| |
Main
Date: 13 Nov 2006 17:47:34
From: zumafan
Subject: DNC 2008 agenda
|
Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION 2008
7:00 P.M. Opening flag burning.
7:15 P.M. Pledge of allegiance to U.N.
7:30 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
7:30 till 8:00 P.M. Nonreligious prayer and worship-- Jessie Jackson
and Al Sharpton.
8:00 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:05 P.M. Ceremonial tree hugging.
8:15- 8:30 P.M. Gay Wedding-- Barney Frank Presiding.
8:30 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:35 P.M. Free Saddam Rally. Cindy Sheehan-- Susan Sarandon.
9:00 P.M. Keynote speech. The proper etiquette for surrender-- French
President Jacques Chirac
9:15P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
9:20 P.M. Collection to benefit Osama Bin Laden kidney transplant fund
9:30 P.M. Unveiling of plan to free freedom fighters from Guantanamo
Bay. Sean Penn
9:40 PM. Why I hate the Military, A short talk by William Jefferson
Clinton
9:45 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
9:50 P.M. Dan Rather presented Truth in Broadcasting award, presented
by Michael Moore
9:55 P.M., Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
10:00 P.M. How George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld brought down the World
Trade Center Towers-- Howard Dean
10:30 P.M. Nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Mahmud Ahnadinejad
11:00 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
11:05 P.M. Al Gore reinvents Internet
11:15 P.M. Our Troops are War Criminals-- John Kerry
11:30 P.M. Coronation of Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton
12:00 A.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
12:05 A.M. Bill asks Ted to drive Hillary home
|
|
| |
Date: 15 Nov 2006 11:59:25
From: Ken Meltzer
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
Jack Hollis wrote:
> The thing that would piss me off more than anything else is that
> Kerry's wife continues to use her dead husbands surname. So she's
> Teresa Heinz Kerry. I wouldn't mind if my wife wanted to have a
> hyphenated name, as long as she used her own maiden name. It's like
> she's willing to use his name, but she's not going to give up her real
> claim to fame.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_300508.html
|
| | |
Date: 15 Nov 2006 21:51:33
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
On 15 Nov 2006 11:59:25 -0800, "Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn@aol.com >
wrote:
>Jack Hollis wrote:
>
>> The thing that would piss me off more than anything else is that
>> Kerry's wife continues to use her dead husbands surname. So she's
>> Teresa Heinz Kerry. I wouldn't mind if my wife wanted to have a
>> hyphenated name, as long as she used her own maiden name. It's like
>> she's willing to use his name, but she's not going to give up her real
>> claim to fame.
>
>http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_300508.html
Teresa Heinz drops 'Kerry'
She obviously has a lot more respect for her dead husband than the one
she has now. I can understand how she feels.
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Nov 2006 07:20:10
From: FredK
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper@aol.com > wrote in message
news:9dknl21e8pu41f1iqheiuchj70hjqe48fl@4ax.com...
> On 15 Nov 2006 11:59:25 -0800, "Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Jack Hollis wrote:
>>
>>> The thing that would piss me off more than anything else is that
>>> Kerry's wife continues to use her dead husbands surname. So she's
>>> Teresa Heinz Kerry. I wouldn't mind if my wife wanted to have a
>>> hyphenated name, as long as she used her own maiden name. It's like
>>> she's willing to use his name, but she's not going to give up her real
>>> claim to fame.
>>
>>http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_300508.html
>
>
> Teresa Heinz drops 'Kerry'
>
> She obviously has a lot more respect for her dead husband than the one
> she has now. I can understand how she feels.
Are you truly this shallow? Or just really sting from the rejection at
the election?
|
| |
Date: 15 Nov 2006 09:26:41
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
And this folks, is as clever as a republican ever gets.
|
| |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 16:48:29
From: zumafan
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
S McFarlane wrote:
> Sounds pretty partisan to me. Usually that = wrong. From my perspective as
> a non-Dempublican, I don't see a dime's worth of difference between either
> party in this regard. It always comes down to the partisan chess match:
> figure out what's best for the party, and follow that course. What's
> ethical to do? Forget about that...
