| |
Main
Date: 16 Oct 2006 21:43:36
From: Joe
Subject: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
time, usually using retired guys with no life.
It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
material, don't you think?
Best regards,
Joe
|
|
| |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 21:25:09
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Getting out of the draft
|
Tex wrote:
> Dene wrote:
> > long&left wrote:
> >
> > > ouch! my experience was a bit humiliating (standing around naked all day
> > > at the physical) but obviously much less painfull
> > > Dave
> >
> > Be glad Cowboy Tex wasn't with you.
>
> You don't have enough shit in your punchbowl?
> Go polish your rusted trophy.
>
> Tex
Ah....the smell of a Tex BBQ. Hehehehehe.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 17:41:01
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Getting out of the draft
|
Dene wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>
> > ouch! my experience was a bit humiliating (standing around naked all day
> > at the physical) but obviously much less painfull
> > Dave
>
> Be glad Cowboy Tex wasn't with you.
You don't have enough shit in your punchbowl?
Go polish your rusted trophy.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 16:52:43
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Getting out of the draft
|
long&left wrote:
> ouch! my experience was a bit humiliating (standing around naked all day
> at the physical) but obviously much less painfull
> Dave
Be glad Cowboy Tex wasn't with you.
-Greg
|
| |
Date: 21 Oct 2006 22:20:49
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
long&left wrote:
> I was able to vote for the first time in '67. I've voted every time I
> was able in the national elections since '67, which was every time. If I
> was sick, or disabled, or dead...I couldn't vote, but I never was. I now
> vote absentee ballot, only because my wife is sight handicapped and
> can't read the ballot at the polling location.
'67? You didn't graduate from high school. How come you weren't in
Vietnam??
Or were you?
-Greg
|
| | |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 07:15:41
From: long&left
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
Dene wrote:
> long&left wrote:
>> I was able to vote for the first time in '67. I've voted every time I
>> was able in the national elections since '67, which was every time. If I
>> was sick, or disabled, or dead...I couldn't vote, but I never was. I now
>> vote absentee ballot, only because my wife is sight handicapped and
>> can't read the ballot at the polling location.
>
> '67? You didn't graduate from high school. How come you weren't in
> Vietnam??
>
> Or were you?
>
> -Greg
>
I got my draft notice on May 20, 1967 and joined the Army instead of
being drafted. Went to Oakland Army Base to take my physical and was
rejected because of a hereditary back problem that I didn't even know
that I had. Reclassified 1Y. I've since suffered through back problems
regularly but they never hurt so bad that I wish I would have gone to
Nam instead...
US Grant HS btw
Dave
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 15:30:00
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Getting out of the draft
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:15:41 -0700, long&left <nospam@diespammers.com >
wrote:
>I got my draft notice on May 20, 1967 and joined the Army instead of
>being drafted. Went to Oakland Army Base to take my physical and was
>rejected because of a hereditary back problem that I didn't even know
>that I had. Reclassified 1Y. I've since suffered through back problems
>regularly but they never hurt so bad that I wish I would have gone to
>Nam instead...
I was in AFROTC the day I got a notice for my draft physical. I told
the ROTC guys to get my deferment fixed, but they told me to get my
physical anyway. So I got my physical that morning - in the
evening, I was driving my motorcycle to the campus chess club when a
car pulled out of a bar and hit me. Chess pieces went flying over
the busy 4 lane road, as did I. The driver stopped for a moment,
saving him a felony hit and run, then left, saving him a drunk
driving. But I had his licence plate embedded in my leg. I wore my
father's old WWII leather jacket, a helmet, good leather boots, good
leather gloves, but ordinary trousers, so only my leg was hurt.
I had 8 months to heal before ROTC summer camp, but still have the
scar.
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 09:19:41
From: long&left
Subject: Re: Getting out of the draft
|
Howard Brazee wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:15:41 -0700, long&left <nospam@diespammers.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I got my draft notice on May 20, 1967 and joined the Army instead of
>> being drafted. Went to Oakland Army Base to take my physical and was
>> rejected because of a hereditary back problem that I didn't even know
>> that I had. Reclassified 1Y. I've since suffered through back problems
>> regularly but they never hurt so bad that I wish I would have gone to
>> Nam instead...
