Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

golf-forums.net
Promoting golf discussion.

Main

Date: 11 Jan 2007 11:13:23
From: larryrsf
Subject: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

DEBKAfile: Kurdish sources report five helicopters carried US forces to
pre-dawn raid of Iranian consulate in N. Iraqi town of Irbil

January 11, 2007, 5:21 PM (GMT+02:00)

They were dropped on the roof while armored vehicles encircled the
building. The troops used loudspeakers to call out in Farsi and Arabic
to the consulate staff not to resist "or else they would be
killed." Five Iranian diplomatic staff members were detained and
documents and computers impounded.

Tehran has strongly protested this breach of its sovereign territory
and summoned the Swiss ambassador who represents US interests in Iran
and the Iraqi ambassador to demand the immediate release of the Iranian
diplomats.

Later Thursday, Jan. 11, Tehran reported three large explosions shaking
the southern town of Khorramshahr north of the oil port of Abadan on
the Shatt al-Arb waterway.

DEBKAfile: Khorramshahr, which faces the Iraqi town of Basra, is one of
the key towns from which Iran delivers smuggled fighters, weapons and
explosives to its Shiite supporters in Iraq. Our sources also report
that some hours before President George W. Bush's policy speech, a
series of explosions were heard in Iranian Balochistan. Tehran imposed
a blackout on the incident.

These statements and events tie in closely with the new Iraq strategy
announced by the US president of confronting Iran and Syria for
"allowing networks to use their territory to attack US forces."

Date: 18 Jan 2007 11:31:03
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:
>
> Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
> attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
> would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
> when I tell them my name--

So what's stoppin ya? Besides your own fear, I mean.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 11:29:14
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Head Shot wrote:
>
>
> Hell - my address is commonly available. He could show up at my house.
> I am not so sure the village idiot has money, Greg. I don't even know
> that he ever said he does.

You are the last one that should be jumping into this thread since you
no-showed me and Sparky recently.
So what is your address?

Date: 18 Jan 2007 11:13:27
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2007 10:04:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >> >Lets see. I post about the premise, offer a general idea, and you
> >> >attack me personally. That kind of 'debate' pretty much sums up the
> >> >difference between Conservatives and Liberals. Which ones are
> >> >"Ignorant f...?
> >> >
> >> >Larry
> >
> >> No contest LLLLLLarrrry. You win that title.
> >
> >Ya know Larry.....just for laughs, you should fly over from San Diego
> >to Dallas, then meet the little horn tooter in the parking lot of his
> >country club. See if he has the nerve to say this to your face.
> >
> >Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
> >ass."
> >
> >-Greg
>
> Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
> attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
> would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
> when I tell them my name--

I for one would wet my pants in fear, jump on my golf cart and get the
hell out of there, tail between my legs.
>
> It is just like the ladies with big hair driving a Cao with a dozen
> dents (from prior confrontations). In that car she is ferocious. When
> she starts the engine she gets mad and drives that way, everyone in
> her path is a total A...h.... But get her out of that car and she's
> meek as a kitten.
>
> Larry

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:21:02
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

John B. wrote:
> larry wrote:
>> Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
>> attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
>> would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
>> when I tell them my name--
>
>
> I for one would wet my pants in fear, jump on my golf cart and get the
> hell out of there, tail between my legs.

People with prehensile tails are so cool. Can you autograph my Shallow Hal
DVD?

Date: 18 Jan 2007 11:04:25
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:

> Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
> attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
> would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
> when I tell them my name--

You have the money and the means....so what stops you from fulfilling
this fantasy?

Here's my prediction, Larry. You would have a nice time, particularily
if you attended RSG-Ohio or Cincy, whose hosts have outstanding
integrity. Attendees like Knight are in the minority. Most guys come
to play golf and consequently are not interested in RSG posturing or
cronyism.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:18:32
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Dene wrote:
> larry wrote:
>
>> Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
>> attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
>> would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
>> when I tell them my name--
>
> You have the money and the means....so what stops you from fulfilling
> this fantasy?

Hell - my address is commonly available. He could show up at my house.
I am not so sure the village idiot has money, Greg. I don't even know
that he ever said he does.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:16:33
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 11:04:25 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>larry wrote:
>
>> Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
>> attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
>> would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
>> when I tell them my name--
>
>You have the money and the means....so what stops you from fulfilling
>this fantasy?
>
>Here's my prediction, Larry. You would have a nice time, particularily
>if you attended RSG-Ohio or Cincy, whose hosts have outstanding
>integrity. Attendees like Knight are in the minority. Most guys come
>to play golf and consequently are not interested in RSG posturing or
>cronyism.
>
>-Greg

You really should go to one of the RSG tournaments Llllllarry. They
are fun weekends, with good golf.

Plus, if there are any that plan to enter who the tournament directors
think would be a detriment to the enjoyment of others, they will be
asked not to attend. That's only happened once. Anyone is welcome
until they prove to be such.
--
___,
\o

Date: 22 Jan 2007 10:04:52
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:30:15 -0500, Carbon
> <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:04:17 +0000, Howard Brazee wrote:
> >
> >> The President got rich by knowing the right people, for instance.
> >
> >That is true. Wubya spent much of his adult life abusing alcohol
>
> What a crock! The guy went tee-total quit drinking at age 32--before
> that he only had an occasional beer. Before that he was a jet pilot,
> accumulating 500+ hours in the Air Forces' most difficult fighter jet.
> He got an Harvard MBA, one of the most rigorous academic programs in
> the nation! How on Earth could anyone drink to excess or use Cocaine
> while doing those things? Answer, nobody could.
>
>
> When people use Cocaine and Pot to excess they become unable to
> function academically-- Like Al Gore did when he flunked out of
> Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity school-- and still talks like a
> retard. THAT is what Cocaine and ijuana use does to your brain.
>
>
> Larry

If I had an hour or two to spare, I'd rebut these idiotic arguments.
Suffice it to say that GWB had more than the occasional beer before he
quit drinking. If that's all he was doing, why dod he feel compelled to
quit? I know lots of people who drank and smoked their way through
college and managed to graduate. GWB was busted for DWI, is known to
have used cocaine and went AWOL from the National Guard. He only got
into the NG because his father was a member of Congress.

Al Gore did not flunk out of divinity school or law school. He quit.
Lots of people do that in graduate school.

Date: 22 Jan 2007 10:46:43
From: larry
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 22 Jan 2007 10:04:52 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com > wrote:

>
>larry wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:30:15 -0500, Carbon
>> <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:04:17 +0000, Howard Brazee wrote:
>> >
>> >> The President got rich by knowing the right people, for instance.
>> >
>> >That is true. Wubya spent much of his adult life abusing alcohol
>>
>> What a crock! The guy went tee-total quit drinking at age 32--before
>> that he only had an occasional beer. Before that he was a jet pilot,
>> accumulating 500+ hours in the Air Forces' most difficult fighter jet.
>> He got an Harvard MBA, one of the most rigorous academic programs in
>> the nation! How on Earth could anyone drink to excess or use Cocaine
>> while doing those things? Answer, nobody could.
>>
>>
>> When people use Cocaine and Pot to excess they become unable to
>> function academically-- Like Al Gore did when he flunked out of
>> Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity school-- and still talks like a
>> retard. THAT is what Cocaine and ijuana use does to your brain.
>>
>>
>> Larry
>
>
>If I had an hour or two to spare, I'd rebut these idiotic arguments.
>Suffice it to say that GWB had more than the occasional beer before he
>quit drinking. If that's all he was doing, why dod he feel compelled to
>quit? I know lots of people who drank and smoked their way through
>college and managed to graduate. GWB was busted for DWI, is known to
>have used cocaine and went AWOL from the National Guard. He only got
>into the NG because his father was a member of Congress.
>
>Al Gore did not flunk out of divinity school or law school. He quit.
>Lots of people do that in graduate school.

I love it. Your partisan hatred is so intense you can ignore
verifiable facts-- while believing (and repeating) lies that have
never been verified.--and which were soundly refuted a dozen times.

Bush was investigated in depth before the Texas election to Governor,
for the reelection, for the presidential campaign, and again during
the reelection campaign. Dan Rather had to INVENT dirt against him
because there was none!! The DNC financed a far more rigorous
investigation of GW Bush than anyone has ever had for any security
clearance. Don't you have any shame? Why repeat what any intelligent
person knows is a partisan smear?

The fact that Gore FlUNKED OUT of Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity
schools is an easily verifiable public record. Gore left Harvard
with an undergrad grade transcript so bad that the US Army refused to
grant him a commission as an officer--refusing to recognize him as a
college graduate. Consequently, Gore went to Vietnam as a private
(and photographer to keep him safe).

Bush was an Officer and a pilot.

Larry

Date: 19 Jan 2007 12:18:41
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> >And all that talk about his swanky country club,
> >when the reality is that he's a locker room attendant there.
>
> That's the job that I was fired from.

"BK, I need a shine over here, boy!"

At least you still got your horn to fall back on.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 14:46:28
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1169237921.898697.211600@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Bobby Knight wrote:
>> >And all that talk about his swanky country club,
>> >when the reality is that he's a locker room attendant there.
>>
>> That's the job that I was fired from.
>
>
> "BK, I need a shine over here, boy!"
>
> At least you still got your horn to fall back on.
>
Ouch!

Date: 17 Jan 2007 10:58:16
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

The little Knipper wrote:

> That option is open to you too, and has been since you were first
> outed as a two-faced, skulking, little prick. Let me know when you
> arrive.

First you announced that you've plonked me, then you respond later with
the excuse that it didn't apply with all your computers. Now you claim
that you'd show up if I flew to your city.

More proof that you are a liar, lil' toot.

> >Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
> >ass."
>
> Trust me....you won't choose that option, because you're in the same
> category as LLLLLarrry....a joke. Now who's the canary ass?
>
> bk

My wife has relatives in Texas, who have been urging us to visit. You
best toot your horn in another direction, dwarf.

-Greg

Date: 17 Jan 2007 13:09:01
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 17 Jan 2007 10:58:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>The little Knipper wrote:
>
>> That option is open to you too, and has been since you were first
>> outed as a two-faced, skulking, little prick. Let me know when you
>> arrive.
>
>First you announced that you've plonked me, then you respond later with
>the excuse that it didn't apply with all your computers. Now you claim
>that you'd show up if I flew to your city.
>
>More proof that you are a liar, lil' toot.
>
>> >Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
>> >ass."
>>
>> Trust me....you won't choose that option, because you're in the same
>> category as LLLLLarrry....a joke. Now who's the canary ass?
>>
>> bk
>
>My wife has relatives in Texas, who have been urging us to visit. You
>best toot your horn in another direction, dwarf.
>
>-Greg

That'll never happen because you're a low-life skulker, lying in
wait for those that have embarrassed you in the past, then nibbling at
them like the mouse you are. This is in the direction of the putrid
poster known as dene. Is that clear enough?

I'll be glad to tell you, to your face, what a sniveling little pest
you are. Let me know when you're coming. LOL..as if.
--
___,
\o

Date: 17 Jan 2007 16:46:27
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net > wrote in message
news:phssq2tfgbjedp1jbh16lvk1gbrni3gr9s@4ax.com...
> On 17 Jan 2007 10:58:16 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>The little Knipper wrote:
>>
>>> That option is open to you too, and has been since you were first
>>> outed as a two-faced, skulking, little prick. Let me know when you
>>> arrive.
>>
>>First you announced that you've plonked me, then you respond later with
>>the excuse that it didn't apply with all your computers. Now you claim
>>that you'd show up if I flew to your city.
>>
>>More proof that you are a liar, lil' toot.
>>
>>> >Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
>>> >ass."
>>>
>>> Trust me....you won't choose that option, because you're in the same
>>> category as LLLLLarrry....a joke. Now who's the canary ass?
>>>
>>> bk
>>
>>My wife has relatives in Texas, who have been urging us to visit. You
>>best toot your horn in another direction, dwarf.
>>
>>-Greg
>
>
> That'll never happen because you're a low-life skulker, lying in
> wait for those that have embarrassed you in the past, then nibbling at
> them like the mouse you are. This is in the direction of the putrid
> poster known as dene. Is that clear enough?
>
> I'll be glad to tell you, to your face, what a sniveling little pest
> you are. Let me know when you're coming. LOL..as if.
> --
The 10 foot tall bullet proof Usenet toughguy is so 90's BK. :)

Date: 17 Jan 2007 10:04:33
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> >Lets see. I post about the premise, offer a general idea, and you
> >attack me personally. That kind of 'debate' pretty much sums up the
> >difference between Conservatives and Liberals. Which ones are
> >"Ignorant f...?
> >
> >Larry

> No contest LLLLLLarrrry. You win that title.

