| |
Main
Date: 30 Aug 2006 11:28:23
From: annika1980
Subject: I did JonBenet!
|
Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
|
|
| |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 05:25:43
From: Thor
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
bill-o wrote:
> On 1-Sep-2006, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Anybody else playin any golf that weekend?
>
> Well, duh!
I'll check my calendar.
-- Thor
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 19:57:50
From: Thor
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
long&left wrote:
> Matt 'Ocho' Aamold wrote:
> > "long&left" <nospam@diespammers.com> wrote in message
> > news:hHMJg.238$pe2.74@newsfe05.lga...
> >
> >
> >>so, you're officially HB Bob now rather than Rancho Bob?
> >>:)
> >
> >
> > Butter Bob
> >
> >
>
> as in smooth? or, maybe slick?? I'll be on the golf course with Butter
> Bob a week from today :)
Ewww.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 19:47:44
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Oh, lighten up, Ben. (That's what Zappa would say.) Do you
> suppose that there may have been a touch of hyperbole in my
> little statement? It sorta goes without saying that nobody
> does barbed social commentary the way FZ did, but even the
> more ham-fisted among us can trigger the same reactions he
> did. Reading earnestness into satire is a very common
> mistake.
Zappa would probably say a lot worse that lighten up. However, there
was quite a bit of hyperbole in my rejoinder, as well. So, FUCK YOU,
CB!!!
|
| | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 03:02:56
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Ben. <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
>> Oh, lighten up, Ben. (That's what Zappa would say.) Do you
>> suppose that there may have been a touch of hyperbole in my
>> little statement? It sorta goes without saying that nobody
>> does barbed social commentary the way FZ did, but even the
>> more ham-fisted among us can trigger the same reactions he
>> did. Reading earnestness into satire is a very common
>> mistake.
>
> Zappa would probably say a lot worse that lighten up. However, there
> was quite a bit of hyperbole in my rejoinder, as well. So, FUCK YOU,
> CB!!!
Oh yeah?
I'm gonna tell you the way it is
And I'm not gonna be kind or easy
Your whole attitude stinks I say
And the live you lead is completely empty
Paint your head
Your mind is dead
You don't even know what I just said
HAHAHAHAHA I BET YOUR FEELING PRETTY STUPID RIGHT NOW >
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 15:56:04
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Dene wrote:
> Tex wrote:
> > Dene wrote:
> > > What's your excuse for being the drunken pig you've become?
> >
> > And yet, with a personality such as yours, you'd want us to believe you
> > are generally nice person.
> >
> > I'm glad you spoke again to once again remove all doubt.
> >
> > Tex
>
> Didn't think you could answer the question.
Why bother with your drivel...You are entitled to your opinion, which,
like most assholes, stinks.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 14:05:48
From: Dene
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex wrote:
> Dene wrote:
> > What's your excuse for being the drunken pig you've become?
>
> And yet, with a personality such as yours, you'd want us to believe you
> are generally nice person.
>
> I'm glad you spoke again to once again remove all doubt.
>
> Tex
Didn't think you could answer the question.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 13:46:23
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Dene wrote:
> What's your excuse for being the drunken pig you've become?
And yet, with a personality such as yours, you'd want us to believe you
are generally nice person.
I'm glad you spoke again to once again remove all doubt.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 11:45:01
From:
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
> > annika1980 wrote:
> >
> > > When have I backpedaled or denied that my post was in poor taste?
> > > I can't help it if some of you are too fuckin stupid to get the real
> > > message.
> >
> > Nothing is funnier than watching a would be clown explain all his
> > material. It just loses its edge.
>
> I agree. In future posts I shall endeavor to simply leave them hanging
> and guessing.
> If my meaning goes over their heads, I'll simply say "Swoosh!"
> Then they'll think it's Nike-related.
Why not lean back and smile the all knowing smile? I'm amazed when
someone gets what I'm saying, as I've learned not to expect much from
the masses.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 11:24:38
From: Dene
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >
> > That explains why no semen was found.
>
> Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower.
Bret,
I get the message behind the message, but if you were the father of a
little girl, you would not/could not post this.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 11:22:18
From: Dene
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex wrote:
> David, you should know by now Annika loves to post things for "shock
> and awe"....he gets off on "sticking it to ya". Much like his dear old
> Dad used to "stick it to him".
> You will also find out soon enough, his skin is not nearly as thick as
> he's made everyone believe, most likely from all the beatings his Dad
> gave him as a child.
Some advice. How about organizing your few remaining brain cells and
come up with a new one. Let's presume that Bret had an abusive father.
He's recovered, in that he's a good man with a solid riage and a
contributor to society.
What's your excuse for being the drunken pig you've become?
> So do yourself a favor, ignore most of his "shock and awe" as a stunt
> to get attention and do recognize that when he was playing golf, he did
> have game and does understand the game. He's probably just bored now
> that he's not playing anymore.
"Shock and awe" describes your posting history. Drunk and dumb are
even more accurate descriptors.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 10:00:57
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Bret D: The most misunderstood artist since Frank Z.
The next time you even dream of mentioning the verbally ham-fisted Bret
in the same paragraph with FZ, you best wake up and apologize.
I understand the comparison you are reaching for - but it is completely
inaccurate. Bret is trolling for reactionaries. Reactionaries trolled
for FZ. While some of Frank's material was, to the less literate among
us, completely morally bankrupt, Frank was clearly parodying the
molesters, the rapers, the Jewish princesses, the latent homosexual
jocks, and all other manner of sexual/social deviants.
Frank was a genius, musical and otherwise, the likes of which we will
not see in our lifetimes again. For every Usenet clown like Bret,
there are 100 others in 100 different newsgroups.
I think bigoldcat's razor sharp sumy of the situation bears
repeating:
"Nothing is funnier than watching a would be clown explain all his
material. It just loses its edge."
Except I would amend it to read "nothing is less funny..."
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 18:59:11
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Ben. <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>
>> Bret D: The most misunderstood artist since Frank Z.
>
> The next time you even dream of mentioning the verbally ham-fisted Bret
> in the same paragraph with FZ, you best wake up and apologize.
Oh, lighten up, Ben. (That's what Zappa would say.) Do you
suppose that there may have been a touch of hyperbole in my
little statement? It sorta goes without saying that nobody
does barbed social commentary the way FZ did, but even the
more ham-fisted among us can trigger the same reactions he
did. Reading earnestness into satire is a very common
mistake.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 12:07:09
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 1 Sep 2006 10:00:57 -0700, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote:
>Frank was a genius, musical and otherwise, the likes of which we will
>not see in our lifetimes again.
Not even close.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:48:20
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
> annika1980 wrote:
>
> > When have I backpedaled or denied that my post was in poor taste?
> > I can't help it if some of you are too fuckin stupid to get the real
> > message.
>
> Nothing is funnier than watching a would be clown explain all his
> material. It just loses its edge.
I agree. In future posts I shall endeavor to simply leave them hanging
and guessing.
If my meaning goes over their heads, I'll simply say "Swoosh!"
Then they'll think it's Nike-related.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:38:16
From:
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> When have I backpedaled or denied that my post was in poor taste?
> I can't help it if some of you are too fuckin stupid to get the real
> message.
Nothing is funnier than watching a would be clown explain all his
material. It just loses its edge.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:34:07
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
John van der Pflum wrote:
> >>Was someone serious when they said you don't play golf anymore?
> >
> >Yes. That was probably me who said that. But like Jeff George, I'm
> >thinkin about a comeback.
