, then he'll be somebody to reckon with. Until
then, it's a flash in the pan. My money's on Rob--- >the professor of
real science, an unpretentious gentleman, and a better golfer.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 08:51:45
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 7:35 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net > wrote:
>
> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
I don't have $50,000, but I'd probably wager $50 on Dalecki in this
one.
Maybe this match will last longer than your big grudge match against
Da Ringer, which I got to witness and which was mercifully called off
after the 2nd hole.
Da Ringer vs. Dalecki might be a good competitive match, however.
When someone first watches Da Ringer swing the first thought is, "Oh
shit, I got a bet with this guy?" Then you watch him putt and it's
like, "Double the bet!"
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 05:59:00
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2--2007, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
> When someone first watches Da Ringer swing the first thought is, "Oh
> shit, I got a bet with this guy?" Then you watch him putt and it's
> like, "Double the bet!"
He should play Laville! Talk about grudge matches! :-P
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 19:21:44
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
bill-o wrote:
> On 2--2007, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > When someone first watches Da Ringer swing the first thought is, "Oh
> > shit, I got a bet with this guy?" Then you watch him putt and it's
> > like, "Double the bet!"
>
> He should play Laville! Talk about grudge matches! :-P
>
> --
That would be a good match; both about equal golf abilitywise and enough
bad blood to know it's for real!
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 17:11:23
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 08:51:45 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>On 1, 7:35 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>
>I don't have $50,000, but I'd probably wager $50 on Dalecki in this
>one.
>Maybe this match will last longer than your big grudge match against
>Da Ringer, which I got to witness and which was mercifully called off
>after the 2nd hole.
>
>Da Ringer vs. Dalecki might be a good competitive match, however.
>
The problem here is that they live 1000 miles apart. Unless they go
to an RSG tournament, and Rob says that he's not interested in that,
how would they work it out? The wager should be enough that it's
worth it for the travel for either. I'd put money on Dalecki without
a doubt. He damned sure isn't scared of Rob.
--
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 08:42:31
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 6:24 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 1 2007 20:43:56 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 1, 6:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
> >> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>
> >> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
> >> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
> >> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
> >> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>
> >> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
> >> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
> >> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
> >> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>
> >> Whadaya say???????
> >> --
>
> >> jvdp
> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> >This kind of juvenile stuff is what's wrong with RSG. ;>
>
> >-Greg
>
> Hey! I'm 35, I'm not juvenile! ;-)
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Got you by 13 years, junior. ; >
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 12:05:32
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 08:42:31 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 6:24 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 1 2007 20:43:56 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 1, 6:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>>
>> >> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
>> >> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
>> >> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
>> >> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>>
>> >> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
>> >> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
>> >> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
>> >> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>>
>> >> Whadaya say???????
>> >> --
>>
>> >> jvdp
>> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>>
>> >This kind of juvenile stuff is what's wrong with RSG. ;>
>>
>> >-Greg
>>
>> Hey! I'm 35, I'm not juvenile! ;-)
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Got you by 13 years, junior. ;>
>
>-Greg
I'll let you play from the Old Ladies tees then.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 08:23:44
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 9:18 am, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net > wrote:
> On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The_Professor wrote:
> > > On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> > >>>> gone.
> > >>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
> > >> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>
> > >> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
> > >> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
> > >> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
> > >> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
> > >> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
> > >> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>
> > >> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>
> > >> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>
> > >> I'd also like to witness:
> > >> Stemmer vs. Dene
> > >> BK vs. Dene
> > >> Big Tex vs. Dene
> > >> Newell vs. Dene
> > >> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
> > >> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
> > >> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
> > >> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
> > >> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
> > >> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
> > >> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
> > >> Multi vs. Pitts
> > >> Brazee vs. Google
>
> > > I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> > > proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> > > to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>
> > > I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>
> > I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>
> > Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
> > recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
> > instances where you actually did that.
>
> > Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
> > precedent, would it?
>
> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
> "bok, bok, bok......"
> At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
> lame cowardice.- Hide quoted text -
What I really love is how he felt the compulsory need to point out
that he only receives your transmissions secondhand lest he be outed
for keeping up w/ the Hamiltons. But alas, Rob, it is you that is the
Gallus Domesticus in this scenario. If you were _actually_ as bold as
you want us to think you are, you would simply email Mike, call him
out, make arrangements, and THEN boast. As it stands, you have placed
the cart latitudinally north of the Equus Caballus. You are
comfortable that Mr. Dalecki has no desire to step foot on a golf
course with the likes of you, so you can safely issue empty challenges
from the comfort of your computer. It should be noted that many
around here claim Mr. Dalecki is quite the linksman, and that you
really aren't all that proficient w/ the crooked stick. Don't get me
wrong, I'd love to see just one of these hollow RSG challenges come to
fruition, but I'm not losing any sleep.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 07:26:51
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 8:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>
> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>
> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>
> Whadaya say???????
Unlike others around here, I'm more than game for a challenge. I will
have to check my calendar though. I am to teach some sort of workshops
as part of a pending grant, and might not be able to make RSG
Cincinnati, but there is a GEA outing in Cincinnati that I also would
like to try to make. If the grnt doesn't come though I should be able
to make it for RSG Cincinnati. The downside of the GEA outing (for
you, I presume) is that it is the same weekend as some golf related
gathering in Wisconsin. I should be able to make one of the two
though.
In any event we will have to travel up to Ohio to visit my wife's
family at some time, so we should be able to get together sometime!
Maybe if Randy does an RSG Atlanta as well? Should be plenty of
opportunity.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 12:10:36
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 07:26:51 -0800, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>On 1, 8:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>>
>> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
>> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
>> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
>> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>>
>> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
>> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
>> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
>> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>>
>> Whadaya say???????
>
>Unlike others around here, I'm more than game for a challenge. I will
>have to check my calendar though. I am to teach some sort of workshops
>as part of a pending grant, and might not be able to make RSG
>Cincinnati, but there is a GEA outing in Cincinnati that I also would
>like to try to make. If the grnt doesn't come though I should be able
>to make it for RSG Cincinnati. The downside of the GEA outing (for
>you, I presume) is that it is the same weekend as some golf related
>gathering in Wisconsin. I should be able to make one of the two
>though.
Unfortunately, I can't go to RSGWI. I can usually only do two events
each year -- mine and Ohio -- unless I cash in some serious
wife/family points. This year I'm heading back to RSGNW with those
points so RSGWI is out. I've heard the courses up there are great,
though, so I want to make it some day.
Divotdigger forwarded me the GEA thread. It would be fun to go so
I'll try and keep an eye on it. The one downside both of those
courses he plans on playing are not walker friendly. Legendary Run
absolutely will not let you walk the back 9 and Stonelick has some
good hikes between greens and tees (haven't played there but have
traded emails with the owner about a possible RSG-CIN date there).
>
>In any event we will have to travel up to Ohio to visit my wife's
>family at some time, so we should be able to get together sometime!
>Maybe if Randy does an RSG Atlanta as well? Should be plenty of
>opportunity.
If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Mar 2007 08:26:32
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 6, 8:57 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> >> Big Bone Lick State Park
> >This place sounds fun...
> It's named after Annika's favorite activity.
Well I am big-boned.
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 08:52:18
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 5, 10:48 am, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> On 5 2007 08:07:56 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >It's just a little tougher when you play different courses, you don't
> >roll the ball, you putt all the putts and you count all the strokes!
>
> >FWIW, in my humble determination, rolling the ball and not putting out
> >every hole is probably worth about 10 strokes per 18 hole round.
>
> I've seen players roll the ball - and I don't see what advantage they
> get (unless the ball is in a divot). It seems more like a nervous
> tick than anything else, about as useful as king the ball on the
> green, "adjusting" it, then putting. A way to slow play down.
>
> I certainly don't miss very many shots from "within the leather" - and
> I'm a poor player!
>
> I suspect though that those who roll the ball on the fairway, give
> themselves bigger advantages when they hit the ball into the native,
> OB, or lost.
It freaks them out when they can't roll the ball, especially if it is
sitting down a little bit and especially in the rough.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 19:46:59
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Dene wrote:
>
>
> You post made no sense. Furthermore, it makes no sense for me to
> accept the advice of a anom. who had hardly posted in the last 3
> years.
>
> You may have the last word. I'm done with you.
>
>
FWIW, Jim has been around here for quite a while, and has been a great contributor
to this and other online fora(?). He is definately one of the better people who
frequent this group.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 09:18:23
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:01 am, divotdigger <divotdig...@usagolfer.com > wrote:
> On 4 2007 00:44:28 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 3, 10:09 pm, divotdigger <divotdig...@usagolfer.com> wrote:
> >> On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
> >> >> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
> >> >> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
> >> >> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
> >> >> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
> >> >> >ship the kids to grandma.
>
> >> >> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
> >> >> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>
> >> >> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
> >> >> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
> >> >> --
>
> >> >> jvdp
> >> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> >> >Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
> >> >to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
> >> >this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
> >> >favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
> >> >including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
> >> >We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
> >> >tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
> >> >been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
> >> >days later, what would be the places to see?
>
> >> >-Greg
>
> >> Greg, Perhaps you don't understand what is obvious to the vast
> >> majority here.
>
> >> There are very few posters or lurkers (like me) in this newsgroup who
> >> want to have anything to do with you, let alone be pared with you on
> >> the course.
>
> >> Why not give John and the players at RSG Cincinnatti a break and stay
> >> home?
>
> >"There are very few posters......????"
> >Yet I'm suppose to alter my plans to please these "very few???"
> >These six day words from a lurker whom I have no history with.
>
> >I'll give these brave words the weight it's due.
>
> >-Greg
>
> After all the ignorant, off-the-wall posts you have made to RSG, you
> have negative "history" with everyone who reads the group.
>
> Along with your other quirks, you have problems with reading
> comprehension too.
> --
>
> Jim
> "Old was NOT one of the things
> I wanted to be when I grew up"- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You post made no sense. Furthermore, it makes no sense for me to
accept the advice of a anom. who had hardly posted in the last 3
years.
You may have the last word. I'm done with you.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 07:18:55
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com > wrote:
> The_Professor wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> >>>> gone.
> >>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
> >> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>
> >> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
> >> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
> >> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
> >> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
> >> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
> >> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>
> >> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>
> >> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>
> >> I'd also like to witness:
> >> Stemmer vs. Dene
> >> BK vs. Dene
> >> Big Tex vs. Dene
> >> Newell vs. Dene
> >> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
> >> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
> >> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
> >> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
> >> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
> >> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
> >> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
> >> Multi vs. Pitts
> >> Brazee vs. Google
>
> > I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> > proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> > to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>
> > I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>
> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>
> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
> instances where you actually did that.
>
> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
> precedent, would it?
>
...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
"bok, bok, bok......"
At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
lame cowardice.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 16:27:55
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
The_Professor wrote:
> On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>> The_Professor wrote:
>>> On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
>>>>>> gone.
>>>>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>>>> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>>>> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
>>>> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
>>>> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
>>>> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
>>>> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
>>>> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>>>> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>>>> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>>>> I'd also like to witness:
>>>> Stemmer vs. Dene
>>>> BK vs. Dene
>>>> Big Tex vs. Dene
>>>> Newell vs. Dene
>>>> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
>>>> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
>>>> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
>>>> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
>>>> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
>>>> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
>>>> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
>>>> Multi vs. Pitts
>>>> Brazee vs. Google
>>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
>>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
>>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>>> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>>
>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
>> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
>> instances where you actually did that.