Ya know Larry.....just for laughs, you should fly over from San Diego
to Dallas, then meet the little horn tooter in the parking lot of his
country club. See if he has the nerve to say this to your face.

Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
ass."

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 21:03:02
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

John B. wrote:

> >
> > Did manage to have a productive work day. Seven calls returned, 6
> > pieces of mail sent, several more pieces opened and filed, made coffee,
> > lunch for myself and daughter, took my son to Bball practice, and had a
> > bowel movement.
> >
> > Do you require a timeline for these events? ;>
> >
> > -Greg
>
>
> that's a productive work day for you, huh? I could do all that in an
> hour.

I did plenty before my first post. But I'm taking Friday off for an
extended weekend.

Jealous?

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 20:06:35
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Dene wrote:
> annika1980 wrote:
> > Dene wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe he has family or a social life that is important to him year
> > > > round.
> > >
> > > If that were the case, he wouldn't have time for 9100+ usenet posts.
> > >
> > > -Greg
> >
> > Before you continue bashing BK (who is retired and thus has lotsa free
> > time on his hands), maybe I should point out the fact that you have
> > made posts in this thread just today at the following times:
> >
> > 11:46
> > 12:18
> > 12:22
> > 12:33
> > 12:46
> > 12:52
> > 12:54
> > 12:59
> > 1:08
> > 1:14 (That was the one where you wrote, "Enough silliness for today.
> > I've spent too much time playing with you.
> > The real world beckons, namely that I have a pile of work in front of
> > me.")
> >
> > And then you posted again 4 minutes later at 1:18.
> >
> > That explains the pile of work in front of you.
>
> That explains that I realized there was another post that I wanted to
> respond to, after I posted the one at 1:14.
>
> Did manage to have a productive work day. Seven calls returned, 6
> pieces of mail sent, several more pieces opened and filed, made coffee,
> lunch for myself and daughter, took my son to Bball practice, and had a
> bowel movement.
>
> Do you require a timeline for these events? ;>
>
> -Greg

that's a productive work day for you, huh? I could do all that in an
hour.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 16:36:54
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

annika1980 wrote:
> Dene wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe he has family or a social life that is important to him year
> > > round.
> >
> > If that were the case, he wouldn't have time for 9100+ usenet posts.
> >
> > -Greg
>
> Before you continue bashing BK (who is retired and thus has lotsa free
> time on his hands), maybe I should point out the fact that you have
> made posts in this thread just today at the following times:
>
> 11:46
> 12:18
> 12:22
> 12:33
> 12:46
> 12:52
> 12:54
> 12:59
> 1:08
> 1:14 (That was the one where you wrote, "Enough silliness for today.
> I've spent too much time playing with you.
> The real world beckons, namely that I have a pile of work in front of
> me.")
>
> And then you posted again 4 minutes later at 1:18.
>
> That explains the pile of work in front of you.

That explains that I realized there was another post that I wanted to
respond to, after I posted the one at 1:14.

Did manage to have a productive work day. Seven calls returned, 6
pieces of mail sent, several more pieces opened and filed, made coffee,
lunch for myself and daughter, took my son to Bball practice, and had a
bowel movement.

Do you require a timeline for these events? ; >

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:13:02
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Dene wrote:
> >
> > Maybe he has family or a social life that is important to him year
> > round.
>
> If that were the case, he wouldn't have time for 9100+ usenet posts.
>
> -Greg

Before you continue bashing BK (who is retired and thus has lotsa free
time on his hands), maybe I should point out the fact that you have
made posts in this thread just today at the following times:

11:46
12:18
12:22
12:33
12:46
12:52
12:54
12:59
1:08
1:14 (That was the one where you wrote, "Enough silliness for today.
I've spent too much time playing with you.
The real world beckons, namely that I have a pile of work in front of
me.")

And then you posted again 4 minutes later at 1:18.

That explains the pile of work in front of you.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:08:29
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <5hmvq2l0ntapm0iemnamdq1136mdeq3js2@4ax.com>,
> Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>
> > On 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> > >in Dallas year around.
> >
> > Nope...never claimed to be anything but comfortable. I just don't
> > have to work any more.
> >
> > > I can see doing that part of the year but why
> > >would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> > >to.
> >
> > H. Ross Perot, k Cuban, T. Boone Pickens, Michael Dell, Robert
> > Bass....billionaires who live in Texas. If it's good enough for
> > them......
> >
> > > Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
> > >pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
> > >obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
> > >time, in contrast to you.
> > >
> > >Yet you ridicule his intelligence....
> > You don't mind all of the others who call him RSG's villaqe idiot.
> > You're just lurking to snipe.
>
> I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
>
> Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
> fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
> during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....

Sour grapes from another internet coward who is stuck in Canada.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:54:08
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Howard Brazee wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> >in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
> >would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> >to. Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
> >pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
> >obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
> >time, in contrast to you.
>
> Maybe he has family or a social life that is important to him year
> round.

If that were the case, he wouldn't have time for 9100+ usenet posts.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:52:30
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> >in Dallas year around.
>
> Nope...never claimed to be anything but comfortable. I just don't
> have to work any more.

Most seniors don't have to work. The prosperous ones snowbird or
travel extensively. I have 200+ clients who are retired. I see the
contrasts often.

> > I can see doing that part of the year but why
> >would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> >to.
>
> H. Ross Perot, k Cuban, T. Boone Pickens, Michael Dell, Robert
> Bass....billionaires who live in Texas. If it's good enough for
> them......

Yes....but where are the retired ones during your hot, humid summer?

> > Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
> >pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
> >obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
> >time, in contrast to you.
> >
> >Yet you ridicule his intelligence....
> You don't mind all of the others who call him RSG's villaqe idiot.
> You're just lurking to snipe.

The so-called village idiot has a life....you don't. That alone puts
you notches below him.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 09:11:28
From: larry
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 17 Jan 2007 10:04:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> >Lets see. I post about the premise, offer a general idea, and you
>> >attack me personally. That kind of 'debate' pretty much sums up the
>> >difference between Conservatives and Liberals. Which ones are
>> >"Ignorant f...?
>> >
>> >Larry
>
>> No contest LLLLLLarrrry. You win that title.
>
>Ya know Larry.....just for laughs, you should fly over from San Diego
>to Dallas, then meet the little horn tooter in the parking lot of his
>country club. See if he has the nerve to say this to your face.
>
>Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
>ass."
>
>-Greg

Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
when I tell them my name--

It is just like the ladies with big hair driving a Cao with a dozen
dents (from prior confrontations). In that car she is ferocious. When
she starts the engine she gets mad and drives that way, everyone in
her path is a total A...h.... But get her out of that car and she's
meek as a kitten.

Larry

Date: 20 Jan 2007 05:09:35
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <8h13r2126cbjbillgt4tascjn89c35ps4i@4ax.com>,
> Howard Brazee <howard@brazee.net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:09:43 -0500, "Head Shot"
> > <HeadShot@ThePinkMist.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I personally believe that Larry is too stupid to have ever generated an
> > >appreciable amount of his own wealth.
> >
> > There are lots of otherwise stupid people who are good at the skill of
> > getting people to invest. And many st people who are good at this
> > skill. Either case, if one is good enough, one can eventually make
> > money.
> >
> > The President got rich by knowing the right people, for instance.
>
> How many people with real wealth have the same address as their business?

I expect that's true of a lot of people, although certainly not Larry.

>
> How many of the truly successful are listed as the sole contact of their
> business?
>
> <http://deldata.com/contact.htm>
>
> --
> "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
> "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
> the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 17:32:04
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Alan Baker wrote:

> Which is why he's in my killfile...

Big whoop. I'm kf'd by a clown who's known for stalking Larry and
making a big deal about Ken Pitts tossing a club.

What is it with Alan's of RSG?

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:18:18
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
> wrote:
> >I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
> >
> >Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
> >fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
> >during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....
>
> That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
> lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
> to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.
> --

Actually, you're the only one I've chosen to reveal, namely your
alligator mouth. I got to hand it to Alan. He kill-filed me, which is
his right. In contrast to you, who claimed to, but didn't.

Yet I'm the liar......

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:59:03
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> >.
>
> The company was sold. I had the choice of going with the buyer, or
> taking six-month's salary and retiring. The new company wasn't one
> that I chose to work for. And, at 68, it was time to retire. You
> should be so lucky.

I'll be fully retired at 58.

> You don't even know the name of the companies...let alone the deal
> they cut.
>
> Nice try, but you're still a liar.

Nice try, but you're not telling the whole truth.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 15:03:51
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 12:59:03 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> >.
>>
>> The company was sold. I had the choice of going with the buyer, or
>> taking six-month's salary and retiring. The new company wasn't one
>> that I chose to work for. And, at 68, it was time to retire. You
>> should be so lucky.
>
>I'll be fully retired at 58.
>
>> You don't even know the name of the companies...let alone the deal
>> they cut.
>>
>> Nice try, but you're still a liar.
>
>Nice try, but you're not telling the whole truth.
>
>-Greg

Then enlighten everyone with your version.
--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 17:58:40
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:11:28 -0800, larry <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
>attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
>would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
>when I tell them my name--
>
>Larry
You wouldn't dare attend an RSG tournament...at least not to play.
That would forever shut the door on your bragging rights about your
game.

--
___,
\o

Date: 17 Jan 2007 12:32:17
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 17 Jan 2007 10:04:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> >Lets see. I post about the premise, offer a general idea, and you
>> >attack me personally. That kind of 'debate' pretty much sums up the
>> >difference between Conservatives and Liberals. Which ones are
>> >"Ignorant f...?
>> >
>> >Larry
>
>> No contest LLLLLLarrrry. You win that title.
>
>Ya know Larry.....just for laughs, you should fly over from San Diego
>to Dallas, then meet the little horn tooter in the parking lot of his
>country club. See if he has the nerve to say this to your face.
>
That option is open to you too, and has been since you were first
outed as a two-faced, skulking, little prick. Let me know when you
arrive.

>Trust me....he won't. He defines the phrase, "Alligator mouth, canary
>ass."

Trust me....you won't choose that option, because you're in the same
category as LLLLLarrry....a joke. Now who's the canary ass?

bk

Date: 16 Jan 2007 18:55:59
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larryrsf wrote:
> But there is no doubt that ignorant protests, Cindy Sheehan, etc. help
> the enemy. They are reading our newspapers and watching our TV.

I hope they are because it just shows them what makes our country the
best.
We are free to protest the government and even ignorant fucks like you
get a chance to spout your BS on public forums.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:18:26
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 11:10:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> We're both able to enter all of the RSG touraments. Are you?
> >
> >Still haven't got the guts to live up to your word and plonk me, huh?
> >Are you so insecure that you cannot bear the thought of someone talking
> >about you without your knowledge?
> >
> No, I just get a kick out of you.

Kewl!! I enjoy getting under your thin skin, revealing your alligator
mouth and canary ass.

> >To answer your snipey little question, once again, I'm able to attend
> >any RSG tournament that *interests* me. That has always been the case,
> >despite the best efforts of your decreasing pack of cronies.
> >
> Your interest wanes when you're told that it is difficult to pair you
> with others?

We've been through this before but since you're too dimwitted and petty
to comprehend this, I'll try to help you connect the dots. We didn't
attend, by choice, in 2005 though we had the means to do so, for
reasons that I shouldn't have said in RSG. Later in Sept., 2005, my
wife and I played our last tourney together. 18 holes on a flat
course....she was in a cart the whole time...and yet her knee killed
her. Afterwards, she relunctantly started taking Celebrex which tore
up her stomach and almost hospitalized her. Another series of
alternative pain medications began in December and it was ineffective.
Surgery was delayed until the summer, due to workman's comp. hoops.
Playing 36 holes at RSG-NW in 2006 was physically impossible for her.
We wouldn't have attended, no matter what.

If you don't believe this about her knee, then I suggest asking Chris
Stricker (Gordo). A year ago, we played 9 holes with he and his wife.
He can tell you first hand about Theresa's ability to walk from the
cart to the ball. Suffice to say, it was a huge struggle, made
bearable by Vicodin and other pain medications. The next day, she was
practically crippled because of it. It was the last time she played
until surgery a few months later.

> >Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
> >you were fired from your last job.

> Never happened. This is the kind of statement that puts you in the
> forefront of liars. So, either admit that you're lying, or prove
> that charge. You can't.

If so, then how does it feel to be falsely accused?