>
> September 16th sounds like a good day to do so.
Yeah, I might play that day just so long as I finish in time for the
Tennessee-Florida game. Did you have any place special in mind where I
should make my comeback?
Anybody else playin any golf that weekend?
|
| | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 20:03:16
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 1 Sep 2006 07:34:07 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>
>John van der Pflum wrote:
>> >>Was someone serious when they said you don't play golf anymore?
>> >
>> >Yes. That was probably me who said that. But like Jeff George, I'm
>> >thinkin about a comeback.
>>
>> September 16th sounds like a good day to do so.
>
>Yeah, I might play that day just so long as I finish in time for the
>Tennessee-Florida game. Did you have any place special in mind where I
>should make my comeback?
>Anybody else playin any golf that weekend?
Game kicks off at 8:00 PM. Unless you plan on playing an 11 hour
round I think you'd be done in plenty of time.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 20:13:08
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 1-Sep-2006, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
> Anybody else playin any golf that weekend?
Well, duh!
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:05:02
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
> > Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>
> You OK? It just doesn't sound like you.
You must be new here.
>Was someone serious when they said you don't play golf anymore?
Yes. That was probably me who said that. But like Jeff George, I'm
thinkin about a comeback.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 22:50:51
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157119502.565682.94560@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>
> AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
>> > Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>
>> You OK? It just doesn't sound like you.
>
> You must be new here.
A couple of years but I've changed my name a few times.
>>Was someone serious when they said you don't play golf anymore?
>
> Yes. That was probably me who said that. But like Jeff George, I'm
> thinkin about a comeback.
>
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 10:23:29
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 1 Sep 2006 07:05:02 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>
>AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
>> > Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>
>> You OK? It just doesn't sound like you.
>
>You must be new here.
>
>>Was someone serious when they said you don't play golf anymore?
>
>Yes. That was probably me who said that. But like Jeff George, I'm
>thinkin about a comeback.
September 16th sounds like a good day to do so.
--
jvdp
The only way to beat me is to make a hole in one
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:02:19
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Matt 'Ocho' Aamold wrote:
> "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1157031911.471737.27920@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
> > Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
> > to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
> > that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
>
> Attempting to change the subject Bret? What you posted about JonBenet is
> what is at issue here.
No, dumbass, it's just weenies like you who try to turn the real
subject into petty little bitching about someone's posting style. I
think I know what the subject is since I started the thread. The
subject is the JonBenet case, the way it was mishandled, and the events
that led up to it.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 00:20:05
From: Matt 'Ocho' Aamold
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157119339.578151.245830@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> No, dumbass, it's just weenies like you who try to turn the real
> subject into petty little bitching about someone's posting style. I
> think I know what the subject is since I started the thread. The
> subject is the JonBenet case, the way it was mishandled, and the events
> that led up to it.
again your post was in poor taste and people have called you on it. Now you
are trying to defend yourself instead of admitting that you were wrong.
BTW....The free speech clause to which you refer to means that the
government cannot go after you for talking bad about the government - It
does not protect you from saying whatever the hell you want to anyone or
about anyone, read a little would ya?
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 01:46:55
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
It seems to me that most people in life want to do something important for
mankind. Most of us can't find something that is really useful to do with
our lives. That is unfortunate and I have that diseaze myself ... wannabe
everything from doctor to volunteer toilet cleaner. It is also unfortuneate
that I, and others, substitute doing good things ... substitute getting 'bad
guys' for doing good things. It makes us feel good to attack someone we
think of as a bad guy, but it really doesn't feel that good because we know
the bad guy isn't really a bad guy. I guess this is really that relevant to
the JonBenet post, but the idea has been eating at me and this is the first
time I've had the excuse to post it anywhere. I wish we all could do
something valuable. Imo, it's not from a lack of trying or caring.
"Matt 'Ocho' Aamold" <maamold@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:ALCdnXeEhJQKr2TZnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1157119339.578151.245830@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>> No, dumbass, it's just weenies like you who try to turn the real
>> subject into petty little bitching about someone's posting style. I
>> think I know what the subject is since I started the thread. The
>> subject is the JonBenet case, the way it was mishandled, and the events
>> that led up to it.
>
> again your post was in poor taste and people have called you on it. Now
> you are trying to defend yourself instead of admitting that you were
> wrong. BTW....The free speech clause to which you refer to means that the
> government cannot go after you for talking bad about the government - It
> does not protect you from saying whatever the hell you want to anyone or
> about anyone, read a little would ya?
>
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 15:11:43
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>
> Matt 'Ocho' Aamold wrote:
>> "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1157031911.471737.27920@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> > If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
>> > Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
>> > to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
>> > that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
>>
>> Attempting to change the subject Bret? What you posted about JonBenet is
>> what is at issue here.
>
> No, dumbass, it's just weenies like you who try to turn the real
> subject into petty little bitching about someone's posting style. I
> think I know what the subject is since I started the thread. The
> subject is the JonBenet case, the way it was mishandled, and the events
> that led up to it.
Bret D: The most misunderstood artist since Frank Z.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 07:02:56
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Jon Benet
|
bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
> I'm just waiting for him to remember that Steve Irwin had a young
> daughter.
Crikey!
Steve Irwin probably never dressed up his daughter to make her look
sexy, paraded her around in beauty pageants for 6-year olds, or pimped
her out to perverts.
The Ramsey's intentions were clear from Day 1. Who names their kid
"Jon Benet" anyway?
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 06:53:57
From:
Subject: Re: Jon Benet
|
Chris S wrote:
> "AKA Gray Asphalt" <goodidea1950@hotmail.spam.com> wrote in message
> news:yesLg.2386$nL2.909@fed1read02...
> >
> > It's a little confusing but when the comment about 'doing Jon Benet' was
> > first posted it seemed extremely insensitive but as time passes it seems
> > to be more directed at the injustice of the whole fiasco of a guy saying
> > he did it and getting attention when he was obviously a nut case ... but
> > at the time of the posting most of us thought he really might have been
> > guilty ... maybe it was the timing or maybe just that the OP understood
> > the situation better than me, but it sure doesn't seem so inappropriate
> > now. To me it seemed like the OP was mocking those who were close to Jon
> > Benet, now it doesn't seem that way at all.
> >
> >
> >
> OP sat at his keyboard wondering what shocking thing he could post on that
> day and dug something up out of his pea brain to do that. Then, when the
> outrage rightfully came, he backpedaled. Typical, and sad.
I'm just waiting for him to remember that Steve Irwin had a young
daughter.
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 06:50:20
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Jon Benet
|
Chris S wrote:
> OP sat at his keyboard wondering what shocking thing he could post on that
> day and dug something up out of his pea brain to do that. Then, when the
> outrage rightfully came, he backpedaled. Typical, and sad.
When did I backpedal? OK, I fucked her!
|
| | | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 07:43:20
From: Chris S
Subject: Re: Jon Benet
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157550620.137606.169960@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Chris S wrote:
>> OP sat at his keyboard wondering what shocking thing he could post on
>> that
>> day and dug something up out of his pea brain to do that. Then, when the
>> outrage rightfully came, he backpedaled. Typical, and sad.
>
> When did I backpedal? OK, I fucked her!
>
Someone needs to lock your keyboard.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 06:54:53
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Matt 'Ocho' Aamold wrote:
> I don't need a committee to tell me brets post was poor taste
And your point?