>>
>> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
>> precedent, would it?
>>
>
> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
> "bok, bok, bok......"
> At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
> lame cowardice.
>
You know what? You're a lousy troll. But then, that's the way it's
always been, hasn't it?
My comments above still stand.
Mike
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 23:23:10
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> The_Professor wrote:
> > On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
> >> The_Professor wrote:
> >>> On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> >>>>>> gone.
> >>>>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
> >>>> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
> >>>> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
> >>>> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
> >>>> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
> >>>> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
> >>>> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
> >>>> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
> >>>> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
> >>>> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
> >>>> I'd also like to witness:
> >>>> Stemmer vs. Dene
> >>>> BK vs. Dene
> >>>> Big Tex vs. Dene
> >>>> Newell vs. Dene
> >>>> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
> >>>> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
> >>>> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
> >>>> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
> >>>> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
> >>>> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
> >>>> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
> >>>> Multi vs. Pitts
> >>>> Brazee vs. Google
> >>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> >>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> >>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
> >>> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
> >> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
> >>
> >> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
> >> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
> >> instances where you actually did that.
> >>
> >> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
> >> precedent, would it?
> >>
> >
> > ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
> > "bok, bok, bok......"
> > At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
> > lame cowardice.
> >
>
> You know what? You're a lousy troll. But then, that's the way it's
> always been, hasn't it?
>
> My comments above still stand.
>
That's the real Mike Dalecki.
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 20:31:25
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Robert Hamilton wrote:
>
> Mike Dalecki wrote:
>
>> The_Professor wrote:
>>> On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>>>> The_Professor wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
>>>>>>>> gone.
>>>>>>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>>>>>> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>>>>>> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
>>>>>> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
>>>>>> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
>>>>>> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
>>>>>> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
>>>>>> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>>>>>> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>>>>>> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>>>>>> I'd also like to witness:
>>>>>> Stemmer vs. Dene
>>>>>> BK vs. Dene
>>>>>> Big Tex vs. Dene
>>>>>> Newell vs. Dene
>>>>>> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
>>>>>> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
>>>>>> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
>>>>>> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
>>>>>> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
>>>>>> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
>>>>>> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
>>>>>> Multi vs. Pitts
>>>>>> Brazee vs. Google
>>>>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
>>>>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
>>>>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>>>>> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>>>> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
>>>> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
>>>> instances where you actually did that.
>>>>
>>>> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
>>>> precedent, would it?
>>>>
>>> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
>>> "bok, bok, bok......"
>>> At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
>>> lame cowardice.
>>>
>> You know what? You're a lousy troll. But then, that's the way it's
>> always been, hasn't it?
>>
>> My comments above still stand.
>>
>
> That's the real Mike Dalecki.
>
Yep--honest, straightforward, forthright.
My comments still stand. Any particular reason you aren't addressing
them?
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
|
| | | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 04:07:47
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> Robert Hamilton wrote:
> >
> > Mike Dalecki wrote:
> >
> >> The_Professor wrote:
> >>> On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
> >>>> The_Professor wrote:
> >>>>> On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> >>>>>>>> gone.
> >>>>>>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
> >>>>>> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
> >>>>>> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
> >>>>>> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
> >>>>>> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
> >>>>>> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
> >>>>>> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
> >>>>>> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
> >>>>>> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
> >>>>>> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
> >>>>>> I'd also like to witness:
> >>>>>> Stemmer vs. Dene
> >>>>>> BK vs. Dene
> >>>>>> Big Tex vs. Dene
> >>>>>> Newell vs. Dene
> >>>>>> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
> >>>>>> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
> >>>>>> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
> >>>>>> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
> >>>>>> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
> >>>>>> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
> >>>>>> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
> >>>>>> Multi vs. Pitts
> >>>>>> Brazee vs. Google
> >>>>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> >>>>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> >>>>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
> >>>>> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
> >>>> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
> >>>> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
> >>>> instances where you actually did that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
> >>>> precedent, would it?
> >>>>
> >>> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
> >>> "bok, bok, bok......"
> >>> At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
> >>> lame cowardice.
> >>>
> >> You know what? You're a lousy troll. But then, that's the way it's
> >> always been, hasn't it?
> >>
> >> My comments above still stand.
> >>
> >
> > That's the real Mike Dalecki.
> >
>
> Yep--honest, straightforward, forthright.
>
> My comments still stand. Any particular reason you aren't addressing
> them?
Addressing what? About the fact that I challenged you when you were blowing hard about being some great golfer, what
with your 7 handicap, telling some poor soul what it takes to be a great golfer such as you? (At least the 3rd time I
challenged you, going way back to your blowing hard about how great single point freq. matching is). Said I would go to
Ohio even; Columbus to be exact. Stand on what you will, and blow hard about whatever. You are a 100% phoney to me on
all accounts. Play your denial all you want. In the end it's all you got. One thing for sure, you haven't got the
stones to take any challenge, especially with someone like me, who will play ROG, no rolling the ball and hole out
every putt, and will report the thing blow by blow regardless. I can shoot 70 or I can shoot 107, and either way it
wouldn't bother me a bit, but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
always have on you regardless.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 23:40:02
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Robert Hamilton wrote:
<snip >
>>>>>>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
>>>>>>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
>>>>>>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>>>>>>> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>>>>>> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
>>>>>> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
>>>>>> instances where you actually did that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
>>>>>> precedent, would it?
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
>>>>> "bok, bok, bok......"
>>>>> At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
>>>>> lame cowardice.
>>>>>
>>>> You know what? You're a lousy troll. But then, that's the way it's
>>>> always been, hasn't it?
>>>>
>>>> My comments above still stand.
>>>>
>>> That's the real Mike Dalecki.
>>>
>> Yep--honest, straightforward, forthright.
>>
>> My comments still stand. Any particular reason you aren't addressing
>> them?
>
> Addressing what?
Is the English language losing favor in Mississippi?
>>>>>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I
don't
>>>>>> recall them.
There. Isolated from other words, easy to pick out.
About the fact that I challenged you when you were blowing hard about
being some great golfer, what
> with your 7 handicap, telling some poor soul what it takes to be a great golfer such as you?
Since I never said a word about what it takes to "be a great golfer such
as [me}", do you feel any remorse about making that up?
Aren't the rules on being honest and telling the truth the same in
Mississippi as everywhere else?
I'm a 7 handicap. Been in the sixes. I can play decent golf. I do it
without a particularly good swing, too.
I don't know whether you can play decent golf, but I'm not particularly
interested in knowing whether you can or can't.
Are you...jealous?
(At least the 3rd time I
> challenged you,
I do not recall this, so I asked you to point out where you had done it.
Pretty simple, eh? If you can't, or won't, then you're just blowing
hot air.
Not that this would be all that unusual, of course.
>going way back to your blowing hard about how great single point freq. matching is).
I thought we had settled this before: You didn't know what you were
talking about. Sadly, that didn't dissuade you from holding forth.
Since you didn't understand frequency matching, and certainly didn't
understand evidence supporting a spining effect, this left you at a
distinct disadvantage in online conversations about those subjects,
didn't it?
And it sounds as if you're still suffering from that same lack of
understanding.
> Said I would go to
> Ohio even; Columbus to be exact.
To do what? Have a match with me? What on earth would be in it for me?
Think about what I'd have to spend 4+ hours doing, and with whom I would
have to be doing it. Doesn't sound very attractive to me.
> Stand on what you will, and blow hard about whatever.
Sounds like capitulation to me. Is it?
You are a 100% phoney to me on
> all accounts.
*That* will keep me up at night, for sure!
> Play your denial all you want. In the end it's all you got. One thing
for sure, you haven't got the
> stones to take any challenge, especially with someone like me, who will play ROG, no rolling the ball and hole out
> every putt, and will report the thing blow by blow regardless. I can shoot 70 or I can shoot 107, and either way it
> wouldn't bother me a bit, but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> always have on you regardless.
Wow.
I guess--in your mind--you're reiterating some sort of challenge to me.
My golf skillset is what it is. Others have witnessed it and reported
on it. Whether you believe them or not is of no interest to me. And
certainly, your belief won't change it.
If your life is so shallow, so incomplete, that only this kind of rabid,
foaming-at-the-mouth blustering will make your life worth living, well,
I feel sorry for you. A good therapist might help.
I'll reiterate: Playing golf with you is not attractive to me, and I'm
not going out of my way to do it.
I'll pass.
Mike
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:46:26
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> Robert Hamilton wrote:
> <snip>
> >>>>>>> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> >>>>>>> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> >>>>>>> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
> >>>>>>> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
> >>>>>> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
> >>>>>> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
> >>>>>> instances where you actually did that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
> >>>>>> precedent, would it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
> >>>>> "bok, bok, bok......"
> >>>>> At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
> >>>>> lame cowardice.
> >>>>>
> >>>> You know what? You're a lousy troll. But then, that's the way it's
> >>>> always been, hasn't it?
> >>>>
> >>>> My comments above still stand.
> >>>>
> >>> That's the real Mike Dalecki.
> >>>
> >> Yep--honest, straightforward, forthright.
> >>
> >> My comments still stand. Any particular reason you aren't addressing
> >> them?
> >
> > Addressing what?
>
> Is the English language losing favor in Mississippi?
>
> >>>>>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I
> don't
> >>>>>> recall them.
>
> There. Isolated from other words, easy to pick out.
>
> About the fact that I challenged you when you were blowing hard about
> being some great golfer, what
> > with your 7 handicap, telling some poor soul what it takes to be a great golfer such as you?
>
> Since I never said a word about what it takes to "be a great golfer such
> as [me}", do you feel any remorse about making that up?
>
> Aren't the rules on being honest and telling the truth the same in
> Mississippi as everywhere else?
>
> I'm a 7 handicap. Been in the sixes. I can play decent golf. I do it
> without a particularly good swing, too.
>
> I don't know whether you can play decent golf, but I'm not particularly
> interested in knowing whether you can or can't.
>
> Are you...jealous?
>
> (At least the 3rd time I
> > challenged you,
>
> I do not recall this, so I asked you to point out where you had done it.
> Pretty simple, eh? If you can't, or won't, then you're just blowing
> hot air.
>
> Not that this would be all that unusual, of course.
>
> >going way back to your blowing hard about how great single point freq. matching is).
>
> I thought we had settled this before: You didn't know what you were
> talking about. Sadly, that didn't dissuade you from holding forth.
>
> Since you didn't understand frequency matching, and certainly didn't
> understand evidence supporting a spining effect, this left you at a
> distinct disadvantage in online conversations about those subjects,
> didn't it?
>
> And it sounds as if you're still suffering from that same lack of
> understanding
>
> > Said I would go to
> > Ohio even; Columbus to be exact.
>
> To do what? Have a match with me? What on earth would be in it for me?
>
> Think about what I'd have to spend 4+ hours doing, and with whom I would
> have to be doing it. Doesn't sound very attractive to me.
>
> > Stand on what you will, and blow hard about whatever.
>
> Sounds like capitulation to me. Is it?
>
> You are a 100% phoney to me on
> > all accounts.
>
> *That* will keep me up at night, for sure!
>
> > Play your denial all you want. In the end it's all you got. One thing
> for sure, you haven't got the
> > stones to take any challenge, especially with someone like me, who will play ROG, no rolling the ball and hole out
> > every putt, and will report the thing blow by blow regardless. I can shoot 70 or I can shoot 107, and either way it
> > wouldn't bother me a bit, but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> > always have on you regardless.
>
> Wow.
