| |
Main
Date: 10 Oct 2006 09:15:11
From: Edwin
Subject: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
survive."
Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
another and that their survival was largely up to them."
Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
clearly joking doesn't count. "
Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
does it?"
Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
others on numerous occasions. "
Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
All of the above? "
Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
|
|
| |
Date: 26 Oct 2006 17:03:29
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1161905158.442157.135800@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > In article <1161903815.575223.56580@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > > > In article <1161797763.474147.276730@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > > > > > In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > > > > > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Edwin wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> survive."
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't
> > > > > > > > >> going
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one
> > > > > > > > >> way
> > > > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > > > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to
> > > > > > > > >> count."
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666
> > > > > > > > >> 5619
> > > > > > > > >> 31c5
> > > > > > > > >> ab
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > > > > > > > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state
> > > > > > > > >> nor
> > > > > > > > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll
> > > > > > > > >> cry
> > > > > > > > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've
> > > > > > > > >> declared
> > > > > > > > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > > > > > > > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > > > > > > > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > > > > > > > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > > > > > > > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of
> > > > > > > > >> beans. "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206
> > > > > > > > >> fc84
> > > > > > > > >> 8207
> > > > > > > > >> ef
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote
> > > > > > > > >> where
> > > > > > > > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to
> > > > > > > > >> count'
> > > > > > > > >> you
> > > > > > > > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I
> > > > > > > > >> was
> > > > > > > > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my
> > > > > > > > >> claim,
> > > > > > > > >> does it?"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have
> > > > > > > > >> applied
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven...
> > > > > > > > >> "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of
> > > > > > > > >> judgment?
> > > > > > > > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence?
> > > > > > > > >> Hypocrisy?
> > > > > > > > >> All of the above? "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but
> > > > > > > > >> couldn't
> > > > > > > > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he
> > > > > > > > >> expects
> > > > > > > > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he
> > > > > > > > >> is.
> > > > > > > > >> "
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366d
> > > > > > > > >> c15e
> > > > > > > > >> 32b1
> > > > > > > > >> bc
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > > > > > > > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his
> > > > > > > > neighborhood
> > > > > > > > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now it's at my *request*?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LOL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Whatever you say, Scotty!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time
> > > > > > after
> > > > > > you finally meeting Two Buddha...
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL
> > > > >
> > > > > A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> > > > > drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> > > > > brief hiatus.
> > > >
> > > > So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
> > > > has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and
> > > > you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
> > >
> > > I post when I post, Edwin. I'm sorry this is a problem for you?
> >
> > Why should you making a fool of yourself with ridiculous made up
> > stories about why you ran away be a problem for me?
>
> I don't know, but the truth clearly is a problem.
Now that you've recognized you have a problem with the truth, you can
start taking steps to correct it.
Why don't you start by admitting what you wrote about the Mayor of
R'lyeh was a lie?
> >
> > > >
> > > > Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
> > >
> > > Right after you post Dave Fritzinger's quotes...
> >
> > WTF are you talking about, and what has it to do with you failing for
> > over two years to back up what you claimed about the Mayor? You said
> > there were too many posts to count. Why haven't you produced any?
>
> Because key words didn't identify them.
Key words? You said there were too many to count. Simple browsing
should have found them in the years you've had to find them.
Key words didn't identify them because there were none to be
identified. Isn't it high time you just admitted to being a liar?
|
| |
Date: 26 Oct 2006 16:25:58
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1161903815.575223.56580@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > In article <1161797763.474147.276730@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > > > In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > > > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Edwin wrote:
> > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > > > > > >> survive."
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way
> > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f6665619
> > > > > > >> 31c5
> > > > > > >> ab
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > > > > > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > > > > > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > > > > > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > > > > > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > > > > > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > > > > > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > > > > > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > > > > > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc84
> > > > > > >> 8207
> > > > > > >> ef
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote
> > > > > > >> where
> > > > > > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count'
> > > > > > >> you
> > > > > > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > > > > > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my
> > > > > > >> claim,
> > > > > > >> does it?"
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of
> > > > > > >> judgment?
> > > > > > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > > > > > >> All of the above? "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but
> > > > > > >> couldn't
> > > > > > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > > > > > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is.
> > > > > > >> "
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e
> > > > > > >> 32b1
> > > > > > >> bc
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> > > > > > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > > > > > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his
> > > > > > neighborhood
> > > > > > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
> > > > > > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now it's at my *request*?
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL
> > > > >
> > > > > Whatever you say, Scotty!
> > > >
> > > > You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time after
> > > > you finally meeting Two Buddha...
> > >
> > > LOL
> > >
> > > A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> > > drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> > > brief hiatus.
> >
> > So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
> > has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and
> > you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
>
> I post when I post, Edwin. I'm sorry this is a problem for you?
Why should you making a fool of yourself with ridiculous made up
stories about why you ran away be a problem for me?
> >
> > Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
>
> Right after you post Dave Fritzinger's quotes...
WTF are you talking about, and what has it to do with you failing for
over two years to back up what you claimed about the Mayor? You said
there were too many posts to count. Why haven't you produced any?
|
| | |
Date: 27 Oct 2006 09:19:58
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161905158.442157.135800@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> > Right after you post Dave Fritzinger's quotes...
>
> WTF are you talking about, and what has it to do with you failing for
> over two years to back up what you claimed about the Mayor? You said
> there were too many posts to count. Why haven't you produced any?
Been there, done that.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| | |
Date: 26 Oct 2006 23:29:14
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161905158.442157.135800@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1161903815.575223.56580@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > > In article <1161797763.474147.276730@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > > > > In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > > > > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Edwin wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> survive."
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't
> > > > > > > >> going
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one
> > > > > > > >> way
> > > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to
> > > > > > > >> count."
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666
> > > > > > > >> 5619
> > > > > > > >> 31c5
> > > > > > > >> ab
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > > > > > > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state
> > > > > > > >> nor
> > > > > > > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll
> > > > > > > >> cry
> > > > > > > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've
> > > > > > > >> declared
> > > > > > > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > > > > > > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > > > > > > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > > > > > > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > > > > > > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of
> > > > > > > >> beans. "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206
> > > > > > > >> fc84
> > > > > > > >> 8207
> > > > > > > >> ef
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote
> > > > > > > >> where
> > > > > > > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to
> > > > > > > >> count'
> > > > > > > >> you
> > > > > > > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I
> > > > > > > >> was
> > > > > > > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my
> > > > > > > >> claim,
> > > > > > > >> does it?"
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have
> > > > > > > >> applied
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven...
> > > > > > > >> "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of
> > > > > > > >> judgment?
> > > > > > > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence?
> > > > > > > >> Hypocrisy?
> > > > > > > >> All of the above? "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but
> > > > > > > >> couldn't
> > > > > > > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he
> > > > > > > >> expects
> > > > > > > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he
> > > > > > > >> is.
> > > > > > > >> "
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366d
> > > > > > > >> c15e
> > > > > > > >> 32b1
> > > > > > > >> bc
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > > > > > > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his
> > > > > > > neighborhood
> > > > > > > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now it's at my *request*?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LOL
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whatever you say, Scotty!
> > > > >
> > > > > You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time
> > > > > after
> > > > > you finally meeting Two Buddha...
> > > >
> > > > LOL
> > > >
> > > > A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> > > > drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> > > > brief hiatus.
> > >
> > > So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
> > > has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and
> > > you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
> >
> > I post when I post, Edwin. I'm sorry this is a problem for you?
>
> Why should you making a fool of yourself with ridiculous made up
> stories about why you ran away be a problem for me?
I don't know, but the truth clearly is a problem.
>
> > >
> > > Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
> >
> > Right after you post Dave Fritzinger's quotes...
>
> WTF are you talking about, and what has it to do with you failing for
> over two years to back up what you claimed about the Mayor? You said
> there were too many posts to count. Why haven't you produced any?
Because key words didn't identify them.
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 26 Oct 2006 16:03:35
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1161797763.474147.276730@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > Edwin wrote:
> > > > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > > > >> survive."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> > > > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> > > > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5
> > > > >> ab
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > > > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > > > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > > > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > > > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > > > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > > > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > > > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > > > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207
> > > > >> ef
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> > > > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> > > > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > > > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> > > > >> does it?"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> > > > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> > > > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > > > >> All of the above? "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> > > > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > > > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1
> > > > >> bc
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> > > > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> > > >
> > > > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > > > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his
> > > > neighborhood
> > > > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
> > > > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
> > >
> > > Now it's at my *request*?
> > >
> > > LOL
> > >
> > > Whatever you say, Scotty!
> >
> > You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time after
> > you finally meeting Two Buddha...
>
> LOL
>
> A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> brief hiatus.
So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and a
you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
|
| | |
Date: 27 Oct 2006 09:19:34
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161903815.575223.56580@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> > A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> > drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> > brief hiatus.
>
> So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
> has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and a
> you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
>
> Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
Been there, done that. Stop playing stupid, Edwin.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Oct 2006 18:32:03
From: George Graves
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <mr-169BB8.09193427102006@individual.net >,
Sandman <mr@sandman.net > wrote:
> In article <1161903815.575223.56580@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> > > drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> > > brief hiatus.
> >
> > So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
> > has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and a
> > you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
> >
> > Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
>
> Been there, done that. Stop playing stupid, Edwin.
Edwin's not playing.
--
George Graves
Avoid arguments with the little woman about lifting the toilet seat
by simply using the sink.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Oct 2006 23:17:10
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161903815.575223.56580@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1161797763.474147.276730@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > > In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > > > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Edwin wrote:
> > > > > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > > > > >> survive."
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f6665619
> > > > > >> 31c5
> > > > > >> ab
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > > > > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > > > > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > > > > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > > > > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > > > > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > > > > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > > > > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > > > > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc84
> > > > > >> 8207
> > > > > >> ef
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote
> > > > > >> where
> > > > > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count'
> > > > > >> you
> > > > > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > > > > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my
> > > > > >> claim,
> > > > > >> does it?"
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of
> > > > > >> judgment?
> > > > > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > > > > >> All of the above? "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but
> > > > > >> couldn't
> > > > > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > > > > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is.
> > > > > >> "
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e
> > > > > >> 32b1
> > > > > >> bc
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> > > > > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > > > > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his
> > > > > neighborhood
> > > > > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
> > > > > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
> > > >
> > > > Now it's at my *request*?
> > > >
> > > > LOL
> > > >
> > > > Whatever you say, Scotty!
> > >
> > > You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time after
> > > you finally meeting Two Buddha...
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
> > drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
> > brief hiatus.
>
> So far every time I've posted about you hiding from answering posts, it
> has resulted in an end of whatever "brief hiatus" you've been on, and a
> you rushing in a short time later to post a denial.
I post when I post, Edwin. I'm sorry this is a problem for you?
>
> Have you found that quote of the Mayor yet?
Right after you post Dave Fritzinger's quotes...
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 25 Oct 2006 10:36:03
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > Edwin wrote:
> > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > >> survive."
> > >>
> > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > >>
> > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> > >>
> > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
> > >>
> > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > >>
> > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> > >>
> > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
> > >>
> > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > >>
> > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > >>
> > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> > >> does it?"
> > >>
> > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > >>
> > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> > >>
> > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > >> All of the above? "
> > >>
> > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> > >>
> > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
> > >
> > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> >
> > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his neighborhood
> > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
> > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
>
> Now it's at my *request*?
>
> LOL
>
> Whatever you say, Scotty!
You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time after
you finally meeting Two Buddha...
|
| | |
Date: 26 Oct 2006 20:50:37
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161797763.474147.276730@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > >
> > > > Edwin wrote:
> > > >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > > >> survive."
> > > >>
> > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> > > >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> > > >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> > > >>
> > > >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> > > >>
> > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5
> > > >> ab
> > > >>
> > > >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > > >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > > >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> > > >>
> > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > > >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > > >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > > >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > > >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > > >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > > >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> > > >>
> > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207
> > > >> ef
> > > >>
> > > >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> > > >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> > > >>
> > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> > > >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > > >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > >>
> > > >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> > > >> does it?"
> > > >>
> > > >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> > > >> others on numerous occasions. "
> > > >>
> > > >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> > > >>
> > > >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> > > >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > > >> All of the above? "
> > > >>
> > > >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> > > >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > > >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> > > >>
> > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1
> > > >> bc
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> > > > year. Dishonest asshole.
> > >
> > > I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> > > Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his
> > > neighborhood
> > > on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
> > > show.....and keeps on lying about why.
> >
> > Now it's at my *request*?
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > Whatever you say, Scotty!
>
> You've been gone quite awhile. I assume it's recuperation time after
> you finally meeting Two Buddha...
LOL
A visit from one's out-of-town girlfriend, followed by a cross-country
drive (Vancouver to Toronto) with one's brother gives one cause for a
brief hiatus.
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 11:07:11
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Sandman wrote:
> In article <1161188842.778950.198380@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > You're a bald-faced liar.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
> > > >
> > > > Why don't you produce the quotes?
> > >
> > > Because you have been playing one of your favorite games. It involves
> > > yelling and screaming for quotes of things you damn well know
> > > happened,
> >
> > You're a bald-faced liar. You're attempting to play tit-for-tat, to
> > accuse me of what you've been guilty of on umpteen occasions, but it is
> > a bald-face lie.
>
> You know "damn well" that that isn't true.
