| |
Main
Date: 01 Dec 2006 10:03:04
From: annika1980
Subject: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
I've watched a few episodes now and can give this capsule review:
"OK, Nat, we get it. You're rich and have a killer bod. So win
already!"
One wonders what would happen if Natalie worked on her game a fraction
of the amount of time she spends doing photo shoots, endorsements, and
playing pro-ams with The Donald.
I hope Michelle Wie watched the last show where somebody asked Nat if
she'd like to play against the men. "No, I love the LPGA," she said.
"I need to work on winning there first."
Hey Nat! Less mascara and eye liner ... more short game practice.
That oughta do it.
|
|
| |
Date: 04 Dec 2006 13:21:07
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
On Dec 4, 3:44 pm, "dsc" <Dudley.Corn...@eku.edu > wrote:
> > She's certainly not flawless or near-flawless
> > like a runway model.I agree she is not perfect... but she's still probably better looking
> than many of those too skinny runway models. You don't necessarily have
> to be the prettiest... to be the hottest. :)
attitude is certainly an important factor in any game.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Dec 2006 19:45:09
From: AKA gray asphalt
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
<strat68@eudoramail.com > wrote in message
news:1165267267.066587.269320@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> On Dec 4, 3:44 pm, "dsc" <Dudley.Corn...@eku.edu> wrote:
>> > She's certainly not flawless or near-flawless
>> > like a runway model.I agree she is not perfect... but she's still
>> > probably better looking
>> than many of those too skinny runway models. You don't necessarily have
>> to be the prettiest... to be the hottest. :)
>
> attitude is certainly an important factor in any game.
For me, her posture is a great asset. And her asset isn't bad either.
|
| |
Date: 04 Dec 2006 12:44:32
From: dsc
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
> She's certainly not flawless or near-flawless
> like a runway model.
I agree she is not perfect... but she's still probably better looking
than many of those too skinny runway models. You don't necessarily have
to be the prettiest... to be the hottest. :)
|
| |
Date: 04 Dec 2006 08:39:03
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
On Dec 3, 7:26 pm, "AKA gray asphalt" <goodidea1...@hotmail.spam.com >
wrote:
> "Miss Anne Thrope" <High_Colo...@webtv.net> wrote in messagenews:5935-457205DF-350@storefull-3154.bay.webtv.net...
>
> > Thanks for the compliment Gray.
>
> > It was very lifelike, for you.MAT is kind of an Unknown Comic. Did you notice that she doesn't ever bite
> back?
That was an M.O. that started a few years back, and that in itself I
find amusing. Imagine waking up and turning on your webtv and replying
to all *initial* thread-starts in RSG, celine dion newsgroup, running,
and a few more... every single day.
Note that MAT only replies to the initial post of a thread, this is how
he resists the urge to reply and does a successful hit and run. The
persistence is "interesting."
|
| |
Date: 04 Dec 2006 08:31:16
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
On Dec 3, 12:38 pm, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it > wrote:
> In article <1165111156.766146.106...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>
>
> motofranks...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > i don't understand the fascination.... seems like a nice enough woman
> > and she has a hard body, but she isn't that great-looking.... she's
> > basically proclaimed to the world that she's hot and people fall into
> > behind that....
> Maybe's it's the behind that's the fascination!!!
> Seriously folks, do you
> have anything proving that it was "she proclaiming" that she was hot
Sure, her own website: "10 on the tee"
They ain't referring to 10:00 AM
I believe some of what motofrank is saying, except saying "she's not
that good looking." She's certainly not flawless or near-flawless
like a runway model. However, for professional sports where looks is
not a requirement, she stands out and gets camera time. If she walked
into a room full of straight men of all age groups, I'm sure there
would be very few "kick outs."
The likes of NG or Erica Blasberg don't need to be #1 to get contracts
from clothing/equipment companies.
> or the media looking for a hot body?
the "media" has never looked for a hot bod, they are above that you
know.
|
| |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 07:50:08
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
Miss Anne Thrope wrote:
> "'I've watched a few episodes..."
>
> Yeah, and then when he was finished, he immediately made a sandwich
> and/or took a nap.
>
> Don't be embarrassed that you pleasure yourself........be embarrassed
> that you're still so lousy at it.
Q. Why is MAT like Michael Richards?
A. They both used to be funny.
|
| |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 02:07:29
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
On 1 Dec 2006 10:03:04 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>"OK, Nat, we get it. You're rich and have a killer bod. So win
>already!"
>
>One wonders what would happen if Natalie worked on her game a fraction
>of the amount of time she spends doing photo shoots, endorsements, and
>playing pro-ams with The Donald.
>
>I hope Michelle Wie watched the last show where somebody asked Nat if
>she'd like to play against the men. "No, I love the LPGA," she said.
>"I need to work on winning there first."
So with one strategy, people are saying "so win already". And with
the other strategy, people are saying "so win already". So your
argument is that which strategy is best should be obvious if Wie was
listening to Natalie...
|
| |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 17:59:16
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
i don't understand the fascination.... seems like a nice enough woman
and she has a hard body, but she isn't that great-looking.... she's
basically proclaimed to the world that she's hot and people fall into
behind that....
|
| | |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 18:38:51
From: George Orwell
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
In article <1165111156.766146.106860@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com >
motofrankster@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> i don't understand the fascination.... seems like a nice enough woman
> and she has a hard body, but she isn't that great-looking.... she's
> basically proclaimed to the world that she's hot and people fall into
> behind that....
Maybe's it's the behind that's the fascination!!! Seriously folks, do you
have anything proving that it was "she proclaiming" that she was hot or
the media looking for a hot body?
|
| |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 18:01:51
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
Thanks for the compliment Gray.