>
> I was in AFROTC the day I got a notice for my draft physical. I told
> the ROTC guys to get my deferment fixed, but they told me to get my
> physical anyway. So I got my physical that morning - in the
> evening, I was driving my motorcycle to the campus chess club when a
> car pulled out of a bar and hit me. Chess pieces went flying over
> the busy 4 lane road, as did I. The driver stopped for a moment,
> saving him a felony hit and run, then left, saving him a drunk
> driving. But I had his licence plate embedded in my leg. I wore my
> father's old WWII leather jacket, a helmet, good leather boots, good
> leather gloves, but ordinary trousers, so only my leg was hurt.
>
> I had 8 months to heal before ROTC summer camp, but still have the
> scar.
ouch! my experience was a bit humiliating (standing around naked all day
at the physical) but obviously much less painfull
Dave
|
| | | | | |
Date: 22 Oct 2006 19:37:58
From: Peter Strauss
Subject: Re: Getting out of the draft
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:19:41 -0700, long&left <nospam@diespammers.com >
wrote:
> Howard Brazee wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:15:41 -0700, long&left <nospam@diespammers.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I got my draft notice on May 20, 1967 and joined the Army instead of
> >> being drafted. Went to Oakland Army Base to take my physical and was
> >> rejected because of a hereditary back problem that I didn't even know
> >> that I had. Reclassified 1Y. I've since suffered through back problems
> >> regularly but they never hurt so bad that I wish I would have gone to
> >> Nam instead...
> >
> > I was in AFROTC the day I got a notice for my draft physical. I told
> > the ROTC guys to get my deferment fixed, but they told me to get my
> > physical anyway. So I got my physical that morning - in the
> > evening, I was driving my motorcycle to the campus chess club when a
> > car pulled out of a bar and hit me. Chess pieces went flying over
> > the busy 4 lane road, as did I. The driver stopped for a moment,
> > saving him a felony hit and run, then left, saving him a drunk
> > driving. But I had his licence plate embedded in my leg. I wore my
> > father's old WWII leather jacket, a helmet, good leather boots, good
> > leather gloves, but ordinary trousers, so only my leg was hurt.
> >
> > I had 8 months to heal before ROTC summer camp, but still have the
> > scar.
>
> ouch! my experience was a bit humiliating (standing around naked all day
> at the physical) but obviously much less painfull
A bit? There's a plaque on the spot, memorializing that day. It
reads simply, eloquently:
"Oh, the humanity!"
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:53:18
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
long&left wrote:
> AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
> > Just for the record, I've only voted twice in my life, for president. Both
> > times for Perot. I was an volunteer lobbyist for foster kids on the state
> > level for about 4 years and I learned that the political system really
> > really stinks. I have never given any money to any political candidates and
> > I liked Reagan. I'm not on the democrats side except for now because Bush is
> > so bad. I guess that isn't true because now if I register it will be
> > democrat. But most of all I know that nobody gives a damn about my personal
> > stuff and I'm pretty sure I won't be posting after the election. It's like a
> > disease. I know it's not going to make any difference and nobody is going to
> > be awakened to the truth by some post on a newsgroup and since I don't know
> > 'the truth', that would be pretty hard. One thing. I don't take myself
> > nearly as seriously as it seems and I have no hard feelings about anything
> > said here. I barely remember what I said myself.
> >
>
> you are really one f****d up dude.
>
> I was able to vote for the first time in '67. I've voted every time I
> was able in the national elections since '67, which was every time. If I
> was sick, or disabled, or dead...I couldn't vote, but I never was. I now
> vote absentee ballot, only because my wife is sight handicapped and
> can't read the ballot at the polling location.
>
> OK, strike all of the above...I've only got one thing to really say: If
> you've only voted twice in your life....you better well be in your early
> 20's. Otherwise, STFU on the political front
Careful Dave, now you'll get the "free speech" crowd yelling at you.
Tex
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:50:49
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
William A. T. Clark wrote:
> In article <1161102896.113990.98180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Bobby Knight wrote:
> > > On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Bobby Knight wrote:
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> > > >
> > > >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> > > >crap?
> > > >
> > > >Tex
> > >
> > > Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
> >
> > So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
> > Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
> > this ratio?
> >
> > Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
> > political spectrum?
> >
> > Tex
>
> You say 3:1 over the past three months. Why not run those same figures
> over the past 12 months and let us all in on that answer?