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 06:53:42
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Chris S wrote:
> > Attempting to change the subject Bret? What you posted about JonBenet is
> > what is at issue here.
> >
> Isn't that the way things are done here?? Make a completely idiotic post,
> and then backpeddle when the outrage starts and try to deflect the point
> that it was in incredibly poor taste.
When have I backpedaled or denied that my post was in poor taste?
I can't help it if some of you are too fuckin stupid to get the real
message.
|
| | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 00:03:28
From: Matt 'Ocho' Aamold
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157118822.136641.231540@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> When have I backpedaled or denied that my post was in poor taste?
> I can't help it if some of you are too fuckin stupid to get the real
> message.
What kind of backup alarm do you have on your garbage truck. You
backpedaled when you changed the subject to JonBenet's parents from your
originally bad taste post about JonBenet.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 08:00:09
From: Chris S
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157118822.136641.231540@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Chris S wrote:
>> > Attempting to change the subject Bret? What you posted about JonBenet
>> > is
>> > what is at issue here.
>> >
>> Isn't that the way things are done here?? Make a completely idiotic
>> post,
>> and then backpeddle when the outrage starts and try to deflect the point
>> that it was in incredibly poor taste.
>
> When have I backpedaled or denied that my post was in poor taste?
> I can't help it if some of you are too fuckin stupid to get the real
> message.
>
Got the message, just was no need to do that here. Pontificating behind
your keyboard again. What a fucking moron. (your words.)
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 06:47:13
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
The Hammer wrote:
> So
> why the Ramseys did not DESERVE what happened to their daughter, they
> are COMPLICIT in what happened to her. If they just would have let
> her be a little girl, and get dirty and hang around friends and just be
> a kid for God sakes, none of this would have ever happened. I agree
> with Bret here, there was nothing particularly "cute" about what the
> Ramseys did with their daughter, it was outright perverse. They are
> every bit as fucking disgusting as the animal that killed their
> daughter. They set the bait well.
Sorry Eric, but I have to call BS on both you and Bret. Total Crap.
These pagents are nothing more than talent shows. No different than
having your kid compete in gymnastics, or swimming, or even softball.
If you see it somehow erotic, or perverse, it speaks volumes to
your own problems.
|
| |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 03:04:59
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1156962503.179450.288510@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
You OK? It just doesn't sound like you. I don't know you but I respect what
I've seen and look forward to what you post. Was someone serious when they
said you don't play golf anymore?
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 19:25:23
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex wrote:
>
> A kids beauty pageant is not an invitation for molestors to come in an
> abuse kids without assuming 100% of the blame. They are not
> advertisements for abuse. Only the sick and twisted mind of the
> criminal child abuser can see them as opportunities.
Do you lock your car when you leave it parked? What about your house
... do you lock the door when you leave? If so, why? It's not your
fault if somebody walks in and steals your stuff. My dad once told me
that a lock was just there to keep honest people honest. (Then he went
back to beatin me.) Only a criminal would see an unlocked door as an
opportunity. But that doesn't help you too much when they steal your
shit.
The point is that there will always be bad people who do bad things,
but why make it easy or tempting for them? Would you let your daughter
go around town wearing just a skimpy bikini? The fact that there are
sickos and criminals out there is precisely the reason to exercise
caution. It's also why we have gun laws, but that's another topic for
a different day.
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 19:08:30
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Tex <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Hammer wrote:
> >> When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
> >> and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
> >> trouble.
> >
> > So you might be saying it's "the woman's fault" if she dresses sexy and
> > gets raped? So you are saying that all the sickos (and you know about
> > them how?) are just waiting to be invited by sexy dress??
> >
> > I've got eye opening news for you...the "fault" lies in the person(s)
> > that commits the crime.
>
> Alert the media: I'm about to take Eric's side of an argument.
> Sort of.
>
> My only point is this: blame can be shared. It's certainly
> possible for parents to irresponsibly put their children in
> positions of great vulnerability/exposure to predators, and
> those who do deserve the heat they get, IMO. That doesn't
> excuse or mitigate the crimes of the predators themselves,
> not one bit. But there are too many parents who fail to take
> their roles as protectors seriously enough; it's not sufficient
> to blame the predators and call it a day.
Agreed, to a point....who's fault is it if your kids are at the
playground and a sniper takes one out? Afterall, you put your kids
outdoors and exposed them.
The fault goes to the person pulling the trigger.
A kids beauty pageant is not an invitation for molestors to come in an
abuse kids without assuming 100% of the blame. They are not
advertisements for abuse. Only the sick and twisted mind of the
criminal child abuser can see them as opportunities.
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 13:48:00
From: David
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 31 Aug 2006 19:08:30 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> Tex <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > The Hammer wrote:
>> >> When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
>> >> and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
>> >> trouble.
>> >
>> > So you might be saying it's "the woman's fault" if she dresses sexy and
>> > gets raped? So you are saying that all the sickos (and you know about
>> > them how?) are just waiting to be invited by sexy dress??
>> >
>> > I've got eye opening news for you...the "fault" lies in the person(s)
>> > that commits the crime.
>>
>> Alert the media: I'm about to take Eric's side of an argument.
>> Sort of.
>>
>> My only point is this: blame can be shared. It's certainly
>> possible for parents to irresponsibly put their children in
>> positions of great vulnerability/exposure to predators, and
>> those who do deserve the heat they get, IMO. That doesn't
>> excuse or mitigate the crimes of the predators themselves,
>> not one bit. But there are too many parents who fail to take
>> their roles as protectors seriously enough; it's not sufficient
>> to blame the predators and call it a day.
>
>Agreed, to a point....who's fault is it if your kids are at the
>playground and a sniper takes one out? Afterall, you put your kids
>outdoors and exposed them.
>
>The fault goes to the person pulling the trigger.
>
>A kids beauty pageant is not an invitation for molestors to come in an
>abuse kids without assuming 100% of the blame. They are not
>advertisements for abuse. Only the sick and twisted mind of the
>criminal child abuser can see them as opportunities.
Which is exactly why Bret is a candidate to be a sexual abuser of
children (if he has not done so already) in my book. The fact is,
wining the Miss America pageant brings a lot of rewards. The girls
that win all started out at a very early age. It is a competition and
like any other competitive event, you start out young if you want to
make it to the top.
Bret tries the first amendment argument here. Well, people have a
right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, also. Simply
because Bret finds pageants for 6 year old girls wrong, that does not
make it wrong for the parents to enter their kids in these events. It
does not make it wrong for a woman to put on something sexy for a date
and expect that her date respect her and not rape her.
Bret is is living in the dark ages. He believes that women who are
raped deserved what they got. Well, new to him, there is no common
profile of women who get raped. They are all ages, races, looks,
etc.... Bret is probably secretly hoping that whoever did this gets
away wtih it, in order to show the world a lesson.
Well, free speech works both way and nothing prevents me from
posting his message all over the internet, so that everyone can see
what a sicko he truly is.
>Tex
David
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 20:14:12
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 1-Sep-2006, David <dgold1958@yahoo.de > wrote:
> Which is exactly why Bret is a candidate to be a sexual abuser of
> children (if he has not done so already) in my book.
Riiiight
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 02:49:59
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>> Tex <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > The Hammer wrote:
>> >> When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
>> >> and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
>> >> trouble.
>> >
>> > So you might be saying it's "the woman's fault" if she dresses sexy and
>> > gets raped? So you are saying that all the sickos (and you know about
>> > them how?) are just waiting to be invited by sexy dress??