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:24:39
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 12:18:26 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:

>> Your interest wanes when you're told that it is difficult to pair you
>> with others?
>
>We've been through this before but since you're too dimwitted and petty
>to comprehend this, I'll try to help you connect the dots. We didn't
>attend, by choice, in 2005 though we had the means to do so, for
>reasons that I shouldn't have said in RSG.
<clip sour grapes story >
This had nothing to do with your wife. You were asked not to attend.
Period. Everything else was after that.
>> >Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
>> >you were fired from your last job.
>
>> Never happened. This is the kind of statement that puts you in the
>> forefront of liars. So, either admit that you're lying, or prove
>> that charge. You can't.
>
>If so, then how does it feel to be falsely accused?
>

From someone with lack of credibility, class, and integrity? Expected.
--
___,
\o

Date: 17 Jan 2007 09:21:22
From: larry
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 16 Jan 2007 18:55:59 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com >
wrote:

>
>larryrsf wrote:
>> But there is no doubt that ignorant protests, Cindy Sheehan, etc. help
>> the enemy. They are reading our newspapers and watching our TV.
>
>I hope they are because it just shows them what makes our country the
>best.
>We are free to protest the government and even ignorant fucks like you
>get a chance to spout your BS on public forums.

Lets see. I post about the premise, offer a general idea, and you
attack me personally. That kind of 'debate' pretty much sums up the
difference between Conservatives and Liberals. Which ones are
"Ignorant f...?

Larry

Date: 19 Jan 2007 21:23:31
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

MnMikew wrote:

> >
> > He should check out Green Valley. Close enough to Tucson but far
> > enough away. Even has a Walt.
> > 30 miles from Nogales but everyone speaks English....many with the
> > Minn. dialect. "Yaw...yaw."
> >
> > Question about ice fishing. You guys really set warming fires on the
> > ice?
> >
> Ice fishing has come a long ways. Most "shantys" now are cabins on the ice
> complete with heat, lights, electric, plasma TVs, microwaves, ect. Not to
> mention sonars, underwater cameras, ect.

Wow! That's some serious fishing.

Back to Az. Have you dad-n-law buy a home in Green Valley, then visit
him in the winter, same time I visit my mom. We'll play tons of golf
and chase old ladies.

-Greg

Date: 22 Jan 2007 15:00:10
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1169270611.805401.94860@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>
>> >
>> > He should check out Green Valley. Close enough to Tucson but far
>> > enough away. Even has a Walt.
>> > 30 miles from Nogales but everyone speaks English....many with the
>> > Minn. dialect. "Yaw...yaw."
>> >
>> > Question about ice fishing. You guys really set warming fires on the
>> > ice?
>> >
>> Ice fishing has come a long ways. Most "shantys" now are cabins on the
>> ice
>> complete with heat, lights, electric, plasma TVs, microwaves, ect. Not to
>> mention sonars, underwater cameras, ect.
>
> Wow! That's some serious fishing.
>
> Back to Az. Have you dad-n-law buy a home in Green Valley, then visit
> him in the winter, same time I visit my mom. We'll play tons of golf
> and chase old ladies.
>
> -Greg
>
Sounds good. But I'll leave the old ladies to you. ;-)

Date: 19 Jan 2007 12:24:11
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

MnMikew wrote:
> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your premise
> is idiotic.

There is a good reason that you can't swing a dead cat in Florida
without hitting a transplanted Yankee, yet you probably can't find 5
Floridians living in Minnesota.

Even on this newsgroup we got a Jersey Nurse living in Atlanta, a NYC
Yankee redneck living in NC, and a Canadian living in Mississippi.
Ain't nobody hoppin up and movin to the North unless they have to.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 14:51:29
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1169238251.060012.212370@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your
>> premise
>> is idiotic.
>
> There is a good reason that you can't swing a dead cat in Florida
> without hitting a transplanted Yankee, yet you probably can't find 5
> Floridians living in Minnesota.

I could probably find five. My uncle lives in Fla. He's thinking of moving
back.

> Even on this newsgroup we got a Jersey Nurse living in Atlanta, a NYC
> Yankee redneck living in NC, and a Canadian living in Mississippi.
> Ain't nobody hoppin up and movin to the North unless they have to.
>
That's ok. Keeps the TN hillbillys out.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 10:33:57
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

MnMikew wrote:
> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1169223892.269031.81760@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > MnMikew wrote:
> >> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1169152420.297721.208200@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> >> > in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
> >> > would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> >> > to.
> >>
> >> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your
> >> premise
> >> is idiotic.
> >
> > Summers in Texas are awful. I suspect many seniors head north for the
> > summer.
>
> They can get pretty ugly up here in the summer at times. I cant stand heat,
> will take a cold winter day anytime over 90's.
> >
> > Funny thing about your climate. I have a home in Green Valley,
> > Az.....an adult community south of Tucson. Easily 50% of the residents
> > are from Minn. I suspect that eventually the Minn. winters wear on
> > people and they head south, if they have the means. Same is true for
> > me in Oregon. I use to like winters because I enjoyed snow skiing.
> > These days, I prefer warm weather activities, which has slowly soured
> > me on living here 24/7.
> >
> My Father is looking to become a snowbird soon in AZ soon. I suppose as you
> get older winters lose their novelity. Needless to say I have all of his old
> ice-fishing and snowmobile stuff. :-)

He should check out Green Valley. Close enough to Tucson but far
enough away. Even has a Walt.
30 miles from Nogales but everyone speaks English....many with the
Minn. dialect. "Yaw...yaw."

Question about ice fishing. You guys really set warming fires on the
ice?

-Greg

Date: 19 Jan 2007 13:52:19
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1169231637.320031.182060@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1169223892.269031.81760@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > MnMikew wrote:
>> >> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1169152420.297721.208200@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you
>> >> > live
>> >> > in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but
>> >> > why
>> >> > would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't
>> >> > have
>> >> > to.
>> >>
>> >> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your
>> >> premise
>> >> is idiotic.
>> >
>> > Summers in Texas are awful. I suspect many seniors head north for the
>> > summer.
>>
>> They can get pretty ugly up here in the summer at times. I cant stand
>> heat,
>> will take a cold winter day anytime over 90's.
>> >
>> > Funny thing about your climate. I have a home in Green Valley,
>> > Az.....an adult community south of Tucson. Easily 50% of the residents
>> > are from Minn. I suspect that eventually the Minn. winters wear on
>> > people and they head south, if they have the means. Same is true for
>> > me in Oregon. I use to like winters because I enjoyed snow skiing.
>> > These days, I prefer warm weather activities, which has slowly soured
>> > me on living here 24/7.
>> >
>> My Father is looking to become a snowbird soon in AZ soon. I suppose as
>> you
>> get older winters lose their novelity. Needless to say I have all of his
>> old
>> ice-fishing and snowmobile stuff. :-)
>
> He should check out Green Valley. Close enough to Tucson but far
> enough away. Even has a Walt.
> 30 miles from Nogales but everyone speaks English....many with the
> Minn. dialect. "Yaw...yaw."
>
> Question about ice fishing. You guys really set warming fires on the
> ice?
>
Ice fishing has come a long ways. Most "shantys" now are cabins on the ice
complete with heat, lights, electric, plasma TVs, microwaves, ect. Not to
mention sonars, underwater cameras, ect.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 08:24:52
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

MnMikew wrote:
> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1169152420.297721.208200@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> > in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
> > would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> > to.
>
> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your premise
> is idiotic.

Summers in Texas are awful. I suspect many seniors head north for the
summer.

Funny thing about your climate. I have a home in Green Valley,
Az.....an adult community south of Tucson. Easily 50% of the residents
are from Minn. I suspect that eventually the Minn. winters wear on
people and they head south, if they have the means. Same is true for
me in Oregon. I use to like winters because I enjoyed snow skiing.
These days, I prefer warm weather activities, which has slowly soured
me on living here 24/7.

-Greg

Date: 19 Jan 2007 13:13:09
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Dene wrote:
> MnMikew wrote:
>> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1169152420.297721.208200@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you
>>> live in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year
>>> but why would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he
>>> didn't have to.
>>
>> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your
>> premise is idiotic.
>
> Summers in Texas are awful.

I have a buddy who is worth some pretty insane cash and lives in Texas. I
think it's near Houston. I remember him saying he likes to hunt a lot in
the summer at some place called Mustang Island or Mustang something or
another. Maybe there are nice places in Texas. I can tell you that San
Antonio is not that place (I did basic at Lackland AFB); but who knows
about the rest of Texas (the suburb of Mexico).

Date: 19 Jan 2007 11:32:43
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1169223892.269031.81760@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> MnMikew wrote:
>> "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1169152420.297721.208200@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
>> > in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
>> > would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
>> > to.
>>
>> Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your
>> premise
>> is idiotic.
>
> Summers in Texas are awful. I suspect many seniors head north for the
> summer.

They can get pretty ugly up here in the summer at times. I cant stand heat,
will take a cold winter day anytime over 90's.
>
> Funny thing about your climate. I have a home in Green Valley,
> Az.....an adult community south of Tucson. Easily 50% of the residents
> are from Minn. I suspect that eventually the Minn. winters wear on
> people and they head south, if they have the means. Same is true for
> me in Oregon. I use to like winters because I enjoyed snow skiing.
> These days, I prefer warm weather activities, which has slowly soured
> me on living here 24/7.
>
My Father is looking to become a snowbird soon in AZ soon. I suppose as you
get older winters lose their novelity. Needless to say I have all of his old
ice-fishing and snowmobile stuff. :-)

Date: 19 Jan 2007 08:24:18
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

John B. wrote:
> >
>
> He's got you there, BK. Ironclad evidence of poverty. No one, and I
> mean NO ONE, who is rich lives in Dallas year-round. You are proven
> beyond any doubt to be a fraud and a liar. You should have known better
> than to mess with Dene.

And all that talk about his swanky country club,
when the reality is that he's a locker room attendant there.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 16:26:15
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 19 Jan 2007 08:24:18 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com >
wrote:

>
>John B. wrote:
>> >
>>
>> He's got you there, BK. Ironclad evidence of poverty. No one, and I
>> mean NO ONE, who is rich lives in Dallas year-round. You are proven
>> beyond any doubt to be a fraud and a liar. You should have known better
>> than to mess with Dene.
>
>And all that talk about his swanky country club,
>when the reality is that he's a locker room attendant there.

That's the job that I was fired from.
--
___,
\o

Date: 19 Jan 2007 07:27:37
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Carbon wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, Dene wrote:
>
> > Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> > in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
> > would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> > to. Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
> > pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
> > obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare time,
> > in contrast to you.
>

He's got you there, BK. Ironclad evidence of poverty. No one, and I
mean NO ONE, who is rich lives in Dallas year-round. You are proven
beyond any doubt to be a fraud and a liar. You should have known better
than to mess with Dene.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 13:11:08
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

John B. wrote:
> Carbon wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, Dene wrote:
>>
>>> Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you
>>> live in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year
>>> but why would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he
>>> didn't have to. Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st
>>> enough to pick a pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to
>>> place to and fro. It's obvious he has a rich, full life and posts
>>> in RSG during his spare time, in contrast to you.
>>
>
> He's got you there, BK. Ironclad evidence of poverty. No one, and I
> mean NO ONE, who is rich lives in Dallas year-round. You are proven
> beyond any doubt to be a fraud and a liar. You should have known
> better than to mess with Dene.

Do you know what land must cost on Dallas? I bet a ton of money. How many
ranch owners are worth $20M? I bet slews of them. Is $20M rich? I
contend it is. That should yield you about $3M a year in interest alone.

--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson

Date: 18 Jan 2007 16:40:49
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:

> I've done my part.

I've heard this before. He has a history of claiming to plonk,
presumably un-plonking, attacking, then hiding once again behind a kill
fille. In fact, one of our first furballs occurred when I confronted
him about doing this to Hibbard....... repeatedly.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

The lil Knipper toots:

> Not an option. Libel is a statement that harms one's reputation. No
> way anything that Greg says could harm my reputation. He's a joke.
>
> Now, if I were still in the workforce, looking for a job, and a
> potential employer saw this..

All a potential employer would need to do is look at a cross-section of
your 9100 posts. They reveal your character quite well....and the fact
that you have way too much time on your hands.

Again Lil Toot, why did you lie about plonking me?

Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
to. Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
time, in contrast to you.

Yet you ridicule his intelligence....