>
> > The Mayor never said Apple was going out of business, and you've never
> > produced a quote of him saying it, excepting one that was clearly meant
> > as a joke.
>
> Incorrect. And you know damn well that I did.
>
> > > and if one does not accommodate your tantrum, one is
> > > supposedly branded a liar.
> >
> > You're just piling one lie on top of another.
>
> You know "damn well" that that isn't true.
Clatter on, Loopy.
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 10:52:18
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
tinWS wrote:
> On 2006-10-18 17:27:22 +0100, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> said:
>
> >
> > Sandman wrote:
> >> In article <1161182476.553460.72840@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> You're a bald-faced liar.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
> >>>
> >>> Why don't you produce the quotes?
> >>
> >> Because you have been playing one of your favorite games. It involves
> >> yelling and screaming for quotes of things you damn well know
> >> happened,
> >
> > You're a bald-faced liar. You're attempting to play tit-for-tat, to
> > accuse me of what you've been guilty of on umpteen occasions, but it is
> > a bald-face lie.
> >
> > The Mayor never said Apple was going out of business, and you've never
> > produced a quote of him saying it, excepting one that was clearly meant
> > as a joke.
> >
> >> and if one does not accommodate your tantrum, one is
> >> supposedly branded a liar.
> >
> > You're just piling one lie on top of another.
>
> I'm afraid Sandman has your trolling technique pretty well nailed.
One liar backs another. Birds of a feather...
> Did you know, there are 2040 hits of 'Edwin and lie' in this news group.
> Also, 2750 of 'Edwin and liar'.
>
> Based on these facts,
>
> There's either a lot of liars or a lot of people calling Edwin a liar :-)
Or a lot of me pointing out other people's lies.
Don't think about that too long, you don't want to smash your pea.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 20:37:56
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161193938.458761.281450@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> > Did you know, there are 2040 hits of 'Edwin and lie' in this news group.
> > Also, 2750 of 'Edwin and liar'.
> >
> > Based on these facts,
> >
> > There's either a lot of liars or a lot of people calling Edwin a liar :-)
>
> Or a lot of me pointing out other people's lies.
>
> Don't think about that too long, you don't want to smash your pea.
Ah, the Snit angle. :)
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 09:27:22
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Sandman wrote:
> In article <1161182476.553460.72840@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > > You're a bald-faced liar.
> > >
> > > Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
> >
> > Why don't you produce the quotes?
>
> Because you have been playing one of your favorite games. It involves
> yelling and screaming for quotes of things you damn well know
> happened,
You're a bald-faced liar. You're attempting to play tit-for-tat, to
accuse me of what you've been guilty of on umpteen occasions, but it is
a bald-face lie.
The Mayor never said Apple was going out of business, and you've never
produced a quote of him saying it, excepting one that was clearly meant
as a joke.
> and if one does not accommodate your tantrum, one is
> supposedly branded a liar.
You're just piling one lie on top of another.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 17:40:31
From: MartinWS
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
On 2006-10-18 17:27:22 +0100, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > said:
>
> Sandman wrote:
>> In article <1161182476.553460.72840@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> You're a bald-faced liar.
>>>>
>>>> Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
>>>
>>> Why don't you produce the quotes?
>>
>> Because you have been playing one of your favorite games. It involves
>> yelling and screaming for quotes of things you damn well know
>> happened,
>
> You're a bald-faced liar. You're attempting to play tit-for-tat, to
> accuse me of what you've been guilty of on umpteen occasions, but it is
> a bald-face lie.
>
> The Mayor never said Apple was going out of business, and you've never
> produced a quote of him saying it, excepting one that was clearly meant
> as a joke.
>
>> and if one does not accommodate your tantrum, one is
>> supposedly branded a liar.
>
> You're just piling one lie on top of another.
I'm afraid Sandman has your trolling technique pretty well nailed.
Did you know, there are 2040 hits of 'Edwin and lie' in this news group.
Also, 2750 of 'Edwin and liar'.
Based on these facts,
There's either a lot of liars or a lot of people calling Edwin a liar :-)
--
--
tinWS
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:43:38
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161188842.778950.198380@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> > > > > You're a bald-faced liar.
> > > >
> > > > Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
> > >
> > > Why don't you produce the quotes?
> >
> > Because you have been playing one of your favorite games. It involves
> > yelling and screaming for quotes of things you damn well know
> > happened,
>
> You're a bald-faced liar. You're attempting to play tit-for-tat, to
> accuse me of what you've been guilty of on umpteen occasions, but it is
> a bald-face lie.
You know "damn well" that that isn't true.
> The Mayor never said Apple was going out of business, and you've never
> produced a quote of him saying it, excepting one that was clearly meant
> as a joke.
Incorrect. And you know damn well that I did.
> > and if one does not accommodate your tantrum, one is
> > supposedly branded a liar.
>
> You're just piling one lie on top of another.
You know "damn well" that that isn't true.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 07:41:16
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Sandman wrote:
> In article <1161126642.770846.292340@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Sandman wrote:
> > > In article <1161113415.911415.196830@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
> > > >
> > > > "And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > > >
> > > > What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
> > >
> > > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened. Ample
> > > quotes have been given in this matter.
> >
> > You're a bald-faced liar.
>
> Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
Polly want a cracker?
Why don't you produce the quotes? Because they don't exist? Of
course they don't. Alan has had over two years to produce them, and
can't. Your lies will not save him.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:13:40
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161182476.553460.72840@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> > > You're a bald-faced liar.
> >
> > Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
>
> Why don't you produce the quotes?
Because you have been playing one of your favorite games. It involves
yelling and screaming for quotes of things you damn well know
happened, and if one does not accommodate your tantrum, one is
supposedly branded a liar.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 16:10:42
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Sandman wrote:
> In article <1161113415.911415.196830@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
> >
> > "And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >
> > What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
>
> Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened. Ample
> quotes have been given in this matter.
You're a bald-faced liar.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 09:48:11
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161126642.770846.292340@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Sandman wrote:
> > In article <1161113415.911415.196830@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
> > >
> > > "And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
> > >
> > > What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
> >
> > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened. Ample
> > quotes have been given in this matter.
>
> You're a bald-faced liar.
Does projecting your own traits into me help soothe your dark soul?
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 12:30:16
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Sandman wrote:
> In article <1161112616.359888.65490@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Alan Baker wrote:
> > > In article <1160754883.578180.150120@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bobby Knight wrote:
> > > > > On 10 Oct 2006 09:15:11 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Because this has no place in most of the news groups to which you
> > > > > crossposted.
> > > >
> > > > Sure it does, if you realize what the post is about. It's not about
> > > > computers, it's about a member of all those groups.
> > >
> > > Actually, it's about you being owned...
> >
> > That's just your tit-for-tat because I said my getting you to change
> > your stale old sig line showed I "owned you."
> >
> > > LOL
> >
> > Laugh this off:
> >
> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > survive."
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >
> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
> >
> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
> >
> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >
> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> > does it?"
> >
> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> > others on numerous occasions. "
> >
> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >
> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > All of the above? "
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
>
> Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
"And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:33:24
From: MuahMan
Subject: New Snit circus with different names!
|
Edwin just give up. Alan is Canadian and hasn't left his house in over 10
years. He is pasty white and can't play a single sport. You can't win
arguments with someone that does literally nothing else but troll like Alan
does. He is already dead though he still breathes.
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:04:34
From: Jim Lee Jr.
Subject: Re: New Snit circus with different names!
|
In article <pYidnQ_OFLG-0ajYnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@adelphia.com >,
"MuahMan" <muahman@gmail.com > wrote:
> Edwin, just give up. Alan is Canadian and hasn't left his house in over 10
> years. He is pasty white and can't play a single sport.
No bringing your pasties up here, leave them for the alt.fetish groups.
So what if Alan does not play sports? Jealous? If you are a sports fan,
Twinkie, think of how many of those big, macho football players who are
flaming queens off the field.
>You can't win arguments with someone that does literally nothing else
but troll like Alan does.
It takes a troll to know one, Pratt Twink.
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 18:08:01
From: MuahMan
Subject: Re: New Snit circus with different names!
|
"Jim Lee Jr." <peejster01@insightbb.com > wrote in message
news:peejster01-556DB2.17043417102006@news.isp.giganews.com...
> In article <pYidnQ_OFLG-0ajYnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <muahman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Edwin, just give up. Alan is Canadian and hasn't left his house in over
>> 10
>> years. He is pasty white and can't play a single sport.
>
> No bringing your pasties up here, leave them for the alt.fetish groups.
>
> So what if Alan does not play sports? Jealous? If you are a sports fan,
> Twinkie, think of how many of those big, macho football players who are
> flaming queens off the field.
>
>>You can't win arguments with someone that does literally nothing else
> but troll like Alan does.
>
> It takes a troll to know one, Pratt Twink.
You do Mac Advocacy proud.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:54:53
From: Jim Lee Jr.
Subject: Re: New Snit circus with different names!
|
In article <kOadnU4hSPPcyajYnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@adelphia.com >,
"MuahMan" <muahman@gmail.com > wrote:
> "Jim Lee Jr." <peejster01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:peejster01-556DB2.17043417102006@news.isp.giganews.com...
> > In article <pYidnQ_OFLG-0ajYnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@adelphia.com>,
> > "MuahMan" <muahman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Edwin, just give up. Alan is Canadian and hasn't left his house in over
> >> 10
> >> years. He is pasty white and can't play a single sport.
> >
> > No bringing your pasties up here, leave them for the alt.fetish groups.
> >
> > So what if Alan does not play sports? Jealous? If you are a sports fan,
> > Twinkie, think of how many of those big, macho football players who are
> > flaming queens off the field.
> >
> >>You can't win arguments with someone that does literally nothing else
> > but troll like Alan does.
> >
> > It takes a troll to know one, Pratt Twink.
>
> You do Mac Advocacy proud.
Thanks, I try to do my best. Can you the same for Windoze advocacy?
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 21:56:16
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161113415.911415.196830@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
>
> "And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
>
> What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened. Ample
quotes have been given in this matter.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:34:22
From: MuahMan
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net > wrote in message
news:mr-EDC36F.21561617102006@individual.net...
> In article <1161113415.911415.196830@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
>> > Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
>>
>> "And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
>>
>> What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
>
> Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened. Ample
> quotes have been given in this matter.
>
And in steps Alan's "life partner"! These mac jihad are a tight bunch.
Check your car for C4!
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 15:34:39
From: Mayor of R'lyeh
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
On 17 Oct 2006 12:30:16 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > chose to
bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>Sandman wrote:
>> In article <1161112616.359888.65490@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Alan Baker wrote:
>> > > In article <1160754883.578180.150120@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>> > > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Bobby Knight wrote:
>> > > > > On 10 Oct 2006 09:15:11 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Because this has no place in most of the news groups to which you
>> > > > > crossposted.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sure it does, if you realize what the post is about. It's not about
>> > > > computers, it's about a member of all those groups.
>> > >
>> > > Actually, it's about you being owned...
>> >
>> > That's just your tit-for-tat because I said my getting you to change
>> > your stale old sig line showed I "owned you."
>> >
>> > > LOL
>> >
>> > Laugh this off:
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
>> > survive."
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
>> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
>> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
>> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
>> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
>> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
>> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
>> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
>> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
>> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
>> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
>> >
>> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
>> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
>> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
>> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
>> > does it?"
>> >
>> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
>> > others on numerous occasions. "
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>> >
>> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
>> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
>> > All of the above? "
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
>> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
>> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
>>
>> Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
>
>"And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
>
>What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
I think he hits his head pretty hard on the window frame when he's
crawling in through it every night.
--
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the
very structure of our government."
Al Gore
Bill Clinton became eligible for reinstatement to the
bar on January 19,2006 after losing his law license
in 2001 for comitting perjury.
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 21:56:47
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <61caj2tsi9fams6j3s6jnjvsd880qta3pm@4ax.com >,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@gmail.com > wrote:
> >> Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
> >
> >"And no the one time where I was clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >
> >What part of that is too complicated for you to understand, Loopy?
>
> I think he hits his head pretty hard on the window frame when he's
> crawling in through it every night.
In the end I proved you wrong and you know it. Fine by me.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 12:16:56
From: Edwin
Subject: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1160754883.578180.150120@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Bobby Knight wrote:
> > > On 10 Oct 2006 09:15:11 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Because this has no place in most of the news groups to which you
> > > crossposted.
> >
> > Sure it does, if you realize what the post is about. It's not about
> > computers, it's about a member of all those groups.
>
> Actually, it's about you being owned...
That's just your tit-for-tat because I said my getting you to change
your stale old sig line showed I "owned you."
> LOL
Laugh this off:
Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
survive."
Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
another and that their survival was largely up to them."
Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
clearly joking doesn't count. "
Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
does it?"
Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
others on numerous occasions. "
Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
All of the above? "
Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 21:19:19
From: Sandman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1161112616.359888.65490@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1160754883.578180.150120@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Bobby Knight wrote:
> > > > On 10 Oct 2006 09:15:11 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Because this has no place in most of the news groups to which you
> > > > crossposted.
> > >
> > > Sure it does, if you realize what the post is about. It's not about
> > > computers, it's about a member of all those groups.
> >
> > Actually, it's about you being owned...
>
> That's just your tit-for-tat because I said my getting you to change
> your stale old sig line showed I "owned you."