>
> I guess--in your mind--you're reiterating some sort of challenge to me.
>
> My golf skillset is what it is. Others have witnessed it and reported
> on it. Whether you believe them or not is of no interest to me. And
> certainly, your belief won't change it.
>
> If your life is so shallow, so incomplete, that only this kind of rabid,
> foaming-at-the-mouth blustering will make your life worth living, well,
> I feel sorry for you. A good therapist might help.
>
> I'll reiterate: Playing golf with you is not attractive to me, and I'm
> not going out of my way to do it.
>
> I'll pass.
>
When normal people get involved in groups like this, challenges are part of the game. Declining hardly requires such
drama. The interteting thing is that this time I offered no challenge at all, only referenced previous challenges. As to
knowledge of golf and clubmaking, you are totally clueless, IMHO, of course.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 09:23:45
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Robert Hamilton wrote:
<snip >
>> > Play your denial all you want. In the end it's all you got. One thing
>> for sure, you haven't got the
>>> stones to take any challenge, especially with someone like me, who will play ROG, no rolling the ball and hole out
>>> every putt, and will report the thing blow by blow regardless. I can shoot 70 or I can shoot 107, and either way it
>>> wouldn't bother me a bit, but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
>>> always have on you regardless.
>>
>> Wow.
>>
>> I guess--in your mind--you're reiterating some sort of challenge to me.
>>
>> My golf skillset is what it is. Others have witnessed it and reported
>> on it. Whether you believe them or not is of no interest to me. And
>> certainly, your belief won't change it.
>>
>> If your life is so shallow, so incomplete, that only this kind of rabid,
>> foaming-at-the-mouth blustering will make your life worth living, well,
>> I feel sorry for you. A good therapist might help.
>>
>> I'll reiterate: Playing golf with you is not attractive to me, and I'm
>> not going out of my way to do it.
>>
>> I'll pass.
>>
>
> When normal people get involved in groups like this, challenges are part of the game.
Really? I guess I have more to live for than that: caaderie,
golfing with friends, enjoying the game for the game's sake, things like
this.
> Declining hardly requires such
> drama.
Since I don't recall the "challenges" this makes little sense to me.
Now, if you made it worth my while to golf with you--such as putting up
all expenses and, say, $2000 payable in cash to me prior to the round,
then I'd play you. That would be sufficient for me to take time out of
my life to endure playing you, since it would likely cost me the
equivalent of a weekend's time I wouldn't be spending with my family, or
golfing with friends.
That would come to about...oh...$400-$500 per hour to golf with you.
Yeah, that's about right.
So if you're that hot to golf with me, and, apparently, put me in my
place, that'll do it.
> The interteting thing is that this time I offered no challenge at all, only referenced previous challenges.
Well, I don't recall them. But then, I don't live for challenges, and I
find them unredeeming.
As to
> knowledge of golf and clubmaking, you are totally clueless, IMHO, of course.
>
The key term: IYHO.
Mike
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 18:05:03
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Mike Dalecki wrote:
> Robert Hamilton wrote:
> <snip>
> >> > Play your denial all you want. In the end it's all you got. One thing
> >> for sure, you haven't got the
> >>> stones to take any challenge, especially with someone like me, who will play ROG, no rolling the ball and hole out
> >>> every putt, and will report the thing blow by blow regardless. I can shoot 70 or I can shoot 107, and either way it
> >>> wouldn't bother me a bit, but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> >>> always have on you regardless.
> >>
> >> Wow.
> >>
> >> I guess--in your mind--you're reiterating some sort of challenge to me.
> >>
> >> My golf skillset is what it is. Others have witnessed it and reported
> >> on it. Whether you believe them or not is of no interest to me. And
> >> certainly, your belief won't change it.
> >>
> >> If your life is so shallow, so incomplete, that only this kind of rabid,
> >> foaming-at-the-mouth blustering will make your life worth living, well,
> >> I feel sorry for you. A good therapist might help.
> >>
> >> I'll reiterate: Playing golf with you is not attractive to me, and I'm
> >> not going out of my way to do it.
> >>
> >> I'll pass.
> >>
> >
> > When normal people get involved in groups like this, challenges are part of the game.
>
> Really? I guess I have more to live for than that: caaderie,
> golfing with friends, enjoying the game for the game's sake, things like
> this.
>
> > Declining hardly requires such
> > drama.
>
> Since I don't recall the "challenges" this makes little sense to me.
>
> Now, if you made it worth my while to golf with you--such as putting up
> all expenses and, say, $2000 payable in cash to me prior to the round,
> then I'd play you. That would be sufficient for me to take time out of
> my life to endure playing you, since it would likely cost me the
> equivalent of a weekend's time I wouldn't be spending with my family, or
> golfing with friends.
>
> That would come to about...oh...$400-$500 per hour to golf with you.
> Yeah, that's about right.
>
> So if you're that hot to golf with me, and, apparently, put me in my
> place, that'll do it.
>
> > The interteting thing is that this time I offered no challenge at all, only referenced previous challenges.
>
> Well, I don't recall them. But then, I don't live for challenges, and I
> find them unredeeming.
>
> As to
> > knowledge of golf and clubmaking, you are totally clueless, IMHO, of course.
> >
>
> The key term: IYHO.
Yup. Just like YHO's on whatever.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:55:28
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 07:18:55 -0800, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>On 1, 11:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>> > I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
>> > proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
>> > to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>>
>> > I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>>
>> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>>
>> Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
>> recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
>> instances where you actually did that.
>>
>> Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
>> precedent, would it?
>>
>
> ...I hear a familiar sound....sounds like a variation on a theme of
>"bok, bok, bok......"
>At least it was YOU who responded this time. A step forward, but still
>lame cowardice.
Rob, you might want to put the brakes on this a little.
I don't know what your wager might be with Mike, but I, and two other
RSGers, witnessed Dalecki shoot 3 over at my course...the first time
he saw it. You, admittedly, don't have that game.
Cowardice is a strong word, and it sure doesn't fit Mike.
--
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 08:16:59
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
There you all go again.........pretending that there's an ounce of
testosterone amongst you.
Silly girls.
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 22:32:30
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 9:55 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com > wrote:
>
> > I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> > proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> > to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
> I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
>
May I be of assistance? Maybe it's "in the reply of someone else."
Perhaps you missed it.....or perhaps, the joke flew over your head.
Try Google for the first possibility....or Giggle for the last.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 20:43:56
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 6:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>
> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>
> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>
> Whadaya say???????
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
This kind of juvenile stuff is what's wrong with RSG. ; >
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 09:24:47
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1 2007 20:43:56 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 1, 6:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>>
>> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
>> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
>> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
>> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>>
>> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
>> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
>> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
>> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>>
>> Whadaya say???????
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
>This kind of juvenile stuff is what's wrong with RSG. ;>
>
>-Greg
Hey! I'm 35, I'm not juvenile! ;-)
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 20:14:10
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 8:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>
> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>
> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>
> Whadaya say???????
How about loser leaves RSG....that'd be nice.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 09:24:06
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1 2007 20:14:10 -0800, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>On 1, 8:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>>
>> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
>> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
>> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
>> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>>
>> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
>> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
>> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
>> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>>
>> Whadaya say???????
>
>How about loser leaves RSG....that'd be nice.
Nah, I like RSG too much to give it up. Of course, I won't lose but
you never know. I might get bitten by a snake on the first tee and
have to withdraw or something.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 16:46:53
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 4:35 pm, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net > wrote:
> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.- Hide quoted text -
>
Already done. Pitts beat Koenig at RSG-NW in a bet (with my
money)Forget which year.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 16:35:06
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> > > gone.
>
> > Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>
> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>
> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>
> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>
> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>
> I'd also like to witness:
> Stemmer vs. Dene
> BK vs. Dene
> Big Tex vs. Dene
> Newell vs. Dene
> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
> Multi vs. Pitts
> Brazee vs. Google
I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 23:55:53
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
The_Professor wrote:
> On Feb 28, 11:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
>>>> gone.
>>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>>
>> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
>> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
>> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
>> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
>> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
>> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>>
>> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>>
>> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>>
>> I'd also like to witness:
>> Stemmer vs. Dene
>> BK vs. Dene
>> Big Tex vs. Dene
>> Newell vs. Dene
>> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
>> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
>> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
>> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
>> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
>> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
>> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
>> Multi vs. Pitts
>> Brazee vs. Google
>
> I've challenged Dalecki several times now. I always get some lame
> proxy response talking about $50,000. The guy is just so plain scared
> to death of me he can't even bring himself to respond at all.
>
> I'd like to see Pitts vs Koenig though.
>
I saw this in the reply of someone else and was amused.
Perhaps you could reference the posts where you challenged me--I don't
recall them. Not that I care, but if I missed them, I'd like to see the
instances where you actually did that.
Unless you just made that up. Of course, that would not be without
precedent, would it?
Mike
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2006 Report http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2006/pics/
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
|
| | |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 21:09:55
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>
>I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
Whadaya say???????
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 17:50:08
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 5, 7:23 pm, "Sparky" <b...@funco.com > wrote:
> On 3--2007, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org> wrote:
>
> > Big Bone Lick State Park
>
> This place sounds fun...
>
> me
Just watch out for the Rangers.
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 08:08:38
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 7:56 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com > wrote:
> The_Professor wrote:
> > On 4, 3:43 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>
> > .....snip Act IV, Scene II...
>
> > ...so what to do with a guy that keeps replying to you saying you are
> > obsessed with him?
>
> > Saying I'm not gay, get over it doesn't seem to work!
>
> Well, liar that you are, I find that incredibly revealing.
In your dreams, cupcake!
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 15:50:36
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 3:43 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com > wrote:
.....snip Act IV, Scene II...
...so what to do with a guy that keeps replying to you saying you are
obsessed with him?
Saying I'm not gay, get over it doesn't seem to work!
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 19:56:21
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
The_Professor wrote:
> On 4, 3:43 pm, Mike Dalecki <m...@removeclubdoctor.com> wrote:
>
> .....snip Act IV, Scene II...
>
> ...so what to do with a guy that keeps replying to you saying you are
> obsessed with him?
>
> Saying I'm not gay, get over it doesn't seem to work!
>
>
Well, liar that you are, I find that incredibly revealing.
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 19:32:21
From: Robert Hamilton
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
"Since your "return", you've been very aggressive in trying to start trouble. It
seems almost orchestrated between you and the Prof. My amnesty plan was
ignored.........."
You have consistently been one of the nastiest posters on this board, and someone
who has almost never posted on golf. I have probably made more golf related posts
here than you have posts. Anything you claim on such issues is kettles and pots
for you at best, and without a doubt hypocracy. Your amnesty plans have the ring
of such from Kim Jong Il to me.
A lot of this for me relates almost exlcusively to Dalecki, for whatever that is
worth. I go out of my way to not get involved in any of his threads, but he does
reply to me in an attacking mode, like in this one, and so I get defensive. In the
case of this thread, all I did was reference previous challenges he made, and he
came back with a lot of drama. So be it. He will continue becuse it is in his
nature, and I will respond because...why not?
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 15:43:43
From: Mike Dalecki
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Robert Hamilton wrote:
>
> bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> "Since your "return", you've been very aggressive in trying to start trouble. It
> seems almost orchestrated between you and the Prof. My amnesty plan was
> ignored.........."
>
> You have consistently been one of the nastiest posters on this board, and someone
> who has almost never posted on golf. I have probably made more golf related posts
> here than you have posts. Anything you claim on such issues is kettles and pots
> for you at best, and without a doubt hypocracy. Your amnesty plans have the ring
> of such from Kim Jong Il to me.