>> >
>> > I've got eye opening news for you...the "fault" lies in the person(s)
>> > that commits the crime.
>>
>> Alert the media: I'm about to take Eric's side of an argument.
>> Sort of.
>>
>> My only point is this: blame can be shared. It's certainly
>> possible for parents to irresponsibly put their children in
>> positions of great vulnerability/exposure to predators, and
>> those who do deserve the heat they get, IMO. That doesn't
>> excuse or mitigate the crimes of the predators themselves,
>> not one bit. But there are too many parents who fail to take
>> their roles as protectors seriously enough; it's not sufficient
>> to blame the predators and call it a day.
>
> Agreed, to a point....who's fault is it if your kids are at the
> playground and a sniper takes one out? Afterall, you put your kids
> outdoors and exposed them.
>
> The fault goes to the person pulling the trigger.
True. The standard expected of the parents must be reasonable;
anticipating snipers is, of course, a bit much. Dressing your
6 y/o daughter up like a beauty queen, complete with makeup,
and entering her in pageants, though... I think that, at the
least, the parent has to understand that this invites some pretty
seriously creepy people into the child's life.
> A kids beauty pageant is not an invitation for molestors to come in an
> abuse kids without assuming 100% of the blame. They are not
> advertisements for abuse. Only the sick and twisted mind of the
> criminal child abuser can see them as opportunities.
Yeah, but it's the parent's job to know that these sick and
twisted people exist, and to navigate the child away from them
rather than towards them. To fail to do so is definitely a
crime of a much lesser magnitude than that of the molester,
but IMO it's a moral crime nonetheless. I probably would have
seen this differently before I was a parent, but now I am very
aware how dependent my kids are on me to keep them in safe
environments.
Now, if I may be excused, I need to haul out the bailing wire
and chewing gum... I have a 54 hole golf tournament this weekend
and my game has more sputters in it than a 1967 Triumph.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 04:08:02
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 31-Aug-2006, Chris Bellomy <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Now, if I may be excused, I need to haul out the bailing wire
> and chewing gum... I have a 54 hole golf tournament this weekend
> and my game has more sputters in it than a 1967 Triumph.
Could be worse, if it was in the condition of my Dad's ole 58 MGB, you
wouldn't make it to the 1st tee!
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 18:23:11
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
The Hammer wrote:
> When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
> and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
> trouble.
So you might be saying it's "the woman's fault" if she dresses sexy and
gets raped? So you are saying that all the sickos (and you know about
them how?) are just waiting to be invited by sexy dress??
I've got eye opening news for you...the "fault" lies in the person(s)
that commits the crime.
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 23:01:42
From: Matt 'Ocho' Aamold
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1157073791.451497.224510@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> So you might be saying it's "the woman's fault" if she dresses sexy and
> gets raped? So you are saying that all the sickos (and you know about
> them how?) are just waiting to be invited by sexy dress??
>
> I've got eye opening news for you...the "fault" lies in the person(s)
> that commits the crime.
>
> Tex
Well it was Bret's fault that his daddy treated him so :-)
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 01:58:49
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> The Hammer wrote:
>> When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
>> and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
>> trouble.
>
> So you might be saying it's "the woman's fault" if she dresses sexy and
> gets raped? So you are saying that all the sickos (and you know about
> them how?) are just waiting to be invited by sexy dress??
>
> I've got eye opening news for you...the "fault" lies in the person(s)
> that commits the crime.
Alert the media: I'm about to take Eric's side of an argument.
Sort of.
My only point is this: blame can be shared. It's certainly
possible for parents to irresponsibly put their children in
positions of great vulnerability/exposure to predators, and
those who do deserve the heat they get, IMO. That doesn't
excuse or mitigate the crimes of the predators themselves,
not one bit. But there are too many parents who fail to take
their roles as protectors seriously enough; it's not sufficient
to blame the predators and call it a day.
None of this is meant as specific comment on the Ramsey case,
about which I simultaneously know not nearly enough and way
too much.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 14:36:13
From:
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
David wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2006 08:54:04 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> >My whole point is that people who are offended when I post something
> >like that should be even more offended by the circumstances that caused
> >me to post it. Some people, not you necessarily, condone beauty
> >pageants for 6 year-olds but act shocked when one of these kids is
> >molested. Believe it or not, I have the same feelings about 6 year-old
> >cheerleaders. Parents dress up their daughters in little cheerleader
> >outfits and let them do provocative gyrations to look hot. Everybody
> >knows that girls don't achieve maximum hotness until at least the age
> >of 12.
>
> Bret, you are simply an asshole. Not once did you make an apology
> for posting that sick crap, then you end what some of your fans might
> fancy to be an apology with another sick rek about 12 year old
> girls.
Hmmm...well I read his post you've cited here. Agreed with him more or
less up until that last sentence.
The last sentence got a laugh.
Thanks for making the guy next to me in the office look at me funny,
Annika. :-P
The rest of your post, well, I'll just delete it and move on.
Bob
Huntington Beach, CA
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 19:13:42
From: long&left
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
double_entendre@hotmail.com wrote:
> David wrote:
>
>>On 31 Aug 2006 08:54:04 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>><snipped>
>>
>>>My whole point is that people who are offended when I post something
>>>like that should be even more offended by the circumstances that caused
>>>me to post it. Some people, not you necessarily, condone beauty
>>>pageants for 6 year-olds but act shocked when one of these kids is
>>>molested. Believe it or not, I have the same feelings about 6 year-old
>>>cheerleaders. Parents dress up their daughters in little cheerleader
>>>outfits and let them do provocative gyrations to look hot. Everybody
>>>knows that girls don't achieve maximum hotness until at least the age
>>>of 12.
>>
>> Bret, you are simply an asshole. Not once did you make an apology
>>for posting that sick crap, then you end what some of your fans might
>>fancy to be an apology with another sick rek about 12 year old
>>girls.
>
>
> Hmmm...well I read his post you've cited here. Agreed with him more or
> less up until that last sentence.
>
> The last sentence got a laugh.
>
> Thanks for making the guy next to me in the office look at me funny,
> Annika. :-P
>
> The rest of your post, well, I'll just delete it and move on.
>
> Bob
> Huntington Beach, CA
>
so, you're officially HB Bob now rather than Rancho Bob?
:)
--
Dave
You are meant to play the ball as it lies, a fact that may help to touch
on your own objective approach to life. ~Grantland Rice
|
| | | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 23:03:14
From: Matt 'Ocho' Aamold
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"long&left" <nospam@diespammers.com > wrote in message
news:hHMJg.238$pe2.74@newsfe05.lga...
> so, you're officially HB Bob now rather than Rancho Bob?
> :)
Butter Bob
|
| | | | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:11:28
From: long&left
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Matt 'Ocho' Aamold wrote:
> "long&left" <nospam@diespammers.com> wrote in message
> news:hHMJg.238$pe2.74@newsfe05.lga...
>
>
>>so, you're officially HB Bob now rather than Rancho Bob?
>>:)
>
>
> Butter Bob
>
>
as in smooth? or, maybe slick?? I'll be on the golf course with Butter
Bob a week from today :)
Dave
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 13:48:46
From: The Hammer
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
David wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2006 08:54:04 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> >My whole point is that people who are offended when I post something
> >like that should be even more offended by the circumstances that caused
> >me to post it. Some people, not you necessarily, condone beauty
> >pageants for 6 year-olds but act shocked when one of these kids is
> >molested. Believe it or not, I have the same feelings about 6 year-old
> >cheerleaders. Parents dress up their daughters in little cheerleader
> >outfits and let them do provocative gyrations to look hot. Everybody
> >knows that girls don't achieve maximum hotness until at least the age
> >of 12.