>
> Scott
If we were st we would vote against EVERY incumbent in EVERY
election. Then maybe they would represent US instead of the lobbyists.
But we're not st.
|
| |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 07:32:42
From: the Moderator
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
"zumafan" <mgeorg@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1163468854.438948.31850@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
> the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
If it were really that funny. I heard Harry Reid on the radio Friday. He
said the FIRST ORDER of business was investigations and subpoenas.
The week before the elections Democrats said they would not re-open a bunch
of investigations. You can't trust anything they say. Prior to the
elections they said they were going to raise taxes. Oddly I believe they
were sincere when they said that.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 13:40:51
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
In article <arednSPM49zmWMTYnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@centurytel.net >
"the Moderator" <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com > wrote:
>
>
> "zumafan" <mgeorg@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1163468854.438948.31850@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> > Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
> > the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
>
> If it were really that funny. I heard Harry Reid on the radio Friday. He
> said the FIRST ORDER of business was investigations and subpoenas.
>
> The week before the elections Democrats said they would not re-open a bunch
> of investigations. You can't trust anything they say. Prior to the
> elections they said they were going to raise taxes. Oddly I believe they
> were sincere when they said that.
Nothing moderate about you is there. Actually, the buzzword during the
campaigns has always been "oversight." That would entail investigations.
As for taxes, when you spend, spend, spend, and cut taxes in the meantime
(on certain groups), any kid will ask you where the money will come from.
Yup, history repeating itself. Repubs put us in a bind, Dems criticised
for getting us out. Business as usual, with the same people chirping the
same song.
|
| |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 23:44:51
From: elnino10@aol.com
Subject: Re: asshole!
|
WW wrote:
> golf not politics asshole!>
Where were you 6 years ago?
|
| |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 23:44:44
From: elnino10@aol.com
Subject: Re: asshole!
|
WW wrote:
> golf not politics asshole!>
Where were you 6 years ago?
|
| |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 21:55:58
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
On 13 Nov 2006 17:47:34 -0800, "zumafan" <mgeorg@gmail.com > wrote:
>Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
>the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
Too bad they didn't have time for the Bill Clinton talk, "Preventing
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and Hillary's talk, "Futures
Trading: How to Turn $1,000 into $100,000 in one year."
|
| | |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 12:54:19
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
In article <pgbil2t0vjb3hlghv9tnpeghi2jvmnq1up@4ax.com >
Jack Hollis <xsleeper@aol.com > wrote:
>
> On 13 Nov 2006 17:47:34 -0800, "zumafan" <mgeorg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
> >the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
>
>
> Too bad they didn't have time for the Bill Clinton talk, "Preventing
> Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and Hillary's talk, "Futures
> Trading: How to Turn $1,000 into $100,000 in one year."
Of course you'd like to deflect the topic away from the real problems.
Some dems really aren't too happy with Bill's antics or Hillary for that
matter and admitted it, very much UNlike what the other side does when
they screw up. It's what makes dems and repubs different and it will
never be anything but different.
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Nov 2006 00:14:23
From: S McFarlane
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
"tiggerspalewife" <anon@comments.header > wrote in message
news:HZZKJT6V39035.3293865741@twistycreek.com...
>
> Of course you'd like to deflect the topic away from the real problems.
> Some dems really aren't too happy with Bill's antics or Hillary for that
> matter and admitted it, very much UNlike what the other side does when
> they screw up. It's what makes dems and repubs different and it will
> never be anything but different.
>
Sounds pretty partisan to me. Usually that = wrong. From my perspective as
a non-Dempublican, I don't see a dime's worth of difference between either
party in this regard. It always comes down to the partisan chess match:
figure out what's best for the party, and follow that course. What's
ethical to do? Forget about that...