>
> A lot of this for me relates almost exlcusively to Dalecki, for whatever that is
> worth.
No kidding! You're obsessed with me. I wonder why that is, but then,
the two people who have that issue are you and Dene.
>I go out of my way to not get involved in any of his threads,
OK Larry.
but he does
> reply to me in an attacking mode,
Someone disagrees with you and it's attacking mode? I find that
hilarious, and I can't imagine that anyone with a PhD would believe
that...unless their PhD was from someplace like the University of
Phoenix Online.
> like in this one, and so I get defensive.
Maybe you should try thinking more, and being defensive less. You don't
know what you're talking about in many circumstances, yet you hold
forth. And then when someone points out your ignorance, they're
attacking you. That's rich.
Example: You said there was no evidence for a spining effect. I
supplied some, from experiments done by RSG'ers you know. The
probability--odds, in fact--of that effect having occurred by chance was
less than 1 in 10,000. That's comfortably less than the 1 in 20 or .05
level of significant, or the .01 level, or the .001 level.
But then you again claimed there is no evidence. Now, either you're a
moron, or a troll, or a troublemaker, but it's hard to believe anyone
with any background in the learned arts would make such conclusions.
You shouldn't be defensive. You should be embarrassed. And you should
consider slinking away with your tail between your legs.
>In the
> case of this thread, all I did was reference previous challenges he made,
*I* made challenges? I don't recall such, and since you have a history
of these kinds of...statements...I believe you're a liar. Show me where
I made those challenges.
I don't erase my posts from Google like you have done, so they should be
easy to find.
I think, Rob, you're a liar.
> and he
> came back with a lot of drama.
Just some truth. Not that you'd recognize that.
> So be it. He will continue becuse it is in his
> nature, and I will respond because...why not?
Well, when you are what you are, then you'll do what you will, because
fidelity to the truth is not something with which you seem to be too
concerned.
Are you not even the tiniest bit embarrassed?
Wow.
--
Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia!
Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 10:05:20
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:52 am, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Dene <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : I'd be quite happy if the previous nonsense were never mentioned
> : again.
>
> I'll say this: If somebody in rsg says something about you that
> you don't like, it doesn't make you a loser to leave it alone.
> It may just mean that you have better things to do.
>
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
Agree....especially in light of my suspicions that a few hope to stir
me up in the hopes that I'll eventually withdraw my interest in RSG-
Cinc.
I'm on my boat....it will be 60 degrees for the first time this
winter.....so I have better things to do than respond further about
this thread. I'm hoping to hit the range this week too. I haven't
had such a long layoff since I took golf up seriously in '00. Results
could be interesting.
Have a good day, Chris.
--Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 09:13:47
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:05 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 4, 9:04 am, bigoldc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > He is saying that very few want to play with you and I have to agree
> > on that point. Since your "return", you've been very aggressive in
> > trying to start trouble. It seems almost orchestrated between you and
> > the Prof. My amnesty plan was ignored, so the crap continues. I'm of
> > the opinion that you won't show in Cincy, never intended to, and that
> > you are using to continue the same old tired crap.Too bad you chose
> > Johns tournament. Of all the rsg posters, he is probably the most
> > innocent of the bunch. I don't recall one unkind word from him. You
> > really are making an ass of yourself, but, if the punch bowl fits
>
> Look, I've met and played with Dene and he's really not a bad guy
> (plus, his wife thinks I'm hot). On the other hand, I can't really
> disagree with what you've just said. Dene needs a 24-pack of
> "GETTHEFUCKOVERIT!" What is past is past.
Attending RSG-Cincy is opportunity to play golf in a venue I like
(Stableford), with my wife, in a city we've never been to. It's also
a opportunity to move forward and meet some people behind the names,
like what happened at the Rhoid.
I'd be quite happy if the previous nonsense were never mentioned
again.
-Greg
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 18:56:21
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4 2007 09:13:47 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 4, 9:05 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>I'd be quite happy if the previous nonsense were never mentioned
>again.
>
>-Greg
Does this mean that you are going to lead by example and never mention
it[1] again?
[1] Anything having to do with RSG NW 2005 and 2006.
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 17:52:37
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
: I'd be quite happy if the previous nonsense were never mentioned
: again.
I'll say this: If somebody in rsg says something about you that
you don't like, it doesn't make you a loser to leave it alone.
It may just mean that you have better things to do.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:25:09
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
news:3T3thlt7I5r3N34@redshark.goodshow.net...
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : I'd be quite happy if the previous nonsense were never mentioned
> : again.
>
> I'll say this: If somebody in rsg says something about you that
> you don't like, it doesn't make you a loser to leave it alone.
> It may just mean that you have better things to do.
>
> --
I've got $100 that says Greg can't leave it alone....whatever it is.....
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 09:05:07
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:04 am, bigoldc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> He is saying that very few want to play with you and I have to agree
> on that point. Since your "return", you've been very aggressive in
> trying to start trouble. It seems almost orchestrated between you and
> the Prof. My amnesty plan was ignored, so the crap continues. I'm of
> the opinion that you won't show in Cincy, never intended to, and that
> you are using to continue the same old tired crap.Too bad you chose
> Johns tournament. Of all the rsg posters, he is probably the most
> innocent of the bunch. I don't recall one unkind word from him. You
> really are making an ass of yourself, but, if the punch bowl fits
Look, I've met and played with Dene and he's really not a bad guy
(plus, his wife thinks I'm hot). On the other hand, I can't really
disagree with what you've just said. Dene needs a 24-pack of
"GETTHEFUCKOVERIT!" What is past is past.
Dene should have never dragged Pflum into this. A private e-mail
could have accomplished the same result without all the drama.
Petty bickering is not limited to RSG. When I worked in the pro shop
I'd sometimes have old men come to me demanding, "Don't pair me with
that guy or that guy or I won't play!' I'd answer, "Then perhaps you
shouldn't play today. Now grow the fuck up."
Nobody wants that drama on the golf course. When Eric and I were
having our most heated battles on RSG, he held a tournament and I
played. Had a great time, too. When Da Ringer and the Professor were
heating it up, they played together. Everybody had a great time.
Perhaps John should make a simple rule for RSG-CINCY: "No Drama
Queens Allowed!"
Of course, Cincinnati is called the "Queen City" but I think that's
for a different reason.
"Just Play Golf!" How hard is that?
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 18:54:11
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4 2007 09:05:07 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>Of course, Cincinnati is called the "Queen City" but I think that's
>for a different reason.
>
We named it after you.
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 09:01:21
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 6:04 am, bigoldc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 4, 3:44 am, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3, 10:09 pm, divotdigger <divotdig...@usagolfer.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > >On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> > > >> >wrote:
>
> > > >> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
> > > >> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
> > > >> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
> > > >> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
> > > >> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
> > > >> >ship the kids to grandma.
>
> > > >> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
> > > >> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>
> > > >> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
> > > >> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
> > > >> --
>
> > > >> jvdp
> > > >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> > > >Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
> > > >to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
> > > >this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
> > > >favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
> > > >including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
> > > >We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
> > > >tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
> > > >been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
> > > >days later, what would be the places to see?
>
> > > >-Greg
>
> > > Greg, Perhaps you don't understand what is obvious to the vast
> > > majority here.
>
> > > There are very few posters or lurkers (like me) in this newsgroup who
> > > want to have anything to do with you, let alone be pared with you on
> > > the course.
>
> > > Why not give John and the players at RSG Cincinnatti a break and stay
> > > home?
>
> > "There are very few posters......????"
> > Yet I'm suppose to alter my plans to please these "very few???"
> > These six day words from a lurker whom I have no history with.
>
> > I'll give these brave words the weight it's due.
>
> > -Greg- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> He is saying that very few want to play with you and I have to agree
> on that point. Since your "return", you've been very aggressive in
> trying to start trouble. It seems almost orchestrated between you and
> the Prof. My amnesty plan was ignored, so the crap continues. I'm of
> the opinion that you won't show in Cincy, never intended to, and that
> you are using to continue the same old tired crap.Too bad you chose
> Johns tournament. Of all the rsg posters, he is probably the most
> innocent of the bunch. I don't recall one unkind word from him. You
> really are making an ass of yourself, but, if the punch bowl fits.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Your opinion is irrelevent to me. Just thought you should know.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 06:04:28
From:
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 3:44 am, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 3, 10:09 pm, divotdigger <divotdig...@usagolfer.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> > >wrote:
> > >> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> > >> >wrote:
>
> > >> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
> > >> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
> > >> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
> > >> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
> > >> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
> > >> >ship the kids to grandma.
>
> > >> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
> > >> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>
> > >> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
> > >> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
> > >> --
>
> > >> jvdp
> > >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> > >Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
> > >to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
> > >this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
> > >favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
> > >including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
> > >We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
> > >tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
> > >been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
> > >days later, what would be the places to see?
>
> > >-Greg
>
> > Greg, Perhaps you don't understand what is obvious to the vast
> > majority here.
>
> > There are very few posters or lurkers (like me) in this newsgroup who
> > want to have anything to do with you, let alone be pared with you on
> > the course.
>
> > Why not give John and the players at RSG Cincinnatti a break and stay
> > home?
>
> "There are very few posters......????"
> Yet I'm suppose to alter my plans to please these "very few???"
> These six day words from a lurker whom I have no history with.
>
> I'll give these brave words the weight it's due.
>
> -Greg- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
He is saying that very few want to play with you and I have to agree
on that point. Since your "return", you've been very aggressive in
trying to start trouble. It seems almost orchestrated between you and
the Prof. My amnesty plan was ignored, so the crap continues. I'm of
the opinion that you won't show in Cincy, never intended to, and that
you are using to continue the same old tired crap.Too bad you chose
Johns tournament. Of all the rsg posters, he is probably the most
innocent of the bunch. I don't recall one unkind word from him. You
really are making an ass of yourself, but, if the punch bowl fits.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 00:44:28
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 10:09 pm, divotdigger <divotdig...@usagolfer.com > wrote:
> On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
> >> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
> >> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
> >> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
> >> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
> >> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
> >> >ship the kids to grandma.
>
> >> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
> >> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>
> >> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
> >> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
> >> --
>
> >> jvdp
> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> >Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
> >to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
> >this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
> >favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
> >including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
> >We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
> >tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
> >been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
> >days later, what would be the places to see?
>
> >-Greg
>
> Greg, Perhaps you don't understand what is obvious to the vast
> majority here.
>
> There are very few posters or lurkers (like me) in this newsgroup who
> want to have anything to do with you, let alone be pared with you on
> the course.
>
> Why not give John and the players at RSG Cincinnatti a break and stay
> home?
"There are very few posters......????"
Yet I'm suppose to alter my plans to please these "very few???"
These six day words from a lurker whom I have no history with.
I'll give these brave words the weight it's due.
-Greg
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 11:01:02
From: divotdigger
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4 2007 00:44:28 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 3, 10:09 pm, divotdigger <divotdig...@usagolfer.com> wrote:
>> On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> >> >wrote:
>>
>> >> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
>> >> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
>> >> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
>> >> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
>> >> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
>> >> >ship the kids to grandma.
>>
>> >> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
>> >> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>>
>> >> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
>> >> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
>> >> --
>>
>> >> jvdp
>> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>>
>> >Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
>> >to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
>> >this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
>> >favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
>> >including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
>> >We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
>> >tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
>> >been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
>> >days later, what would be the places to see?