>
> > LOL
>
> Laugh this off:
>
> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> survive."
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>
> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
>
> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
>
> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> clearly joking doesn't count. "
>
> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> does it?"
>
> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> others on numerous occasions. "
>
> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>
> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> All of the above? "
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
Been there, done that. And you know damn well it happened.
--
Sandman[.net]
|
| |
Date: 15 Oct 2006 08:28:44
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > I guess I really do own you...
> > >
> > > LOL
> >
> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> >
> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
>
> Nope.
You misspelled "yes."
> By your own standard,
Show where I've ever expressed such a "standard."
> you looking up other groups I've posted in
> and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
> you.
It means I'm exposing your true character to a wider audience.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:17:59
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160926124.817252.235440@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > I guess I really do own you...
> > > >
> > > > LOL
> > >
> > > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> > > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> > >
> > > An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >
> > Nope.
>
> You misspelled "yes."
>
> > By your own standard,
>
> Show where I've ever expressed such a "standard."
Please. If the situation had been reversed you'd have been dancing in
glee that you "owned" me.
>
> > you looking up other groups I've posted in
> > and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
> > you.
>
> It means I'm exposing your true character to a wider audience.
LOL
Amazing how little support you're garnering, isn't it?
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 15 Oct 2006 07:58:39
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Murphy wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-A28D6A.13493610102006@news.telus.net...
> > In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> > I guess I really do own you...
> >> >
> >> > LOL
> >>
> >> You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> >> refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> >>
> >> An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >
> > Nope. By your own standard, you looking up other groups I've posted in
> > and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
> > > you.
> >
> Don't feel bad about it, Edwin. He also owns
> Larry from this group.
No returns, no refunds. :-)
|
| |
Date: 15 Oct 2006 07:57:17
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Bobby Knight wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:46:34 -0500, Lloyd Parsons
> <lloydparsons@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <k4tni2dld64hpvvj826lm75k05gn4ndbef@4ax.com>,
> > Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10 Oct 2006 12:22:19 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Alan, what was the original news group? The fact that this idot
> >> is crossposting to 5 others shows his disregard, and contempt, for
> >> those who have no interest.
> >>
> >> You win by default :-)
>
> >> bk
> >
> >Bobby, this is coming out of comp.sys.mac.advocacy
> >
> >And as with other advocacy groups, it is a bit wild and wooly!
>
> It gets wild and wooly here too. However, it would take a schmuck
> like Edwin to crosspost golf content to comp.sys.mac....etc.
You're mistaking the content for something about computers. It's not.
It's about the character of Alan Baker, who is a member of all the
groups I posted that to.
|
| |
Date: 14 Oct 2006 07:33:44
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> Two Buddha wrote:
> > The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies or the
> > lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not discuss
> > his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged and
> > ridiculous fantasies.
> > Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a psychopath who
> > loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak he is.
> > How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
>
> What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
> quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the content of
> the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington State
> Board of Health?
Hey Scott! It's almost 24 hours, and still no response from you. This
is your big opportunity to show everyone what a liar I am - just post
that complaint you say I made to the licensing agency.
|
| | |
Date: 16 Oct 2006 19:30:54
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160836424.299561.48950@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Richard Henry wrote:
>> Two Buddha wrote:
>
>> > The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies or
>> > the
>> > lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not
>> > discuss
>> > his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged
>> > and
>> > ridiculous fantasies.
>> > Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a
>> > psychopath who
>> > loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak he
>> > is.
>> > How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
>>
>> What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
>> quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the content of
>> the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington State
>> Board of Health?
>
> Hey Scott! It's almost 24 hours, and still no response from you. This
> is your big opportunity to show everyone what a liar I am - just post
> that complaint you say I made to the licensing agency.
You know you went real life with an anonymous complaint, and so do I. Why
lie some more, freak? You know you are lying, I know you are lying, and I
know what a despicable, cowardly, desperate freak you are. My contempt is
boundless.
I won. They blew you off. How pathetic. Fuck yourself again.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 20:44:19
From:
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> VtSkier wrote:
> > Richard Henry wrote:
> > > Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
> > > among us:
> > >
> > > http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
> >
> > You might also try
> > http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>
> That's where I started the last tiem we went around on this point, but
> it doesnt show the city limits so Scott's new friend is likely to make
> the same mistake again.
LOL! So what was he supposed to do, call City Hall on his way through
to make sure he was technically within the limits? At best, you've
proved he was mistaken, not lying. That makes you a liar.
One quick question. If those houses on the west side of the line
aren't in Poway, where are they?
|
| | |
Date: 15 Oct 2006 21:50:56
From: Sven Golly
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote in news:1160797458.963102.198460
@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
> One quick question. If those houses on the west side of the line
> aren't in Poway, where are they?
San Diego.
--
Sven Golly
Yah sure by gosh by yumpin' yiminy
Trolling as usual
Change the "_" to "." to reply by email
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 21:54:39
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
<sbm2006@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:1160797458.963102.198460@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> Richard Henry wrote:
>> VtSkier wrote:
>> > Richard Henry wrote:
>> > > Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
>> > > among us:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>> >
>> > You might also try
>> > http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>>
>> That's where I started the last tiem we went around on this point, but
>> it doesnt show the city limits so Scott's new friend is likely to make
>> the same mistake again.
>
> LOL! So what was he supposed to do, call City Hall on his way through
> to make sure he was technically within the limits? At best, you've
> proved he was mistaken, not lying. That makes you a liar.
He lies like he breathes. Pathologically. Laughably. You show up, take a
look, and laugh your ass of at him, spotting him for what he is immediately.
My kind of guy.
>
> One quick question. If those houses on the west side of the line
> aren't in Poway, where are they?
He'll ignore you, like he ignores anyone who tells the truth and catches him
in a lie.
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:29:20
From: Yabahoobs
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> Happy to hear you say that in person. I would do a dance of joy. You would
> do a dance, too. On your ass.
HAHAHAHAAHHA...take the fucking hook outta yer mouth, dipshit.
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:16:19
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
VtSkier wrote:
> Richard Henry wrote:
> > Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
> > among us:
> >
> > http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>
> You might also try
> http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
That's where I started the last tiem we went around on this point, but
it doesnt show the city limits so Scott's new friend is likely to make
the same mistake again.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:24:47
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160788579.154020.86790@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> VtSkier wrote:
>> Richard Henry wrote:
>> > Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
>> > among us:
>> >
>> > http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>>
>> You might also try
>> http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>
> That's where I started the last tiem we went around on this point, but
> it doesnt show the city limits so Scott's new friend is likely to make
> the same mistake again.
It sure shows the road going through Poway. Discuss reality instead of your
desperate, pathetic lies.
How laughable. How Richard Henry, stalking psychopathic freak show.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:16:13
From: Yabahoobs
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> Amazing. The freak uses LOL again. So deranged, so insane, so utterly
> devoid of insight that he does exactly what is described and predicted.
> I don't think you're funny, Baker. I think you are a dangerous, mentally
> ill stalker. Insane, but not crazy enough to show up at Whistler.
alan's right. He owns you. I own you. RSA owns you. You are the
office pet. NOW DANCE FOR ME BITCH. DANCE, I SAY !!
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:24:05
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Yabahoobs" <chendrikson@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160788573.521005.66120@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>
>> Amazing. The freak uses LOL again. So deranged, so insane, so utterly
>> devoid of insight that he does exactly what is described and predicted.
>> I don't think you're funny, Baker. I think you are a dangerous, mentally
>> ill stalker. Insane, but not crazy enough to show up at Whistler.
>
> alan's right. He owns you. I own you. RSA owns you. You are the
> office pet. NOW DANCE FOR ME BITCH. DANCE, I SAY !!
Happy to hear you say that in person. I would do a dance of joy. You would
do a dance, too. On your ass.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 14:06:06
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
> Richard Henry wrote:
> > Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
> > > Richard Henry wrote:
> > > > Two Buddha wrote:
> > > > > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> > > > > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> > > > > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
> > > > >
> > > > > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
> > > > > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
> > > > > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
> > > > > You really are pathetic, freak.
> > > >
> > > > Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
> > > > have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
> > > > published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
> > > > ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
> > > > which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
> > > > 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
> > >
> > >
> > > Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
> >
> > If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
> > stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
> > as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
> > "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
> > divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
> >
> > In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
> > Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
> > traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
> > have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
> > included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
> > Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
> > country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
> > (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
> > made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
> > adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
> > fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
> > freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
>
>
> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
> Freeway.
>
> > Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
> > road.
>
> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
>
Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
among us:
http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 17:34:50
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160773566.140933.108320@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
>> Richard Henry wrote:
>> > Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>> > > Richard Henry wrote:
>> > > > Two Buddha wrote:
>> > > > > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like
>> > > > > > Highway 94) or
>> > > > > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the
>> > > > > > name and/or
>> > > > > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me
>> > > > > in a lie
>> > > > > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion
>> > > > > of your
>> > > > > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How
>> > > > > Richard Henry.
>> > > > > You really are pathetic, freak.
>> > > >
>> > > > Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book
>> > > > then. I
>> > > > have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>> > > > published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of
>> > > > years
>> > > > ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN
>> > > > number,
>> > > > which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>> > > > 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>> >
>> > If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
>> > stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
>> > as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
>> > "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
>> > divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>> >
>> > In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
>> > Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
>> > traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
>> > have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
>> > included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
>> > Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
>> > country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
>> > (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
>> > made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
>> > adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
>> > fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
>> > freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
>>
>>
>> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
>> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
>> Freeway.
>>
>> > Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
>> > road.
>>
>> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
>>
>
> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
> among us:
>
> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
As I was saying about Henry getting caught lying, then ignoring getting
caught and telling some more lies? I think the freak is losing it.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:47:22
From: VtSkier
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>>> Two Buddha wrote:
>>>>>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
>>>>>>> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
>>>>>>> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>>>>>> You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
>>>>>> you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
>>>>>> pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
>>>>>> You really are pathetic, freak.
>>>>> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
>>>>> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>>>>> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>>>>> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
>>>>> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>>>>> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>>>>
>>>> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>>> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
>>> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
>>> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
>>> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
>>> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>>>
>>> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
>>> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
>>> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
>>> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
>>> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
>>> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
>>> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
>>> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
>>> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
>>> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
>>> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
>>> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
>>
>> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
>> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
>> Freeway.
>>
>>> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
>>> road.
>> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
>
> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
> among us:
>
> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
You might also try
http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 17:35:30
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"VtSkier" <VtSkier@nospam.net > wrote in message
news:4pajbsFi32h7U1@individual.net...
> Richard Henry wrote:
>> sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>>>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>>>> Two Buddha wrote:
>>>>>>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway
>>>>>>>> 94) or
>>>>>>>> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>>>>>>> You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in
>>>>>>> a lie
>>>>>>> you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
>>>>>>> Henry.
>>>>>>> You really are pathetic, freak.
>>>>>> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>>>>>> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>>>>>> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN
>>>>>> number,
>>>>>> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>>>>>> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>>>> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
>>>> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
>>>> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
>>>> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
>>>> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>>>>
>>>> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
>>>> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
>>>> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
>>>> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
>>>> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
>>>> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
>>>> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
>>>> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
>>>> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
>>>> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
>>>> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
>>>> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
>>>
>>> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
>>> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
>>> Freeway.
>>>
>>>> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
>>>> road.
>>> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
>>
>> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
>> among us:
>>
>> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>
> You might also try
> http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
One pathological liar and real life stalker supporting another stalking
psychopath. Amazing how the freaks band together to lie and lie and lie and
lie.......
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 21:10:34
From: VtSkier
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "VtSkier" <VtSkier@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:4pajbsFi32h7U1@individual.net...
>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>> sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
>>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>>> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>>>>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>>>>> Two Buddha wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway
>>>>>>>>> 94) or
>>>>>>>>> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>>> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>>>>>>>> You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in
>>>>>>>> a lie
>>>>>>>> you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
>>>>>>>> Henry.
>>>>>>>> You really are pathetic, freak.
>>>>>>> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>>>>>>> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>>>>>>> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN
>>>>>>> number,
>>>>>>> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>>>>>>> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>>>>>> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>>>>> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
>>>>> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
>>>>> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
>>>>> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
>>>>> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
>>>>> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
>>>>> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
>>>>> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
>>>>> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
>>>>> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
>>>>> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
>>>>> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
>>>>> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
>>>>> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
>>>>> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
>>>>> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
>>>> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
>>>> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
>>>> Freeway.
>>>>
>>>>> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
>>>>> road.
>>>> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
>>> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
>>> among us:
>>>
>>> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>> You might also try
>> http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>
> One pathological liar and real life stalker supporting another stalking
> psychopath. Amazing how the freaks band together to lie and lie and lie and
> lie.......
Hey shithead, the road is where it is and it ain't in Poway.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:23:25
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"VtSkier" <VtSkier@nospam.net > wrote in message
news:4parocFi4gaqU1@individual.net...
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "VtSkier" <VtSkier@nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:4pajbsFi32h7U1@individual.net...
>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>> sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
>>>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>>>> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>>>>>>> Richard Henry wrote:
>>>>>>>> Two Buddha wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway
>>>>>>>>>> 94) or
>>>>>>>>>> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>>>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>>>> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>>>>>>>>> You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me
>>>>>>>>> in a lie
>>>>>>>>> you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How
>>>>>>>>> Richard Henry.