>
> Bret, you are simply an asshole. Not once did you make an apology
> for posting that sick crap, then you end what some of your fans might
> fancy to be an apology with another sick rek about 12 year old
> girls. Placing the blame what happened to that unfortunate girl on
> her parents does not give you the right to make a post like that.
>
> You are probably the type that blames the girl when she gets raped
> because she should have worn clothing that covered every inch of her
> body, instead of something stylish and, dare I say it, sexy.
>
> I wonder how Natalie Gulbis would feel about all of the pictures you
> have taken of her and your obvous infatuation of her if she were to
> read what you posted here. Her bodyguards would not let you within
> 100 yards of her because you are obviously a threat.
>
> David
You are a bigger asshole. because you have totally missed the point of
what Bret was trying to say. I will give the benefit of the doubt to
him on this one.
When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
trouble. There are tens of thousands of sickos out there that will
drool just at the sight of these pictures and she can easily become
targeted by one of them. This is reality. There are sick
motherfuckers out there that look for this stuff, actively seeking it
out, so why put it out there for them in the first place. With the
internet, it can take seconds to find out where someone lives. So
why the Ramseys did not DESERVE what happened to their daughter, they
are COMPLICIT in what happened to her. If they just would have let
her be a little girl, and get dirty and hang around friends and just be
a kid for God sakes, none of this would have ever happened. I agree
with Bret here, there was nothing particularly "cute" about what the
Ramseys did with their daughter, it was outright perverse. They are
every bit as fucking disgusting as the animal that killed their
daughter. They set the bait well.
And Bret's orgininal point about the asshole who confessed and got a
first class flight. He deserved to be tied up and gagged and thrown in
the bathroom full of unflushed crap. That is all he deserved. What he
got was a taste of royalty for a short time, and enough notoriety to
last a lifetime. Even though he didn't do it, he should be killed for
even saying that he did. Because the fact that one even thinks such
thoughts, makes him worthy of permanently being removed from the gene
pool. I hope his days are numbered and we read one day of some
mysterious accident or sickness while in jail or when he gets out. I
will toast to whomever did that when it happens.
To some extent, we deserve what we get with all this child molestation
crap. My wife's son-in-law is a senior official with the federal
probation department and they cannot keep up with the caseload for
these offenders. We let them out, they do it again. They are stalking
all over the internet, and even though the odds are high of getting
entrapped, they are more than willing to take the risk, because they
are so fucking ill. If we took every one of these offenders and threw
them into a pool of starved alligators and made a public spectacle of
it, I am certain we would see very few of these offenses in the future.
But since we do not have the will to do it, and we have liberal,
sociologist types that see many of these folks of "victums" themselves
and worthy of public efforts to rehabilitate, we will see many more Jon
Benet's.
Bret's comments on the surface appear in bad taste, but I will defer to
him this time that there is a message behind the message.
The Hammer
|
| | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 01:23:31
From: David
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 31 Aug 2006 13:48:46 -0700, "The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com >
wrote:
<snipped >
>Bret's comments on the surface appear in bad taste, but I will defer to
>him this time that there is a message behind the message.
And what was the message behind the message when he posted the
following comment: "Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower?"
You are just one of Bret's bitches.
>The Hammer
David
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 16:07:56
From: The World Wide Wade
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
In article
<1157057326.314004.117830@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com >,
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote:
> I agree
> with Bret here, there was nothing particularly "cute" about what the
> Ramseys did with their daughter, it was outright perverse. They are
> every bit as fucking disgusting as the animal that killed their
> daughter.
That's insane.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 16:57:09
From: Da Ringer
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
SHAZAAAAAAM!!!!!
"The Hammer" <buggertt@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1157057326.314004.117830@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>
> You are a bigger asshole. because you have totally missed the point of
> what Bret was trying to say. I will give the benefit of the doubt to
> him on this one.
>
> When you take a little girl and dress her up to be years older looking
> and broadcast her likeness all over the media, you are inviting
> trouble. There are tens of thousands of sickos out there that will
> drool just at the sight of these pictures and she can easily become
> targeted by one of them. This is reality. There are sick
> motherfuckers out there that look for this stuff, actively seeking it
> out, so why put it out there for them in the first place. With the
> internet, it can take seconds to find out where someone lives. So
> why the Ramseys did not DESERVE what happened to their daughter, they
> are COMPLICIT in what happened to her. If they just would have let
> her be a little girl, and get dirty and hang around friends and just be
> a kid for God sakes, none of this would have ever happened. I agree
> with Bret here, there was nothing particularly "cute" about what the
> Ramseys did with their daughter, it was outright perverse. They are
> every bit as fucking disgusting as the animal that killed their
> daughter. They set the bait well.
>
> And Bret's orgininal point about the asshole who confessed and got a
> first class flight. He deserved to be tied up and gagged and thrown in
> the bathroom full of unflushed crap. That is all he deserved. What he
> got was a taste of royalty for a short time, and enough notoriety to
> last a lifetime. Even though he didn't do it, he should be killed for
> even saying that he did. Because the fact that one even thinks such
> thoughts, makes him worthy of permanently being removed from the gene
> pool. I hope his days are numbered and we read one day of some
> mysterious accident or sickness while in jail or when he gets out. I
> will toast to whomever did that when it happens.
>
> To some extent, we deserve what we get with all this child molestation
> crap. My wife's son-in-law is a senior official with the federal
> probation department and they cannot keep up with the caseload for
> these offenders. We let them out, they do it again. They are stalking
> all over the internet, and even though the odds are high of getting
> entrapped, they are more than willing to take the risk, because they
> are so fucking ill. If we took every one of these offenders and threw
> them into a pool of starved alligators and made a public spectacle of
> it, I am certain we would see very few of these offenses in the future.
> But since we do not have the will to do it, and we have liberal,
> sociologist types that see many of these folks of "victums" themselves
> and worthy of public efforts to rehabilitate, we will see many more Jon
> Benet's.
>
> Bret's comments on the surface appear in bad taste, but I will defer to
> him this time that there is a message behind the message.
>
> The Hammer
>
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 13:44:34
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
David wrote:
> Bret, you are simply an asshole.
Can't argue that.
> Not once did you make an apology
> for posting that sick crap, then you end what some of your fans might
> fancy to be an apology with another sick rek about 12 year old
> girls. Placing the blame what happened to that unfortunate girl on
> her parents does not give you the right to make a post like that.
You're right, the Constitution of the good old US of A gives me that
right.
And you're right once again, I do blame the parents. When a situation
like that happens, 11 times out of 10 it's someone in the family
involved.
No apologies will be forthcoming. You must be new here.
> I wonder how Natalie Gulbis would feel about all of the pictures you
> have taken of her and your obvous infatuation of her if she were to
> read what you posted here. Her bodyguards would not let you within
> 100 yards of her because you are obviously a threat.
Natalie Gulbis? Isn't she like 22?
BTW, when I jerk your chain, does it leave a k?
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 08:54:04
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
> > Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
> > to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
> > that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
>
> The Ramseys and others like them are guilty of child abuse. This does
> not excuse you writing that you "did" JonBenet and then posting a sick
> reference to having oral sex with her. You probably got some serious
> bad karma headed your way.
Dude, I've been surrounded by bad karma for 30 years. I bathe in it.