>>
>> >-Greg
>>
>> Greg, Perhaps you don't understand what is obvious to the vast
>> majority here.
>>
>> There are very few posters or lurkers (like me) in this newsgroup who
>> want to have anything to do with you, let alone be pared with you on
>> the course.
>>
>> Why not give John and the players at RSG Cincinnatti a break and stay
>> home?
>
>"There are very few posters......????"
>Yet I'm suppose to alter my plans to please these "very few???"
>These six day words from a lurker whom I have no history with.
>
>I'll give these brave words the weight it's due.
>
>-Greg
>
After all the ignorant, off-the-wall posts you have made to RSG, you
have negative "history" with everyone who reads the group.
Along with your other quirks, you have problems with reading
comprehension too.
--
Jim
"Old was NOT one of the things
I wanted to be when I grew up"
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 07:54:44
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 9:45 pm, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
>
> I'd also like to witness:
> Stemmer vs. Dene
> BK vs. Dene
> Big Tex vs. Dene
> Newell vs. Dene
> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
I'd murduh em.
-MeanDene
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 06:33:58
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>
> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
Fat? I haven't been over 300 in years!
Just make sure if you hit me, move out of the way...... "Timberrrrrrr"
> I'd also like to witness:
> Stemmer vs. Dene
> BK vs. Dene
> Big Tex vs. Dene
> Newell vs. Dene
> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
So, maybe five on one? Maybe I should've done a poll on the most
beloved RSGer....
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 06:31:00
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 8:29 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:50:09 -0500, John van der Pflum
>
> <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org> wrote:
>
> >How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
>
> Former head coach of Purdue men's b-ball. I figured since
> "BigPurdueFan" started this post he'd like an Indiana U/Purdue
> matchup.
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
Yeah, best coach to never make a Final Four. :-)
|
| | |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 10:17:53
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1 2007 06:31:00 -0800, "BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com > wrote:
>On 1, 8:29 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:50:09 -0500, John van der Pflum
>>
>> <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org> wrote:
>>
>> >How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
>>
>> Former head coach of Purdue men's b-ball. I figured since
>> "BigPurdueFan" started this post he'd like an Indiana U/Purdue
>> matchup.
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
>Yeah, best coach to never make a Final Four. :-)
That, my friend, is called rationalization.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 06:30:08
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 1, 8:32 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2007 21:45:47 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
>
> Oooh, that would be ugly. Hardly fair, though. I'm a
> super-light-feather weight and the Meal is a heavy weight.
>
> To best honest -- I doubt I could finish that combo meal. I'd
> probably puke.
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
Me too (puke), except I would because I'm a vegetarian.
|
| | |
Date: 25 Apr 2007 15:42:07
From: \R&B\
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172759408.363788.196880@31g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
> On 1, 8:32 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> wrote:
>> On 28 Feb 2007 21:45:47 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
>>
>> Oooh, that would be ugly. Hardly fair, though. I'm a
>> super-light-feather weight and the Meal is a heavy weight.
>>
>> To best honest -- I doubt I could finish that combo meal. I'd
>> probably puke.
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> Me too (puke), except I would because I'm a vegetarian.
Oh yeah, right. Like there's actually meat in a Quarter Pounder.
Randy
|
| | | |
Date: 25 Apr 2007 20:00:19
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:42:07 -0400, "\"R&B\""
<noneofyourbusiness@all.com > wrote:
>"BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:1172759408.363788.196880@31g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>> On 1, 8:32 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 Feb 2007 21:45:47 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
>>>
>>> Oooh, that would be ugly. Hardly fair, though. I'm a
>>> super-light-feather weight and the Meal is a heavy weight.
>>>
>>> To best honest -- I doubt I could finish that combo meal. I'd
>>> probably puke.
>>> --
>>>
>>> jvdp
>>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>>
>> Me too (puke), except I would because I'm a vegetarian.
>
>
>Oh yeah, right. Like there's actually meat in a Quarter Pounder.
>
>Randy
>
Damn, Randy. You're responding to a post from ch 1? :-)
bk
|
| |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 04:50:57
From: cja
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 4:49 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> On Feb 28, 12:50 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> wrote:
> > How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
>
> Who is Gene Keady?
>
He was the basketball coach of Purdue for 25 years, with an
exceptional combover.
|
| |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 21:45:47
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
>
> > That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> > gone.
>
> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>
Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!
http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
(OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
I'd also like to witness:
Stemmer vs. Dene
BK vs. Dene
Big Tex vs. Dene
Newell vs. Dene
Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
Multi vs. Pitts
Brazee vs. Google
|
| | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 08:07:56
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 5, 9:53 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 4, 9:32 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The difference for me is that I couldn't care less who doesn't want to play
> > with me. I'm better as a single anyway, I can use a foot wedge without all
> > the dirty looks.
>
> We had a guy at our course who was a consistent 90-shooter.
> One week he played 4 times by himself. Each time he'd come into the
> pro shop and say, "I shot 75 today!" or "Wow, I birdied the last 2 for
> a 73!"
> I didn't say a word.
>
> On Saturday he played in the usual weekend game and came in, slumped
> on the table scratching his head. "I just don't understand. I shot 92
> today."
>
> I said, "It's a little tougher playin with people, ain't it?"
Interesting. I've always found it hard to get "the guys" to count all
my strokes. I would shoot an 84 and they would say I shot a 77. Last
time I really went for the weekend morning group my GHIN index went
under 10. My lowest in these parts was around a 7 when I played the
same course all the time and almost all my scores came from group
outings...and then I played in RSG memphis and hard a hard time
breaking 100!
It's just a little tougher when you play different courses, you don't
roll the ball, you putt all the putts and you count all the strokes!
FWIW, in my humble determination, rolling the ball and not putting out
every hole is probably worth about 10 strokes per 18 hole round.
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 09:48:23
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 5 2007 08:07:56 -0800, "The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
>It's just a little tougher when you play different courses, you don't
>roll the ball, you putt all the putts and you count all the strokes!
>
>FWIW, in my humble determination, rolling the ball and not putting out
>every hole is probably worth about 10 strokes per 18 hole round.
I've seen players roll the ball - and I don't see what advantage they
get (unless the ball is in a divot). It seems more like a nervous
tick than anything else, about as useful as king the ball on the
green, "adjusting" it, then putting. A way to slow play down.
I certainly don't miss very many shots from "within the leather" - and
I'm a poor player!
I suspect though that those who roll the ball on the fairway, give
themselves bigger advantages when they hit the ball into the native,
OB, or lost.
|
| | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 07:53:59
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:32 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
>
> The difference for me is that I couldn't care less who doesn't want to play
> with me. I'm better as a single anyway, I can use a foot wedge without all
> the dirty looks.
We had a guy at our course who was a consistent 90-shooter.
One week he played 4 times by himself. Each time he'd come into the
pro shop and say, "I shot 75 today!" or "Wow, I birdied the last 2 for
a 73!"
I didn't say a word.
On Saturday he played in the usual weekend game and came in, slumped
on the table scratching his head. "I just don't understand. I shot 92
today."
I said, "It's a little tougher playin with people, ain't it?"
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:32:29
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 6:32 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org> wrote in messagenews:nvpiu214ihagvtrjoefvevc061j7lditj6@4ax.com...
> BTW -- I should say that this does not just apply to someone not
>
> > wanting to play/associate with you. I would feel the same way if
> > someone said it about Thor, Stemmer, Peter Strauss, you name it.
> > --
>
> The difference for me is that I couldn't care less who doesn't want to play
> with me. I'm better as a single anyway, I can use a foot wedge without all
> the dirty looks.
Dang....that was funny. I just wish *you* hadn't said it. ; >
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 19:18:18
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 9:58 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Steve S <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>
> : Chris Bellomy" <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
> :news:0T3tgbo3IoriN34@redshark.goodshow.net...:> annika1980 <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> :> : On 3, 12:55 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> :> :>
> :> :> THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
> :> :> of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
> :> :> now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
> :> :> that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
> :> :>
> :> : Asshole.
> :>
> :> Scoundrel.
> :>
> :> See, I told you I toned it down.
> :
> : Yeah, but that just makes you a toned down DICK.
>
> True.
>
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
My usual response to comments like that is "I'd argue if I could."
Not that I'm ever called a DICK of course.
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 03:25:27
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4 2007 19:18:18 -0800, "BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com > wrote:
>On 4, 9:58 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>> Steve S <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>>
>> : Chris Bellomy" <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message
>> :news:0T3tgbo3IoriN34@redshark.goodshow.net...:> annika1980 <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> :> : On 3, 12:55 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>> :> :>
>> :> :> THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
>> :> :> of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
>> :> :> now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
>> :> :> that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
>> :> :>
>> :> : Asshole.
>> :>
>> :> Scoundrel.
>> :>
>> :> See, I told you I toned it down.
>> :
>> : Yeah, but that just makes you a toned down DICK.
>>
>> True.
>>
>> --
>> Chris Bellomy
>> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
>
>My usual response to comments like that is "I'd argue if I could."
>
>Not that I'm ever called a DICK of course.
Hard to believe that, looking at your username. Surely you've been
to some Indiana U. games. :-)
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 08:49:09
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4, 12:44 am, "bill-o" <assimil...@borg.org > wrote:
> I can honestly say I would play, and have played, with both of you. I guess
> it won't ever be in the same 4some though. :-(
>
> --
> bill-o
Hell, bill-o, you'll play with anybody!
That little red truck of yours has been more places than Johnny Cash.
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Mar 2007 16:12:08
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4--2007, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
> Hell, bill-o, you'll play with anybody!
> That little red truck of yours has been more places than Johnny Cash.
I bought in the summer of 2003 and it's maiden voyage was to RSG-Cin that
year, since, it has been back to Cin twice to OH thrice
to WI once (was living in StL), to NC once, to many improptu outings in AL,
N GA, StL, however I will be flying to RSG-NW and WI this year. I will not
drive more than 9 hours to play golf! I have my standards!
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 19:02:23
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 4 2007 08:49:09 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>On 4, 12:44 am, "bill-o" <assimil...@borg.org> wrote:
>> I can honestly say I would play, and have played, with both of you. I guess
>> it won't ever be in the same 4some though. :-(
>>
>> --
>> bill-o
>
>Hell, bill-o, you'll play with anybody!
>That little red truck of yours has been more places than Johnny Cash.
You ain't kidding.
Amy (the wife), Jean (the kid), and I (the Legend) were driving up to
RSG Ohio two years ago. Driving pretty fast like I usually do I was
passing a little red pickup truck driving in the right lane. As I
came up to it I noticed it had a RSG Ohio "Match Play Madness Rule"
and "RSG-CIN" bumpers stickers on it. I immediately knew it was
Bill-O!
We waved hello as we went on by.
If Bill-O ever gets rid of that truck we should buy it and distribute
parts of it to all the people who have ever attended an RSG event.
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 21:27:38
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 12:55 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
>
> THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
> of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
> now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
> that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
>
Asshole.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 05:52:17
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
annika1980 <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
: On 3, 12:55 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
: >
: > THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
: > of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
: > now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
: > that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
: >
: Asshole.
Scoundrel.
See, I told you I toned it down.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:36:09
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
news:0T3tgbo3IoriN34@redshark.goodshow.net...
> annika1980 <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
> : On 3, 12:55 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> :>
> :> THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
> :> of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
> :> now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
> :> that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
> :>
> : Asshole.
>
> Scoundrel.
>
> See, I told you I toned it down.
