golf-forums.net
Promoting golf discussion.

Main
Date: 04 Apr 2007 08:51:00
From: me
Subject: Martha's soldiers at it again
Just when you thought it was safe to advertise at the Masters again:

<http://rawstory.com/news/afp/
US_lawmaker_takes_aim_at_Augusta_Na_04032007.html >

[small excerpt]
US representative Carolyn Maloney introduced the bill before the US
Congress with specific mention of Augusta National, host club for this
week's 71st Masters, the year's first major golf championship.

"Golf courses are set up to allow fair competition between men and
women. But at the Augusta National clubhouse, men have long had an
unfair advantage," Maloney said.

"Men who belong to clubs like Augusta National reap financial benefits
- either directly through tax deductions for business expenses or
indirectly through career opportunities and board appointments - that
women can't get just because they are women.

"The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
tax code."





 
Date: 05 Apr 2007 05:56:13
From: me
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again
On Apr 4, 5:02 pm, "MnMikew" <mnmiik...@aol.com > wrote:
> "me" <oconn...@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175713744.585999.327100@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 4, 1:34 pm, "MnMikew" <mnmiik...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> "me" <oconn...@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175701860.413802.311070@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > [snip]
> >> > "The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
> >> > unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
> >> > tax code."
>
> >> A goofy do nothing bill from a Dem. How unusuall.-
>
> > Yeah, how I miss the days of solid legislation like changing the
> > name of french fries to "freedom fries".
>
> There was no legislation involved here. Bob Ney was in the committee that
> oversaw restaurant operations.

A distinction looking for a difference.

> A symbolic protest much like the Dems
> non-binding war vote.




 
Date: 04 Apr 2007 12:09:04
From: me
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again
On Apr 4, 1:34 pm, "MnMikew" <mnmiik...@aol.com > wrote:
> "me" <oconn...@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175701860.413802.311070@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
> > "The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
> > unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
> > tax code."
>
> A goofy do nothing bill from a Dem. How unusuall.-

Yeah, how I miss the days of solid legislation like changing the
name of french fries to "freedom fries".



  
Date: 04 Apr 2007 16:02:28
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again

"me" <oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com > wrote in message
news:1175713744.585999.327100@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 4, 1:34 pm, "MnMikew" <mnmiik...@aol.com> wrote:
>> "me" <oconn...@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1175701860.413802.311070@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> [snip]
>> > "The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
>> > unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
>> > tax code."
>>
>> A goofy do nothing bill from a Dem. How unusuall.-
>
> Yeah, how I miss the days of solid legislation like changing the
> name of french fries to "freedom fries".
>
There was no legislation involved here. Bob Ney was in the committee that
oversaw restaurant operations. A symbolic protest much like the Dems
non-binding war vote.




   
Date: 04 Apr 2007 22:31:56
From: The World Wide Wade
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again
In article <57ii35F2ceot1U1@mid.individual.net >,
"MnMikew" <mnmiikkew@aol.com > wrote:

> "me" <oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote in message
> news:1175713744.585999.327100@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 4, 1:34 pm, "MnMikew" <mnmiik...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> "me" <oconn...@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >> news:1175701860.413802.311070@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > [snip]
> >> > "The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
> >> > unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
> >> > tax code."
> >>
> >> A goofy do nothing bill from a Dem. How unusuall.-
> >
> > Yeah, how I miss the days of solid legislation like changing the
> > name of french fries to "freedom fries".
> >
> There was no legislation involved here. Bob Ney was in the committee that
> oversaw restaurant operations. A symbolic protest much like the Dems
> non-binding war vote.

The Dems posture in the right direction, Ney postured like an idiot to
morons everywhere.


 
Date: 04 Apr 2007 20:07:48
From: David
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again
On 4 Apr 2007 08:51:00 -0700, "me" <oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com > wrote:

<snipped >

>"The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
>unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
>tax code."

I wasn't aware that Augusta National is being subsidzed. I am
reminded of an incident a some years back when a man was allowed ti
matriculate in to an all-women's university. The women stood outside
balling their eyes out.

Women cannot have it both ways. There are enough organisations that
men do not have access to. I say, let them have their space and we
should be accorded ours.

David



  
Date: 04 Apr 2007 14:31:00
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:07:48 +0200, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de > wrote:

>On 4 Apr 2007 08:51:00 -0700, "me" <oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote:
>
><snipped>
>
>>"The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
>>unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
>>tax code."
>
> I wasn't aware that Augusta National is being subsidzed. I am
>reminded of an incident a some years back when a man was allowed ti
>matriculate in to an all-women's university. The women stood outside
>balling their eyes out.
>
> Women cannot have it both ways. There are enough organisations that
>men do not have access to. I say, let them have their space and we
>should be accorded ours.
>
>David

Sexist. ;-)
--

jvdp
RSG Cincinnati July 13-15, 2007
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com


   
Date: 04 Apr 2007 21:07:35
From: David
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:31:00 -0400, John van der Pflum
<nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:

>On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:07:48 +0200, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>>On 4 Apr 2007 08:51:00 -0700, "me" <oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com> wrote:
>>
>><snipped>
>>
>>>"The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
>>>unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
>>>tax code."
>>
>> I wasn't aware that Augusta National is being subsidzed. I am
>>reminded of an incident a some years back when a man was allowed ti
>>matriculate in to an all-women's university. The women stood outside
>>balling their eyes out.
>>
>> Women cannot have it both ways. There are enough organisations that
>>men do not have access to. I say, let them have their space and we
>>should be accorded ours.
>>
>>David
>
>Sexist. ;-)

LOL

David



 
Date: 04 Apr 2007 12:34:31
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Martha's soldiers at it again

"me" <oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com > wrote in message
news:1175701860.413802.311070@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> Just when you thought it was safe to advertise at the Masters again:
>
> <http://rawstory.com/news/afp/
> US_lawmaker_takes_aim_at_Augusta_Na_04032007.html>
>
> [small excerpt]
> US representative Carolyn Maloney introduced the bill before the US
> Congress with specific mention of Augusta National, host club for this
> week's 71st Masters, the year's first major golf championship.
>
> "Golf courses are set up to allow fair competition between men and
> women. But at the Augusta National clubhouse, men have long had an
> unfair advantage," Maloney said.
>
> "Men who belong to clubs like Augusta National reap financial benefits
> - either directly through tax deductions for business expenses or
> indirectly through career opportunities and board appointments - that
> women can't get just because they are women.
>
> "The American taxpayer shouldn't be subsidizing discrimination. These
> unfair writeoffs should be driven off the golf course and out of the
> tax code."
>
A goofy do nothing bill from a Dem. How unusuall.