-Greg

Date: 22 Jan 2007 14:44:12
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2007 11:47:00 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >larry wrote:
> >> On 22 Jan 2007 10:04:52 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >larry wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:30:15 -0500, Carbon
> >> >> <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:04:17 +0000, Howard Brazee wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The President got rich by knowing the right people, for instance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That is true. Wubya spent much of his adult life abusing alcohol
> >> >>
> >> >> What a crock! The guy went tee-total quit drinking at age 32--before
> >> >> that he only had an occasional beer. Before that he was a jet pilot,
> >> >> accumulating 500+ hours in the Air Forces' most difficult fighter jet.
> >> >> He got an Harvard MBA, one of the most rigorous academic programs in
> >> >> the nation! How on Earth could anyone drink to excess or use Cocaine
> >> >> while doing those things? Answer, nobody could.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> When people use Cocaine and Pot to excess they become unable to
> >> >> function academically-- Like Al Gore did when he flunked out of
> >> >> Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity school-- and still talks like a
> >> >> retard. THAT is what Cocaine and ijuana use does to your brain.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Larry
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >If I had an hour or two to spare, I'd rebut these idiotic arguments.
> >> >Suffice it to say that GWB had more than the occasional beer before he
> >> >quit drinking. If that's all he was doing, why dod he feel compelled to
> >> >quit? I know lots of people who drank and smoked their way through
> >> >college and managed to graduate. GWB was busted for DWI, is known to
> >> >have used cocaine and went AWOL from the National Guard. He only got
> >> >into the NG because his father was a member of Congress.
> >> >
> >> >Al Gore did not flunk out of divinity school or law school. He quit.
> >> >Lots of people do that in graduate school.
> >>
> >> I love it. Your partisan hatred is so intense you can ignore
> >> verifiable facts-- while believing (and repeating) lies that have
> >> never been verified.--and which were soundly refuted a dozen times.
> >>
> >> Bush was investigated in depth before the Texas election to Governor,
> >> for the reelection, for the presidential campaign, and again during
> >> the reelection campaign. Dan Rather had to INVENT dirt against him
> >> because there was none!! The DNC financed a far more rigorous
> >> investigation of GW Bush than anyone has ever had for any security
> >> clearance. Don't you have any shame? Why repeat what any intelligent
> >> person knows is a partisan smear?
> >>
> >> The fact that Gore FlUNKED OUT of Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity
> >> schools is an easily verifiable public record. Gore left Harvard
> >> with an undergrad grade transcript so bad that the US Army refused to
> >> grant him a commission as an officer--refusing to recognize him as a
> >> college graduate. Consequently, Gore went to Vietnam as a private
> >> (and photographer to keep him safe).
> >>
> >> Bush was an Officer and a pilot.
> >>
> >> Larry
> >
> >
> >Larry, if you had ever once provided even a shred of evidence for any
> >of your countless preposterous claims, I would take the time to show
> >you how wrong you are. But why should I do that for you, when you've
> >never done it for anyone else? You are an intellectual coward - you
> >spew a lot of bile, then run away like a scared little boy when someone
> >asks you to back it up with facts. Why? Because you can't.
>
> Whew! Do your homework, then post. It is tiresome to be attacked
> for simply stating well-known facts.
>
>
> Larry

That's exactly the sort of lame-ass response I expected from you.
You've confirmed everything I said.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 09:55:30
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote in message
news:1169152420.297721.208200@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
> would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> to.

Some would claim the climate in Minnesota is awful. I disagree. Your premise
is idiotic.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 10:13:15
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, Dene wrote:

> Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
> would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> to. Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
> pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
> obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare time,
> in contrast to you.

I knew a cab driver once. He said he only worried about getting stiffed
when people got in his cab and said, "don't worry, I got lotsa money." His
response was invariably, "ok, let's see it."

Unlike Bobby, Larry yaps incessantly about how much money he says he has.
What he means is, he really wants you to believe he's rich. Does he own a
large ISP and a private plane and all the rest of it? I sincerely doubt
it.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:45:25
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
>in Dallas year around. I can see doing that part of the year but why
>would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
>to. Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
>pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
>obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
>time, in contrast to you.

Maybe he has family or a social life that is important to him year
round.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:45:23
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
>in Dallas year around.

Nope...never claimed to be anything but comfortable. I just don't
have to work any more.

> I can see doing that part of the year but why
>would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
>to.

H. Ross Perot, k Cuban, T. Boone Pickens, Michael Dell, Robert
Bass....billionaires who live in Texas. If it's good enough for
them......

> Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
>pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
>obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
>time, in contrast to you.
>
>Yet you ridicule his intelligence....
You don't mind all of the others who call him RSG's villaqe idiot.
You're just lurking to snipe.
--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

In article <5hmvq2l0ntapm0iemnamdq1136mdeq3js2@4ax.com >,
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:

> On 18 Jan 2007 12:33:40 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Here's another contradiction. You claim to be loaded and yet you live
> >in Dallas year around.
>
> Nope...never claimed to be anything but comfortable. I just don't
> have to work any more.
>
> > I can see doing that part of the year but why
> >would any "rich" guy endure this awful summer climate if he didn't have
> >to.
>
> H. Ross Perot, k Cuban, T. Boone Pickens, Michael Dell, Robert
> Bass....billionaires who live in Texas. If it's good enough for
> them......
>
> > Larry lives in San Diego. Obviously he's st enough to pick a
> >pleasant climate 24/7. He talks of travel to place to and fro. It's
> >obvious he has a rich, full life and posts in RSG during his spare
> >time, in contrast to you.
> >
> >Yet you ridicule his intelligence....
> You don't mind all of the others who call him RSG's villaqe idiot.
> You're just lurking to snipe.

I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.

Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 15:12:14
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net >
wrote:
>I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
>
>Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
>fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
>during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....

That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.
--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 21:20:43
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

In article <edovq29qeo1go8f7tsu3dufbhmcf8c9r8u@4ax.com >,
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
> wrote:
> >I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
> >
> >Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
> >fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
> >during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....
>
> That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
> lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
> to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.

Agreed.

Which is why he's in my killfile...

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 15:27:26
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:20:43 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net >
wrote:

>In article <edovq29qeo1go8f7tsu3dufbhmcf8c9r8u@4ax.com>,
> Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
>> wrote:
>> >I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
>> >
>> >Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
>> >fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
>> >during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....
>>
>> That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
>> lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
>> to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.
>
>Agreed.
>
>Which is why he's in my killfile...

He's going back in mine. I just was told about the lies that he was
telling about my work, and that pissed me off. He's a low-life.

Remember when he said that he was leaving RSG forever? That was soon
after he was outed at RSG-NW and threatened to sue over being named
turd in the punchbowl.

I can't understand how he can call you an "internet (sic) coward"
when you use your real name and he doesn't.
--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 21:37:25
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

In article <uapvq2dhp9mum85nr3nar8ni8jsn2d8onf@4ax.com >,
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:20:43 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <edovq29qeo1go8f7tsu3dufbhmcf8c9r8u@4ax.com>,
> > Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
> >> >
> >> >Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where -- golf
> >> >fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play much
> >> >during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....
> >>
> >> That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
> >> lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
> >> to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.
> >
> >Agreed.
> >
> >Which is why he's in my killfile...
>
> He's going back in mine. I just was told about the lies that he was
> telling about my work, and that pissed me off. He's a low-life.
>
> Remember when he said that he was leaving RSG forever? That was soon
> after he was outed at RSG-NW and threatened to sue over being named
> turd in the punchbowl.
>
> I can't understand how he can call you an "internet (sic) coward"
> when you use your real name and he doesn't.

Did he call me that?

Ah, well. It's like the buzzing of gnats...

...actually, it's not even that. Gnats would be a minor annoyance.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 09:58:52
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-DCB9E9.13372518012007@news.telus.net...
> In article <uapvq2dhp9mum85nr3nar8ni8jsn2d8onf@4ax.com>,
> Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:20:43 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <edovq29qeo1go8f7tsu3dufbhmcf8c9r8u@4ax.com>,
>> > Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
>> >> >
>> >> >Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where --
>> >> >golf
>> >> >fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play
>> >> >much
>> >> >during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....
>> >>
>> >> That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
>> >> lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
>> >> to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.
>> >
>> >Agreed.
>> >
>> >Which is why he's in my killfile...
>>
>> He's going back in mine. I just was told about the lies that he was
>> telling about my work, and that pissed me off. He's a low-life.
>>
>> Remember when he said that he was leaving RSG forever? That was soon
>> after he was outed at RSG-NW and threatened to sue over being named
>> turd in the punchbowl.
>>
>> I can't understand how he can call you an "internet (sic) coward"
>> when you use your real name and he doesn't.
>
> Did he call me that?
>
> Ah, well. It's like the buzzing of gnats...
>
>
> ...actually, it's not even that. Gnats would be a minor annoyance.
>
> --
> "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
> "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone.

So alan, just what is this fetish you have about Apple? :-)

Date: 19 Jan 2007 18:46:01
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

In article <51c85tF1k2s3qU1@mid.individual.net >,
"MnMikew" <mnmiikkew@aol.com > wrote:

> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-DCB9E9.13372518012007@news.telus.net...
> > In article <uapvq2dhp9mum85nr3nar8ni8jsn2d8onf@4ax.com>,
> > Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:20:43 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <edovq29qeo1go8f7tsu3dufbhmcf8c9r8u@4ax.com>,
> >> > Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:02:03 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >I've got "Dene" killfiled, but I can't let this pass.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Larry's so-called "intelligence" has him living in a place where --
> >> >> >golf
> >> >> >fanatic that he occasionally claims to be -- he says he can't play
> >> >> >much
> >> >> >during the summer because it's "too hot and humid"....
> >> >>
> >> >> That doesn't matter to "dene". His major purpose on RSG has been to
> >> >> lie in wait for a few posters, or someone that mentions those posters,
> >> >> to snipe at them. He'll make up any reason, or lie, to do so.
> >> >
> >> >Agreed.
> >> >
> >> >Which is why he's in my killfile...
> >>
> >> He's going back in mine. I just was told about the lies that he was
> >> telling about my work, and that pissed me off. He's a low-life.
> >>
> >> Remember when he said that he was leaving RSG forever? That was soon
> >> after he was outed at RSG-NW and threatened to sue over being named
> >> turd in the punchbowl.
> >>
> >> I can't understand how he can call you an "internet (sic) coward"
> >> when you use your real name and he doesn't.
> >
> > Did he call me that?
> >
> > Ah, well. It's like the buzzing of gnats...
> >
> >
> > ...actually, it's not even that. Gnats would be a minor annoyance.
> >
> > --
> > "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
> > "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone.
>
> So alan, just what is this fetish you have about Apple? :-)

It's just a little fun I'm having with a poster in another group...

<g >

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone.

Date: 19 Jan 2007 13:14:54
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

MnMikew wrote:
> So alan, just what is this fetish you have about Apple? :-)

Apple. The other white meat.

Date: 17 Jan 2007 13:27:45
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2007 12:46:52 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >You presumeably play once a week. You presumeably watch the stock
> >ket. You definitely sit on your canary ass and profusely post on
> >the internet, when you could be doing what most prosperous seniors
> >do.....travel, volunteer, play with the grandkids, start a business,
> >read, etc.
> >
> Learn to spell. Presumably.

Thank you.

> I play an average of three times weekly. My wife and I travel, are
> involved in six charitable groups...one of which we began...saw my
> grandkids last month, and don't need to start a business.

Uh huh. Bingo hall down the street isn't traveling. Sure...you
presumably went to Vegas, then posted from there. I've been there
twice in the last three years. Last thing on my mind was RSG.

As for your wife's charities, it's likely she has a full life and
doesn't share your internet addiction. You should follow her example.

> >I'm not the first to draw attn. to your bitterness. As for your
> >stature, I've seen pictures of you, squirt.
> >
> I guess 6 foot, 190 is a squirt to some...but not you.

I'm taller and larger, younger and stronger, if indeed you are telling
the truth about your stature, which I doubt.
Once a liar, always a liar.

> >> Dalecki, and the others on the C-list who dumped your ass, then
> >> making personal attacks when none of them are even mentioning you.
> >> Little is jumping in on other's posts just to vent your spleen for
> >> something that embarassed you years ago. That'd be dene.
> >
> >This has been covered before. The fact that you keep rehashing it
> >demonstrates your lack of purpose, imagination, and intelligence.
> >
> No...you rehash it by lurking in wait. You still snipe, as Bellomy
> brought out today.

Obvious diversion. I noticed your alligator mouth was in high gear
gain, this time with Larry. I addressed the post to him. That's
hardly lurking in wait. The fact that you falsely plonked me
demonstrates you're keenly interested in what I post....not vice-versa.

> >> So, I take this to mean that your threat is empty? You aren't coming
> >> to Dallas to do me bodily harm when I tell you what a sniveling ass
> >> you are? Again...LMAO.

There will be a time when I do Dallas. Whether I will have time or
interest to visit you in the nursing home remains to be seen.