Scott
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Nov 2006 13:54:44
From: tiggerspalewife
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
In article <zZs6h.10561$l%2.10394@trnddc05 >
"S McFarlane" <spam@nothanks.com > wrote:
>
>
> "tiggerspalewife" <anon@comments.header> wrote in message
> news:HZZKJT6V39035.3293865741@twistycreek.com...
> >
> > Of course you'd like to deflect the topic away from the real problems.
> > Some dems really aren't too happy with Bill's antics or Hillary for that
> > matter and admitted it, very much UNlike what the other side does when
> > they screw up. It's what makes dems and repubs different and it will
> > never be anything but different.
> >
>
> Sounds pretty partisan to me. Usually that = wrong. From my perspective as
> a non-Dempublican, I don't see a dime's worth of difference between either
> party in this regard. It always comes down to the partisan chess match:
> figure out what's best for the party, and follow that course. What's
> ethical to do? Forget about that...
>
> Scott
Everyone is partisan to some extent. You sound to be partisan AWAY from
the parties. OK, your opinion. I just think the Dems have more what I
consider ethical than the repubs do. That's how you choose sides although
I'm not blind to looking at other candidates, have done that and have
voted for them.
|
| | |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 03:31:04
From: bill-o
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
On 13-Nov-2006, Jack Hollis <xsleeper@aol.com > wrote:
> >Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
> >the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
>
>
> Too bad they didn't have time for the Bill Clinton talk, "Preventing
> Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and Hillary's talk, "Futures
> Trading: How to Turn $1,000 into $100,000 in one year."
Then there's John Kerry's presentation: "How to Soak the Rich through
riage!"
--
bill-o
A "gimme" can best be defined as an agreement between
two golfers neither of whom can putt very well.
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 23:26:38
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:31:04 GMT, "bill-o" <assimilate@borg.org >
wrote:
>On 13-Nov-2006, Jack Hollis <xsleeper@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> >Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
>> >the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
>>
>>
>> Too bad they didn't have time for the Bill Clinton talk, "Preventing
>> Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and Hillary's talk, "Futures
>> Trading: How to Turn $1,000 into $100,000 in one year."
>
>Then there's John Kerry's presentation: "How to Soak the Rich through
>riage!"
>
>--
>bill-o
I'd rather live in a welfare hotel than live with his wife.
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 12:59:05
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: Cut and Run consequences coming
|
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:20:40 -0500, Head Shot wrote:
> Carbon wrote:
>> You are absolutely right. It is far, far worse to get a blowjob from an
>> intern than to mislead the country into the hopeless quagmire that is
>> Iraq.
>
> Before you go on the "Bill Clinton was not all that bad" rant; you
> should read up on Rwanda and his involvement in the genocide; including
> the parts involving c Rich.
>
> The blowjobs and lying about it - he should have said the truth when
> asked, which is "none of your fucking business, asshole". I will
> never understand why he didn't take that position. Nobody other than
> Hilary and Chelsea have a right to ask him about his sex life. That
> whole thing was a witch hunt and nothing more.
>
> But Rwanda - that was unforgivable. Did he talk about that in his
> book at all?
Of course Clinton is a scumbag. I think at the time of the genocide in
Rwanda he was afraid of political fallout after the hit he took over the
intervention in Bosnia. Hundreds of thousands died due to his inaction.
But Bush is worse. There is no way on earth Clinton would have stupid
enough to fall for that bullshit Neocon theory that we could just waltz
into Iraq without any consequences. There is just no way. This stupid,
avoidable war has bled hundreds of billions of dollars from the American
economy with no end in sight. It's awful, an epic disaster.
For the record, I have no objection to America trying to control the oil
supply in the Middle East. But the stupidity and short-sightedness of the
current bunch of extremists in Washington is an offense. The good thing is
they've screwed up so badly that it'll probably be a generation before a
similar group of nutjobs manages to seize power.