>
> Oh, but then you might have to be equally critical of someone from the
> far right, and that would never do, would it?
Well, since you post ZERO golf content, we could start with you.
But then, you'd just spin out about some vast conspiracy and hatred of
England, blah, blah, blah.
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 19 Oct 2006 05:45:33
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
In article <1161222649.722859.250530@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com >,
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> William A. T. Clark wrote:
> > In article <1161102896.113990.98180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Bobby Knight wrote:
> > > > On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Bobby Knight wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> > > > >
> > > > >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> > > > >crap?
> > > > >
> > > > >Tex
> > > >
> > > > Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
> > >
> > > So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
> > > Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
> > > this ratio?
> > >
> > > Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
> > > political spectrum?
> > >
> > > Tex
> >
> > You say 3:1 over the past three months. Why not run those same figures
> > over the past 12 months and let us all in on that answer?
> >
> > Oh, but then you might have to be equally critical of someone from the
> > far right, and that would never do, would it?
>
> Well, since you post ZERO golf content, we could start with you.
> But then, you'd just spin out about some vast conspiracy and hatred of
> England, blah, blah, blah.
>
> Tex
Dear, oh, dear, you can't even get the country rght, can you?
Oh, well.
William Clark
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 15:40:52
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
Just for the record, I've only voted twice in my life, for president. Both
times for Perot. I was an volunteer lobbyist for foster kids on the state
level for about 4 years and I learned that the political system really
really stinks. I have never given any money to any political candidates and
I liked Reagan. I'm not on the democrats side except for now because Bush is
so bad. I guess that isn't true because now if I register it will be
democrat. But most of all I know that nobody gives a damn about my personal
stuff and I'm pretty sure I won't be posting after the election. It's like a
disease. I know it's not going to make any difference and nobody is going to
be awakened to the truth by some post on a newsgroup and since I don't know
'the truth', that would be pretty hard. One thing. I don't take myself
nearly as seriously as it seems and I have no hard feelings about anything
said here. I barely remember what I said myself.
"Joe" <joehnospam@ospamwarwick.net > wrote in message
news:c2TYg.9$tb6.7@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com...
> How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
> group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
> time, usually using retired guys with no life.
>
> It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
> material, don't you think?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Joe
>
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 17:42:35
From: long&left
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
> Just for the record, I've only voted twice in my life, for president. Both
> times for Perot. I was an volunteer lobbyist for foster kids on the state
> level for about 4 years and I learned that the political system really
> really stinks. I have never given any money to any political candidates and
> I liked Reagan. I'm not on the democrats side except for now because Bush is
> so bad. I guess that isn't true because now if I register it will be
> democrat. But most of all I know that nobody gives a damn about my personal
> stuff and I'm pretty sure I won't be posting after the election. It's like a
> disease. I know it's not going to make any difference and nobody is going to
> be awakened to the truth by some post on a newsgroup and since I don't know
> 'the truth', that would be pretty hard. One thing. I don't take myself
> nearly as seriously as it seems and I have no hard feelings about anything
> said here. I barely remember what I said myself.
>
you are really one f****d up dude.
I was able to vote for the first time in '67. I've voted every time I
was able in the national elections since '67, which was every time. If I
was sick, or disabled, or dead...I couldn't vote, but I never was. I now
vote absentee ballot, only because my wife is sight handicapped and
can't read the ballot at the polling location.
OK, strike all of the above...I've only got one thing to really say: If
you've only voted twice in your life....you better well be in your early
20's. Otherwise, STFU on the political front
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 19:00:16
From: AKA Gray Asphalt
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
"long&left" <nospam@diespammers.com > wrote in message
news:_RzZg.207$rR1.93@newsfe06.lga...
> AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
>> Just for the record, I've only voted twice in my life, for president.
>> Both times for Perot. I was an volunteer lobbyist for foster kids on the
>> state level for about 4 years and I learned that the political system
>> really really stinks. I have never given any money to any political
>> candidates and I liked Reagan. I'm not on the democrats side except for
>> now because Bush is so bad. I guess that isn't true because now if I
>> register it will be democrat. But most of all I know that nobody gives a
>> damn about my personal stuff and I'm pretty sure I won't be posting after
>> the election. It's like a disease. I know it's not going to make any
>> difference and nobody is going to be awakened to the truth by some post
>> on a newsgroup and since I don't know 'the truth', that would be pretty
>> hard. One thing. I don't take myself nearly as seriously as it seems and
>> I have no hard feelings about anything said here. I barely remember what
>> I said myself.