> >Who said anything about bodily harm. Watching you piddle down your leg
> >is sufficient
>
> Do you really think that you're scary? C'mon down. You've boasted,
> and said that I should be careful about what I say about you...well,
> that didn't work. So, c'mon down. You can see what it feels like
> for someone to tell you to your face what a schmuck your are, and not
> be able to do anything about it.

I'm not scary. It's you who's the keyboard coward. You accuse, then
run from a 5k bet. You claim to plonk, then respond. Long list of
this nonsense.

> Ross is right. Anything else to say to you should be to your face.
> You're worthless.

Who is Ross?

And for the record, you are not worthless. I don't hate you. I pity
you. That's the truth.

-Greg

-Greg

Date: 17 Jan 2007 12:54:54
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:05:46 -0600, frankross <fross@net.net> wrote:
>
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
>
> >> Empty Dene as usual.
> >
> >Why even reply BK? He's full of it and most here know it.
> >Frank
>
> You're right. He's just so meddlesome.
> --

Plonk me. Actually do it this time. Just take a few deep breaths and
hit the keys. Your canary ass will thank you for it.

-Greg

Date: 17 Jan 2007 17:30:08
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:21:22 -0800, larry <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>On 16 Jan 2007 18:55:59 -0800, "annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>larryrsf wrote:
>>> But there is no doubt that ignorant protests, Cindy Sheehan, etc. help
>>> the enemy. They are reading our newspapers and watching our TV.
>>
>>I hope they are because it just shows them what makes our country the
>>best.
>>We are free to protest the government and even ignorant fucks like you
>>get a chance to spout your BS on public forums.
>
>Lets see. I post about the premise, offer a general idea, and you
>attack me personally. That kind of 'debate' pretty much sums up the
>difference between Conservatives and Liberals. Which ones are
>"Ignorant f...?
>
>Larry
No contest LLLLLLarrrry. You win that title.
--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:46:44
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 12:18:26 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
>
> >> Your interest wanes when you're told that it is difficult to pair you
> >> with others?
> >
> >We've been through this before but since you're too dimwitted and petty
> >to comprehend this, I'll try to help you connect the dots. We didn't
> >attend, by choice, in 2005 though we had the means to do so, for
> >reasons that I shouldn't have said in RSG.
> <clip sour grapes story>
> This had nothing to do with your wife. You were asked not to attend.
> Period. Everything else was after that.

I didn't think you would or could connect the dots.

> >> >Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
> >> >you were fired from your last job.
> >
> >> Never happened. This is the kind of statement that puts you in the
> >> forefront of liars. So, either admit that you're lying, or prove
> >> that charge. You can't.
> >
> >If so, then how does it feel to be falsely accused?
> >
>
> From someone with lack of credibility, class, and integrity? Expected.

Hmmm....been in business since 1988 in a tough, competitive field that
requires credibility and integrity, otherwise one quickly loses his
license, reputation, and book of business.

Regardless of your semantical denials, I know more about your last
employment that you think I do. You were forced out. You can argue
semantics about "canned" if you want. I don't care. I understand if
this reality is difficult for you to face. The real world out there is
a tough place, not condusive for bitter old has-beens. It's much
safer for you to socialize and express your frustration on the
internet, isn't it?

Which is precisely why I pity you.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:54:56
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 12:46:44 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On 18 Jan 2007 12:18:26 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:

>Regardless of your semantical denials, I know more about your last
>employment that you think I do. You were forced out. You can argue
>semantics about "canned" if you want. I don't care. I understand if
>this reality is difficult for you to face. The real world out there is
>a tough place, not condusive for bitter old has-beens. It's much
>safer for you to socialize and express your frustration on the
>internet, isn't it?
>.

The company was sold. I had the choice of going with the buyer, or
taking six-month's salary and retiring. The new company wasn't one
that I chose to work for. And, at 68, it was time to retire. You
should be so lucky.

You don't even know the name of the companies...let alone the deal
they cut.

Nice try, but you're still a liar.
--
___,
\o

Date: 16 Jan 2007 09:24:08
From: larryrsf
Subject: Re: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

On Jan 16, 7:22 am, Bear <bearlys...@XShawX.ca > wrote:

> >Maybe post about golf? That would be a novel idea. I am convinced that half the arguing OT idiots don't actually play the
> game anymore.-

The real golfers left RSG months or years ago. Now this forum is 90%
sad cases who spend their ENTIRE DAY posting on the Usenet. This is
their life-- they relish arguing and making vicious personal attacks
over nearly anything, no matter how trivial. They need entertainment.
Notice that it is the same old names in EVERY thread, posting and
postiing and posting. Thousands of posts every week in dozens of
threads on every subject.

Larry

Date:
From:
Subject:

Date: 16 Jan 2007 06:36:34
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

John van der Pflum wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:51:12 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
> >>>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
> >>>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
> >>>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
> >>>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
> >>>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
> >>>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
> >>>
> >>That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
> >>this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
> >>should do...support the CIC no matter what.
> >>
> >> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
> >>answer shows you as a hypocrite.
> >
> >Have you figured out how to answer this yet?
>
> Please don't change the title the off-topic threads (especially the
> political ones) because then they get through my extensive kill
> filter.
>
> Thanks.
> --
>
Gosh, we're sorry, John. Is there anything else we can do for you?

Date: 16 Jan 2007 10:00:00
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

On 16 Jan 2007 06:36:34 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com > wrote:

>
>John van der Pflum wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:51:12 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>> >>>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>> >>>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>> >>>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>> >>>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>> >>>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>> >>>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>> >>>
>> >>That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
>> >>this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
>> >>should do...support the CIC no matter what.
>> >>
>> >> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
>> >>answer shows you as a hypocrite.
>> >
>> >Have you figured out how to answer this yet?
>>
>> Please don't change the title the off-topic threads (especially the
>> political ones) because then they get through my extensive kill
>> filter.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>>
>Gosh, we're sorry, John. Is there anything else we can do for you?

Maybe post about golf? That would be a novel idea.
--

jvdp
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com

Date: 16 Jan 2007 09:36:48
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

"John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote in message
news:v2qpq2lsemlccb1dgiakvn2jup3hdgd95g@4ax.com...
> On 16 Jan 2007 06:36:34 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>John van der Pflum wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:51:12 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
>>> >>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>>> >>>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>>> >>>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>>> >>>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>>> >>>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>>> >>>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>>> >>>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>>> >>>
>>> >>That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
>>> >>this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
>>> >>should do...support the CIC no matter what.
>>> >>
>>> >> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
>>> >>answer shows you as a hypocrite.
>>> >
>>> >Have you figured out how to answer this yet?
>>>
>>> Please don't change the title the off-topic threads (especially the
>>> political ones) because then they get through my extensive kill
>>> filter.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> --
>>>
>>Gosh, we're sorry, John. Is there anything else we can do for you?
>
> Maybe post about golf? That would be a novel idea.
> --
Golf is dead in Minnesota, so there. -11 today, balmy. The closest I get to
golf now is Ebay.

Date: 16 Jan 2007 15:22:43
From: Bear
Subject: Re: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:00:00 -0500, John van der Pflum
<nowhammymyspammy@bite.org > wrote:

>On 16 Jan 2007 06:36:34 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>John van der Pflum wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:51:12 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
>>> >>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>>> >>>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>>> >>>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>>> >>>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>>> >>>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>>> >>>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>>> >>>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>>> >>>
>>> >>That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
>>> >>this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
>>> >>should do...support the CIC no matter what.
>>> >>
>>> >> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
>>> >>answer shows you as a hypocrite.
>>> >
>>> >Have you figured out how to answer this yet?
>>>
>>> Please don't change the title the off-topic threads (especially the
>>> political ones) because then they get through my extensive kill
>>> filter.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> --
>>>
>>Gosh, we're sorry, John. Is there anything else we can do for you?
>
>Maybe post about golf? That would be a novel idea.

I am convinced that half the arguing OT idiots don't actually play the
game anymore.

Date: 15 Jan 2007 15:08:49
From: larryrsf
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Jan 15, 9:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net > wrote:>
> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
> answer shows you as a hypocrite.

It is the duty of every citizen in a democracy to support his country
when it is at war. I was riding a nuclear sub just off the coast of
Russia during much of Vietnam-- and we were all fully supportive of our
Commander-in-Chief.

In every American war so far-- the radical left has been wildly wrong!
Their track record is perfect. Those with the responsibility (and like
now with the real facts) must simply listen politely and then ignore
them (you). Lindbergh was wildly wrong before WWII-- a pacifist who
protested our involvement against Hitler-- And on and on.

You simply don't know the facts and neither do I. Those who know the
reality of our present threat from world Al Queda cannot tell you
--without simultaneously telling the enemy. We simply have no choice
but to trust our leaders.

But there is no doubt that ignorant protests, Cindy Sheehan, etc. help
the enemy. They are reading our newspapers and watching our TV.

Larry

Date: 18 Jan 2007 12:22:11
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

frankross wrote:

> Sue the bastard for Libel.
> Frank

Ooooooh.....such brave words from the brave anonymous Frank Ross.

-Greg

Date: 17 Jan 2007 12:46:52
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

The lil Knipper pecks....

> <clip standard fare from a loser>

This loser has a rich and full life. The kind of life you've never
experienced. If I'm a loser, what does that make you?

> Lot's of empty rhetoric from a skulker. The 85 news groups? If you
> had a brain and could read, you'd see that all but a couple are
> crossposts. If you had a brain.... LMAO.

Once again, you sidestep your lies about plonking me. Now you're
sidestepping the fact that you have a "legacy" of 9500 posts. You're
not too bright, are you?

> As far as my life goes, you'll be lucky if you have anything that
> compares to it when you retire. Playing golf, and the ket ain't
> all bad.

You presumeably play once a week. You presumeably watch the stock
ket. You definitely sit on your canary ass and profusely post on
the internet, when you could be doing what most prosperous seniors
do.....travel, volunteer, play with the grandkids, start a business,
read, etc.

> I'm neither bitter or little. Bitter is lying in wait for me,

I'm not the first to draw attn. to your bitterness. As for your
stature, I've seen pictures of you, squirt.

> Dalecki, and the others on the C-list who dumped your ass, then
> making personal attacks when none of them are even mentioning you.
> Little is jumping in on other's posts just to vent your spleen for
> something that embarassed you years ago. That'd be dene.

This has been covered before. The fact that you keep rehashing it
demonstrates your lack of purpose, imagination, and intelligence.

> So, I take this to mean that your threat is empty? You aren't coming
> to Dallas to do me bodily harm when I tell you what a sniveling ass
> you are? Again...LMAO.

Who said anything about bodily harm. Watching you piddle down your leg
is sufficient.

> Empty Dene as usual.

"Empty" is an accurate descriptor of when it was time for you to put up
5k to see Eric's degrees, canary ass.

-Greg

Date: 17 Jan 2007 15:02:43
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 17 Jan 2007 12:46:52 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>You presumeably play once a week. You presumeably watch the stock
>ket. You definitely sit on your canary ass and profusely post on
>the internet, when you could be doing what most prosperous seniors
>do.....travel, volunteer, play with the grandkids, start a business,
>read, etc.
>
Learn to spell. Presumably.

I play an average of three times weekly. My wife and I travel, are
involved in six charitable groups...one of which we began...saw my
grandkids last month, and don't need to start a business.

>I'm not the first to draw attn. to your bitterness. As for your
>stature, I've seen pictures of you, squirt.
>
I guess 6 foot, 190 is a squirt to some...but not you.

>> Dalecki, and the others on the C-list who dumped your ass, then
>> making personal attacks when none of them are even mentioning you.
>> Little is jumping in on other's posts just to vent your spleen for
>> something that embarassed you years ago. That'd be dene.
>
>This has been covered before. The fact that you keep rehashing it
>demonstrates your lack of purpose, imagination, and intelligence.
>
No...you rehash it by lurking in wait. You still snipe, as Bellomy
brought out today.

>> So, I take this to mean that your threat is empty? You aren't coming
>> to Dallas to do me bodily harm when I tell you what a sniveling ass
>> you are? Again...LMAO.
>
>Who said anything about bodily harm. Watching you piddle down your leg
>is sufficient

Do you really think that you're scary? C'mon down. You've boasted,
and said that I should be careful about what I say about you...well,
that didn't work. So, c'mon down. You can see what it feels like
for someone to tell you to your face what a schmuck your are, and not
be able to do anything about it.

Ross is right. Anything else to say to you should be to your face.
You're worthless.
--
___,
\o

Date: 17 Jan 2007 12:30:39
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

frankross wrote:

> Why even reply BK? He's full of it and most here know it.
> Frank

Brave words from a guy who claims to have a history here and yet
refuses to reveal his original name.