>>>>>>>>> You really are pathetic, freak.
>>>>>>>> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book
>>>>>>>> then. I
>>>>>>>> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>>>>>>>> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of
>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN
>>>>>>>> number,
>>>>>>>> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>>>>>>>> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>>>>>>> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>>>>>> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
>>>>>> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
>>>>>> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
>>>>>> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
>>>>>> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
>>>>>> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
>>>>>> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
>>>>>> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
>>>>>> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
>>>>>> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
>>>>>> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
>>>>>> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so
>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
>>>>>> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
>>>>>> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through
>>>>>> Poway.
>>>>> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
>>>>> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
>>>>> Freeway.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
>>>>>> road.
>>>>> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
>>>> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
>>>> among us:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>>> You might also try
>>> http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>>
>> One pathological liar and real life stalker supporting another stalking
>> psychopath. Amazing how the freaks band together to lie and lie and lie
>> and lie.......
>
> Hey shithead, the road is where it is and it ain't in Poway.
Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps. Why is
it that you ignore that reality?
Hey, shithead, got the balls to find ME on a map, in person? Happy to give
you directions....like you gave to a freak who threatened my life.
What a despicable coward you are. As I said, one pathological liar and real
life stalker supporting another stalking psychopath.
Fuck yourself again, freak.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 15 Oct 2006 21:50:17
From: Sven Golly
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote in
news:1160789084_13015@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
> Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps.
Is what on Google Maps? 15 runs just west of Poway's city boundaries. Going
"through" Poway, you'd need to move it about 6 miles east. It's pretty much
quibbling but technically Richard's right and you're wrong.
> Hey, shithead, got the balls to find ME on a map, in person? Happy to
> give you directions....like you gave to a freak who threatened my
> life.
It's great you're so willing to give people directions to come find you.
Sort of makes that whole "no duty to retreat" excuse of yours absurd.
--
Sven Golly
Yah sure by gosh by yumpin' yiminy
Trolling as usual
Change the "_" to "." to reply by email
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 16 Oct 2006 19:49:00
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Sven Golly" <sven_medelsvensson@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:Xns985D9703C7586svengolly@66.75.164.120...
> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:1160789084_13015@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>
>> Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps.
>
> Is what on Google Maps? 15 runs just west of Poway's city boundaries.
> Going
> "through" Poway, you'd need to move it about 6 miles east. It's pretty
> much
> quibbling but technically Richard's right and you're wrong.
Not on the map I looked at when I went through, and Henry knows it.
Quibbling is right. Long way from a lie....and Henry keeps claiming he
caught me in a lie. Truly desperate. Pathetic.
>
>> Hey, shithead, got the balls to find ME on a map, in person? Happy to
>> give you directions....like you gave to a freak who threatened my
>> life.
>
> It's great you're so willing to give people directions to come find you.
> Sort of makes that whole "no duty to retreat" excuse of yours absurd.
Come find out, coward. You ain't even got the balls to use a verifiable
identity. Which makes YOUR entire arguement absurd, freak.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 07:52:37
From: Olaf Timandahaff
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:49:00 -0700, Two Buddha wrote:
> "Sven Golly" <sven_medelsvensson@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns985D9703C7586svengolly@66.75.164.120...
>> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:1160789084_13015@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>>
>>> Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps.
>>
>> Is what on Google Maps? 15 runs just west of Poway's city boundaries.
>> Going
>> "through" Poway, you'd need to move it about 6 miles east. It's pretty
>> much
>> quibbling but technically Richard's right and you're wrong.
>
> Not on the map I looked at when I went through, and Henry knows it.
> Quibbling is right. Long way from a lie....and Henry keeps claiming he
> caught me in a lie. Truly desperate. Pathetic.
>>
>>> Hey, shithead, got the balls to find ME on a map, in person? Happy to
>>> give you directions....like you gave to a freak who threatened my life.
>>
>> It's great you're so willing to give people directions to come find you.
>> Sort of makes that whole "no duty to retreat" excuse of yours absurd.
>
> Come find out, coward. You ain't even got the balls to use a verifiable
> identity. Which makes YOUR entire arguement absurd, freak.
>
Please don't Xp0ast into comp.sys.mac.advocacy, Sp0ck!
and don't wipe your nose on your sleeve, it ain't genteel.
#317
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Oct 2006 01:07:44
From: Dave Cartman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160786209_12997@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> >> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
> >> among us:
> >>
> >> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
> >
> > You might also try
> > http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>
> One pathological liar and real life stalker supporting another stalking
> psychopath. Amazing how the freaks band together to lie and lie and lie and
> lie.......
Apparently, Google is in on it too. You should add them to to your
"known enemy list." HTH.
Dave
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:21:52
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Dave Cartman" <vern93@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:vern93-755A9D.15074313102006@news-server.hawaii.rr.com...
> In article <1160786209_12997@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Here's a better map source for the geographically-challenged posters
>> >> among us:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.ci.poway.ca.us/trails/poway_trails_map.pdf
>> >
>> > You might also try
>> > http://tinyurl.com/ylupg3
>>
>> One pathological liar and real life stalker supporting another stalking
>> psychopath. Amazing how the freaks band together to lie and lie and lie
>> and
>> lie.......
>
> Apparently, Google is in on it too. You should add them to to your
> "known enemy list." HTH.
Not in on it at all. You freaks just latch onto anything that even remotely
resembles an inconsistency and then exploit it: when exposed as a liar, you
just lie more. No comment, of course, on the liars getting caught lying and
lying and lying.
One thing for sure: You've been on my known assholes list for a long time.
Also on the known cowards, known pathological liars, known stalkers.....
Fuck yourself again, freak.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 14 Oct 2006 01:48:06
From: Dave Cartman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160788991_13013@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> > Apparently, Google is in on it too. You should add them to to your
> > "known enemy list." HTH.
>
>
> Not in on it at all. You freaks just latch onto anything that even remotely
> resembles an inconsistency and then exploit it: when exposed as a liar, you
> just lie more. No comment, of course, on the liars getting caught lying and
> lying and lying.
> One thing for sure: You've been on my known assholes list for a long time.
> Also on the known cowards, known pathological liars, known stalkers.....
> Fuck yourself again, freak.
Out of curiosity, how do have me listed?
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 12:31:51
From:
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
> > Richard Henry wrote:
> > > Two Buddha wrote:
> > > > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> > > > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> > > > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
> > > >
> > > > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
> > > > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
> > > > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
> > > > You really are pathetic, freak.
> > >
> > > Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
> > > have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
> > > published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
> > > ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
> > > which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
> > > 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
> >
> >
> > Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>
> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>
> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
Freeway.
> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
> road.
Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
> Now you're caught up on this thread, ignoramus.
>
> For another laugh, ask Scott who Bobaloobob is, and how he tricked
> himself into admitting B's true identity.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 13:14:31
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
--
<sbm2006@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:1160767911.632746.74000@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Richard Henry wrote:
>> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>> > Richard Henry wrote:
>> > > Two Buddha wrote:
>> > > > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway
>> > > > > 94) or
>> > > > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>> > > > > and/or
>> > > > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>> > > >
>> > > > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me
>> > > > in a lie
>> > > > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of
>> > > > your
>> > > > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How
>> > > > Richard Henry.
>> > > > You really are pathetic, freak.
>> > >
>> > > Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then.
>> > > I
>> > > have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>> > > published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>> > > ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN
>> > > number,
>> > > which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>> > > 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>> >
>> >
>> > Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>>
>> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
>> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
>> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
>> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
>> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
>>
>> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
>> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
>> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
>> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
>> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
>> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
>> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
>> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
>> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
>> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
>> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
>> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
>
>
> Oh really? Because I just checked on Google Earth and it shows I-15
> passing right through your town, when it's called the Escondido
> Freeway.
No shit. Just like my Rand McNally.
Nice try, but when Richard Henry is lying (which is all the time), he
doesn't pay attention to anyone who exposes him as a liar. He just keeps
lying and lying and lying......
>
>> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
>> road.
>
> Google Maps also shows a road. Seems that you're the liar, asshole.
Sure is. I've told him exactly what map book I use, and he lies. And lies.
And lies......
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 10:16:40
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160757976.004659.56250@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >
> >> If you check Google records, you will find that Richard Henry is a real
> >> life
> >> stalker, a pathological liar, and a truly pathetic psychopath. When
> >> exposed
> >> in a lie, he just keeps lying and lying and lying some more. As in the
> >> above outright lie. He enjoys it. It is ttruly pathetic, predictable,
> >> and
> >> laughable.
> >>
> >>
> >> Truly pathetic, predictable, and laughable. Desperate. Check the maps.
> >> Freeway has Poway exits. And this sick freak is so deranged, so deluded,
> >> so
> >> ridiculous that he thinks this quibble is a smoking gun that justifies
> >> all
> >> his claims.
> >> He's told THOUSANDS of defamatory lies about me.....and has NEVER
> >> provided
> >> ANY evidence of his lies.
> >> How pathetic. How desperate. How gutless. How Richard Henry.
> >
> >> Tricked? Did it on purpose. For a real laugh, ask me about how the
> >> freaks
> >> of rsa deliberately lied to the cops and a judge in a criminal conspiracy
> >> to
> >> control a stupid newsgroup, committing scores of felonies along the way.
> >> That's truly funny. You'll be amazed that Richard Henry and his buddies
> >> lie
> >> so much over a dead shithole like RSA.
> >> How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
> >
> > Q.E.D.
>
> The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies or the
> lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not discuss
> his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged and
> ridiculous fantasies.
> Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a psychopath who
> loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak he is.
> How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the content of
the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington State
Board of Health?
> >
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 10:14:14
From: Yabahoobs
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> > Deeper and deeper...
>
> Off the meds again? Your delusions are truly powerful. Insane. Typical.
HAHAHAHHAHA ?? You got delusions out of the words "deeper and deeper".
Who's insane ? (Answer = you)
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 09:47:58
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160734433.664343.77600@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> > Maybe you missed it, but we've already caught you lying, and not just
> > in this thread. Now we're just enjoying it.
>
> Maybe you missed it, but you didn't catch me lying. Never have, really.
> You just make up whoppers then claim it as fact. Gotta admit, I truly do
> enjoy YOU making up whoppers. Like this one. How pathetic. How laughable.
> How desperate.
> >
> > And you can't help yourself. You're stuck in the mud of your own bs
> > stories and all your struggling to get out just gets you in deeper and
> > deeper.
>
> You really are deranged. Delusional. Desperate. Pathetic. Laughable.
> And very amusing: I love watching you try to hang me up......while lying and
> lying and lying some more.
> Clue time, freak. All the decent people saw you for what you are and left
> in disgust and contempt. You're playing to fellow psychopaths, pathological
> liars, freaks, and gutless wackos.
> Fuck yourself again, Henry.
Deeper and deeper...
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 10:08:22
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160758078.383535.132780@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160734433.664343.77600@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > Maybe you missed it, but we've already caught you lying, and not just
>> > in this thread. Now we're just enjoying it.
>>
>> Maybe you missed it, but you didn't catch me lying. Never have, really.
>> You just make up whoppers then claim it as fact. Gotta admit, I truly do
>> enjoy YOU making up whoppers. Like this one. How pathetic. How
>> laughable.
>> How desperate.
>> >
>> > And you can't help yourself. You're stuck in the mud of your own bs
>> > stories and all your struggling to get out just gets you in deeper and
>> > deeper.
>>
>> You really are deranged. Delusional. Desperate. Pathetic. Laughable.
>> And very amusing: I love watching you try to hang me up......while lying
>> and
>> lying and lying some more.
>> Clue time, freak. All the decent people saw you for what you are and
>> left
>> in disgust and contempt. You're playing to fellow psychopaths,
>> pathological
>> liars, freaks, and gutless wackos.
>> Fuck yourself again, Henry.
>
> Deeper and deeper...
Off the meds again? Your delusions are truly powerful. Insane. Typical.
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 09:46:16
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> If you check Google records, you will find that Richard Henry is a real life
> stalker, a pathological liar, and a truly pathetic psychopath. When exposed
> in a lie, he just keeps lying and lying and lying some more. As in the
> above outright lie. He enjoys it. It is ttruly pathetic, predictable, and
> laughable.
>
>
> Truly pathetic, predictable, and laughable. Desperate. Check the maps.
> Freeway has Poway exits. And this sick freak is so deranged, so deluded, so
> ridiculous that he thinks this quibble is a smoking gun that justifies all
> his claims.
> He's told THOUSANDS of defamatory lies about me.....and has NEVER provided
> ANY evidence of his lies.
> How pathetic. How desperate. How gutless. How Richard Henry.
> Tricked? Did it on purpose. For a real laugh, ask me about how the freaks
> of rsa deliberately lied to the cops and a judge in a criminal conspiracy to
> control a stupid newsgroup, committing scores of felonies along the way.
> That's truly funny. You'll be amazed that Richard Henry and his buddies lie
> so much over a dead shithole like RSA.
> How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
Q.E.D.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 10:07:53
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160757976.004659.56250@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>
>> If you check Google records, you will find that Richard Henry is a real
>> life
>> stalker, a pathological liar, and a truly pathetic psychopath. When
>> exposed
>> in a lie, he just keeps lying and lying and lying some more. As in the
>> above outright lie. He enjoys it. It is ttruly pathetic, predictable,
>> and
>> laughable.
