| |
Main
Date: 24 Sep 2006 10:57:31
From: Acrux
Subject: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
My name is Lorenzo Crescini. I am a Captain of the merchant Navy now
on retirement.
When I was a secular missionary in an African leprosary, I wrote some
Flashes on the Holy Gospels which helped a lot of people by giving
them new trust and hope. You will find them in web site
www.lorenzocrescini.it/holygospels
E mail:
ricercapap@lorenzocrescini.it
Here are the first three Flashes as an example
1. There is the historical proof the myth could not invent the Cross .
If the Cross roused a "social orror" by the heathens ,it caused a
shocking religious dismay by the Jews. It is not a case that the first
christians in order to avoid that the preaching might be
jeopardised.,represented the Cross by an anchor ,a plough, a mast, a
man praying with open arms.How can we think that this way of dying was
put in the myth by the christians themselves ?
2. Should somebody tell us of having seen a dead person on the cross
resuscitated, nobody would believe him. But if the same person stating
that could also make miracles, then we would believe him. That happened
to the Apostles who got the power of making miracles in order to be
believed. Without that power, Christianity couldn't have been born.
3. Jesus says on the Cross: "My God ,My God ,why did You abandon me ?
Such words might even shock the reader. Why should they have been
written if they weren't true,then ?
|
|
| |
Date: 25 Sep 2006 14:14:41
From: multi
Subject: Re: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
On 24 Sep 2006 10:57:31 -0700, "Acrux" <mailfree@lorenzocrescini.it >
wrote:
>Should somebody tell us of having seen a dead person on the cross
>resuscitated, nobody would believe him. But if the same person stating
>that could also make miracles, then we would believe him.
Maybe. What I can't understand is why so many people believe it when
someone tells us a dead person came back, and the same person tells us
the dead person could do miracles, but the person telling us all this
can't do any himself, and in many cases is a nutjob (Falwell and
Robertson), crook (Bakker), hypocrite (Swaggert), or pedophile
(hundreds of priests). Oh yeah, and the original source are books
written so long ago that all most people know about the authors is
their first name, and which disagree with each other about many
details. It's like:
"Elvis is alive."
"Who says so?"
"Ralph."
"Ralph who?"
"I don't know."
"That's good enough for me!"
|
| |
Date: 25 Sep 2006 09:49:13
From: Frankenshank
Subject: Re: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
Acrux wrote:
"My God ,My God ,why did You abandon me ?
> Such words might even shock the reader. Why should they have been
> written if they weren't true,then ?
Jesus IS the Eternal Son of God, fully God, fully man.
The only sacrifice for mankinds sins, thus the only way to Heaven.
I'm not sure what this has to do with GOLF however!
FrankenShank
|
| |
Date: 25 Sep 2006 16:12:31
From: John Reddy
Subject: Re: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
In article <1159120651.559443.283630@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com >,
"Acrux" <mailfree@lorenzocrescini.it > wrote:
> 2. Should somebody tell us of having seen a dead person on the cross
> resuscitated, nobody would believe him. But if the same person stating
> that could also make miracles, then we would believe him. That happened
> to the Apostles who got the power of making miracles in order to be
> believed. Without that power, Christianity couldn't have been born.
Right on. If I were to see a guy drop a fifty footer on a hard sloping
green running 13 on the stimp meter twice, I would convert on the spot
to whatever religion he was selling. I just hope I don't see a muslim
do it.
|
| |
Date: 25 Sep 2006 09:19:19
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
Just when I thought a golf forum couldn't get any sillier.
|
| |
Date: 24 Sep 2006 14:26:17
From:
Subject: Re: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
Tro Jan wrote:
> confused prick
> >
such language is shocking, so it must be true.
|
| |
Date: 24 Sep 2006 21:40:37
From: Tro Jan
Subject: Re: Jesus, Myth of history or Son of God ?
|
confused prick
>
|
|