What ya hiding, Frankie?

-Greg

Date: 15 Jan 2007 19:10:31
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 15 Jan 2007 15:08:49 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 15, 9:45 am, Bobby Knight <bkni...@conramp.net> wrote:>
>> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
>> answer shows you as a hypocrite.
>
>It is the duty of every citizen in a democracy to support his country
>when it is at war. I was riding a nuclear sub just off the coast of
>Russia during much of Vietnam-- and we were all fully supportive of our
>Commander-in-Chief.
>
>In every American war so far-- the radical left has been wildly wrong!
>Their track record is perfect. Those with the responsibility (and like
>now with the real facts) must simply listen politely and then ignore
>them (you). Lindbergh was wildly wrong before WWII-- a pacifist who
>protested our involvement against Hitler-- And on and on.
>
>You simply don't know the facts and neither do I. Those who know the
>reality of our present threat from world Al Queda cannot tell you
>--without simultaneously telling the enemy. We simply have no choice
>but to trust our leaders.
>
That reminds me of the statement at Nueremberg; "I was only following
orders". Blind obedience is repugnant to me.

Bush was, and is, wrong in this stupid "war".
bk

Date: 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51
From: larryrsf
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Jan 15, 7:00 am, "boo-radley" <mpmul...@gmail.com > wrote:
> And doubles down the number poor will be dead kids who are fighting
> instead of him, for all that is left of his image.
> Put a cork in it, lickspittle.

Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.

Today VOLUNTEERS making more than they could make as civilians are
going to Iraq and Afghanistan repeatedly because they are professional
soldiers. They WANT to go because that is their employment. Their
families are enjoying middle class income--- they drive nice cars and
live in nice homes. They would be unemployed if the US were not
embroiled in wars.

Larry

Date: 18 Jan 2007 11:46:49
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:

> You really should go to one of the RSG tournaments Llllllarry. They
> are fun weekends, with good golf.

Notice he makes fun of your name while extending the invitation. Drips
with sincerity.

> Plus, if there are any that plan to enter who the tournament directors
> think would be a detriment to the enjoyment of others, they will be
> asked not to attend. That's only happened once. Anyone is welcome
> until they prove to be such.

Manipulating behind the scenes with your cronies, loving every second
of it, now trying to rehash it with this trolling bait. This reveals
more about your character than it does mine.

Speaking of character....you have yet to address why you lied about
plonking me. Don't bother...the answer is obvious. Lying is 2nd
nature to you......obviously a factor with your multiple divorces.

Were you caught lying when you got canned or was that a result of your
"pleasant" personality?

-Greg

Date: 22 Jan 2007 16:15:16
From: annika1980
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Carbon wrote:
>
> What boards are you on, Larry? Exxon? IBM?

Checkers.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:54:15
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 11:46:49 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:

>Were you caught lying when you got canned or was that a result of your
>"pleasant" personality?
>
>-Greg

Since I have never been "canned" that's an empty question. Cite any
source that supports this contention. You can't.
--
___,
\o

Date: 22 Jan 2007 11:47:00
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2007 10:04:52 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >larry wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:30:15 -0500, Carbon
> >> <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:04:17 +0000, Howard Brazee wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The President got rich by knowing the right people, for instance.
> >> >
> >> >That is true. Wubya spent much of his adult life abusing alcohol
> >>
> >> What a crock! The guy went tee-total quit drinking at age 32--before
> >> that he only had an occasional beer. Before that he was a jet pilot,
> >> accumulating 500+ hours in the Air Forces' most difficult fighter jet.
> >> He got an Harvard MBA, one of the most rigorous academic programs in
> >> the nation! How on Earth could anyone drink to excess or use Cocaine
> >> while doing those things? Answer, nobody could.
> >>
> >>
> >> When people use Cocaine and Pot to excess they become unable to
> >> function academically-- Like Al Gore did when he flunked out of
> >> Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity school-- and still talks like a
> >> retard. THAT is what Cocaine and ijuana use does to your brain.
> >>
> >>
> >> Larry
> >
> >
> >If I had an hour or two to spare, I'd rebut these idiotic arguments.
> >Suffice it to say that GWB had more than the occasional beer before he
> >quit drinking. If that's all he was doing, why dod he feel compelled to
> >quit? I know lots of people who drank and smoked their way through
> >college and managed to graduate. GWB was busted for DWI, is known to
> >have used cocaine and went AWOL from the National Guard. He only got
> >into the NG because his father was a member of Congress.
> >
> >Al Gore did not flunk out of divinity school or law school. He quit.
> >Lots of people do that in graduate school.
>
> I love it. Your partisan hatred is so intense you can ignore
> verifiable facts-- while believing (and repeating) lies that have
> never been verified.--and which were soundly refuted a dozen times.
>
> Bush was investigated in depth before the Texas election to Governor,
> for the reelection, for the presidential campaign, and again during
> the reelection campaign. Dan Rather had to INVENT dirt against him
> because there was none!! The DNC financed a far more rigorous
> investigation of GW Bush than anyone has ever had for any security
> clearance. Don't you have any shame? Why repeat what any intelligent
> person knows is a partisan smear?
>
> The fact that Gore FlUNKED OUT of Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity
> schools is an easily verifiable public record. Gore left Harvard
> with an undergrad grade transcript so bad that the US Army refused to
> grant him a commission as an officer--refusing to recognize him as a
> college graduate. Consequently, Gore went to Vietnam as a private
> (and photographer to keep him safe).
>
> Bush was an Officer and a pilot.
>
> Larry

Larry, if you had ever once provided even a shred of evidence for any
of your countless preposterous claims, I would take the time to show
you how wrong you are. But why should I do that for you, when you've
never done it for anyone else? You are an intellectual coward - you
spew a lot of bile, then run away like a scared little boy when someone
asks you to back it up with facts. Why? Because you can't.

Date: 22 Jan 2007 14:32:41
From: larry
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 22 Jan 2007 11:47:00 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com > wrote:

>
>larry wrote:
>> On 22 Jan 2007 10:04:52 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >larry wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:30:15 -0500, Carbon
>> >> <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:04:17 +0000, Howard Brazee wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The President got rich by knowing the right people, for instance.
>> >> >
>> >> >That is true. Wubya spent much of his adult life abusing alcohol
>> >>
>> >> What a crock! The guy went tee-total quit drinking at age 32--before
>> >> that he only had an occasional beer. Before that he was a jet pilot,
>> >> accumulating 500+ hours in the Air Forces' most difficult fighter jet.
>> >> He got an Harvard MBA, one of the most rigorous academic programs in
>> >> the nation! How on Earth could anyone drink to excess or use Cocaine
>> >> while doing those things? Answer, nobody could.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> When people use Cocaine and Pot to excess they become unable to
>> >> function academically-- Like Al Gore did when he flunked out of
>> >> Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity school-- and still talks like a
>> >> retard. THAT is what Cocaine and ijuana use does to your brain.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Larry
>> >
>> >
>> >If I had an hour or two to spare, I'd rebut these idiotic arguments.
>> >Suffice it to say that GWB had more than the occasional beer before he
>> >quit drinking. If that's all he was doing, why dod he feel compelled to
>> >quit? I know lots of people who drank and smoked their way through
>> >college and managed to graduate. GWB was busted for DWI, is known to
>> >have used cocaine and went AWOL from the National Guard. He only got
>> >into the NG because his father was a member of Congress.
>> >
>> >Al Gore did not flunk out of divinity school or law school. He quit.
>> >Lots of people do that in graduate school.
>>
>> I love it. Your partisan hatred is so intense you can ignore
>> verifiable facts-- while believing (and repeating) lies that have
>> never been verified.--and which were soundly refuted a dozen times.
>>
>> Bush was investigated in depth before the Texas election to Governor,
>> for the reelection, for the presidential campaign, and again during
>> the reelection campaign. Dan Rather had to INVENT dirt against him
>> because there was none!! The DNC financed a far more rigorous
>> investigation of GW Bush than anyone has ever had for any security
>> clearance. Don't you have any shame? Why repeat what any intelligent
>> person knows is a partisan smear?
>>
>> The fact that Gore FlUNKED OUT of Vanderbilt Law and then Divinity
>> schools is an easily verifiable public record. Gore left Harvard
>> with an undergrad grade transcript so bad that the US Army refused to
>> grant him a commission as an officer--refusing to recognize him as a
>> college graduate. Consequently, Gore went to Vietnam as a private
>> (and photographer to keep him safe).
>>
>> Bush was an Officer and a pilot.
>>
>> Larry
>
>
>Larry, if you had ever once provided even a shred of evidence for any
>of your countless preposterous claims, I would take the time to show
>you how wrong you are. But why should I do that for you, when you've
>never done it for anyone else? You are an intellectual coward - you
>spew a lot of bile, then run away like a scared little boy when someone
>asks you to back it up with facts. Why? Because you can't.

Whew! Do your homework, then post. It is tiresome to be attacked
for simply stating well-known facts.

Larry

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:08:02
From: frankross
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 11:46:49 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Bobby Knight wrote:
>
>> Were you caught lying when you got canned or was that a result of your
>> "pleasant" personality?
>>
>> -Greg
>
> Since I have never been "canned" that's an empty question. Cite any
> source that supports this contention. You can't.

Sue the bastard for Libel.
Frank

Date: 23 Jan 2007 18:26:38
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Jan 23, 2:21 pm, "William A. T. Clark" <clark...@nospamosu.edu >
wrote:
> In article <9fhcr21ni8bgful572a8pr745qq9ef3...@4ax.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> larry <l...@deldata.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:25:35 -0700, "glfnaz" <glf...@qwesttrash.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >"larry" <l...@deldata.com> wrote in message
> > >news:r1v9r2hjj5onhfh3k8n5acr846s6g0jfih@4ax.com...
> > >> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:09:46 -0600, "the Moderator"
> > >> <sparky@no_spam_engineer.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>"Alan Baker" <alangba...@telus.net> wrote in message
> > >>>news:alangbaker-84B394.20155919012007@news.telus.net...
> > >>>> How many people with real wealth have the same address as their
> > >>>> business?
>
> > >>>> How many of the truly successful are listed as the sole contact of their
> > >>>> business?
>
> > >>>> <http://deldata.com/contact.htm>
>
> > >>>People whose business only has one employee.
>
> > >> Wow. I thought there would be a few here who understand that many
> > >> successful people in their retirement years mostly sit on corporate
> > >> boards and/or do venture capital investing. They don't have
> > >> employees and they don't go to an office away from the comfort of
> > >> their homes.
>
> > >> Larry
>
> > >Well you posted that you had a corner glass office that looked out on all
> > >the employees making you money.
> > >Was that just another Lllaarryyy lie?
>
> > I was Senior VP in a engineering company that competes with Bechtel.
> > That company is located in an outskirt of D.C. a few years ago. I
> > had a corner office with a door and windows-- a very big deal when
> > most worked in cubicles.
>
> > Larry

This just gets better and better.
>
William Clark

What I don't understand is why anybody pays any attention to him.

Date: 24 Jan 2007 08:58:20
From: larry
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 23 Jan 2007 18:26:38 -0800, "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com > wrote:

>What I don't understand is why anybody pays any attention to him.

I could give lots of references, but I really don't care whether
anyone believes anything about me- except that my handicap has gone
from beginner to 8.0 with a 7.7 trend in only 5 years--and that I
started golfing when I turned 60. Today I can drive it farther and
straighter than most-- and ALL who are my age.

See ya out there. BTW, why are you still in our country? Go home and
bother the folks where you were born!

Larry

Date:
From:
Subject:

Date: 22 Jan 2007 14:45:02
From: John B.
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larry wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:20:08 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
> <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> >
> >Probably has kids and illegals working for him. He'd be the type.
>
> And you know that because.......? How much courage does it take to
> throw feces from the shadows?
>
>
> Larry

You tell us. You do it all the time.

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:14:19
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:08:02 -0600, frankross <fross@net.net > wrote:

>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On 18 Jan 2007 11:46:49 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Bobby Knight wrote:
>>
>>> Were you caught lying when you got canned or was that a result of your
>>> "pleasant" personality?
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>
>> Since I have never been "canned" that's an empty question. Cite any
>> source that supports this contention. You can't.
>
>Sue the bastard for Libel.
>Frank

Not an option. Libel is a statement that harms one's reputation. No
way anything that Greg says could harm my reputation. He's a joke.

Now, if I were still in the workforce, looking for a job, and a
potential employer saw this..
--
___,
\o

Date: 17 Jan 2007 11:44:07
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

The lil Knipper pecks...
>
> That'll never happen because you're a low-life skulker, lying in
> wait for those that have embarrassed you in the past, then nibbling at
> them like the mouse you are. This is in the direction of the putrid
> poster known as dene. Is that clear enough?