>
Yeah, but that just makes you a toned down DICK.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 02:58:12
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
Steve S <none@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
: Chris Bellomy" <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote in message
: news:0T3tgbo3IoriN34@redshark.goodshow.net...
: > annika1980 <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
: > : On 3, 12:55 pm, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
: > :>
: > :> THere's a bigger meta post to be made about the allure and dangers
: > :> of nonstop Usenet bickering, but I don't have that one within me
: > :> now. I'll just say that I've made a conscious decision to tone
: > :> that stuff way down, for my own reasons.
: > :>
: > : Asshole.
: >
: > Scoundrel.
: >
: > See, I told you I toned it down.
:
: Yeah, but that just makes you a toned down DICK.
True.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 09:28:48
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 4:23 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
> >ship the kids to grandma.
>
> BTW -- I should say that this does not just apply to someone not
> wanting to play/associate with you. I would feel the same way if
> someone said it about Thor, Stemmer, Peter Strauss, you name it.
> --
Thor? We have no issues. I look forward to meeting him. I'm trying
to hate Stemmer but I doubt I'll succeed. : > Strauss....I'm not going
to return his pettiness with pettiness. I will play with whomever,
wherever. It's golf....not a camping trip.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 20:57:14
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
> >ship the kids to grandma.
>
> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>
> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
days later, what would be the places to see?
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 00:09:02
From: divotdigger
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
>> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
>> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
>> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
>> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
>> >ship the kids to grandma.
>>
>> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
>> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>>
>> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
>> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
>Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
>to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
>this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
>favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
>including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
>We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
>tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
>been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
>days later, what would be the places to see?
>
>-Greg
Greg, Perhaps you don't understand what is obvious to the vast
majority here.
There are very few posters or lurkers (like me) in this newsgroup who
want to have anything to do with you, let alone be pared with you on
the course.
Why not give John and the players at RSG Cincinnatti a break and stay
home?
--
Jim
"Old was NOT one of the things
I wanted to be when I grew up"
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:44:35
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
>> >not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
>> >pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
>> >about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
>> >to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
>> >ship the kids to grandma.
>>
>> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
>> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>>
>> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
>> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
>Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
>to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
>this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
>favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
>including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
>We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
>tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
>been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
>days later, what would be the places to see?
>
>-Greg
Well, unfortunately the Reds aren't in town that weekend or you could
catch a game at the most honmer-friendly park in the game.
I'd start here for things to do:
http://www.cincinnatiusa.com/
Suggestions, in no particular order,:
Cincinnati Art Museum
Cincinnati Museum Center
Riverboat Cruises
Cincinnati Zoo -- this place rocks. Lots of animals you don't see
anywhere else. We have a kick as gorilla and Sumatran Rhine breeding
program.
Big Bone Lick State Park
Newport Aquarium
Without know too much of what you like to do I can't make too many
specific suggestions. There is also a lot of cool stuff within
driving distance
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 06 Mar 2007 00:23:12
From: Sparky
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3--2007, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:
> Big Bone Lick State Park
This place sounds fun...
me
|
| | | | | |
Date: 06 Mar 2007 08:57:44
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Tue, 6 2007 00:23:12 GMT, "Sparky" <biff@funco.com > wrote:
>
>On 3--2007, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org> wrote:
>
>> Big Bone Lick State Park
>
>This place sounds fun...
>
>me
It's named after Annika's favorite activity.
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 16:44:27
From: BAR
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
John van der Pflum wrote:
> On 2 2007 20:57:14 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2, 6:25 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
>>>> not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
>>>> pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
>>>> about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
>>>> to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
>>>> ship the kids to grandma.
>>> If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
>>> would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
>>>
>>> If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
>>> you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
>>> --
>>>
>>> jvdp
>>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>> Thanks John. Again, I'm sorry for putting you on the spot but I had
>> to know before I would/could committ. I had a sense you would take
>> this stance so I tossed it out to my better half. She was very
>> favorable. In April, we'll be going to Az., playing lots of golf,
>> including a round with Chris Stricker (Gordo) and his better half.
>> We'll see how her the knee holds up. If all goes well, we'll shop for
>> tickets afterwards. Neither of us have been to Cincy, though I've
>> been to Canton and Cleveland. If we arrived early or left a couple of
>> days later, what would be the places to see?
>>
>> -Greg
>
> Well, unfortunately the Reds aren't in town that weekend or you could
> catch a game at the most honmer-friendly park in the game.
>
> I'd start here for things to do:
> http://www.cincinnatiusa.com/
>
> Suggestions, in no particular order,:
>
> Cincinnati Art Museum
> Cincinnati Museum Center
> Riverboat Cruises
> Cincinnati Zoo -- this place rocks. Lots of animals you don't see
> anywhere else. We have a kick as gorilla and Sumatran Rhine breeding
> program.
> Big Bone Lick State Park
> Newport Aquarium
>
> Without know too much of what you like to do I can't make too many
> specific suggestions. There is also a lot of cool stuff within
> driving distance
You mean the Interstate to get the hell out of town?
|
| | |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 12:30:03
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172727947.420122.284700@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 28, 8:39 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not
>> > really
>> > gone.
>>
>> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>>
>
> Met him? Why it took Laville and David Hayes to keep em apart!
> http://www.pbase.com/annika1980/image/3167977
>
> That's like a who's who of RSG in that pic. Just some of the frequent
> posters in that photo: R&B, Dalecki, BK, Laville, Strauss, Stemmer,
> Strulowitz (2), Pitts (2), Stultz (2), Pflum (3), Bellomy, Bill-o,
> Sparky, Da Ringer, a USGA official and the two winners of the Coveted
> Peach Jacket ... all in one place.
> (OK, I Photoshopped Bellomy in later).
>
> That, for me, truly was the Best of Times in RSG.
>
> As for a cage match, PUFFY, I'll try your fat ass.
>
> I'd also like to witness:
> Stemmer vs. Dene
> BK vs. Dene
> Big Tex vs. Dene
> Newell vs. Dene
> Strauss vs. Dene (I'm sensing a pattern here)
> R&B vs. Eric the Hammer
> Pitts vs. Sparky (he kills the ball)
> Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
> Frostback vs. Dalecki (Nutty Professor Match)
> Da Ringer vs. Head Shot
> MAT vs. Larry (Loser Leaves RSG Match)
> Multi vs. Pitts
> Brazee vs. Google
>
Now THATS funny!
|
| | |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 08:32:37
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 28 Feb 2007 21:45:47 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com >
wrote:
>Pflum vs. Double Quarter Pounder w/cheese Meal
Oooh, that would be ugly. Hardly fair, though. I'm a
super-light-feather weight and the Meal is a heavy weight.
To best honest -- I doubt I could finish that combo meal. I'd
probably puke.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 17:50:50
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 5:43 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172713143.774034.265770@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 5:30 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
> >> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1172699345.673928.108420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > I don't think Eric would mind me sharing this but we had a very
> >> > memorable phone conversation a few months ago. He was thinking about
> >> > hosting a tournament, then at the conclusion, challenging Tex to a
> >> > boxing match with percentages of bet money going to charity. I've met
> >> > both men and naturally thought that Tex would have a distinct
> >> > advantage, given the weight differential, but Eric assured me he could
> >> > hold his own. Ya know....I think he's right, especially with his
> >> > temper and being a southpaw.
>
> >> > My dollar two 90 would have been on Eric.
>
> >> > Definitely would have been entertaining.
>
> >> > -Greg
>
> >> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not
> >> really
> >> gone.
>
> > Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>
> > -Greg
>
> Yes, I 've met him. Always struck me as a bit odd.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You gotta get past the haircut. He's a blast to hang with, unless
he's driving.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 17:39:03
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 5:30 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com > wrote:
> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172699345.673928.108420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I don't think Eric would mind me sharing this but we had a very
> > memorable phone conversation a few months ago. He was thinking about
> > hosting a tournament, then at the conclusion, challenging Tex to a
> > boxing match with percentages of bet money going to charity. I've met
> > both men and naturally thought that Tex would have a distinct
> > advantage, given the weight differential, but Eric assured me he could
> > hold his own. Ya know....I think he's right, especially with his
> > temper and being a southpaw.
>
> > My dollar two 90 would have been on Eric.
>
> > Definitely would have been entertaining.
>
> > -Greg
>
> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
> gone.
Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 20:43:19
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172713143.774034.265770@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 28, 5:30 pm, "Steve S" <n...@fughettaboutit.com> wrote:
>> "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1172699345.673928.108420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > I don't think Eric would mind me sharing this but we had a very
>> > memorable phone conversation a few months ago. He was thinking about
>> > hosting a tournament, then at the conclusion, challenging Tex to a
>> > boxing match with percentages of bet money going to charity. I've met
>> > both men and naturally thought that Tex would have a distinct
>> > advantage, given the weight differential, but Eric assured me he could
>> > hold his own. Ya know....I think he's right, especially with his
>> > temper and being a southpaw.
>>
>> > My dollar two 90 would have been on Eric.
>>
>> > Definitely would have been entertaining.
>>
>> > -Greg
>>
>> That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not
>> really
>> gone.
>
> Ever met him? He's sane....and lots of fun to be around.
>
> -Greg
>
>
Yes, I 've met him. Always struck me as a bit odd.
|
| |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 13:49:05
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Feb 28, 12:50 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2007 12:43:41 -0800, "BigPurdueFan" <bigpu...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Things are pretty lively on here between some people, so maybe we
> >could arrange a few cage matches between people at the next RSG
> >outing? I don't really follow who is arguing with who (gram
> >check?), but I read a lot of the posts and there seem to be some
> >lingering issues. Which two posters would you most like to see in the
> >ring?
>
> Oooo, talk about opening wounds.
>
> Are we talking serious blood shed or just good natured competition?
>
> For the latter I'd like to see Tex (not around here anymore) vs.
> Annika or Bellomy.
>
> How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
> --
Who is Gene Keady?
I don't think Eric would mind me sharing this but we had a very
memorable phone conversation a few months ago. He was thinking about
hosting a tournament, then at the conclusion, challenging Tex to a
boxing match with percentages of bet money going to charity. I've met
both men and naturally thought that Tex would have a distinct
advantage, given the weight differential, but Eric assured me he could
hold his own. Ya know....I think he's right, especially with his
temper and being a southpaw.
My dollar two 90 would have been on Eric.
Definitely would have been entertaining.
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:24:09
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 6:19 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net > wrote:
>
> > Regardless, my regrets/remorse and your lack thereof, have been fully
> > hashed in RSG.
>
> You're wrong about my lack thereof. You think I wanted it to come to
> this? I am truly sorry it came to this. I'm sorry you felt compelled
> to threaten me with lawsuit about a tournament that is supposedly dead
> to you. I'm sorry that others have witmessed this drama on the group
> and have made their judgements about you, me and the other RSG
> participants and tournaments. I didn't produce RSGNW so that I could
> play god with people's feelings and have the foresight that I'd have
> to make these kind of decisions. I did it so that my friends could
> come together once a year to have some fun playing golf in a little
> different format that your typical gross/net medal score method.
> That's all.
Frankly, I see more victim talk than I do an actual apology/remorse.
But....perhaps I'm seeing the situation through red glasses, so I'll
ask this specific question. Knowing what you know now, what would
have done differently, starting in December? You need not address the
"ceremony." I accept your explanation. I'm curious what you would
do differently in December.
Answering my own question, I would have not criticized your tournament
in RSG a month prior. Also, I would have not sent you an e-mail (any
e-mails) about suing you. Had I consulted with Bowen or Buege first,
instead of my attorney, I'd learned that the "ceremony" was never a
ceremony.....just a gag. When I read about it in RSG, I honestly had
visions of you standing up in front of 25 or more people and
slandering me, my reputation, into the ground. Fortunately, you
didn't do that.