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 23:43:08
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
Jack Hollis wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:31:04 GMT, "bill-o" <assimilate@borg.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 13-Nov-2006, Jack Hollis <xsleeper@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda
>>>> for the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
>>>
>>>
>>> Too bad they didn't have time for the Bill Clinton talk, "Preventing
>>> Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and Hillary's talk, "Futures
>>> Trading: How to Turn $1,000 into $100,000 in one year."
>>
>> Then there's John Kerry's presentation: "How to Soak the Rich through
>> riage!"
>>
>> --
>> bill-o
>
> I'd rather live in a welfare hotel than live with his wife.
She is worth between $1B and $3B. I would live with her. I would also
hide like a dozen Hooters waitresses somewhere else on the estate.
--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson
|
| | | | | |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 13:23:07
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:43:08 -0500, "Head Shot"
<HeadShot@ThePinkMist.com > wrote:
>>
>> I'd rather live in a welfare hotel than live with his wife.
>
>
>
>She is worth between $1B and $3B. I would live with her. I would also
>hide like a dozen Hooters waitresses somewhere else on the estate.
You have to have some self-respect. I don't think I'd ever want to be
known as the guy who ried the widow of the guy with the money.
Politics is full of sleazy people, but Kerry manages to stand out in
that group.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 14 Nov 2006 20:11:03
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
Jack Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:43:08 -0500, "Head Shot"
> <HeadShot@ThePinkMist.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I'd rather live in a welfare hotel than live with his wife.
>>
>>
>>
>> She is worth between $1B and $3B. I would live with her. I would
>> also hide like a dozen Hooters waitresses somewhere else on the
>> estate.
>
> You have to have some self-respect. I don't think I'd ever want to be
> known as the guy who ried the widow of the guy with the money.
> Politics is full of sleazy people, but Kerry manages to stand out in
> that group.
Nobody can say Kerry is useless. He can always serve as a bad example.
--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 15 Nov 2006 13:35:46
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:11:03 -0500, "Head Shot"
<HeadShot@ThePinkMist.com > wrote:
>Jack Hollis wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:43:08 -0500, "Head Shot"
>> <HeadShot@ThePinkMist.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather live in a welfare hotel than live with his wife.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> She is worth between $1B and $3B. I would live with her. I would
>>> also hide like a dozen Hooters waitresses somewhere else on the
>>> estate.
>>
>> You have to have some self-respect. I don't think I'd ever want to be
>> known as the guy who ried the widow of the guy with the money.
>> Politics is full of sleazy people, but Kerry manages to stand out in
>> that group.
>
>
>
>Nobody can say Kerry is useless. He can always serve as a bad example.
The thing that would piss me off more than anything else is that
Kerry's wife continues to use her dead husbands surname. So she's
Teresa Heinz Kerry. I wouldn't mind if my wife wanted to have a
hyphenated name, as long as she used her own maiden name. It's like
she's willing to use his name, but she's not going to give up her real
claim to fame. Personally, I wouldn't put up with it, but I doubt
that Kerry has any choice. He knows which side of the bread his
butter's on.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 22:09:12
From: William A. T. Clark
Subject: Re: DNC 2008 agenda
|
In article <pgbil2t0vjb3hlghv9tnpeghi2jvmnq1up@4ax.com >,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper@aol.com > wrote:
> On 13 Nov 2006 17:47:34 -0800, "zumafan" <mgeorg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hard to believe, but the Dems have already released their agenda for
> >the 2008 agenda. I got my hands on an advance copy:
>
>
> Too bad they didn't have time for the Bill Clinton talk, "Preventing
> Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and Hillary's talk, "Futures
> Trading: How to Turn $1,000 into $100,000 in one year."
How about Foley's talk "Turning over a new page in GOP history", or Bob
Ney's talk "How to profit from GoP fundraising"?
William Clark
|
| |
Date: 13 Nov 2006 18:07:34
From: zumafan
Subject: DNC 2008 agenda
|
WW wrote:
> golf not politics asshole!
Clinton golfs. Sorta.
|
|