I would think you of all people could decipher the difference between
what is real and what is said in jest.
My whole point is that people who are offended when I post something
like that should be even more offended by the circumstances that caused
me to post it. Some people, not you necessarily, condone beauty
pageants for 6 year-olds but act shocked when one of these kids is
molested. Believe it or not, I have the same feelings about 6 year-old
cheerleaders. Parents dress up their daughters in little cheerleader
outfits and let them do provocative gyrations to look hot. Everybody
knows that girls don't achieve maximum hotness until at least the age
of 12.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 20:35:29
From: David
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 31 Aug 2006 08:54:04 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com >
wrote:
<snipped >
>My whole point is that people who are offended when I post something
>like that should be even more offended by the circumstances that caused
>me to post it. Some people, not you necessarily, condone beauty
>pageants for 6 year-olds but act shocked when one of these kids is
>molested. Believe it or not, I have the same feelings about 6 year-old
>cheerleaders. Parents dress up their daughters in little cheerleader
>outfits and let them do provocative gyrations to look hot. Everybody
>knows that girls don't achieve maximum hotness until at least the age
>of 12.
Bret, you are simply an asshole. Not once did you make an apology
for posting that sick crap, then you end what some of your fans might
fancy to be an apology with another sick rek about 12 year old
girls. Placing the blame what happened to that unfortunate girl on
her parents does not give you the right to make a post like that.
You are probably the type that blames the girl when she gets raped
because she should have worn clothing that covered every inch of her
body, instead of something stylish and, dare I say it, sexy.
I wonder how Natalie Gulbis would feel about all of the pictures you
have taken of her and your obvous infatuation of her if she were to
read what you posted here. Her bodyguards would not let you within
100 yards of her because you are obviously a threat.
David
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 08:17:17
From:
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> bigoldc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > I agree with you somewhat, but, that little girl was abused her entire
> > life, beauty queen, etc. Then raped and murdered. She didn't choose to
> > be here in rsg. Bret, you, and I and many others are big boys and
> > choose to be part of this, that child didn't and doesn't deserve his
> > disrespect. I'm sure that I'd have to bitch slap Bret, in memory of
> > JonBenet, if he was here.
>
> If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
> Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
> to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
> that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
The Ramseys and others like them are guilty of child abuse. This does
not excuse you writing that you "did" JonBenet and then posting a sick
reference to having oral sex with her. You probably got some serious
bad karma headed your way.
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 06:45:11
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
bigoldc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I agree with you somewhat, but, that little girl was abused her entire
> life, beauty queen, etc. Then raped and murdered. She didn't choose to
> be here in rsg. Bret, you, and I and many others are big boys and
> choose to be part of this, that child didn't and doesn't deserve his
> disrespect. I'm sure that I'd have to bitch slap Bret, in memory of
> JonBenet, if he was here.
If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 22:59:25
From: Matt 'Ocho' Aamold
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157031911.471737.27920@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
> Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
> to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
> that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
Attempting to change the subject Bret? What you posted about JonBenet is
what is at issue here.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 11:32:55
From: Otto
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
And then when the little girl wets her pants and the parents think she is 25
but they have screwed up her mind and they get frustrated and there is a
scuffle in the bathroom and the little girl slips and falls and fractures
her skull on the toilet or tub and the parents panic.
Then the cover up.
Merry Christmas.
None of the above is based on fact but it is the only theory that answers
all my questions.
Otto
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1157031911.471737.27920@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> If you are that concerned with it, I suggest you go bitch slap Mr.
> Ramsey, who pimped her out. I think anybody who dresses up a 6 year old
> to try to make them look sexy deserves a good beatin. Parents who do
> that crap think it's cute until their kid gets molested or even worse.
>
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 06:36:13
From:
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex wrote:
> David wrote:
> > On 30 Aug 2006 14:36:54 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > >>
> > >> That explains why no semen was found.
> > >
> > >Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower.
> >
> > I have withheld my judgement of you until now. I was not sure what
> > to make of you based on your posts. This, however, has put you over
> > the edge and shown everyone what a complete idiot you are. I hope
> > that you don't have children. If you do, you have probably abused them
> > in the past, or will do so in the near future. Your reks in this
> > thread cannot be construed as sarcasm--simply sick.
>
> David, you should know by now Annika loves to post things for "shock
> and awe"....he gets off on "sticking it to ya". Much like his dear old
> Dad used to "stick it to him".
>
> You will also find out soon enough, his skin is not nearly as thick as
> he's made everyone believe, most likely from all the beatings his Dad
> gave him as a child.
>
> So do yourself a favor, ignore most of his "shock and awe" as a stunt
> to get attention and do recognize that when he was playing golf, he did
> have game and does understand the game. He's probably just bored now
> that he's not playing anymore.
>
> Tex
I agree with you somewhat, but, that little girl was abused her entire
life, beauty queen, etc. Then raped and murdered. She didn't choose to
be here in rsg. Bret, you, and I and many others are big boys and
choose to be part of this, that child didn't and doesn't deserve his
disrespect. I'm sure that I'd have to bitch slap Bret, in memory of
JonBenet, if he was here.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 07:25:20
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
David wrote:
>> >A kids beauty pageant is not an invitation for molestors to come in an
> >abuse kids without assuming 100% of the blame. They are not
> >advertisements for abuse. Only the sick and twisted mind of the
> >criminal child abuser can see them as opportunities.
>
> Which is exactly why Bret is a candidate to be a sexual abuser of
> children (if he has not done so already) in my book.
Before we continue further, please take a moment to go fuck yourself.
>
> Bret tries the first amendment argument here.
Yeah, ain't it great? Do they have the same freedoms where you live?
> Well, people have a
> right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, also. Simply
> because Bret finds pageants for 6 year old girls wrong, that does not
> make it wrong for the parents to enter their kids in these events.
I think it's much more disgusting and just plain wrong than someone
making offensive posts on a newsgroup. But we can differ here.
> Bret is is living in the dark ages. He believes that women who are
> raped deserved what they got.
I think in the future that you and I will get along better if you stop
trying to tell me what I think. That's like me saying, "David believes
it is OK to pimp your kids out, parade them as sexual objects, and
offer them to men with money."
What I really believe is that actions have consequences. If a beauty
queen goes up to Mike Tyson's room at 2AM, that's called "safe sex,"
because it's a damn safe bet that she's about to get some sex. If you
are a pretty girl walking down the street nude, you have exponentially
increased your chances of getting approached by some pervert.
And if you dress up your 6 year-old daughter to look sexy like Scarlett
Johansson, you might think it's cute but your actions could have
negative consequences.
> Well, free speech works both way and nothing prevents me from
> posting his message all over the internet, so that everyone can see
> what a sicko he truly is.
Yes, you certainly have that right. It's not like people haven't
already done that many times before, posting not only my words, but my
personal info like my address and phone numbers. And then I'll have the
right to do what I'll do.
Actions do have consequences.
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Sep 2006 01:16:03
From: David
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 1 Sep 2006 07:25:20 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
>
>David wrote:
<snipped >
Bret, you can go fuck yourself before you start doing to little
girls on the beach wearing bikinis.
>> Well, free speech works both way and nothing prevents me from
>> posting his message all over the internet, so that everyone can see
>> what a sicko he truly is.
>
>Yes, you certainly have that right. It's not like people haven't
>already done that many times before, posting not only my words, but my
>personal info like my address and phone numbers. And then I'll have the
>right to do what I'll do.