>>
>
> you are really one f****d up dude.
>
> I was able to vote for the first time in '67. I've voted every time I was
> able in the national elections since '67, which was every time. If I was
> sick, or disabled, or dead...I couldn't vote, but I never was. I now vote
> absentee ballot, only because my wife is sight handicapped and can't read
> the ballot at the polling location.
>
> OK, strike all of the above...I've only got one thing to really say: If
> you've only voted twice in your life....you better well be in your early
> 20's. Otherwise, STFU on the political front
Yeah, you're right. Except I know enough to know that most of the time we're
all being fooled. If your dumb ass is being fooled by tv commercials, what
do you think the hight paid madision avenue spin doctors are doing to you
politically. Forge the dumb ass. It was for effect. I really didn't expect
anyone to read all the way through my post. Thanks. I guess I should sign
off until after the elections.
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 20:50:39
From: long&left
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
> "long&left" <nospam@diespammers.com> wrote in message
> news:_RzZg.207$rR1.93@newsfe06.lga...
>> AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
>>> Just for the record, I've only voted twice in my life, for president.
>>> Both times for Perot. I was an volunteer lobbyist for foster kids on the
>>> state level for about 4 years and I learned that the political system
>>> really really stinks. I have never given any money to any political
>>> candidates and I liked Reagan. I'm not on the democrats side except for
>>> now because Bush is so bad. I guess that isn't true because now if I
>>> register it will be democrat. But most of all I know that nobody gives a
>>> damn about my personal stuff and I'm pretty sure I won't be posting after
>>> the election. It's like a disease. I know it's not going to make any
>>> difference and nobody is going to be awakened to the truth by some post
>>> on a newsgroup and since I don't know 'the truth', that would be pretty
>>> hard. One thing. I don't take myself nearly as seriously as it seems and
>>> I have no hard feelings about anything said here. I barely remember what
>>> I said myself.
>>>
>> you are really one f****d up dude.
>>
>> I was able to vote for the first time in '67. I've voted every time I was
>> able in the national elections since '67, which was every time. If I was
>> sick, or disabled, or dead...I couldn't vote, but I never was. I now vote
>> absentee ballot, only because my wife is sight handicapped and can't read
>> the ballot at the polling location.
>>
>> OK, strike all of the above...I've only got one thing to really say: If
>> you've only voted twice in your life....you better well be in your early
>> 20's. Otherwise, STFU on the political front
>
> Yeah, you're right. Except I know enough to know that most of the time we're
> all being fooled. If your dumb ass is being fooled by tv commercials, what
> do you think the hight paid madision avenue spin doctors are doing to you
> politically. Forge the dumb ass. It was for effect. I really didn't expect
> anyone to read all the way through my post. Thanks. I guess I should sign
> off until after the elections.
>
OK, I'm now really curious, oh only have voted twice in my life
dude...how old are you?
Do you really think that you're being original with the old "you all are
being fooled" mission. Come on dude, you're now talking to a guy who
left home at 15. Who has worked every single day since for every single
thing he and his family owns. So WTF are you going to teach me? Not much
I expect.
please enlighten me with your age and then tell me why you have any
right to explain politics or life to me...
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 14:50:22
From: Ben.
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On Oct 17, 12:25 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:
> >I'm sorry, I didn't know it was required to be on any side or in the
> >middle.
> >I'm kinda glad I get under your skin...means I'm not a conformist.
>
> >Get back to golf, you need the practice.
>
> >TexYou don't get under my skin. I just find it amusing that someone who
> is obviously intelligent chooses to be so one-sided on this subject.
> That is the absolute epitome of conformity.
And if there are two guys above political diatribes on this NG, it's
clearly Tex and BK. Which is why, you see, why they can discuss AKA
and LLLLarry's RSG political musings with clear consciences.
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 10:15:10
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2006 09:34:56 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >> On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> >> >
> >> >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> >> >crap?
> >> >
> >> >Tex
> >>
> >> Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
> >
> >So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
> >Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
> >this ratio?
> >
> >Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
> >political spectrum?