What's clear are your lies about plonking me, which you conveniently
sidestep. This isn't new behavior from you....remember Eric's degrees.
Once again you pop off your alligator mouth and then when the bet was
to be funded, you skulked away, showing your canary ass and the fact
that you don't have the right to spend your 4th wife's dowry.

And yet I'm to trust that you'd show up....alone. LOL...as if.

> I'll be glad to tell you, to your face, what a sniveling little pest
> you are. Let me know when you're coming. LOL..as if.

If I'm "little", what does that make you.....squirt?

-Greg

Ps. What a sad life you live. 85 usenet group....over 9,500 posts.
Most people like me spend a few minutes a day on forums, yet it's your
whole life. The legacy of your retirement years.

No wonder you're a bitter little man.

Date: 17 Jan 2007 13:58:54
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 17 Jan 2007 11:44:07 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

<clip standard fare from a loser >

Lot's of empty rhetoric from a skulker. The 85 news groups? If you
had a brain and could read, you'd see that all but a couple are
crossposts. If you had a brain.... LMAO.

As far as my life goes, you'll be lucky if you have anything that
compares to it when you retire. Playing golf, and the ket ain't
all bad.

I'm neither bitter or little. Bitter is lying in wait for me,
Dalecki, and the others on the C-list who dumped your ass, then
making personal attacks when none of them are even mentioning you.
Little is jumping in on other's posts just to vent your spleen for
something that embarassed you years ago. That'd be dene.

So, I take this to mean that your threat is empty? You aren't coming
to Dallas to do me bodily harm when I tell you what a sniveling ass
you are? Again...LMAO.

Empty Dene as usual.
--
___,
\o

Date: 17 Jan 2007 14:05:46
From: frankross
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2007 11:44:07 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> <clip standard fare from a loser>
>
> Lot's of empty rhetoric from a skulker. The 85 news groups? If you
> had a brain and could read, you'd see that all but a couple are
> crossposts. If you had a brain.... LMAO.
>
> As far as my life goes, you'll be lucky if you have anything that
> compares to it when you retire. Playing golf, and the ket ain't
> all bad.
>
> I'm neither bitter or little. Bitter is lying in wait for me,
> Dalecki, and the others on the C-list who dumped your ass, then
> making personal attacks when none of them are even mentioning you.
> Little is jumping in on other's posts just to vent your spleen for
> something that embarassed you years ago. That'd be dene.
>
> So, I take this to mean that your threat is empty? You aren't coming
> to Dallas to do me bodily harm when I tell you what a sniveling ass
> you are? Again...LMAO.
>
> Empty Dene as usual.

Why even reply BK? He's full of it and most here know it.
Frank

Date: 17 Jan 2007 14:48:19
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:05:46 -0600, frankross <fross@net.net > wrote:

>Bobby Knight wrote:

>> Empty Dene as usual.
>
>Why even reply BK? He's full of it and most here know it.
>Frank

You're right. He's just so meddlesome.
--
___,
\o

Date: 16 Jan 2007 05:03:52
From: Not me
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

In article <1168882490.678998.197740@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >,
"larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com > wrote:

> On Jan 15, 7:00 am, "boo-radley" <mpmul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And doubles down the number poor will be dead kids who are fighting
> > instead of him, for all that is left of his image.
> > Put a cork in it, lickspittle.
>
> Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
> troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
> battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
> offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
> hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
> DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
> prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.

LOL

So when Kennedy and Johnson were prosecuting it, the war in Vietnam was
wrong, but when it was Eisenhower or Nixon it was right?

LOLOLOLOL

>
> Today VOLUNTEERS making more than they could make as civilians are
> going to Iraq and Afghanistan repeatedly because they are professional
> soldiers. They WANT to go because that is their employment. Their
> families are enjoying middle class income--- they drive nice cars and
> live in nice homes. They would be unemployed if the US were not
> embroiled in wars.

What an utter load of crap.

Date: 16 Jan 2007 00:12:14
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Not me wrote:
> "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com> wrote:
>> Today VOLUNTEERS making more than they could make as civilians are
>> going to Iraq and Afghanistan repeatedly because they are
>> professional soldiers. They WANT to go because that is their
>> employment. Their families are enjoying middle class income--- they
>> drive nice cars and live in nice homes. They would be unemployed
>> if the US were not embroiled in wars.
>
> What an utter load of crap.

Larry must never have seen the pay grades for enlisted and officers. They
don't make squat. An E4 Buck Sergeant would make more at McDonalds dropping
fries; and with a hell of a lot less responsibilities.

--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson

Date: 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>
That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
should do...support the CINC no matter what.

Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
answer shows you as a hypocrite.

--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 16:48:43
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Chris Bellomy wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
> : you were fired from your last job.
>
> Not to intrude on this pointless flamefest, but Bobby couldn't
> get fired from that job if he tried (and I think he did a few
> times). Nobody else in that company could get away with saying
> the things he used to say to the uppermost brass. He was just
> too good a producer.

If so, then it's something BK and I share in common. I'm a good
producer and I'm not afraid to speak my mind to anyone, particularily
authority figures.

The distinction between us is the ability to share ideas without
insulting one's intelligence for having a contrary view. Case in
point...a few threads have been devoted or re-routed about religion.
Yet they have been quite tame, amazing when you consider the subject.
The distinction between these threads and others is that BK didn't
actively get involved in them, spending his time with displaying his
superior intelligence about Birdie Bill pal's dog and Howard's lateral
water hazard.

> Now, if you two will just plonk each other...

Can't....I use Google exclusively. If this is a consolation, he's been
plonked from personal e-mail since 12/05. Nice to not have his bitchy
e-mails in my in-box.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 11:10:33
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:

>
> We're both able to enter all of the RSG touraments. Are you?

Still haven't got the guts to live up to your word and plonk me, huh?
Are you so insecure that you cannot bear the thought of someone talking
about you without your knowledge?

To answer your snipey little question, once again, I'm able to attend
any RSG tournament that *interests* me. That has always been the case,
despite the best efforts of your decreasing pack of cronies.

Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
you were fired from your last job.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 21:49:56
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Dene <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

: Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
: you were fired from your last job.

Not to intrude on this pointless flamefest, but Bobby couldn't
get fired from that job if he tried (and I think he did a few
times). Nobody else in that company could get away with saying
the things he used to say to the uppermost brass. He was just
too good a producer.

Now, if you two will just plonk each other...

--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/

Date: 18 Jan 2007 16:10:13
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:49:56 GMT, Chris Bellomy
<puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:

>Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
>: Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
>: you were fired from your last job.
>
>Not to intrude on this pointless flamefest, but Bobby couldn't
>get fired from that job if he tried (and I think he did a few
>times). Nobody else in that company could get away with saying
>the things he used to say to the uppermost brass. He was just
>too good a producer.

Plus the fact that the Vice-President that you're referencing my
discussion with was fired very soon after. The ensuing court
proceedings were short and sweet...he didn't have a leg to stand on.
I stayed on for four more years though.

>
>Now, if you two will just plonk each other...
I've done my part. But he'll just keep lying and sniping.

--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:35:02
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 11:10:33 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>
>>
>> We're both able to enter all of the RSG touraments. Are you?
>
>Still haven't got the guts to live up to your word and plonk me, huh?
>Are you so insecure that you cannot bear the thought of someone talking
>about you without your knowledge?
>
No, I just get a kick out of you.
>To answer your snipey little question, once again, I'm able to attend
>any RSG tournament that *interests* me. That has always been the case,
>despite the best efforts of your decreasing pack of cronies.
>
Your interest wanes when you're told that it is difficult to pair you
with others?

>Don't you have anything to do today? Lots of time on your hands since
>you were fired from your last job.

Never happened. This is the kind of statement that puts you in the
forefront of liars. So, either admit that you're lying, or prove
that charge. You can't.
--
___,
\o

Date: 18 Jan 2007 14:19:46
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Dene wrote:
> To answer your snipey little question, once again, I'm able to attend
> any RSG tournament that *interests* me. That has always been the
> case, despite the best efforts of your decreasing pack of cronies.

Are there ever RSG tournaments that have incredibly hot babes? I would
volunteer to play from the red tees with them *

* In the interest of public relations, of course.

--
___________________________________________________________
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises,
I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it
gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. -- Thomas
Jefferson

Date: 15 Jan 2007 16:51:12
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net >
wrote:

>On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>>
>That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
>this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
>should do...support the CIC no matter what.
>
> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
>answer shows you as a hypocrite.

Have you figured out how to answer this yet?

Date: 16 Jan 2007 09:19:58
From: John van der Pflum
Subject: Re: Larry? (was Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers)

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:51:12 -0600, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net >
wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:45:52 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>>>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>>>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>>>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>>>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>>>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>>>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>>>
>>That brings up a good question. You're now all in favor of supporting
>>this bumbling president, because you think that's what a good American
>>should do...support the CIC no matter what.
>>
>> Were you supporting Johnson when he was doing the above? Either
>>answer shows you as a hypocrite.
>
>Have you figured out how to answer this yet?

Please don't change the title the off-topic threads (especially the
political ones) because then they get through my extensive kill
filter.

Thanks.
--

jvdp
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com

Date: 15 Jan 2007 17:38:46
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 15 Jan 2007 09:34:51 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 15, 7:00 am, "boo-radley" <mpmul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And doubles down the number poor will be dead kids who are fighting
>> instead of him, for all that is left of his image.
>> Put a cork in it, lickspittle.
>
>Where were you when Lyndon Johnson, Democrat, ordered our DRAFTED
>troops against their will and very poorly paid, into battle after
>battle in Vietnam-- ONE DAY dead was over 3000 during the Tet
>offensive. What was he trying to "win?" There was no such goal or
>hope-- the American mainland was never in any danger. In that
>DEMOCRAT war 50,000+ died, 300,000+ were badly injured-- only to
>prevent the spread of communism throughout that part of Asia.
>
I'll tell you where I was; protesting the whole mess. The mistakes
made by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon certainly weren't a
learning process for this dumbbell president.

>Today VOLUNTEERS making more than they could make as civilians are
>going to Iraq and Afghanistan repeatedly because they are professional
>soldiers. They WANT to go because that is their employment. Their
>families are enjoying middle class income--- they drive nice cars and
>live in nice homes. They would be unemployed if the US were not
>embroiled in wars.
>
>Larry

Didn't Kerry get torched for saying something similar?
--
___,
\o

Date: 15 Jan 2007 09:27:56
From: larryrsf
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Jan 13, 2:26 pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> On 13 Jan 2007 11:06:21 -0800, "larryrsf" <l...@deldata.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
> >> Democratic president ever right?
>
> >Anyone who is actively hoping for the US to lose in Iraq or Afghanistan
> >or anywhere is a disloyal traitor. And shamefully that may include
> >many democrats-- who seem to be hoping and even working for us to lose
> >(withdrawal=loss) ONLY because they hate our president. If that is
> >you, you better look ahead to the likely future after the US abandons
> >Iraq and allows the Middle East to spiral into horrors far worse than
> >after Vietnam. Bush will be long gone, but the aftermath will just
> >keep getting worse....Ahh, you chose not to answer.
>
> >We have only one president and every American should be supporting him.As much as you supported his predecessor and will support the next
> Democratic president?

Of course. Just as Senator Dole during his presidential campaign
refused to criticize Clinton about Kosovo, etc. Clinton was our
Commander-in-Chief and should be supported by every
American--especially in statements which would be read and analyzed
around the world. Republicans are loyal Americans. Democrats are
feeding America's enemies-- just as they did during Vietnam,
effectively extending the war years and 50,000 lives because the enemy
became aware after Jane Fonda, etc. that pacifists inside America
would force us to withdraw-- if they just persisted. It worked--and
much of Al Queda's persistence today comes from that lesson learned--
The US is weak because our left is so predictibly pacifist (read
appeasement).

Larry

.