>>
>>
>> Truly pathetic, predictable, and laughable. Desperate. Check the maps.
>> Freeway has Poway exits. And this sick freak is so deranged, so deluded,
>> so
>> ridiculous that he thinks this quibble is a smoking gun that justifies
>> all
>> his claims.
>> He's told THOUSANDS of defamatory lies about me.....and has NEVER
>> provided
>> ANY evidence of his lies.
>> How pathetic. How desperate. How gutless. How Richard Henry.
>
>> Tricked? Did it on purpose. For a real laugh, ask me about how the
>> freaks
>> of rsa deliberately lied to the cops and a judge in a criminal conspiracy
>> to
>> control a stupid newsgroup, committing scores of felonies along the way.
>> That's truly funny. You'll be amazed that Richard Henry and his buddies
>> lie
>> so much over a dead shithole like RSA.
>> How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
>
> Q.E.D.
The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies or the
lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not discuss
his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged and
ridiculous fantasies.
Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a psychopath who
loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak he is.
How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
>
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 03:30:55
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
> Richard Henry wrote:
> > Two Buddha wrote:
> > > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > > >
> >
> > > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> > > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> > > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
> > >
> > > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
> > > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
> > > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
> > > You really are pathetic, freak.
> >
> > Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
> > have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
> > published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
> > ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
> > which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
> > 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>
>
> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
"lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
(why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
road. Now you're caught up on this thread, ignoramus.
For another laugh, ask Scott who Bobaloobob is, and how he tricked
himself into admitting B's true identity.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 09:35:42
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160735455.436253.96430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>> Richard Henry wrote:
>> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> > > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> > > >
>> >
>> > > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway
>> > > > 94) or
>> > > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>> > > > and/or
>> > > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>> > >
>> > > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in
>> > > a lie
>> > > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of
>> > > your
>> > > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
>> > > Henry.
>> > > You really are pathetic, freak.
>> >
>> > Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
>> > have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>> > published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>> > ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
>> > which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>> > 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>>
>>
>> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>
> If you check the google records, you will notice a pattern to Scott's
> stories. Whenever he is challenged to provide a checkable fact (such
> as the name of a highway, a book ID number, an actual example of a
> "lie" told about him, etc.) he will attempts to change the subject or
> divert into obscenities. It's pathetic, predictable, and laughable.
If you check Google records, you will find that Richard Henry is a real life
stalker, a pathological liar, and a truly pathetic psychopath. When exposed
in a lie, he just keeps lying and lying and lying some more. As in the
above outright lie. He enjoys it. It is ttruly pathetic, predictable, and
laughable.
>
> In this case, Scott claimed years ago to having visited my home town,
> Poway, CA, in a veiled attempt to intimidate me (Poway is out of the
> traffic mainstream, and the only logical reason for being here would
> have been physical harrassment). His attempts to defend that story
> included an explanation that he was passing through on his way from
> Palm Springs to Coronado. Anyone familiar with this part of the
> country was already laughing. He later attempted to rescue the story
> (why he doesn't just drop these threads when he is being so thoroughly
> made to look like a fool I'll never understand, but he soldiers on,
> adding onr laughable lie after another) by saying that he had been
> fooled by highway signs, and that he had just passed through town on a
> freeway. The problem with that? there are no freeways through Poway.
> Then he blamed his mythical book of highway maps, which show such a
> road. Now you're caught up on this thread, ignoramus.
Truly pathetic, predictable, and laughable. Desperate. Check the maps.
Freeway has Poway exits. And this sick freak is so deranged, so deluded, so
ridiculous that he thinks this quibble is a smoking gun that justifies all
his claims.
He's told THOUSANDS of defamatory lies about me.....and has NEVER provided
ANY evidence of his lies.
How pathetic. How desperate. How gutless. How Richard Henry.
>
> For another laugh, ask Scott who Bobaloobob is, and how he tricked
> himself into admitting B's true identity.
Tricked? Did it on purpose. For a real laugh, ask me about how the freaks
of rsa deliberately lied to the cops and a judge in a criminal conspiracy to
control a stupid newsgroup, committing scores of felonies along the way.
That's truly funny. You'll be amazed that Richard Henry and his buddies lie
so much over a dead shithole like RSA.
How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 03:13:53
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:1160711795.501310.118920@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Richard Henry wrote:
> >> Two Buddha wrote:
> >> > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >> > >
> >>
> >> > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94)
> >> > > or
> >> > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
> >> > > and/or
> >> > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
> >> >
> >> > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a
> >> > lie
> >> > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
> >> > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
> >> > Henry.
> >> > You really are pathetic, freak.
> >>
> >> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
> >> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
> >> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
> >> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
> >> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
> >> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
> >
> >
> > Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>
> This is his latest obsessed attempt to catch me lying.....while he has
> stalked me in real life and made false complaints to my licensing board.
> Truly a psychopathic liar and real life stalker.
Maybe you missed it, but we've already caught you lying, and not just
in this thread. Now we're just enjoying it.
And you can't help yourself. You're stuck in the mud of your own bs
stories and all your struggling to get out just gets you in deeper and
deeper.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 09:30:42
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160734433.664343.77600@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:1160711795.501310.118920@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Richard Henry wrote:
>> >> Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > >
>> >>
>> >> > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway
>> >> > > 94)
>> >> > > or
>> >> > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>> >> > > and/or
>> >> > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>> >> >
>> >> > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in
>> >> > a
>> >> > lie
>> >> > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of
>> >> > your
>> >> > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
>> >> > Henry.
>> >> > You really are pathetic, freak.
>> >>
>> >> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then.
>> >> I
>> >> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>> >> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>> >> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
>> >> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>> >> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>> >
>> >
>> > Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
>>
>> This is his latest obsessed attempt to catch me lying.....while he has
>> stalked me in real life and made false complaints to my licensing board.
>> Truly a psychopathic liar and real life stalker.
>
> Maybe you missed it, but we've already caught you lying, and not just
> in this thread. Now we're just enjoying it.
Maybe you missed it, but you didn't catch me lying. Never have, really.
You just make up whoppers then claim it as fact. Gotta admit, I truly do
enjoy YOU making up whoppers. Like this one. How pathetic. How laughable.
How desperate.
>
> And you can't help yourself. You're stuck in the mud of your own bs
> stories and all your struggling to get out just gets you in deeper and
> deeper.
You really are deranged. Delusional. Desperate. Pathetic. Laughable.
And very amusing: I love watching you try to hang me up......while lying and
lying and lying some more.
Clue time, freak. All the decent people saw you for what you are and left
in disgust and contempt. You're playing to fellow psychopaths, pathological
liars, freaks, and gutless wackos.
Fuck yourself again, Henry.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 21:00:40
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>
> Desperate. Laughable. Fixated. Obsessed. Utterly psychopathic. How
> pathetic. How Richard Henry.
Deeper and deeper...
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 21:36:35
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160712040.373630.5040@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
>> > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
>> > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>>
>> Desperate. Laughable. Fixated. Obsessed. Utterly psychopathic. How
>> pathetic. How Richard Henry.
>
> Deeper and deeper...
Desperate. Laughable. Fixated. Obsessed. Utterly psychopathic. How
pathetic. How Richard Henry.
You really think you caught me lying, don't you? You're losing it, Henry.
As deranged and deluded as Baker.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 20:59:21
From: Siobhan Medeiros
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> Two Buddha wrote:
> > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1160594404.854107.158010@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > Two Buddha wrote:
> > >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > >> >
> > >> > Two Buddha wrote:
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
> > >> >> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
> > >> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> >> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
> > >> >> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> > >> >> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> > >> >> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
> > >> >> >> bullshit.
> > >> >> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
> > >> >
> > >> > <top-posting corrected>
> > >> >> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
> > >> >
> > >> > What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
> > >> > that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
> > >> > defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
> > >>
> > >> You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell the
> > >> truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a
> > >> defamation
> > >> case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you lie
> > >> and
> > >> lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
> > >
> > > So which of these is the truth?
> > >
> > > "I passed through Poway on my way to Coronado"
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > "I've never been to Poway in my life"
> >
> > I sure as hell never have gotten off the freeway in Poway....but according
> > to the map, I passed through.
> > Amazing how desperate you are to catch me in a lie....while I've caught you
> > hundreds of times. Indeed, this ludicrous twisting of the facts is just
> > another ridiculous and laughable Richard Henry lie.
> > You really can't understand that there are honest, honorable people in the
> > world, do you? You think everybody lies the way you do. You can't conceive
> > of people who don't. You can't understand why everybody isn't an amoral,
> > stalking psychopath like you.
> > What a case study. You fascinate me.
>
> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
I-15. Next question.
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 20:56:35
From: Siobhan Medeiros
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> Two Buddha wrote:
> > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > >
>
> > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
> >
> > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
> > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
> > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
> > You really are pathetic, freak.
>
> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 21:35:28
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:1160711795.501310.118920@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Richard Henry wrote:
>> Two Buddha wrote:
>> > "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> > >
>>
>> > > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94)
>> > > or
>> > > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name
>> > > and/or
>> > > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>> >
>> > You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a
>> > lie
>> > you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
>> > pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
>> > Henry.
>> > You really are pathetic, freak.
>>
>> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
>> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
>> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
>> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
>> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
>> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
>
>
> Wtf is that supposed to prove, moron?
This is his latest obsessed attempt to catch me lying.....while he has
stalked me in real life and made false complaints to my licensing board.
Truly a psychopathic liar and real life stalker.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 20:50:23
From: Siobhan Medeiros
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Edwin wrote:
> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> survive."
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>
> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
>
> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
>
> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> clearly joking doesn't count. "
>
> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> does it?"
>
> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> others on numerous occasions. "
>
> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>
> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> All of the above? "
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
year. Dishonest asshole.
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 21:34:31
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edwin wrote:
>> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
>> survive."
>>
>> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
>> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
>> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>>
>> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
>>
>> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
>> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
>> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>>
>> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
>> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
>> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
>> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
>> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
>> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
>> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
>>
>> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
>> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>>
>> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
>> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
>> clearly joking doesn't count. "
>>
>> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
>> does it?"
>>
>> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
>> others on numerous occasions. "
>>
>> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>>
>> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
>> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
>> All of the above? "
>>
>> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
>> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
>> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
>
> Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> year. Dishonest asshole.
I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his neighborhood
on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
show.....and keeps on lying about why.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 04:42:24
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160714151_1623@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:1160711423.011066.234470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edwin wrote:
> >> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> >> survive."
> >>
> >> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> >> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> >> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >>
> >> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
> >>
> >> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> >> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> >> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >>
> >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> >> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> >> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> >> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> >> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> >> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> >> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
> >>
> >> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> >> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >>
> >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> >> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> >> clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >>
> >> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> >> does it?"
> >>
> >> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> >> others on numerous occasions. "
> >>
> >> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >>
> >> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> >> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> >> All of the above? "
> >>
> >> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> >> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> >> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
> >
> > Yeah, no surprise. I caught Baker in a bold-faced lie earlier this
> > year. Dishonest asshole.
>
> I've caught him in hundreds of lies.
> Gotta share the best: I set up a meet, at his request, in his neighborhood
> on Whistler Mountain. Chickenshit coward didn't have the balls to
> show.....and keeps on lying about why.
Now it's at my *request*?
LOL
Whatever you say, Scotty!
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 17:32:53
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>
> You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
> you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
> pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
> You really are pathetic, freak.
Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 19:43:36
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160699572.973751.18400@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>
>> > Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
>> > a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
>> > number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
>>
>> You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a
>> lie
>> you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
>> pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard
>> Henry.
>> You really are pathetic, freak.
>
> Let's change the subject and talk about your Rand McNally book then. I
> have a recent Thomas Guide California Road Atlas 22nd Edition,
> published by Rand McNally, that I bought at Walt a couple of years
> ago. Probably similar to yours. On the back cover is an ISBN number,
> which uniquely identifies the book. The number on my book is
> 0-528-99571-5. What's the number on yours?
Let's change the subject back to how pathetic and ridiculous you are. Throw
in a discussion of your hypocrisy, double standards, and outright,
manipulative dishonesty. Discuss.
This is truly amusing. Glad I stopped in to fuck with you freaks again,
I've been feeling pissy since I got back from vacation.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 16:13:16
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1160540216.978746.210650@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "gpsman" <gpsman@driversmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Edwin wrote: <brevity snip/groups adjusted>
> >
> > Who's Alan Baker...? Is he some sort of idiot crossposter?
> > -----
> >
> > - gpsman
>
> Sorry, gps, but no.
>
> Edwin has just decided to lash out by crossposting this little diatribe
> in groups I frequent.
How does widening the audience of the lies you've posted count as
"lashing out," or as a "diatribe?"
Why don't you just admit you were wrong and apologize to the Mayor of
R'lyeh?
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 00:18:59
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160694796.406388.50020@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1160540216.978746.210650@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> > "gpsman" <gpsman@driversmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Edwin wrote: <brevity snip/groups adjusted>
> > >
> > > Who's Alan Baker...? Is he some sort of idiot crossposter?
> > > -----
> > >
> > > - gpsman
> >
> > Sorry, gps, but no.
> >
> > Edwin has just decided to lash out by crossposting this little diatribe
> > in groups I frequent.
>
> How does widening the audience of the lies you've posted count as
> "lashing out," or as a "diatribe?"