>Actions do have consequences.
There is not consequence here, Bret. What you posted is black and
white. The only person who could expect any consequences would be you
for posting something so sick.
David
|
| | | | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 22:47:36
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"David" <dgold1958@yahoo.de > wrote in message
news:hmfhf2t11kbd3injrpjnbihrv19q280t7k@4ax.com...
> On 1 Sep 2006 07:25:20 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>David wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> Bret, you can go fuck yourself before you start doing to little
> girls on the beach wearing bikinis.
>
>>> Well, free speech works both way and nothing prevents me from
>>> posting his message all over the internet, so that everyone can see
>>> what a sicko he truly is.
>>
>>Yes, you certainly have that right. It's not like people haven't
>>already done that many times before, posting not only my words, but my
>>personal info like my address and phone numbers. And then I'll have the
>>right to do what I'll do.
>>Actions do have consequences.
>
> There is not consequence here, Bret. What you posted is black and
> white. The only person who could expect any consequences would be you
> for posting something so sick.
>
> David
He didn't do anything. He just said something that is out of character for
him. He doesn't need me to defend him but there are a lot of things that
didn't come out the way I wanted or meant and nobody made a federal case out
of it, luckily. I'm trying not to say something I'll regret right now.
Strange temptation isn't it ...
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 05:58:43
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
David wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2006 14:36:54 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >>
> >> That explains why no semen was found.
> >
> >Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower.
>
> I have withheld my judgement of you until now. I was not sure what
> to make of you based on your posts. This, however, has put you over
> the edge and shown everyone what a complete idiot you are. I hope
> that you don't have children. If you do, you have probably abused them
> in the past, or will do so in the near future. Your reks in this
> thread cannot be construed as sarcasm--simply sick.
David, you should know by now Annika loves to post things for "shock
and awe"....he gets off on "sticking it to ya". Much like his dear old
Dad used to "stick it to him".
You will also find out soon enough, his skin is not nearly as thick as
he's made everyone believe, most likely from all the beatings his Dad
gave him as a child.
So do yourself a favor, ignore most of his "shock and awe" as a stunt
to get attention and do recognize that when he was playing golf, he did
have game and does understand the game. He's probably just bored now
that he's not playing anymore.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 02:48:11
From: muk
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 30 Aug 2006 11:28:23 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > :
>Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
Dude, everyone knows she is too old for your tastes.
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 18:44:54
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
long&left wrote:
> Vandar wrote:
> > long&left wrote:
> >
> >> annika1980 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
> >>>
> >>
> >> ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
> >> pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and
> >> comes up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and
> >> chocolate milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to mention
> >> 1st class air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in CO after
> >> a long and expensive trial...
> >
> >
> > FTR, he wasn't wasting away in a Thai jail. The Boulder DA got the
> > warrant for his arrest and passed it on to the Thai authorities. When
> > they received it, they revoked his visa. Karr was then picked up by Thai
> > Immigration and turned over to US Immigration. They brought him to
> > California and he was arrested there for the Ramsey warrant.
>
> thanks for the clarification. I'm just a dumb sh*t that only watches TGC
> so WTF do I know...I still betcha he's not the one that did it and gets
> off the hook...
Way to stay up with cuurent events :)
All charges were dropped and the weasel is on his way to California for
Child Porn charges...
Jon Benet's killer still runs free.
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 07:09:37
From: long&left
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Tex wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>
>>Vandar wrote:
>>
>>>long&left wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>annika1980 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
>>>>pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and
>>>>comes up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and
>>>>chocolate milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to mention
>>>>1st class air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in CO after
>>>>a long and expensive trial...
>>>
>>>
>>>FTR, he wasn't wasting away in a Thai jail. The Boulder DA got the
>>>warrant for his arrest and passed it on to the Thai authorities. When
>>>they received it, they revoked his visa. Karr was then picked up by Thai
>>>Immigration and turned over to US Immigration. They brought him to
>>>California and he was arrested there for the Ramsey warrant.
>>
>>thanks for the clarification. I'm just a dumb sh*t that only watches TGC
>>so WTF do I know...I still betcha he's not the one that did it and gets
>>off the hook...
>
>
> Way to stay up with cuurent events :)
> All charges were dropped and the weasel is on his way to California for
> Child Porn charges...
>
> Jon Benet's killer still runs free.
>
> Tex
>
HEY! I know that Ben Wah balls come on a Swing Setter!
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 02:20:15
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 30 Aug 2006 18:44:54 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>All charges were dropped and the weasel is on his way to California for
>Child Porn charges...
>
>Jon Benet's killer still runs free.
Yeah, and a thousand other killers of children who weren't as pretty
and rich.
|
| | | |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 22:41:51
From: Otto
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
The killer might be dead.
Otto
> On 30 Aug 2006 18:44:54 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>All charges were dropped and the weasel is on his way to California for
>>Child Porn charges...
>>
>>Jon Benet's killer still runs free.
|
| | | | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 07:15:41
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Recently deceased?
Otto wrote:
> The killer might be dead.
>
> Otto
>
>
>> On 30 Aug 2006 18:44:54 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All charges were dropped and the weasel is on his way to California for
>>> Child Porn charges...
>>>
>>> Jon Benet's killer still runs free.
>
>
|
| | | | | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 07:44:36
From: Otto
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Perhaps in the past year or so from ovarian cancer?
Otto
"Bert Robbins" <screw@you.com > wrote in message
news:LYqdnQfUdIlDWWvZnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Recently deceased?
>
> Otto wrote:
>> The killer might be dead.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 08:19:01
From: Bert Robbins
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
I believe we are in agreement on this issue.
Otto wrote:
> Perhaps in the past year or so from ovarian cancer?
>
> Otto
>
>
> "Bert Robbins" <screw@you.com> wrote in message
> news:LYqdnQfUdIlDWWvZnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Recently deceased?
>>
>> Otto wrote:
>>> The killer might be dead.
>
>
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 16:12:47
From: long&left
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>
ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and comes
up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and chocolate
milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to mention 1st class
air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in CO after a long and
expensive trial...
Dave
|
| | |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 23:39:24
From: Vandar
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
long&left wrote:
> annika1980 wrote:
>
>> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>
>
> ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
> pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and comes
> up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and chocolate
> milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to mention 1st class
> air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in CO after a long and
> expensive trial...
FTR, he wasn't wasting away in a Thai jail. The Boulder DA got the
warrant for his arrest and passed it on to the Thai authorities. When
they received it, they revoked his visa. Karr was then picked up by Thai
Immigration and turned over to US Immigration. They brought him to
California and he was arrested there for the Ramsey warrant.
|
| | | |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 17:03:07
From: long&left
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Vandar wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>
>> annika1980 wrote:
>>
>>> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>>
>>
>> ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
>> pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and
>> comes up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and
>> chocolate milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to mention
>> 1st class air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in CO after
>> a long and expensive trial...
>
>
> FTR, he wasn't wasting away in a Thai jail. The Boulder DA got the
> warrant for his arrest and passed it on to the Thai authorities. When
> they received it, they revoked his visa. Karr was then picked up by Thai
> Immigration and turned over to US Immigration. They brought him to
> California and he was arrested there for the Ramsey warrant.
thanks for the clarification. I'm just a dumb sh*t that only watches TGC
so WTF do I know...I still betcha he's not the one that did it and gets
off the hook...
|
| | | | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 01:14:11
From: Vandar
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
long&left wrote:
> Vandar wrote:
>
>> long&left wrote:
>>
>>> annika1980 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>>>
>>>
>>> ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
>>> pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and
>>> comes up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and
>>> chocolate milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to mention
>>> 1st class air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in CO after
>>> a long and expensive trial...