Ironically, I do believe that you were somewhat of a victim. I think
the so-called six are more to blame, along with me, than you the
host. But.... had you stood your ground with them, like John will,
there never would have been a problem, especially since we couldn't
come despite my intitial hopes. Again, Theresa has no knowledge of
these events and yet has no desire to attend to this day. She
reiterated that tonight when we discussed John's event. She hates
cold weather golf and she didn't think much of k or Todd.....drunk
or sober.
Like it or not, they changed your tournament.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:38:25
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 21:24:09 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 6:19 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Regardless, my regrets/remorse and your lack thereof, have been fully
>> > hashed in RSG.
>>
>> You're wrong about my lack thereof. You think I wanted it to come to
>> this? I am truly sorry it came to this. I'm sorry you felt compelled
>> to threaten me with lawsuit about a tournament that is supposedly dead
>> to you. I'm sorry that others have witmessed this drama on the group
>> and have made their judgements about you, me and the other RSG
>> participants and tournaments. I didn't produce RSGNW so that I could
>> play god with people's feelings and have the foresight that I'd have
>> to make these kind of decisions. I did it so that my friends could
>> come together once a year to have some fun playing golf in a little
>> different format that your typical gross/net medal score method.
>> That's all.
>
>Frankly, I see more victim talk than I do an actual apology/remorse.
>But....perhaps I'm seeing the situation through red glasses, so I'll
>ask this specific question. Knowing what you know now, what would
>have done differently, starting in December? You need not address the
>"ceremony." I accept your explanation. I'm curious what you would
>do differently in December.
>
>Answering my own question, I would have not criticized your tournament
>in RSG a month prior. Also, I would have not sent you an e-mail (any
>e-mails) about suing you. Had I consulted with Bowen or Buege first,
>instead of my attorney, I'd learned that the "ceremony" was never a
>ceremony.....just a gag. When I read about it in RSG, I honestly had
>visions of you standing up in front of 25 or more people and
>slandering me, my reputation, into the ground. Fortunately, you
>didn't do that.
>
>Ironically, I do believe that you were somewhat of a victim. I think
>the so-called six are more to blame, along with me, than you the
>host. But.... had you stood your ground with them, like John will,
>there never would have been a problem, especially since we couldn't
>come despite my intitial hopes. Again, Theresa has no knowledge of
>these events and yet has no desire to attend to this day. She
>reiterated that tonight when we discussed John's event. She hates
>cold weather golf and she didn't think much of k or Todd.....drunk
>or sober.
>
>Like it or not, they changed your tournament.
>
>-Greg
<sigh > Come on, man, let it go.
Stop opening up the old wounds and comparing a future unwritten ("What
John will do.......") to hindsight ("what would you have done
differently.....").
You said here, or at least gave the impression, that you want it
forget about it and not be involved in pettiness but then I wake up
this morning to see you bringing it up again. You say that you are
"over it" but you talking about it.
Which do you want? To bring it up again and again or move on
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 14:49:48
From: BigPurdueFan
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 2:43 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 11:29:42 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >On 2, 12:10 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
>
> >> If you travel to Ohio odds are you go right through Cincy on your way.
>
> >Yeah, but if you keep it around 90MPH and hold your nose, it ain't so
> >bad.
>
> That's only your old neighborhood. The people with class (like me)
> live on the east side of town.
We like to call that Pennsylvania.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 11:56:43
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 11:31 am, "annika1980" <annika1...@aol.com > wrote:
> On 2, 2:26 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm invited to your tunament....or are you referring to the caddy
> > round?
>
> > -Greg-
>
> Who's gonna bring the punchbowl?
Me!
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 11:31:22
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 2:26 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
>
> I'm invited to your tunament....or are you referring to the caddy
> round?
>
> -Greg-
Who's gonna bring the punchbowl?
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 11:26:33
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 9:05 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 08:42:31 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 2, 6:24 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >wrote:
> >> On 1 2007 20:43:56 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On 1, 6:09 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> On 1 2007 16:35:06 -0800, "The_Professor" <d...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >> >> >I've challenged Dalecki several times now.
>
> >> >> That's it, Hamilton!!! I'm fed up with your crap!! Tossing your
> >> >> weight around, claiming you can hit a SW 247 yards under a tree, over
> >> >> a bridge, from a fried egg lie. I hereby challenge you to a no
> >> >> prisoners, no shots given, death blood match at RSG Cincy this year.
>
> >> >> Loser has to do 10 pushups on the 18th green! Or wash the other guy's
> >> >> car. Or each a double cheeseburger meal with fries and a coke. Or
> >> >> sing the Alabama fight song. Or publicly say that you are Annika's
> >> >> love child. Or some other incredibly humiliating act.
>
> >> >> Whadaya say???????
> >> >> --
>
> >> >> jvdp
> >> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
> >> >This kind of juvenile stuff is what's wrong with RSG. ;>
>
> >> >-Greg
>
> >> Hey! I'm 35, I'm not juvenile! ;-)
> >> --
>
> >> jvdp
> >> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com-Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Got you by 13 years, junior. ;>
>
> >-Greg
>
> I'll let you play from the Old Ladies tees then.
> --
I'm invited to your tunament....or are you referring to the caddy
round?
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 20:30:58
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172699345.673928.108420@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> I don't think Eric would mind me sharing this but we had a very
> memorable phone conversation a few months ago. He was thinking about
> hosting a tournament, then at the conclusion, challenging Tex to a
> boxing match with percentages of bet money going to charity. I've met
> both men and naturally thought that Tex would have a distinct
> advantage, given the weight differential, but Eric assured me he could
> hold his own. Ya know....I think he's right, especially with his
> temper and being a southpaw.
>
> My dollar two 90 would have been on Eric.
>
> Definitely would have been entertaining.
>
> -Greg
>
That sounds psychotic and juvenile enough that it's as if Eric is not really
gone.
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 09:30:11
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3, 4:47 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> On 2 2007 21:53:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
> >> always have on you regardless.
>
> >Nor would he post it.
>
> >-Greg
>
> I don't understand that. Why not post it? Would either guy be
> embarrassed about the outcome? If there is a score shouldn't it be
> public knowledge? Does the PGA tour not post the scores of the guys
> who shoot 86 so as to not embarrass them?
> --
>
> jvdp
> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
I remain skeptical about his 7 handicap.
-Greg
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 16:27:07
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3 2007 09:30:11 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 3, 4:47 am, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>> On 2 2007 21:53:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 2, 8:07 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> but if you shot 92 and I shot 85? You'd never get over it....and that's the edge I will
>> >> always have on you regardless.
>>
>> >Nor would he post it.
>>
>> >-Greg
>>
>> I don't understand that. Why not post it? Would either guy be
>> embarrassed about the outcome? If there is a score shouldn't it be
>> public knowledge? Does the PGA tour not post the scores of the guys
>> who shoot 86 so as to not embarrass them?
>> --
>>
>> jvdp
>> Start clearing your calendarshttp://www.rsgcincinnati.com
>
>I remain skeptical about his 7 handicap.
>
>-Greg
Don't be.
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 05:43:32
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 3--2007, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:
> >I remain skeptical about his 7 handicap.
> >
> >-Greg
>
> Don't be.
Agreed, it's the real deal
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:39:25
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"bill-o" <assimilate@borg.org > wrote in message
news:45ea5c7f$0$17348$882e0bbb@news.ThunderNews.com...
>
> On 3--2007, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org> wrote:
>
>> >I remain skeptical about his 7 handicap.
>> >
>> >-Greg
>>
>> Don't be.
>
> Agreed, it's the real deal
>
I don't know, I saw him miss holing a shot from a bunker by a few inches. A
true 7 would have holed that shot out.
Obvious vanity handicap in the league of Trump's 3 handicap.
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:21:27
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 5:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
>
> Anyone on RSG is welcome to come to my event and I do my best as a
> host to make sure that everyone has a good time. The only person who
> I would have a strong negative towards would be Eric. I think his
> words go far beyond the petty bickering and Monty Python-esque "Yes it
> is, no it isn't" arguing that takes place most of the time in RSG. He
> and I would have to have a serious personal discussion before I would
> feel comfortable about him playing.
At least if Eric pulled the TITPB gag, it would be done with a real
punchbowl and real turds.
> Maybe I'm being naive but I think you'd all be a lot more civil in person.
Unless Stemmer or that sumbitch, Bellomy, was playin.
> Annika and Ken Pitts are two of the best examples of this dichotomy.
> Online it's easy to see how they can rub people the wrong way and
> get them up in arms.
Who? Moi?
>But in real life both of them are quiet, kind[1], complimentary, and great
> be around. Hell, if Koenig and Bellomy can get together, play golf
> and agree to disagree anyone can do it.
Ken and I have had many verbal battles here on RSG. But we've also
battled head-to-head on the golf course many times without even a hint
of a problem. That's because we know how to "turn it off" when we
play golf. We are also trying to beat the crap out of each other on
the course.
One thing I've noticed in all the RSG events I've attended is how
little talk there is about RSG at the event. Of course, at some of
the events many of the players are not active posters on RSG, but even
the RSG people are usually reluctant to talk too much about it while
there. It seems most of them truly do come there for the golf. Or
maybe it's the beer.
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:30:28
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1172899287.057841.12120@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
> On 2, 5:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>> Maybe I'm being naive but I think you'd all be a lot more civil in
>> person.
>
> Unless Stemmer or that sumbitch, Bellomy, was playin.
I have that inate ability to be consistent online and off. Some call it a
talent, others a curse
>
>
>>But in real life both of them are quiet, kind[1], complimentary, and great
>> be around.
I don't have that problem, I'm loud and obnoxious in real life too.
> Ken and I have had many verbal battles here on RSG. But we've also
> battled head-to-head on the golf course many times without even a hint
> of a problem. That's because we know how to "turn it off" when we
> play golf. We are also trying to beat the crap out of each other on
> the course.
>
I don't think I have an "Off" switch. Good luck playing with me. I talk
the best game in RSG, undisputed.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 05 Mar 2007 08:44:18
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Sun, 4 2007 21:30:28 -0500, "Steve S" <none@fughettaboutit.com >
wrote:
>annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:1172899287.057841.12120@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>> On 2, 5:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>>> Maybe I'm being naive but I think you'd all be a lot more civil in
>>> person.
>>
>> Unless Stemmer or that sumbitch, Bellomy, was playin.
>
>I have that inate ability to be consistent online and off. Some call it a
>talent, others a curse
>
>>
>>
>
>>>But in real life both of them are quiet, kind[1], complimentary, and great
>>> be around.
>
>I don't have that problem, I'm loud and obnoxious in real life too.
>
>> Ken and I have had many verbal battles here on RSG. But we've also
>> battled head-to-head on the golf course many times without even a hint
>> of a problem. That's because we know how to "turn it off" when we
>> play golf. We are also trying to beat the crap out of each other on
>> the course.
>>
>
>I don't think I have an "Off" switch. Good luck playing with me. I talk
>the best game in RSG, undisputed.
>
>
Those that can't do, talk.
--
jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:05:03
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 6:58 pm, "George Hibbard" <g...@perfectimpact.com > wrote:
> I wanna play with Annika.
Aw George, how sweet!
Sounds like a plan! Then you'll finally be able to witness Perfect
Impact in person. I'll need to work on my game a bit first,
however.