LOL
>
> Why don't you just admit you were wrong and apologize to the Mayor of
> R'lyeh?
LOL
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 09:26:13
From: The_Professor
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
I can state for an absolute fact that Apple is not going to survive. I
see no shame in stating the obvious.
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 22:54:56
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Apple's survival (was Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160670373.343283.21670@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >,
"The_Professor" <dbid@att.net > wrote:
> I can state for an absolute fact that Apple is not going to survive. I
> see no shame in stating the obvious.
LOL
I bet you were saying the same thing ten years ago, too...
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 23:53:15
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160594404.854107.158010@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> >> --
> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> >> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
> >> >> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
> >> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> >> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> >> >> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> >> >> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
> >> >> >> bullshit.
> >> >> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
> >> >
> >> > <top-posting corrected>
> >> >> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
> >> >
> >> > What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
> >> > that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
> >> > defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
> >>
> >> You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell the
> >> truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a
> >> defamation
> >> case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you lie
> >> and
> >> lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
> >
> > So which of these is the truth?
> >
> > "I passed through Poway on my way to Coronado"
> >
> > or
> >
> > "I've never been to Poway in my life"
>
> I sure as hell never have gotten off the freeway in Poway....but according
> to the map, I passed through.
> Amazing how desperate you are to catch me in a lie....while I've caught you
> hundreds of times. Indeed, this ludicrous twisting of the facts is just
> another ridiculous and laughable Richard Henry lie.
> You really can't understand that there are honest, honorable people in the
> world, do you? You think everybody lies the way you do. You can't conceive
> of people who don't. You can't understand why everybody isn't an amoral,
> stalking psychopath like you.
> What a case study. You fascinate me.
Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 19:42:21
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160594404.854107.158010@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
>> >> >> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
>> >> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> >> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to
>> >> >> >> be a
>> >> >> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> >> >> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>> >> >> >> bullshit.
>> >> >> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
>> >> >
>> >> > <top-posting corrected>
>> >> >> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
>> >> >
>> >> > What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
>> >> > that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
>> >> > defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
>> >>
>> >> You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell
>> >> the
>> >> truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a
>> >> defamation
>> >> case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you
>> >> lie
>> >> and
>> >> lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
>> >
>> > So which of these is the truth?
>> >
>> > "I passed through Poway on my way to Coronado"
>> >
>> > or
>> >
>> > "I've never been to Poway in my life"
>>
>> I sure as hell never have gotten off the freeway in Poway....but
>> according
>> to the map, I passed through.
>> Amazing how desperate you are to catch me in a lie....while I've caught
>> you
>> hundreds of times. Indeed, this ludicrous twisting of the facts is just
>> another ridiculous and laughable Richard Henry lie.
>> You really can't understand that there are honest, honorable people in
>> the
>> world, do you? You think everybody lies the way you do. You can't
>> conceive
>> of people who don't. You can't understand why everybody isn't an amoral,
>> stalking psychopath like you.
>> What a case study. You fascinate me.
>
> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
Desperate. Laughable. Fixated. Obsessed. Utterly psychopathic. How
pathetic. How Richard Henry.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2006 10:30:28
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160635991.304202.46890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160594404.854107.158010@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
>> >> >> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
>> >> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> >> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to
>> >> >> >> be a
>> >> >> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> >> >> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>> >> >> >> bullshit.
>> >> >> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
>> >> >
>> >> > <top-posting corrected>
>> >> >> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
>> >> >
>> >> > What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
>> >> > that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
>> >> > defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
>> >>
>> >> You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell
>> >> the
>> >> truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a
>> >> defamation
>> >> case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you
>> >> lie
>> >> and
>> >> lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
>> >
>> > So which of these is the truth?
>> >
>> > "I passed through Poway on my way to Coronado"
>> >
>> > or
>> >
>> > "I've never been to Poway in my life"
>>
>> I sure as hell never have gotten off the freeway in Poway....but
>> according
>> to the map, I passed through.
>> Amazing how desperate you are to catch me in a lie....while I've caught
>> you
>> hundreds of times. Indeed, this ludicrous twisting of the facts is just
>> another ridiculous and laughable Richard Henry lie.
>> You really can't understand that there are honest, honorable people in
>> the
>> world, do you? You think everybody lies the way you do. You can't
>> conceive
>> of people who don't. You can't understand why everybody isn't an amoral,
>> stalking psychopath like you.
>> What a case study. You fascinate me.
>
> Freeways in this part of the country have a number (like Highway 94) or
> a name (like tin Luther King Jr. Freeway). What was the name and/or
> number of the freeway through Poway on your alleged map?
You just can't give up, can you? You're so desperate to catch me in a lie
you beat this to death......while lying and ignoring discussion of your
pathological lying. How ridiculous. How contemptible. How Richard Henry.
You really are pathetic, freak.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 12:20:04
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> --
> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
> >> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> >> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> >> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
> >> >> bullshit.
> >> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
> >
> > <top-posting corrected>
> >> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
> >
> > What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
> > that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
> > defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
>
> You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell the
> truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a defamation
> case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you lie and
> lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
So which of these is the truth?
"I passed through Poway on my way to Coronado"
or
"I've never been to Poway in my life"
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 20:45:10
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > I see you're back again, Scott, but you still haven't answered this
> > one. Are you admitting you made a mistake?
>
> Rand McNally might have made a mistake. I didn't have google maps in my car
> when I passed through.
> Are YOU admitting YOU made a mistake when you accused me of deliberatly
> lying about pasing through Poway? Or was your lie deliberate, and no
> mistake?
Back to Rand McNally again, is it? What's the ISBN on that book?
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 22:19:13
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1161229510.264481.18490@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
>> > I see you're back again, Scott, but you still haven't answered this
>> > one. Are you admitting you made a mistake?
>>
>> Rand McNally might have made a mistake. I didn't have google maps in my
>> car
>> when I passed through.
>> Are YOU admitting YOU made a mistake when you accused me of deliberatly
>> lying about pasing through Poway? Or was your lie deliberate, and no
>> mistake?
>
> Back to Rand McNally again, is it? What's the ISBN on that book?
Back to your pathetic, desperate attempts to catch me lying. How
ridiculous. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
I know you are psychopathic, but you're really losing it, Henry. Obsessed.
Deranged. And you think you are proving a point.
Fuck yourself again, freak.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 20:03:45
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160594404.854107.158010@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> --
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------
>> >> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
>> >> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
>> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
>> >> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> >> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>> >> >> bullshit.
>> >> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
>> >
>> > <top-posting corrected>
>> >> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
>> >
>> > What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
>> > that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
>> > defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
>>
>> You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell the
>> truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a
>> defamation
>> case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you lie
>> and
>> lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
>
> So which of these is the truth?
>
> "I passed through Poway on my way to Coronado"
>
> or
>
> "I've never been to Poway in my life"
I sure as hell never have gotten off the freeway in Poway....but according
to the map, I passed through.
Amazing how desperate you are to catch me in a lie....while I've caught you
hundreds of times. Indeed, this ludicrous twisting of the facts is just
another ridiculous and laughable Richard Henry lie.
You really can't understand that there are honest, honorable people in the
world, do you? You think everybody lies the way you do. You can't conceive
of people who don't. You can't understand why everybody isn't an amoral,
stalking psychopath like you.
What a case study. You fascinate me.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 09:39:20
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
> >> bullshit.
> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
> >
> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
<top-posting corrected >
> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 15:28:31
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Richard Henry wrote:
> Two Buddha wrote:
> > "Sven Golly" <sven_medelsvensson@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns985D9703C7586svengolly@66.75.164.120...
> > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > > news:1160789084_13015@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
> > >
> > >> Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps.
> > >
> > > Is what on Google Maps? 15 runs just west of Poway's city boundaries.
> > > Going
> > > "through" Poway, you'd need to move it about 6 miles east. It's pretty
> > > much
> > > quibbling but technically Richard's right and you're wrong.
> >
> > Not on the map I looked at when I went through, and Henry knows it.
> > Quibbling is right. Long way from a lie....and Henry keeps claiming he
> > caught me in a lie. Truly desperate. Pathetic.
>
> So are you admitting you made a mistake? I could accept that.
I see you're back again, Scott, but you still haven't answered this
one. Are you admitting you made a mistake?
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:00:19
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1161210511.394170.19030@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Richard Henry wrote:
>> Two Buddha wrote:
>> > "Sven Golly" <sven_medelsvensson@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns985D9703C7586svengolly@66.75.164.120...
>> > > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> > > news:1160789084_13015@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
>> > >
>> > >> Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps.
>> > >
>> > > Is what on Google Maps? 15 runs just west of Poway's city boundaries.
>> > > Going
>> > > "through" Poway, you'd need to move it about 6 miles east. It's
>> > > pretty
>> > > much
>> > > quibbling but technically Richard's right and you're wrong.
>> >
>> > Not on the map I looked at when I went through, and Henry knows it.
>> > Quibbling is right. Long way from a lie....and Henry keeps claiming he
>> > caught me in a lie. Truly desperate. Pathetic.
>>
>> So are you admitting you made a mistake? I could accept that.
>
> I see you're back again, Scott, but you still haven't answered this
> one. Are you admitting you made a mistake?
Rand McNally might have made a mistake. I didn't have google maps in my car
when I passed through.
Are YOU admitting YOU made a mistake when you accused me of deliberatly
lying about pasing through Poway? Or was your lie deliberate, and no
mistake?
|
| | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 15:27:08
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1161053385.406257.105420@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Two Buddha wrote:
> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1160836424.299561.48950@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Richard Henry wrote:
> >> >> Two Buddha wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies
> >> >> > or
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not
> >> >> > discuss
> >> >> > his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > ridiculous fantasies.
> >> >> > Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a
> >> >> > psychopath who
> >> >> > loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak
> >> >> > he
> >> >> > is.
> >> >> > How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
> >> >>
> >> >> What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
> >> >> quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the content
> >> >> of
> >> >> the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington
> >> >> State
> >> >> Board of Health?
> >> >
> >> > Hey Scott! It's almost 24 hours, and still no response from you. This
> >> > is your big opportunity to show everyone what a liar I am - just post
> >> > that complaint you say I made to the licensing agency.
> >>
> >> You know you went real life with an anonymous complaint, and so do I.
> >> Why
> >> lie some more, freak? You know you are lying, I know you are lying, and
> >> I
> >> know what a despicable, cowardly, desperate freak you are. My contempt
> >> is
> >> boundless.
> >> I won. They blew you off. How pathetic. Fuck yourself again.
> >
> > Actually, I expected you to evade this. Instead, you reply with
> > nothing and prove my point.
>
> Actually, you continue to evade accountability and prove my point: you are a
> stalking psychopath who has tried to harm me in real life. I know it, you
> know it. None of your games will change that....and I loathe you for your
> cowardice.
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > Remember, Scott, we're not really ster than you. We just pretend to
> > be.
>
> Neither ster or better. Scum. Utter scum. A freak who thinks facility
> in lying denotes intelligence. How pathetic. How Richard Henry.
So post the content of the anonymous complaint.
And if it's anonymous, what makes you think I sent it? I have posted
the full content of the non-anonymous, non-complaint I sent the
Washington State Board of Health long ago. Shall I drag it back up and
pretend to make you look like an idiot again?
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 18:05:51
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1161210428.643700.69860@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1161053385.406257.105420@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1160836424.299561.48950@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Richard Henry wrote:
>> >> >> Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> > The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his
>> >> >> > lies
>> >> >> > or
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does
>> >> >> > not
>> >> >> > discuss
>> >> >> > his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his
>> >> >> > deranged
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > ridiculous fantasies.
>> >> >> > Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a
>> >> >> > psychopath who
>> >> >> > loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral
>> >> >> > freak
>> >> >> > he
>> >> >> > is.
>> >> >> > How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
>> >> >> quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the
>> >> >> content
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington
>> >> >> State
>> >> >> Board of Health?
>> >> >
>> >> > Hey Scott! It's almost 24 hours, and still no response from you.
>> >> > This
>> >> > is your big opportunity to show everyone what a liar I am - just
>> >> > post
>> >> > that complaint you say I made to the licensing agency.
>> >>
>> >> You know you went real life with an anonymous complaint, and so do I.
>> >> Why
>> >> lie some more, freak? You know you are lying, I know you are lying,
>> >> and
>> >> I
>> >> know what a despicable, cowardly, desperate freak you are. My
>> >> contempt
>> >> is
>> >> boundless.
>> >> I won. They blew you off. How pathetic. Fuck yourself again.
>> >
>> > Actually, I expected you to evade this. Instead, you reply with
>> > nothing and prove my point.
>>
>> Actually, you continue to evade accountability and prove my point: you
>> are a
>> stalking psychopath who has tried to harm me in real life. I know it,
>> you
>> know it. None of your games will change that....and I loathe you for
>> your
>> cowardice.
>> >
>> > Thank you very much.
>> >
>> > Remember, Scott, we're not really ster than you. We just pretend to
>> > be.
>>
>> Neither ster or better. Scum. Utter scum. A freak who thinks
>> facility
>> in lying denotes intelligence. How pathetic. How Richard Henry.
>
> So post the content of the anonymous complaint.
You know and I know you made an anonymous complaint to my licensing board.