>>
>>
>>
>> FTR, he wasn't wasting away in a Thai jail. The Boulder DA got the
>> warrant for his arrest and passed it on to the Thai authorities. When
>> they received it, they revoked his visa. Karr was then picked up by
>> Thai Immigration and turned over to US Immigration. They brought him
>> to California and he was arrested there for the Ramsey warrant.
>
>
> thanks for the clarification. I'm just a dumb sh*t that only watches TGC
> so WTF do I know...
Hopefully, how to play golf. :)
> I still betcha he's not the one that did it and gets
> off the hook...
He's a loon for sure. Evidence suggests it wasn't him, but it still
might be.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 18:26:12
From: long&left
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Vandar wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>
>> Vandar wrote:
>>
>>> long&left wrote:
>>>
>>>> annika1980 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ya know, while this is in poor taste, ya gotta admit that the guy is
>>>> pretty st. He's wasting away in a prison in southeast Asia and
>>>> comes up with this great plan to change his fortunes to steaks and
>>>> chocolate milkshakes and a pretty nice pad to stay in, not to
>>>> mention 1st class air travel. I'll bet you $100 bucks he gets off in
>>>> CO after a long and expensive trial...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FTR, he wasn't wasting away in a Thai jail. The Boulder DA got the
>>> warrant for his arrest and passed it on to the Thai authorities. When
>>> they received it, they revoked his visa. Karr was then picked up by
>>> Thai Immigration and turned over to US Immigration. They brought him
>>> to California and he was arrested there for the Ramsey warrant.
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks for the clarification. I'm just a dumb sh*t that only watches
>> TGC so WTF do I know...
>
>
> Hopefully, how to play golf. :)
>
>> I still betcha he's not the one that did it and gets off the hook...
>
>
> He's a loon for sure. Evidence suggests it wasn't him, but it still
> might be.
yes I do, and we shall see :)
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 12:55:34
From: Cesar Neri
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
You forgot to mention the first class accomodations at the county jail, the
designer bright orange outfit and of course, that wonderful bling you get to
wear on your hands and your feet. If all that appeals to you, GO FOR IT!
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1156962503.179450.288510@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 14:36:54
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> That explains why no semen was found.
Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 10:20:08
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2006 10:00:57 -0700, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Frank was a genius, musical and otherwise, the likes of which we will
> >not see in our lifetimes again.
>
> Not even close.
Show me another musician as fluent in as many genres as Frank and I'll
retract. There are certainly musicians more competent in their
particular genre; however, I've yet to hear someone as well-versed as
Frank was in:
- rock
- jazz
- avant garde/digital music programming (Synclavier)
- classical - he was an astute student of Varese, Bartok, Ravel, etc
- metal
- pop
- country (it _is_ a genre, after all)
Many times in the same song.
Let us not forget, Frank was a composer - he literally wrote the music
out himself in longhand prior to the Synclavier - and I would wager he
was one of the first "composers" to use this technique. I know you are
a musician, I'm not. I am an appreciater of great music...and if there
is someone I've not heard that rivals Frank's rekably diverse range
as a highly competent composer/guitarist/musician in general, please
enlighten me. I'm not being contentious - I would like to hear this
person!
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 13:11:13
From: Booker Little
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
"Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1157131208.866225.251700@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On 1 Sep 2006 10:00:57 -0700, "Ben." <kombi45@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Frank was a genius, musical and otherwise, the likes of which we will
>> >not see in our lifetimes again.
>>
>> Not even close.
>
> Show me another musician as fluent in as many genres as Frank and I'll
> retract. There are certainly musicians more competent in their
> particular genre; however, I've yet to hear someone as well-versed as
> Frank was in:
>
> - rock
> - jazz
> - avant garde/digital music programming (Synclavier)
> - classical - he was an astute student of Varese, Bartok, Ravel, etc
> - metal
> - pop
> - country (it _is_ a genre, after all)
>
> Many times in the same song.
>
> Let us not forget, Frank was a composer - he literally wrote the music
> out himself in longhand prior to the Synclavier - and I would wager he
> was one of the first "composers" to use this technique. I know you are
> a musician, I'm not. I am an appreciater of great music...and if there
> is someone I've not heard that rivals Frank's rekably diverse range
> as a highly competent composer/guitarist/musician in general, please
> enlighten me. I'm not being contentious - I would like to hear this
> person!
Frank Zappa! You must have a limited musical background. How about Miles
Davis, John Coltrane, Charles Yardbird Parker, Charles Mingus, Duke
Ellington, Dizzy Gillepsie, Gerry Mulligan, George Gershwin, anon. I could
keep going if you wish...........
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 12:06:04
From: Da Ringer
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Damn........ Hammer would write a novel in response to this.
Where is he when we need him?
Da Ringer
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1156973814.116275.231480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>> That explains why no semen was found.
>
> Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower.
>
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 13:38:56
From: David
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On 30 Aug 2006 14:36:54 -0700, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com >
wrote:
>
>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>> That explains why no semen was found.
>
>Her daddy taught her well. She was a swallower.
I have withheld my judgement of you until now. I was not sure what
to make of you based on your posts. This, however, has put you over
the edge and shown everyone what a complete idiot you are. I hope
that you don't have children. If you do, you have probably abused them
in the past, or will do so in the near future. Your reks in this
thread cannot be construed as sarcasm--simply sick.
David
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 16:36:06
From: Da Ringer
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
Damn dude........ you need to lay off the diet coke.
Da Ringer
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1156962503.179450.288510@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 21:30:04
From: Nomen Nescio
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
In article <1156962503.179450.288510@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com >
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
That explains why no semen was found.
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 12:11:26
From: Tex
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
> annika1980 wrote:
> > Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>
> I'm waiting to hear from the committee on "poor taste".
There is a committee? I thought the "poor taste" crowd left with the
Psycho?
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 19:41:37
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:11:26 -0700, Tex wrote:
> bigoldcat2@yahoo.com wrote:
>> annika1980 wrote:
>> > Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>>
>> I'm waiting to hear from the committee on "poor taste".
>
> There is a committee? I thought the "poor taste" crowd left with the
> Psycho?
Which one?
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 11:58:21
From: dugjustdug
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
I don't think you have the neck for it - or lack thereof...
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 11:56:36
From: The World Wide Wade
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
In article
<1156962503.179450.288510@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com >,
"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote:
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
Buddy, you've sunk low.
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 11:44:23
From: Larry Bud
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
Amazingly, you're far too boring to be of any media interest.
|
| |
Date: 30 Aug 2006 11:39:07
From:
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
annika1980 wrote:
> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
I'm waiting to hear from the committee on "poor taste".
|
| | |
Date: 01 Sep 2006 02:59:05
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
<bigoldcat2@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1156963147.644626.156140@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> annika1980 wrote:
>> Now where's my first class flight to Colorado?
>
> I'm waiting to hear from the committee on "poor taste".
Not exactly 80s high point.
|
| | |
Date: 31 Aug 2006 22:54:07
From: Matt 'Ocho' Aamold
Subject: Re: I did JonBenet!
|
<bigoldcat2@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1156963147.644626.156140@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> I'm waiting to hear from the committee on "poor taste".
I don't need a committee to tell me brets post was poor taste
|
|