Since the temps were in the mid-60's here today, I went to the range
to swing at a few. It was the first time I touched a club since mid-
December when I played with Sparky.
I'm happy to report that my very first swing of the year only missed
it's target by 1 yard. Of course, it was a skulled PW shot which
never got higher than knee-high and almost knocked over the 100 yard
ker as it whizzed by. But hey, at least my aim is still good!
The rest of the small bucket went much better, especially the short
irons and wedges. The driver felt very unhappy in my hands, however.
Even the Clanger got a brief (one swing) audition and it was upset as
well (as were the other folks on the range).
I think the reason I hit the shorter clubs better is because I am so
stiff right now that I can't take my hands much past shoulder height
on the backswing. But it's early.
I also went to the putting green to stroke a few putts. I'd drop my
usual 3 balls and putt to a hole 15-20 feet away. For some reason I'd
usually make the 2nd one, but miss the other two badly. The bad thing
is that all of the putts felt the same to me. Oh well, touch can be
regained with a few hours of practice.
|
| | | | |
Date: 25 Apr 2007 15:55:06
From: \R&B\
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote
>
> I'm happy to report that my very first swing of the year only missed
> it's target by 1 yard. Of course, it was a skulled PW shot which
> never got higher than knee-high and almost knocked over the 100 yard
> ker as it whizzed by.
That's not so bad. There have been times after long layoffs that my first
swing would only miss the target by a foot or so. The divot would be about
a foot behind the ball......and the ball didn't move an inch.
Randy
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 16:05:08
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 3:46 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net > wrote:
> On 2, 3:37 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Uh Scott....this isn't about you or your tournament.
>
> Thanks for playing the part of the RSG posting police, Greg, but I
> believe I am allowed to provide clarification and rationale for my
> actions when my name is mentioned in a thread.
You're right. I retract my statement. I'm also will not debate you
further about your tournament. It *really* is a dead issue to me.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:46:05
From: newellsatwsu
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 3:37 pm, "Dene" <gdst...@aol.com > wrote:
> Uh Scott....this isn't about you or your tournament.
Thanks for playing the part of the RSG posting police, Greg, but I
believe I am allowed to provide clarification and rationale for my
actions when my name is mentioned in a thread.
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:37:19
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 3:10 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...@adelphia.net > wrote:
> On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
> wrote:
>
> > It was the host doing what he thought was best for
> > his event.
>
> And that's exactly what it was. **I** made the decision for my event
> based on how negative the atmosphere had become surrounding Greg's
> attendence.
>
> > I would be furious if any personal feuds spilled over during my event.
> > If I had an inkling something like that was going to happen I would
> > take whatever steps I deemed necessary to make sure things didn't get
> > out of hand or violent -- including removing someone from the event.
>
> And my decision didn't have really anything to do with anyone's
> behavior **during** the event. It had everything to do with the bad
> blood that spilled over in the newsgroup/private email interactions
> before & after the event.
>
> > Of course I would. Would I expect those people to behave like
> > adults? Absolutely.
>
> I would gladly play golf with Greg again. I would look forward to
> getting a rematch from our Sept 2005 match where he beat me at my home
> course. But I was not about to let the common denominator detract
> from other's participation in my event and erode the
> commoraderie...especially when I can't control the pairings due to the
> format.
>
> My choice...and I accept the criticism and responsibility for that
> choice.
Uh Scott....this isn't about you or your tournament.
-Greg
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:32:33
From: Dene
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> Wow. OK. Here we go.
>
> Scott is a good good friend of mine and I have a deep fondness for him
> and Kelly. He, and a number of other (at times controversial) RSGers,
> were with me on a golf trip that literally changed my life. Those
> people, to me, are closer than my own blood brothers and sisters. I
> would do anything for those people. No questions asked.
I respect that.
> As I said back when this whole debate was raging on, I fully stand
> behind any host to do whatever the hell he wants to do with his event.
> He is God. I unequivocally reject the characterization that it was
> "Newell Nonsense". It was the host doing what he thought was best for
> his event. I'll stand by ANY RSG host -- Scott, Thor, Mike Dalecki,
> Bob Patterson, Randy, Eric, Stemmer, -- TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT TO
> DO WITH THEIR EVENT. Period. End of story.
I agree! I don't think that has ever been in dispute. I, along with
others, questioned the means and motives of Scott's decision.
Nonetheless, it is his tournament, and he's the boss.....same applies
to you, which is why I asked you this tough question.
> I would be furious if any personal feuds spilled over during my event.
> If I had an inkling something like that was going to happen I would
> take whatever steps I deemed necessary to make sure things didn't get
> out of hand or violent -- including removing someone from the event.
> In a heartbeat. I might give them a second chance the next year if
> they still wanted to come. I understand that not everyone gets along
> and that's fine but suck it up, be a man, and be civil. If you're an
> asshole don't let everyone know. Pretend to be a decent human being.
> RSG Cincinnati does not have a Code of Conduct and I'd be really
> annoyed to have to write one. I expect everyone to come, play golf,
> drink a few drinks (alcoholic or not), tell some stories, and leave
> with some new ones. If you want to have a lively debate about
> something, fine. But be civil and respectful of the other person's
> idiotic views.
I agree completely.
> I do my best to honor one or two pairing requests. I have yet to have
> any "Don't pair me with this guy" requests but I know that some people
> prefer to not be paired with other or whose personalities clash so I
> do my best to keep them apart if I can, especially in the tournament
> rounds where things are a bit more serious.
As for me, I'll play golf with anyone.
> Anyone on RSG is welcome to come to my event and I do my best as a
> host to make sure that everyone has a good time. The only person who
> I would have a strong negative towards would be Eric. I think his
> words go far beyond the petty bickering and Monty Python-esque "Yes it
> is, no it isn't" arguing that takes place most of the time in RSG. He
> and I would have to have a serious personal discussion before I would
> feel comfortable about him playing.
And he would respond accordingly. I've never heard of Eric acting out
in a tournament, but if he has, that's between you and him.
> Would I feel some apprehension if you, Koenig, Annika, Rob, Scott,
> Bobby Knight, George Hibbard, Randy, and Larry all decided to come to
> my event, knowing the past history between these folks? Of course I
> would. Would I expect those people to behave like adults? Absolutely.
> I believe the medium of RSG itself lends itself to fighting. Tell me
> honestly, would you -- or BK -- or Larry -- or Annika -- or -- Ken
> Pitts -- or Rob -- or whoever -- really say some of the things you've
> said, and act the fool, if your "enemy" was sitting across the table
> from you having a beer or diet coke? Maybe I'm being naive but I
> think you'd all be a lot more civil in person. Annika and Ken Pitts
> are two of the best examples of this dichotomy. Online it's easy to
> see how they can rub people the wrong way and get them up in arms. But
> in real life both of them are quiet, kind[1], complimentary, and great
> be around. Hell, if Koenig and Bellomy can get together, play golf
> and agree to disagree anyone can do it.
You're right about the medium of RSG. You, unlike me, have always
stayed above the fray. Regardless...I'd play golf with all the
above....and likely enjoy it, especially if I whupped them.
I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
ship the kids to grandma.
> [1] Except for Annika peeing my the RSG Cincinnati Jug.
> --
Yikes....there goes my plans about putting a turd in it.
-Greg
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:23:18
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>
>I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
>not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
>pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
>about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
>to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
>ship the kids to grandma.
>
BTW -- I should say that this does not just apply to someone not
wanting to play/associate with you. I would feel the same way if
someone said it about Thor, Stemmer, Peter Strauss, you name it.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 21:32:25
From: Steve S
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote in message
news:nvpiu214ihagvtrjoefvevc061j7lditj6@4ax.com...
BTW -- I should say that this does not just apply to someone not
> wanting to play/associate with you. I would feel the same way if
> someone said it about Thor, Stemmer, Peter Strauss, you name it.
> --
The difference for me is that I couldn't care less who doesn't want to play
with me. I'm better as a single anyway, I can use a foot wedge without all
the dirty looks.
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:25:53
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2 2007 15:32:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:
>On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org>
>wrote:
>
>
>I'm sorry to press but I really need a definitive answer. Cincy is
>not a 3 hour drive. I would hate to buy tickets and then have the rug
>pulled from under me. So....if people make demands or ultimatums
>about my presence or pairings, then what are you going to do? I have
>to know before I float this past my wife, buy airline tickets, and
>ship the kids to grandma.
>
If they requested not to be paired with you I would tell them that I
would do my best I wouldn't be able to guarantee it.
If they were not happy with that, or said that they would not come if
you attended, then I would look forward to seeing them next year.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 18:58:59
From: George Hibbard
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
I wanna play with Annika.
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:10:08
From: newellsatwsu
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 2, 2:55 pm, John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspa...@bite.org >
wrote:
> It was the host doing what he thought was best for
> his event.
And that's exactly what it was. **I** made the decision for my event
based on how negative the atmosphere had become surrounding Greg's
attendence.
> I would be furious if any personal feuds spilled over during my event.
> If I had an inkling something like that was going to happen I would
> take whatever steps I deemed necessary to make sure things didn't get
> out of hand or violent -- including removing someone from the event.
And my decision didn't have really anything to do with anyone's
behavior **during** the event. It had everything to do with the bad
blood that spilled over in the newsgroup/private email interactions
before & after the event.
> Of course I would. Would I expect those people to behave like
> adults? Absolutely.
I would gladly play golf with Greg again. I would look forward to
getting a rematch from our Sept 2005 match where he beat me at my home
course. But I was not about to let the common denominator detract
from other's participation in my event and erode the
commoraderie...especially when I can't control the pairings due to the
format.
My choice...and I accept the criticism and responsibility for that
choice.
|
| |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 15:50:09
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On 28 Feb 2007 12:43:41 -0800, "BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com >
wrote:
>Things are pretty lively on here between some people, so maybe we
>could arrange a few cage matches between people at the next RSG
>outing? I don't really follow who is arguing with who (gram
>check?), but I read a lot of the posts and there seem to be some
>lingering issues. Which two posters would you most like to see in the
>ring?
Oooo, talk about opening wounds.
Are we talking serious blood shed or just good natured competition?
For the latter I'd like to see Tex (not around here anymore) vs.
Annika or Bellomy.
How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | |
Date: 01 Mar 2007 08:29:32
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:50:09 -0500, John van der Pflum
<nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:
>
>How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
Former head coach of Purdue men's b-ball. I figured since
"BigPurdueFan" started this post he'd like an Indiana U/Purdue
matchup.
--
jvdp
Start clearing your calendars
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| | |
Date: 28 Feb 2007 15:37:27
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: RSG Cage Match
|
"John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote in message
news:sgqbu2dtlhsg0nrdnbrc85ge0u7sehqvh3@4ax.com...
> On 28 Feb 2007 12:43:41 -0800, "BigPurdueFan" <bigpufan@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Things are pretty lively on here between some people, so maybe we
>>could arrange a few cage matches between people at the next RSG
>>outing? I don't really follow who is arguing with who (gram
>>check?), but I read a lot of the posts and there seem to be some
>>lingering issues. Which two posters would you most like to see in the
>>ring?
>
> Oooo, talk about opening wounds.
>
> Are we talking serious blood shed or just good natured competition?
>
> For the latter I'd like to see Tex (not around here anymore) vs.
> Annika or Bellomy.
Dang, I was gonna pick that one.
>
> How about Bobby Knight vs. Gene Keady?
> --
Who's Gene Keady?
Coleman E Howard vs Tysm0
MAT vs Bigoldcat
|
|