Admit it. Good for the soul, freak. What kind of pathetic freak does that,
and encourages others to harass people in real life by making false
allegations, simply because they want to silence the truth.
A pathetic freak like you, Henry.
You know you are lying and I know you are lying. Everybody who reads this
shithole knows you are lying. Fuck yourself again, freak.
>
> And if it's anonymous, what makes you think I sent it? I have posted
> the full content of the non-anonymous, non-complaint I sent the
> Washington State Board of Health long ago. Shall I drag it back up and
> pretend to make you look like an idiot again?
Another real life harassment thinly veiled. How pathetic. Clue time,
freak. Idiots make false allegations to licensing authorities and encourage
others to do the same. You can't make me look like you, idiot freak. What
a pathetically laughable weakness you have, Henry, that you must lie and lie
and lie when confronted with a real man who exposes you for the cowardly
stalker you are.
How pathetic. How psychopathic. How Richard Henry
|
| | |
Date: 16 Oct 2006 19:52:24
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Sven Golly" <sven_medelsvensson@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns985D9703C7586svengolly@66.75.164.120...
> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > news:1160789084_13015@sp6iad.superfeed.net:
> >
> >> Is on my map. Which is what I've always said. Is on Google maps.
> >
> > Is what on Google Maps? 15 runs just west of Poway's city boundaries.
> > Going
> > "through" Poway, you'd need to move it about 6 miles east. It's pretty
> > much
> > quibbling but technically Richard's right and you're wrong.
>
> Not on the map I looked at when I went through, and Henry knows it.
> Quibbling is right. Long way from a lie....and Henry keeps claiming he
> caught me in a lie. Truly desperate. Pathetic.
So are you admitting you made a mistake? I could accept that.
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 10:23:24
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160584760.823684.123600@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
>> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Two Buddha wrote:
>> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
>> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>> >> bullshit.
>> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>> >
>> > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
>
> <top-posting corrected>
>> What defamation? You truly are deranged.
>
> What I found most amusing, giving the rsa context, was the statement
> that the palintiff "pursued the case even though she knew the
> defendant ... has no hope of paying such an award."
You just keep forgetting that truth is a defense. You lie. I tell the
truth about you lying. Period. The defense. You'd NEVER win a defamation
case, you sick stalking lying coward. And we both know it. Yet you lie and
lie and lie and smear. As usual. Richard Henry, gutless psychopath.
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 21:16:57
From: gpsman
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Edwin wrote: <brevity snip/groups adjusted >
Who's Alan Baker...? Is he some sort of idiot crossposter?
-----
- gpsman
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 04:36:32
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160540216.978746.210650@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com >,
"gpsman" <gpsman@driversmail.com > wrote:
> Edwin wrote: <brevity snip/groups adjusted>
>
> Who's Alan Baker...? Is he some sort of idiot crossposter?
> -----
>
> - gpsman
Sorry, gps, but no.
Edwin has just decided to lash out by crossposting this little diatribe
in groups I frequent.
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 21:12:04
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real bullshit.
> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
|
| | |
Date: 16 Oct 2006 19:49:45
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
Two Buddha wrote:
> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160836424.299561.48950@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Richard Henry wrote:
> >> Two Buddha wrote:
> >
> >> > The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies or
> >> > the
> >> > lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not
> >> > discuss
> >> > his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged
> >> > and
> >> > ridiculous fantasies.
> >> > Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a
> >> > psychopath who
> >> > loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak he
> >> > is.
> >> > How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
> >>
> >> What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
> >> quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the content of
> >> the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington State
> >> Board of Health?
> >
> > Hey Scott! It's almost 24 hours, and still no response from you. This
> > is your big opportunity to show everyone what a liar I am - just post
> > that complaint you say I made to the licensing agency.
>
> You know you went real life with an anonymous complaint, and so do I. Why
> lie some more, freak? You know you are lying, I know you are lying, and I
> know what a despicable, cowardly, desperate freak you are. My contempt is
> boundless.
> I won. They blew you off. How pathetic. Fuck yourself again.
Actually, I expected you to evade this. Instead, you reply with
nothing and prove my point.
Thank you very much.
Remember, Scott, we're not really ster than you. We just pretend to
be.
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Oct 2006 13:48:40
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1161053385.406257.105420@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160836424.299561.48950@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Richard Henry wrote:
>> >> Two Buddha wrote:
>> >
>> >> > The observer will note that Richard Henry does not discuss his lies
>> >> > or
>> >> > the
>> >> > lies of his friends. Criminal lies. Felonious lies. He does not
>> >> > discuss
>> >> > his real life lies to licensing agencies, his stalking, his deranged
>> >> > and
>> >> > ridiculous fantasies.
>> >> > Same old, same old. Another pathetic nutcase usenet wacko, a
>> >> > psychopath who
>> >> > loathes anyone who sees him for the gutless, nutless, amoral freak
>> >> > he
>> >> > is.
>> >> > How pathetic. How laughable. How Richard Henry.
>> >>
>> >> What lies? Show everyone that I was mistaken about you by actually
>> >> quoting a lie I told about you. For starters, how about the content
>> >> of
>> >> the "false accusation" you say I made about you to the Washington
>> >> State
>> >> Board of Health?
>> >
>> > Hey Scott! It's almost 24 hours, and still no response from you. This
>> > is your big opportunity to show everyone what a liar I am - just post
>> > that complaint you say I made to the licensing agency.
>>
>> You know you went real life with an anonymous complaint, and so do I.
>> Why
>> lie some more, freak? You know you are lying, I know you are lying, and
>> I
>> know what a despicable, cowardly, desperate freak you are. My contempt
>> is
>> boundless.
>> I won. They blew you off. How pathetic. Fuck yourself again.
>
> Actually, I expected you to evade this. Instead, you reply with
> nothing and prove my point.
Actually, you continue to evade accountability and prove my point: you are a
stalking psychopath who has tried to harm me in real life. I know it, you
know it. None of your games will change that....and I loathe you for your
cowardice.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Remember, Scott, we're not really ster than you. We just pretend to
> be.
Neither ster or better. Scum. Utter scum. A freak who thinks facility
in lying denotes intelligence. How pathetic. How Richard Henry.
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 07:21:25
From: pigo
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1161053385.406257.105420@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Remember, Scott, we're not really ster than you. We just
> pretend to
> be.
I wonder if that reporter would be interested in a "registered
counselor" mess in the making?
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Oct 2006 20:11:51
From: comadreja
Subject: Re: Richard Henry, pathetic psychopath.
|
In article <1161053385.406257.105420@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Two Buddha wrote:
>>They blew you off. How pathetic. Fuck yourself again.
>
> Actually, I expected you to evade this. Instead, you reply with
> nothing and prove my point.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Remember, Scott, we're not really ster than you. We just pretend to
> be.
http://tinyurl.com/y3n8aj
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 22:41:40
From: Richard Henry
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
sbm2006@shaw.ca wrote:
>
> One quick question. If those houses on the west side of the line
> aren't in Poway, where are they?
San Diego.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 18:26:38
From: Yabahoobs
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Two Buddha wrote:
>You've been on my known assholes list for a long time.
> Also on the known cowards, known pathological liars, known stalkers.....
> Fuck yourself again, freak.
Now see this is totally believable. Fattie's home / apt...littered
with Wendy's trash with hundreds of his "lists' posted on the walls.
The "pathological liars", the "freaks", the "people who need a
'Clue-Time' ". Hahahahha....Like an amalgam of Steve Buscemi
characters, except much, much fatter.
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 22:30:57
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
What defamation? You truly are deranged.
--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Two Buddha wrote:
>> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
>> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>> bullshit.
>> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
>
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 04:58:23
From: Sven Golly
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com > wrote in
news:1160539924.023811.93560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case
> _x.htm
No mun, no fun.
--
Sven Golly
Yah sure by gosh by yumpin' yiminy
Trolling as usual
Change the "_" to "." to reply by email
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 00:53:45
From: Mayor of R'lyeh
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
On 10 Oct 2006 21:12:04 -0700, "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com >
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>Two Buddha wrote:
>> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
>> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real bullshit.
>> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>
>http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
Truth is an absolute defense.
--
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the
very structure of our government."
Al Gore
Bill Clinton became eligible for reinstatement to the
bar on January 19,2006 after losing his law license
in 2001 for comitting perjury.
|
| | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 05:33:23
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <96uoi2dug5katg17f8epio7eg8ee807gs2@4ax.com >,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2006 21:12:04 -0700, "Richard Henry" <pomerado@hotmail.com>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >
> >Two Buddha wrote:
> >> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> >> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> >> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real bullshit.
> >> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
> >
> >http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm
>
> Truth is an absolute defense.
How in the world would you know? You've never tried it.
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 15:49:40
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real bullshit.
Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote in message
news:1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> survive."
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>
> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
>
> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
>
> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> clearly joking doesn't count. "
>
> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> does it?"
>
> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> others on numerous occasions. "
>
> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>
> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> All of the above? "
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
>
>
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 23:04:25
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160520661_14027@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real bullshit.
> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
Never was there a better example of knowing someone by those he calls
friends...
LOL
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
> from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > survive."
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >
> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931c5ab
> >
> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc848207ef
> >
> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >
> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> > does it?"
> >
> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> > others on numerous occasions. "
> >
> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >
> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > All of the above? "
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32b1bc
> >
> >
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 22:30:27
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-AB0109.16042510102006@news.telus.net...
> In article <1160520661_14027@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
>> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>> bullshit.
>> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>
> Never was there a better example of knowing someone by those he calls
> friends...
>
> LOL
Yeah. Like your friends here. Criminals, stalkers, pathological liars, the
scum of the scum.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 10:31:28
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160544708_16595@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
>
>
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-AB0109.16042510102006@news.telus.net...
>> In article <1160520661_14027@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
>> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like I'm not the only person who has found Alan Baker to be a
>>> deranged, deluded, stalking lunatic.. He loves making up insane
>>> fantasies....and never, ever discusses real evidence of his real
>>> bullshit.
>>> Oh, well. At least he is consistent.
>>
>> Never was there a better example of knowing someone by those he calls
>> friends...
>>
>> LOL
>
>
> Yeah. Like your friends here. Criminals, stalkers, pathological liars,
> the scum of the scum.
Looks like you're doing the stalking fudgepacker.
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 13:45:41
From: dugjustdug
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Cut me some slack, man. I also believe in Dog.
On Oct 10, 11:37 am, Chris Bellomy <p...@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> dugjustdug <prestigerea...@yvn.com> wrote:: Gosh, Edwin. Did Alan beat you 8 & 9?
>
> How could anyone win 8 & 9?
>
> --
> Chris Bellomy
> C-List Charter Memberhttp://clist.org/
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 12:22:19
From: Edwin
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
[unsnip]
Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
survive."
Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
another and that their survival was largely up to them."
Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
clearly joking doesn't count. "
Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
does it?"
Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
others on numerous occasions. "
Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
All of the above? "
Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
> I guess I really do own you...
>
> LOL
You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
An interesting POV, to say the least...
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 15:50:48
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote in message
news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Alan Baker wrote:
>> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>
> [unsnip]
>
> Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> survive."
>
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>
>
> Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
>
>
>
> Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
>
>
>
> Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> clearly joking doesn't count. "
>
>
> Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> does it?"
>
>
> Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> others on numerous occasions. "
>
>
> Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>
>
> Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> All of the above? "
>
>
> Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
>
>
>
>> I guess I really do own you...
>>
>> LOL
>
> You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
>
> An interesting POV, to say the least...
>
Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his own
insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many times.
|
| | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 10:33:08
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> I've watched him pull this crap on me too many times.
You aint too bright then eh.
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 23:03:39
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Alan Baker wrote:
> >> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >
> > [unsnip]
> >
> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> > survive."
> >
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >
> >
> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
> >
> >
> >
> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
> >
> >
> >
> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >
> >
> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> > does it?"
> >
> >
> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> > others on numerous occasions. "
> >
> >
> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >
> >
> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> > All of the above? "
> >
> >
> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
> >
> >
> >
> >> I guess I really do own you...
> >>
> >> LOL
> >
> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> >
> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >
>
> Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his own
> insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many times.
LOL
Not even Edwin matches you in kookery, Scotty.
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Oct 2006 00:31:58
From: Carbon
Subject: Re: George W. Bush
|
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:12:55 -0700, AKA Gray Asphalt wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.10.13.20.33.07.183851@nospam.verizon.net...
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:30:08 -0700, Tex wrote:
>>
>>> Much like the Dems had the Foley emails back in July...but sat on it
>>> for maximum "hit" value right before the elections.
>>
>> Hastert's office knew about Foley for at least a year and did nothing
>> about it. Do you think it was right to allow a pedophile access to
>> underage boys because of political expediency? Because most folks are
>> going to disagree with you.
>>
>> And obviously, if Hastert had done the right thing when he first heard
>> about Foley it wouldn't be an election issue now.
>
> How can anyone argue with this?
Ever watch Fox?
|
| | | | | |
Date: 17 Oct 2006 17:15:57
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160786132_12993@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-F816DE.16033910102006@news.telus.net...
> > In article <1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker wrote:
> >> >> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> <snip>
> >> >
> >> > [unsnip]
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> >> > survive."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> >> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> >> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> >> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> >> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> >> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> >> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> >> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> >> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> >> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> >> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> >> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> >> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> >> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> >> > does it?"
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> >> > others on numerous occasions. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> >> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> >> > All of the above? "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> >> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> >> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> I guess I really do own you...