It was very lifelike, for you.
|
| | |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 16:26:59
From: AKA gray asphalt
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
"Miss Anne Thrope" <High_Colonic@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:5935-457205DF-350@storefull-3154.bay.webtv.net...
> Thanks for the compliment Gray.
>
> It was very lifelike, for you.
MAT is kind of an Unknown Comic. Did you notice that she doesn't ever bite
back?
|
| |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 11:31:29
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
annika1980 wrote:
> curtjester1@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Lay off. Natalie probably does more for the promotion of women's golf
> > than anybody on that tour. If she doesn't win, she's a nobody
> > approach; is just a typical bleacher seat retort.
>
> Don't get me wrong. I was following (and photographing) Natalie before
> most people here had ever heard of her (over 4 years ago).
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/1906599
>
> In fact, one photo I took of her and her dad is still on her website.
> Both her and her dad, John, have always been friendly to me. In fact,
> I remember Natalie actually coming up to ME to shake my hand the second
> year I went to watch her (chicks dig me, what can I say?). My point is
> that I'd like to see more attention paid to her golf (which has
Yeah, and she said I should just room with her entourage since I came
to so many tournaments.
> improved) and less paid to how many photo shoots she can do in a week.
There must be some ratio in the pics you take and the strokes she could
drop....or you could drop?
CJ
|
| |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 10:26:23
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
"'I've watched a few episodes..."
Yeah, and then when he was finished, he immediately made a sandwich
and/or took a nap.
Don't be embarrassed that you pleasure yourself........be embarrassed
that you're still so lousy at it.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 12:51:02
From: AKA gray asphalt
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
"Miss Anne Thrope" <High_Colonic@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:29596-45719B1F-410@storefull-3158.bay.webtv.net...
> "'I've watched a few episodes..."
>
> Yeah, and then when he was finished, he immediately made a sandwich
> and/or took a nap.
>
> Don't be embarrassed that you pleasure yourself........be embarrassed
> that you're still so lousy at it.
That's pretty funny, for you.
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 01:35:14
From: Brian Foster
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
"AKA gray asphalt" <goodidea1950@hotmail.spam.com > wrote in message
news:IIlch.5895$Zb5.2266@newsfe13.phx...
>
> "Miss Anne Thrope" <High_Colonic@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:29596-45719B1F-410@storefull-3158.bay.webtv.net...
>> "'I've watched a few episodes..."
>>
>> Yeah, and then when he was finished, he immediately made a sandwich
>> and/or took a nap.
>>
>> Don't be embarrassed that you pleasure yourself........be embarrassed
>> that you're still so lousy at it.
>
> That's pretty funny, for you.
There is still a spark there, we just don't see it very much anymore.....
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 13:38:43
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
curtjester1@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Lay off. Natalie probably does more for the promotion of women's golf
> than anybody on that tour. If she doesn't win, she's a nobody
> approach; is just a typical bleacher seat retort.
Don't get me wrong. I was following (and photographing) Natalie before
most people here had ever heard of her (over 4 years ago).
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/1906599
In fact, one photo I took of her and her dad is still on her website.
Both her and her dad, John, have always been friendly to me. In fact,
I remember Natalie actually coming up to ME to shake my hand the second
year I went to watch her (chicks dig me, what can I say?). My point is
that I'd like to see more attention paid to her golf (which has
improved) and less paid to how many photo shoots she can do in a week.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 17:46:51
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
On 1 Dec 2006 13:38:43 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>
>curtjester1@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Lay off. Natalie probably does more for the promotion of women's golf
>> than anybody on that tour. If she doesn't win, she's a nobody
>> approach; is just a typical bleacher seat retort.
>
>Don't get me wrong. I was following (and photographing) Natalie before
>most people here had ever heard of her (over 4 years ago).
>http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/1906599
>
>In fact, one photo I took of her and her dad is still on her website.
>Both her and her dad, John, have always been friendly to me. In fact,
>I remember Natalie actually coming up to ME to shake my hand the second
>year I went to watch her (chicks dig me, what can I say?). My point is
>that I'd like to see more attention paid to her golf (which has
>improved) and less paid to how many photo shoots she can do in a week.
Nice pics there, annika. Couple of comments. Someone needs to start
grooming John Gulbis.
And that goose bumps pic? Well, it gave me goose bumps.
Craig
"Nothing matters but the weekend, from a Tuesday point of view."
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 13:03:27
From: dsc
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
> One wonders what would happen if Natalie worked on her game a fraction
> of the amount of time she spends doing photo shoots, endorsements, and
> playing pro-ams with The Donald.
I'd say she' lose a million dollars... maybe more... :)
She's pretty good, but she probably won't ever get much better. JMO.
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 11:14:29
From:
Subject: Re: "Natalie Gulbis Show" review
|
annika1980 wrote:
> I've watched a few episodes now and can give this capsule review:
>
> "OK, Nat, we get it. You're rich and have a killer bod. So win
> already!"
>
> One wonders what would happen if Natalie worked on her game a fraction
> of the amount of time she spends doing photo shoots, endorsements, and
> playing pro-ams with The Donald.
>
> I hope Michelle Wie watched the last show where somebody asked Nat if
> she'd like to play against the men. "No, I love the LPGA," she said.
> "I need to work on winning there first."
>
> Hey Nat! Less mascara and eye liner ... more short game practice.
> That oughta do it.
Lay off. Natalie probably does more for the promotion of women's golf
than anybody on that tour. If she doesn't win, she's a nobody
approach; is just a typical bleacher seat retort. On the course, while
chatting at times the majority of the time she is tweaking her swing,
and not primping herself around. She loves golf, and she doesn't do to
bad for someone who never had a golf coach til she became pro. The
only thing I see wrong with her show, is she should increase that fig
leaf a little. I almost had a heart attack!
CJ
|
|
