| |
Main
Date: 10 Feb 2007 20:34:00
From: BobP
Subject: Big Break #WayTooDamnedMany
|
Brenda was saying that they're having a Big Break 10^<infinity > and
inviting all the losers from past shows. (1) Tonight I was watching
Shell's Wonderful World of Golf with Nick Price and Greg Norman
battling it out. It was a really tight match until Norman sent one
swimming on the par 3 16th and took a triple. (Shit, I can take a
triple on a par 3.)
Anyway, it occurred to me that I'd be far more interested in watching
a new version of the Wonderful World of Golf than of more Big Break
<WTDM >. Voters in favor?
And suggested pairings?
Rancho Bob
(1) Loser = "didn't win." I know they're better than me. Not the
point.
|
|
| |
Date: 11 Feb 2007 11:27:52
From: Matt
Subject: Re: Big Break #WayTooDamnedMany
|
"BobP" <double_entendre@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1171168440.189398.259060@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Brenda was saying that they're having a Big Break 10^<infinity> and
> inviting all the losers from past shows. (1) Tonight I was watching
> Shell's Wonderful World of Golf with Nick Price and Greg Norman
> battling it out. It was a really tight match until Norman sent one
> swimming on the par 3 16th and took a triple. (Shit, I can take a
> triple on a par 3.)
>
> Anyway, it occurred to me that I'd be far more interested in watching
> a new version of the Wonderful World of Golf than of more Big Break
> <WTDM>. Voters in favor?
>
I love Wonderful World of Golf , I always watch it. As far as Im concerned
Big Break jumped the shark on USA vs the Euro. I have no watched it since
#3..
|
| |
Date: 11 Feb 2007 06:24:23
From: Birdie Bill
Subject: Re: Big Break #WayTooDamnedMany
|
On Feb 10, 10:34 pm, "BobP" <double_enten...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Brenda was saying that they're having a Big Break 10^<infinity> and
> inviting all the losers from past shows. (1) Tonight I was watching
> Shell's Wonderful World of Golf with Nick Price and Greg Norman
> battling it out. It was a really tight match until Norman sent one
> swimming on the par 3 16th and took a triple. (Shit, I can take a
> triple on a par 3.)
>
> Anyway, it occurred to me that I'd be far more interested in watching
> a new version of the Wonderful World of Golf than of more Big Break
> <WTDM>. Voters in favor?
>
> And suggested pairings?
>
> Rancho Bob
>
> (1) Loser = "didn't win." I know they're better than me. Not the
> point.
Hmmm, they already did that. Freddy Couples beats everyone (pretty
much).
|
| |
Date: 10 Feb 2007 21:17:05
From: BobP
Subject: Re: Big Break #WayTooDamnedMany
|
On Feb 10, 9:12 pm, "Otto" <ottondebREMOVE%$#%^%$@@bellsouth.net >
wrote:
> "BobP" <double_enten...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1171168440.189398.259060@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Brenda was saying that they're having a Big Break 10^<infinity> and
> > inviting all the losers from past shows. (1) Tonight I was watching
> > Shell's Wonderful World of Golf with Nick Price and Greg Norman
> > battling it out. It was a really tight match until Norman sent one
> > swimming on the par 3 16th and took a triple. (Shit, I can take a
> > triple on a par 3.)
>
> > Anyway, it occurred to me that I'd be far more interested in watching
> > a new version of the Wonderful World of Golf than of more Big Break
> > <WTDM>. Voters in favor?
>
> Not in favor of Price Vs Norman.
>
> > And suggested pairings?
>
> Perhaps Woods Vs Els or Woods Vs Michelson. The big break is wannabes.
>
> Otto
Excessive wordiness in OP fixed.
;)
Rancho Bob
|
| |
Date: 11 Feb 2007 00:12:18
From: Otto
Subject: Re: Big Break #WayTooDamnedMany
|
"BobP" <double_entendre@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1171168440.189398.259060@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Brenda was saying that they're having a Big Break 10^<infinity> and
> inviting all the losers from past shows. (1) Tonight I was watching
> Shell's Wonderful World of Golf with Nick Price and Greg Norman
> battling it out. It was a really tight match until Norman sent one
> swimming on the par 3 16th and took a triple. (Shit, I can take a
> triple on a par 3.)
>
> Anyway, it occurred to me that I'd be far more interested in watching
> a new version of the Wonderful World of Golf than of more Big Break
> <WTDM>. Voters in favor?
Not in favor of Price Vs Norman.
> And suggested pairings?
Perhaps Woods Vs Els or Woods Vs Michelson. The big break is more fun to
watch than the washed up seniors or wannabes.
Otto
|
|