> >
> >Tex
>
> No. They both are on the edges of their political spectrum.
> LLlllarry just seems to be more blind to another side of any argument
> other than the ultra right's. I've never seen a scintilla of
> acceptance of any centrist attitude from him, and don't pay much
> attention to AKA. Those of us closer to the middle can see reason
> from either side. I haven't seen that from you either.
I'm sorry, I didn't know it was required to be on any side or in the
middle.
I'm kinda glad I get under your skin...means I'm not a conformist.
Get back to golf, you need the practice.
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:01:47
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
In article <1161105310.913506.171960@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> Bobby Knight wrote:
> > On 17 Oct 2006 09:34:56 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Bobby Knight wrote:
> > >> On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >Bobby Knight wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> > >> >
> > >> >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> > >> >crap?
> > >> >
> > >> >Tex
> > >>
> > >> Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
> > >
> > >So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
> > >Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
> > >this ratio?
> > >
> > >Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
> > >political spectrum?
> > >
> > >Tex
> >
> > No. They both are on the edges of their political spectrum.
> > LLlllarry just seems to be more blind to another side of any argument
> > other than the ultra right's. I've never seen a scintilla of
> > acceptance of any centrist attitude from him, and don't pay much
> > attention to AKA. Those of us closer to the middle can see reason
> > from either side. I haven't seen that from you either.
>
> I'm sorry, I didn't know it was required to be on any side or in the
> middle.
> I'm kinda glad I get under your skin...means I'm not a conformist.
>
> Get back to golf, you need the practice.
>
> Tex
Get back to being civil(ized) human being. You clearly need that
practice.
William Clark
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 12:25:02
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On 17 Oct 2006 10:15:10 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On 17 Oct 2006 09:34:56 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
=
>> >Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
>> >political spectrum?
>> >
>> >Tex
>>
>> No. They both are on the edges of their political spectrum.
>> LLlllarry just seems to be more blind to another side of any argument
>> other than the ultra right's. I've never seen a scintilla of
>> acceptance of any centrist attitude from him, and don't pay much
>> attention to AKA. Those of us closer to the middle can see reason
>> from either side. I haven't seen that from you either.
>
>I'm sorry, I didn't know it was required to be on any side or in the
>middle.
>I'm kinda glad I get under your skin...means I'm not a conformist.
>
>Get back to golf, you need the practice.
>
>Tex
You don't get under my skin. I just find it amusing that someone who
is obviously intelligent chooses to be so one-sided on this subject.
That is the absolute epitome of conformity.
--
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 09:34:56
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> >
> >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> >crap?
> >
> >Tex
>
> Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
this ratio?
Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
political spectrum?
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:00:33
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
In article <1161102896.113990.98180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> Bobby Knight wrote:
> > On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> > >
> > >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> > >crap?
> > >
> > >Tex
> >
> > Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
>
> So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
> Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
> this ratio?
>
> Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
> political spectrum?
>
> Tex
You say 3:1 over the past three months. Why not run those same figures
over the past 12 months and let us all in on that answer?
Oh, but then you might have to be equally critical of someone from the
far right, and that would never do, would it?
William Clark
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 11:54:36
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On 17 Oct 2006 09:34:56 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Bobby Knight wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
>> >
>> >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
>> >crap?
>> >
>> >Tex
>>
>> Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
>
>So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
>Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
>this ratio?
>
>Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
>political spectrum?
>
>Tex
No. They both are on the edges of their political spectrum.
LLlllarry just seems to be more blind to another side of any argument
other than the ultra right's. I've never seen a scintilla of
acceptance of any centrist attitude from him, and don't pay much
attention to AKA. Those of us closer to the middle can see reason
from either side. I haven't seen that from you either.
--
___,
\o
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 12:50:06
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
In article <1161102896.113990.98180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> Bobby Knight wrote:
> > On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > >> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
> > >
> > >And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> > >crap?
> > >
> > >Tex
> >
> > Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
>
> So the 3:1 ratio than AKA has over LLlary means nothing to you?
> Or are you suggesting that AKA's golf content more than makes up for
> this ratio?
>
> Or is it just your blinded bias because AKA posts on your side of the
> political spectrum?
>
> Tex
Last three months only, very clever. Try stretching our famous
subiner's record back a bit further. Larry wrote the book on OT
political posting in rsg.
