| |
Main
Date: 05 Feb 2007 16:03:06
From:
Subject: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between. A
tournament is a tournament, and who cares whether the media hypes some
events as majors? If he loses an event in May, then his streak is
over, regardless of what all the little tigger sycophants say. In
fact, the only way he will impress me is if he wins the four majors in
four consecutive weeks. Having a month or more between them isn't the
way Byron would have done it.
|
|
| |
Date: 07 Feb 2007 23:31:50
From: Joe Snow
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
You're confused.
Grand Slam and streak aren't the same.
Apples and oranges.
<a2mgoog@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1170720186.172819.216150@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> ... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between. A
> tournament is a tournament, and who cares whether the media hypes some
> events as majors? If he loses an event in May, then his streak is
> over, regardless of what all the little tigger sycophants say. In
> fact, the only way he will impress me is if he wins the four majors in
> four consecutive weeks. Having a month or more between them isn't the
> way Byron would have done it.
>
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 22:35:25
From: Bucky
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On Feb 6, 7:51 am, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> You're obviously not a bridge player.
> I haven't had one of Denny's Grand Slam breakfasts so I don't know
> what they consist of.
LOL. All right, in sports context, grand slam is almost always 4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_slam
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 05:34:29
From: johnty
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On 6 Feb, 07:19, "Bucky" <uw_badg...@email.com > wrote:
> On Feb 5, 4:03 pm, a2mg...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > ... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between. A
> > tournament is a tournament, and who cares whether the media hypes some
> > events as majors?
>
> you do know that the term "grand slam" implies 4?
Or 13 in some cases.
|
| |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 23:19:32
From: Bucky
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On Feb 5, 4:03 pm, a2mg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between. A
> tournament is a tournament, and who cares whether the media hypes some
> events as majors?
you do know that the term "grand slam" implies 4? so if you consider
that "a tournament is a tournament", then he's already won a grand
slam.
|
| | |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 08:51:59
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On 5 Feb 2007 23:19:32 -0800, "Bucky" <uw_badgers@email.com > wrote:
>you do know that the term "grand slam" implies 4? so if you consider
>that "a tournament is a tournament", then he's already won a grand
>slam.
You're obviously not a bridge player.
I haven't had one of Denny's Grand Slam breakfasts so I don't know
what they consist of.
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 01:08:50
From: \R&B\
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
<a2mgoog@yahoo.com > wrote
>
> the only way he will impress me is if he wins
> the four majors in four consecutive weeks.
Now that would be a good trick.
Randy
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 03:13:44
From: John Reddy
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
In article <1170720186.172819.216150@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com >,
a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
> In
> fact, the only way he will impress me is if he wins the four majors in
> four consecutive weeks.
A. I don't think his goal is to impress you. You could write to him
and ask.
B. I don't think the powers that be will reschedule the four majors so
you can be impressed. You could write to them and ask.
C. I don't think your mother had any idea what an asshole you would
grow up to be. You could write to her and ask. Oh, sorry, you don't
know who she is. (Blush)
|
| |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 17:11:59
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On Feb 5, 7:03 pm, a2mg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between. A
> tournament is a tournament, and who cares whether the media hypes some
> events as majors? If he loses an event in May, then his streak is
> over, regardless of what all the little tigger sycophants say. In
> fact, the only way he will impress me is if he wins the four majors in
> four consecutive weeks. Having a month or more between them isn't the
> way Byron would have done it.
Hell, Byron would've won em all in the same week!
|
| |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 17:01:26
From: EdSmithers
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On Feb 5, 7:03 pm, a2mg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between.
I know you're trying to be funny, but there are other racist pricks on
this newsgroup who say similar things, who don't understand that Tiger
will pass Nicklaus by April and then shatter all records in between
coptering off to that yacht of his.
The Snedekraps and Badderkraps should just pack it in.
|
| | |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 05:02:44
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
On 5-Feb-2007, "EdSmithers" <spirosdarlotts@yahoo.com > wrote:
> but there are other racist pricks on
> this newsgroup who say similar things
I said knock the chip off your shoulder Smithers......then......release the
hounds! :-P
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 19:06:06
From: Otto
Subject: Re: If Tiger wins all four majors this year...
|
<a2mgoog@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1170720186.172819.216150@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> ... it won't be a Grand Slam unless he wins everything in between. A
> tournament is a tournament, and who cares whether the media hypes some
> events as majors? If he loses an event in May, then his streak is
> over, regardless of what all the little tigger sycophants say. In
> fact, the only way he will impress me is if he wins the four majors in
> four consecutive weeks. Having a month or more between them isn't the
> way Byron would have done it.
Tiger sucks.
Otto
|
|