Date: 15 Jan 2007 07:00:06
From: boo-radley
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

And doubles down the number poor will be dead kids who are fighting
instead of him, for all that is left of his image.
Put a cork in it, lickspittle.
larryrsf wrote:
> DEBKAfile: Kurdish sources report five helicopters carried US forces to
> pre-dawn raid of Iranian consulate in N. Iraqi town of Irbil
>
> January 11, 2007, 5:21 PM (GMT+02:00)
>
> They were dropped on the roof while armored vehicles encircled the
> building. The troops used loudspeakers to call out in Farsi and Arabic
> to the consulate staff not to resist "or else they would be
> killed." Five Iranian diplomatic staff members were detained and
> documents and computers impounded.
>
> Tehran has strongly protested this breach of its sovereign territory
> and summoned the Swiss ambassador who represents US interests in Iran
> and the Iraqi ambassador to demand the immediate release of the Iranian
> diplomats.
>
> Later Thursday, Jan. 11, Tehran reported three large explosions shaking
> the southern town of Khorramshahr north of the oil port of Abadan on
> the Shatt al-Arb waterway.
>
> DEBKAfile: Khorramshahr, which faces the Iraqi town of Basra, is one of
> the key towns from which Iran delivers smuggled fighters, weapons and
> explosives to its Shiite supporters in Iraq. Our sources also report
> that some hours before President George W. Bush's policy speech, a
> series of explosions were heard in Iranian Balochistan. Tehran imposed
> a blackout on the incident.
>
> These statements and events tie in closely with the new Iraq strategy
> announced by the US president of confronting Iran and Syria for
> "allowing networks to use their territory to attack US forces."

Date: 18 Jan 2007 10:59:04
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:11:28 -0800, larry <larry@deldata.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
> >attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
> >would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
> >when I tell them my name--
> >
> >Larry
> You wouldn't dare attend an RSG tournament...at least not to play.
> That would forever shut the door on your bragging rights about your
> game.
>

The little Knipper might be right about the bragging rights, but if
Larry's presence shut his alligator mouth for a season, that alone
would be worth the trip. Regardless, there are only 3 or 4 RSG
tourneys. Doubtful if either will show.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:14:26
From: Dene
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Bobby Knight wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2007 12:59:03 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bobby Knight wrote:
> >> >.
> >>
> >> The company was sold. I had the choice of going with the buyer, or
> >> taking six-month's salary and retiring. The new company wasn't one
> >> that I chose to work for. And, at 68, it was time to retire. You
> >> should be so lucky.
> >
> >I'll be fully retired at 58.
> >
> >> You don't even know the name of the companies...let alone the deal
> >> they cut.
> >>
> >> Nice try, but you're still a liar.
> >
> >Nice try, but you're not telling the whole truth.
> >
> >-Greg
>
> Then enlighten everyone with your version.
> --

The key lies in the words, "the new company wasn't the one I chose to
work for." Uh huh.

Enough silliness for today. I've spent too much time playing with you.
The real world beckons, namely that I have a pile of work in front of
me.

Cya in a few hours, lil toot.

-Greg

Date: 18 Jan 2007 13:01:03
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 18 Jan 2007 10:59:04 -0800, "Dene" <gdstrue@aol.com > wrote:

>
>Bobby Knight wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:11:28 -0800, larry <larry@deldata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Those with the biggest mouth, those who revert to gratuitous personal
>> >attacks here where they are safe, are ALWAYS cowards in person. I
>> >would love to go to an RSG tournament and watch them turn mealy-mouth
>> >when I tell them my name--
>> >
>> >Larry
>> You wouldn't dare attend an RSG tournament...at least not to play.
>> That would forever shut the door on your bragging rights about your
>> game.
>>
>
>The little Knipper might be right about the bragging rights, but if
>Larry's presence shut his alligator mouth for a season, that alone
>would be worth the trip. Regardless, there are only 3 or 4 RSG
>tourneys. Doubtful if either will show.
>
>-Greg

We're both able to enter all of the RSG touraments. Are you?
--
___,
\o

Date: 13 Jan 2007 11:06:21
From: larryrsf
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Jan 13, 6:22 am, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net > wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <l...@deldata.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
> Democratic president ever right?

Anyone who is actively hoping for the US to lose in Iraq or Afghanistan
or anywhere is a disloyal traitor. And shamefully that may include
many democrats-- who seem to be hoping and even working for us to lose
(withdrawal=loss) ONLY because they hate our president. If that is
you, you better look ahead to the likely future after the US abandons
Iraq and allows the Middle East to spiral into horrors far worse than
after Vietnam. Bush will be long gone, but the aftermath will just
keep getting worse....

We have only one president and every American should be supporting him.

Larry

Date: 13 Jan 2007 22:26:06
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 13 Jan 2007 11:06:21 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
>> Democratic president ever right?
>
>Anyone who is actively hoping for the US to lose in Iraq or Afghanistan
>or anywhere is a disloyal traitor. And shamefully that may include
>many democrats-- who seem to be hoping and even working for us to lose
>(withdrawal=loss) ONLY because they hate our president. If that is
>you, you better look ahead to the likely future after the US abandons
>Iraq and allows the Middle East to spiral into horrors far worse than
>after Vietnam. Bush will be long gone, but the aftermath will just
>keep getting worse....

Ahh, you chose not to answer.

>We have only one president and every American should be supporting him.

As much as you supported his predecessor and will support the next
Democratic president?

Date: 13 Jan 2007 19:24:43
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 13 Jan 2007 11:06:21 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>
>
>On Jan 13, 6:22 am, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
>> On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <l...@deldata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
>> Democratic president ever right?
>
>Anyone who is actively hoping for the US to lose in Iraq or Afghanistan
>or anywhere is a disloyal traitor. And shamefully that may include
>many democrats-- who seem to be hoping and even working for us to lose
>(withdrawal=loss) ONLY because they hate our president. If that is
>you, you better look ahead to the likely future after the US abandons
>Iraq and allows the Middle East to spiral into horrors far worse than
>after Vietnam. Bush will be long gone, but the aftermath will just
>keep getting worse....
>
>We have only one president and every American should be supporting him.
>
>Larry
I don't know of anyone that wants the U.S. to "lose" in Iraq. I know
many, including Republicans, who know we can't "win".

I don't support Dubya, but I support the poor kids that he's sending
to put their life on the line for his idiotic agenda.
--
___,
\o

Date: 13 Jan 2007 14:22:07
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

larryrsf wrote:
> On Jan 13, 6:22 am, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
>> On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <l...@deldata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
>> Democratic president ever right?
>
> Anyone who is actively hoping for the US to lose in Iraq or
> Afghanistan or anywhere is a disloyal traitor.

Bushtard should be tried in the Hague by a panel of judges and hung by the
neck until dead. The thousands of dead soldiers are due to his illegal war
against some idiot strongman that was absolutely no threat to USA.

Date: 13 Jan 2007 07:18:50
From: dsc
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Howard Brazee wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
> Democratic president ever right?

That question works pretty well the other way around too... :)

My answer is sometimes... either way you ask it. :)

Date: 13 Jan 2007 22:24:40
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 13 Jan 2007 07:18:50 -0800, "dsc" <Dudley.Cornman@eku.edu > wrote:

>> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
>> Democratic president ever right?
>
>That question works pretty well the other way around too... :)

You've got to adjust the question to whom you're asking it.

>My answer is sometimes... either way you ask it. :)

If the answer is "no", then the person answering is just a shill, if
that person gives examples of when his opinions differed from the
established view, then he has actually considered reality.

Date: 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41
From: larryrsf
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Jan 11, 6:13 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...@aol.com > wrote:

.Yes, we all know how much respect the Iranian's show for embassy's and
diplomats. Payback's a bitch. Excellent move.

And those Iranians were NOT diplomats, they were Right Guard operatives
there to distribute and teach IED technology to those who target
Americans. I hope our Special Forces kill them all-- and invites more
to come in!

Combine this (and likely much more we don't know about) with the two
aircraft carriers off Iran's coast- and the upcoming air/sea practice
operations there-- and Iran/Syria had better get the picture. The US
is not going to take any more. We might unleash Israel to use
conventional bunker busters to take out their enrichment facilities.

Larry

Date: 13 Jan 2007 14:22:18
From: Howard Brazee
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
Democratic president ever right?

Date: 13 Jan 2007 12:27:33
From: Head Shot
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

Howard Brazee wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm curious - is the Republican president ever wrong, or the
> Democratic president ever right?

I can't even remember the last time we had an honest president that had
integrity and did good work. Carter was honest; but his foreign policy
and economic policy leave something to be desired.

Date: 12 Jan 2007 15:43:09
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On 12 Jan 2007 11:51:41 -0800, "larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com >
wrote:

>On Jan 11, 6:13 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>.Yes, we all know how much respect the Iranian's show for embassy's and
> diplomats. Payback's a bitch. Excellent move.
>
>And those Iranians were NOT diplomats, they were Right Guard operatives
>there to distribute and teach IED technology to those who target
>Americans. I hope our Special Forces kill them all-- and invites more
>to come in!

I suppose that the Iranians have not had a pleasant time in American
custody. Perhaps a move to Cuba is in their future. I also assume
that the documents and computer drives confiscated in the raid will
result in some excellent intelligence. Well-done US Special Forces.

Date: 11 Jan 2007 15:24:04
From: FredK
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

or: Bush to World: F*** diplomacy, and F*** you.

"larryrsf" <larry@deldata.com > wrote in message
news:1168542803.287593.281150@p59g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> DEBKAfile: Kurdish sources report five helicopters carried US forces to
> pre-dawn raid of Iranian consulate in N. Iraqi town of Irbil
>
> January 11, 2007, 5:21 PM (GMT+02:00)
>
> They were dropped on the roof while armored vehicles encircled the
> building. The troops used loudspeakers to call out in Farsi and Arabic
> to the consulate staff not to resist "or else they would be
> killed." Five Iranian diplomatic staff members were detained and
> documents and computers impounded.
>
> Tehran has strongly protested this breach of its sovereign territory
> and summoned the Swiss ambassador who represents US interests in Iran
> and the Iraqi ambassador to demand the immediate release of the Iranian
> diplomats.
>

Just great. One of the fundamentals that allows diplomacy at all is
violated. Smooth move W.

> Later Thursday, Jan. 11, Tehran reported three large explosions shaking
> the southern town of Khorramshahr north of the oil port of Abadan on
> the Shatt al-Arb waterway.
>

I didn't hear the part of the speech where we declared war on Iran.

> DEBKAfile: Khorramshahr, which faces the Iraqi town of Basra, is one of
> the key towns from which Iran delivers smuggled fighters, weapons and
> explosives to its Shiite supporters in Iraq. Our sources also report
> that some hours before President George W. Bush's policy speech, a
> series of explosions were heard in Iranian Balochistan. Tehran imposed
> a blackout on the incident.
>
> These statements and events tie in closely with the new Iraq strategy
> announced by the US president of confronting Iran and Syria for
> "allowing networks to use their territory to attack US forces."
>

Have we just expanded the war in a way that wasn't announced?

Somebody sedate W quick.

Date: 11 Jan 2007 21:16:33
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:24:04 -0500, "FredK" <fred.nospam@dec.com >
wrote:

>> Later Thursday, Jan. 11, Tehran reported three large explosions shaking
>> the southern town of Khorramshahr north of the oil port of Abadan on
>> the Shatt al-Arb waterway.
>>
>
>I didn't hear the part of the speech where we declared war on Iran.

It's just civil unrest. There are minority Arab and Kurdish
populations in Iran that are unsatisfied. There just expressing their
desire for freedom. Hopefully, the US will give them as much support
as possible.

Date: 11 Jan 2007 21:13:43
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:24:04 -0500, "FredK" <fred.nospam@dec.com >
wrote:

>> Tehran has strongly protested this breach of its sovereign territory
>> and summoned the Swiss ambassador who represents US interests in Iran
>> and the Iraqi ambassador to demand the immediate release of the Iranian
>> diplomats.
>>
>
>Just great. One of the fundamentals that allows diplomacy at all is
>violated. Smooth move W.

Yes, we all know how much respect the Iranian's show for embassy's and
diplomats. Payback's a bitch. Excellent move.

Date: 12 Jan 2007 08:42:58
From: FredK
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper@aol.com > wrote in message
news:virdq25j97480tndl3muoa6s574cf7k204@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:24:04 -0500, "FredK" <fred.nospam@dec.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Tehran has strongly protested this breach of its sovereign territory
>>> and summoned the Swiss ambassador who represents US interests in Iran
>>> and the Iraqi ambassador to demand the immediate release of the Iranian
>>> diplomats.
>>>
>>
>>Just great. One of the fundamentals that allows diplomacy at all is
>>violated. Smooth move W.
>
> Yes, we all know how much respect the Iranian's show for embassy's and
> diplomats. Payback's a bitch. Excellent move.

We didn't send in students to take it over. It was an official act - and if
it was a consulate or embassy committed an act of war.

Date: 12 Jan 2007 20:51:58
From: Jack Hollis
Subject: Re: Bush doubles down-- or, In your face, appeasers

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:42:58 -0500, "FredK" <fred.nospam@dec.com >
wrote:

> It was an official act - and if
>it was a consulate or embassy committed an act of war.

Excellent.