William Clark
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2006 08:11:18 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >William A. T. Clark wrote:
> >> In article <c2TYg.9$tb6.7@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> >> Joe <joehnospam@ospamwarwick.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
> >> > group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
> >> > time, usually using retired guys with no life.
> >> >
> >> > It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
> >> > material, don't you think?
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> > Joe
> >>
> >> Ever heard of a guy called Larry on this ng? Makes AKA look like a rank
> >> amateur.
> >
> >Really?
> >
> >Here's the stats for RSG:
> >Poster October September August
> >AKA.......213..........86............92
> >LLlary......70...........52............61
> >
> >And to LLlary's credit, he also posts frequently to political
> >groups....
> >
> >Tex
>
> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
crap?
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 04:49:53
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On 17-Oct-2006, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
> crap?
Not this month!
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 10:48:07
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On 17 Oct 2006 08:32:46 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>>
>> Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
>
>And do you *honestly* think AKA has more golf content that political
>crap?
>
>Tex
Nope. Neither does LLLLLarry.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 08:11:18
From: Tex
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
William A. T. Clark wrote:
> In article <c2TYg.9$tb6.7@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> Joe <joehnospam@ospamwarwick.net> wrote:
>
> > How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
> > group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
> > time, usually using retired guys with no life.
> >
> > It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
> > material, don't you think?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Joe
>
> Ever heard of a guy called Larry on this ng? Makes AKA look like a rank
> amateur.
Really?
Here's the stats for RSG:
Poster October September August
AKA.......213..........86............92
LLlary......70...........52............61
And to LLlary's credit, he also posts frequently to political
groups....
Tex
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 12:48:07
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
In article <1161097878.573519.22940@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com >,
"Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
> William A. T. Clark wrote:
> > In article <c2TYg.9$tb6.7@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> > Joe <joehnospam@ospamwarwick.net> wrote:
> >
> > > How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
> > > group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
> > > time, usually using retired guys with no life.
> > >
> > > It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
> > > material, don't you think?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Joe
> >
> > Ever heard of a guy called Larry on this ng? Makes AKA look like a rank
> > amateur.
>
> Really?
>
> Here's the stats for RSG:
> Poster October September August
> AKA.......213..........86............92
> LLlary......70...........52............61
>
> And to LLlary's credit, he also posts frequently to political
> groups....
>
> Tex
Nice job selecting only the last 3 months of Larry's inanities, instead
of his complete history. The reason his count has gone down lately is
because he has been run off every time he gratuitously opens another
purely political thread. He cannot respond to the counterpoints, so he
runs and hides until he launches his next piece of propaganda.
AKA is just learning (unfortunately) from the master.
William Clark
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 04:52:16
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On 17-Oct-2006, "William A. T. Clark" <clark.31@nospamosu.edu > wrote:
> Nice job selecting only the last 3 months of Larry's inanities, instead
> of his complete history.
You know the ole saying: "What have you done for me lately?"
> AKA is just learning (unfortunately) from the master.
Oh so true!
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 10:14:07
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
On 17 Oct 2006 08:11:18 -0700, "Tex" <ktexkoenig@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>William A. T. Clark wrote:
>> In article <c2TYg.9$tb6.7@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
>> Joe <joehnospam@ospamwarwick.net> wrote:
>>
>> > How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
>> > group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
>> > time, usually using retired guys with no life.
>> >
>> > It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
>> > material, don't you think?
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Joe
>>
>> Ever heard of a guy called Larry on this ng? Makes AKA look like a rank
>> amateur.
>
>Really?
>
>Here's the stats for RSG:
>Poster October September August
>AKA.......213..........86............92
>LLlary......70...........52............61
>
>And to LLlary's credit, he also posts frequently to political
>groups....
>
>Tex
Joe said "based on content", not numbers of posts.
___,
\o
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 10:44:42
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: Hey AKA Gray Asphalt
|
In article <c2TYg.9$tb6.7@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com >,
Joe <joehnospam@ospamwarwick.net > wrote:
> How much are you being paid by the Dems for each political post to this
> group. Not a silly question, the pump and dump stock boys do it all the
> time, usually using retired guys with no life.
>
> It really has to be something like that, based on the content of your
> material, don't you think?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Joe
Ever heard of a guy called Larry on this ng? Makes AKA look like a rank
amateur.
William Clark
|
|