> >> >>
> >> >> LOL
> >> >
> >> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> >> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> >> >
> >> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >> >
> >>
> >> Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his own
> >> insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many times.
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > Not even Edwin matches you in kookery, Scotty.
>
> Amazing. The freak uses LOL again. So deranged, so insane, so utterly
> devoid of insight that he does exactly what is described and predicted.
> I don't think you're funny, Baker. I think you are a dangerous, mentally
> ill stalker. Insane, but not crazy enough to show up at Whistler.
Are you making a formal accusation that I have stalked someone according
to any applicable law?
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 22:29:50
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-F816DE.16033910102006@news.telus.net...
> In article <1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
>> news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Alan Baker wrote:
>> >> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >
>> > [unsnip]
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
>> > survive."
>> >
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
>> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
>> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>> >
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>> >
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
>> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
>> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>> >
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
>> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
>> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
>> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
>> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
>> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
>> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>> >
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
>> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>> >
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
>> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
>> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
>> >
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
>> > does it?"
>> >
>> >
>> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
>> > others on numerous occasions. "
>> >
>> >
>> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>> >
>> >
>> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
>> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
>> > All of the above? "
>> >
>> >
>> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
>> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
>> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>> >
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> I guess I really do own you...
>> >>
>> >> LOL
>> >
>> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
>> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
>> >
>> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
>> >
>>
>> Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his own
>> insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many times.
>
> LOL
>
> Not even Edwin matches you in kookery, Scotty.
Translation: anyone who sees Alan Baker for the insane, deranged, deluded
wacko he is is a kook.
Of course, in Alan Baker's mind, anyone who tells the truth is a kook.
You stupid, sick, psychopathic freak. You truly need psychiatric help. Get
it.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| | | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 05:33:00
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160544671_16587@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-F816DE.16033910102006@news.telus.net...
> > In article <1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker wrote:
> >> >> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> <snip>
> >> >
> >> > [unsnip]
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> >> > survive."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going to
> >> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> >> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> >> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> >> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> >> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> >> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> >> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> >> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> >> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> >> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> >> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> >> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> >> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my claim,
> >> > does it?"
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> >> > others on numerous occasions. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> >> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> >> > All of the above? "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> >> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> >> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> I guess I really do own you...
> >> >>
> >> >> LOL
> >> >
> >> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> >> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> >> >
> >> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >> >
> >>
> >> Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his own
> >> insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many times.
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > Not even Edwin matches you in kookery, Scotty.
>
> Translation: anyone who sees Alan Baker for the insane, deranged, deluded
> wacko he is is a kook.
> Of course, in Alan Baker's mind, anyone who tells the truth is a kook.
> You stupid, sick, psychopathic freak. You truly need psychiatric help. Get
> it.
I can't claim to have Scotty owned. He's definitely the communal
property of rec.skiing.alpine.
<g >
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 10:21:36
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-6802BE.22330010102006@news.telus.net...
> In article <1160544671_16587@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:alangbaker-F816DE.16033910102006@news.telus.net...
>> > In article <1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
>> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Alan Baker wrote:
>> >> >> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> >> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <snip>
>> >> >
>> >> > [unsnip]
>> >> >
>> >> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
>> >> > survive."
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going
>> >> > to
>> >> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
>> >> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
>> >> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
>> >> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
>> >> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
>> >> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
>> >> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
>> >> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
>> >> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
>> >> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
>> >> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
>> >> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
>> >> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my
>> >> > claim,
>> >> > does it?"
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
>> >> > others on numerous occasions. "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
>> >> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
>> >> > All of the above? "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
>> >> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
>> >> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> I guess I really do own you...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> LOL
>> >> >
>> >> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
>> >> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of
>> >> > "LOL?"
>> >> >
>> >> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his
>> >> own
>> >> insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many
>> >> times.
>> >
>> > LOL
>> >
>> > Not even Edwin matches you in kookery, Scotty.
>>
>> Translation: anyone who sees Alan Baker for the insane, deranged, deluded
>> wacko he is is a kook.
>> Of course, in Alan Baker's mind, anyone who tells the truth is a kook.
>> You stupid, sick, psychopathic freak. You truly need psychiatric help.
>> Get
>> it.
>
> I can't claim to have Scotty owned. He's definitely the communal
> property of rec.skiing.alpine.
> <g>
The insanity of net wackos and freaks never ceases to amaze me. I tell the
truth, they lie and stalk and commit felonies.
And NONE of them ever has the balls to do it in person.
Who owns who, freak? Thanks for reminding the newcomers of what a shithole
this is.
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 18:17:21
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160587376_22695@sp6iad.superfeed.net >,
"Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-6802BE.22330010102006@news.telus.net...
> > In article <1160544671_16587@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> >> news:alangbaker-F816DE.16033910102006@news.telus.net...
> >> > In article <1160520731_14041@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> >> > "Two Buddha" <scottabe@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Alan Baker wrote:
> >> >> >> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >> >> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> <snip>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [unsnip]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Alan Baker: "Funny. You keep telling us that Apple's not going to
> >> >> > survive."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh : "Where have I ever said that Apple wasn't going
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > survive? I've actually said that it didn't matter to me one way or
> >> >> > another and that their survival was largely up to them."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Alan Baker: "You've implied on occasions too numerous to count."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e1f666561931.
> >> >> > ..
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Alan Baker: "As I said: your essential dishonesty comes as no
> >> >> > surprise. You're seriously suggesting that you've never state nor
> >> >> > implied that Apple is doomed to fail? Come on, Mayor."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "No I haven't. Where's your proof Alan 'I'll cry
> >> >> > like a little girl until you give me a URL" Baker? You've declared
> >> >> > that I've made the implication too many times to count. Surely
> >> >> > out of all those times youcan produce just one. Go to Google
> >> >> > and use the search terms 'Apple' 'doom' and 'fail' with me as
> >> >> > the author. Surely this will yield thousands upon
> >> >> > thousands of hits for you to post...unless you're full of beans. "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/522206fc8482.
> >> >> > ..
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Me: "When you get done laughing, maybe you can find that quote where
> >> >> > the Mayor says Apple is going out of business? "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "Just one out of the 'too many times to count' you
> >> >> > claimed I said it would be nice. And no the one time where I was
> >> >> > clearly joking doesn't count. "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Alan Baker: "So my failure to provide a reference disproves my
> >> >> > claim,
> >> >> > does it?"
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Me: "It does according to the rules of judgment you have applied to
> >> >> > others on numerous occasions. "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Alan Baker: "I admit my claim about Clyde remains unproven... "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Me: "Why don't you hold yourself to your own standards of judgment?
> >> >> > Lack of ethics? No morals? Lack of intelligence? Hypocrisy?
> >> >> > All of the above? "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh: "He's had two years to find one quote but couldn't
> >> >> > and he still can't admit that he's wrong...something he expects
> >> >> > everyone else to do after 30 seconds. What a piece of work he is. "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c6366dc15e32.
> >> >> > ..
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I guess I really do own you...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> LOL
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> >> >> > refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of
> >> >> > "LOL?"
> >> >> >
> >> >> > An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Couldn't agree more. He truly is deranged. Utterly convinced of his
> >> >> own
> >> >> insane worldview, I've watched him pull this crap on me too many
> >> >> times.
> >> >
> >> > LOL
> >> >
> >> > Not even Edwin matches you in kookery, Scotty.
> >>
> >> Translation: anyone who sees Alan Baker for the insane, deranged, deluded
> >> wacko he is is a kook.
> >> Of course, in Alan Baker's mind, anyone who tells the truth is a kook.
> >> You stupid, sick, psychopathic freak. You truly need psychiatric help.
> >> Get
> >> it.
> >
> > I can't claim to have Scotty owned. He's definitely the communal
> > property of rec.skiing.alpine.
> > <g>
>
>
> The insanity of net wackos and freaks never ceases to amaze me. I tell the
> truth, they lie and stalk and commit felonies.
> And NONE of them ever has the balls to do it in person.
> Who owns who, freak? Thanks for reminding the newcomers of what a shithole
> this is.
LOL
Whatever you say, Scotty.
Next time, be as specific before the meet as you were willing to be
afterwards.
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 06:17:34
From: Sven Golly
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in news:alangbaker-
6802BE.22330010102006@news.telus.net:
> I can't claim to have Scotty owned. He's definitely the communal
> property of rec.skiing.alpine.
I'd like a divorce please so you can have him. I'll take the Porsche.
--
Sven Golly
Yah sure by gosh by yumpin' yiminy
Trolling as usual
Change the "_" to "." to reply by email
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 10:22:13
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Sven Golly" <sven_medelsvensson@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:Xns9858ECF8169F0svengolly@66.75.164.119...
> Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in news:alangbaker-
> 6802BE.22330010102006@news.telus.net:
>
>> I can't claim to have Scotty owned. He's definitely the communal
>> property of rec.skiing.alpine.
>
> I'd like a divorce please so you can have him. I'll take the Porsche.
Thanks, freak. One freak laughs about another freak's insane, deranged
defamations. RSA. Normal.
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 20:49:37
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
<snip >
> > I guess I really do own you...
> >
> > LOL
>
> You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
>
> An interesting POV, to say the least...
Nope. By your own standard, you looking up other groups I've posted in
and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
you.
LOL
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Oct 2006 09:28:14
From: Two Buddha
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Truly insane. Utterly deranged. Typical Alan Baker.
--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-A28D6A.13493610102006@news.telus.net...
> In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> > I guess I really do own you...
>> >
>> > LOL
>>
>> You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
>> refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
>>
>> An interesting POV, to say the least...
>
> Nope. By your own standard, you looking up other groups I've posted in
> and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
> you.
>
> LOL
>
> --
> 'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
> "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD
> Unix'
> (Edwin on Mac OS X)
>
> '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
> 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
> IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 06:17:34
From: Alan Murphy
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net > wrote in message
news:alangbaker-A28D6A.13493610102006@news.telus.net...
> In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> > I guess I really do own you...
>> >
>> > LOL
>>
>> You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
>> refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
>>
>> An interesting POV, to say the least...
>
> Nope. By your own standard, you looking up other groups I've posted in
> and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
> > you.
>
Don't feel bad about it, Edwin. He also owns
Larry from this group.
Alan
|
| | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 05:32:05
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <BfudncjyC5Dw47HYnZ2dnUVZ8s6dnZ2d@bt.com >,
"Alan Murphy" <afmccl@btinternet.com > wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-A28D6A.13493610102006@news.telus.net...
> > In article <1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> > I guess I really do own you...
> >> >
> >> > LOL
> >>
> >> You guess you "own" people through false accasations, lies, and
> >> refusing to admit when you're wrong, all backed up by overuse of "LOL?"
> >>
> >> An interesting POV, to say the least...
> >
> > Nope. By your own standard, you looking up other groups I've posted in
> > and then plastering them with posts about my "Eternal Shame" means I own
> > > you.
> >
> Don't feel bad about it, Edwin. He also owns
> Larry from this group.
>
> Alan
I'm starting a collection.
<g >
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 15:08:11
From: MnMikew
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote in message
news:1160508139.735025.48120@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Alan Baker wrote:
>> In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>
> [unsnip]
>
Get a real computer.
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 14:36:39
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
On 10 Oct 2006 12:22:19 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
Hey Alan, what was the original news group? The fact that this idot
is crossposting to 5 others shows his disregard, and contempt, for
those who have no interest.
You win by default :-)
--
___,
\o
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 20:55:23
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <k4tni2dld64hpvvj826lm75k05gn4ndbef@4ax.com >,
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2006 12:22:19 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Alan, what was the original news group? The fact that this idot
> is crossposting to 5 others shows his disregard, and contempt, for
> those who have no interest.
>
> You win by default :-)
Thanks, Bobby.
What's great is that everyone -- including Edwin -- knows it.
<g >
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 14:46:34
From: Lloyd Parsons
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <k4tni2dld64hpvvj826lm75k05gn4ndbef@4ax.com >,
Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net > wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2006 12:22:19 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Alan, what was the original news group? The fact that this idot
> is crossposting to 5 others shows his disregard, and contempt, for
> those who have no interest.
>
> You win by default :-)
> --
> ___,
> \o
>
|
| | | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 15:16:40
From: Bobby Knight
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:46:34 -0500, Lloyd Parsons
<lloydparsons@mac.com > wrote:
>In article <k4tni2dld64hpvvj826lm75k05gn4ndbef@4ax.com>,
> Bobby Knight <bknight@conramp.net> wrote:
>
>> On 10 Oct 2006 12:22:19 -0700, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Alan, what was the original news group? The fact that this idot
>> is crossposting to 5 others shows his disregard, and contempt, for
>> those who have no interest.
>>
>> You win by default :-)
>> bk
>
>Bobby, this is coming out of comp.sys.mac.advocacy
>
>And as with other advocacy groups, it is a bit wild and wooly!
It gets wild and wooly here too. However, it would take a schmuck
like Edwin to crosspost golf content to comp.sys.mac....etc.
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 18:37:24
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Well played, Alan. Well played.
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 18:43:36
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <2T3hje6sIb3hN34@redshark.goodshow.net >,
Chris Bellomy <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid > wrote:
> Well played, Alan. Well played.
Thanks, Chris!
I thought so too.
<g >
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 18:01:51
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160496911.917243.85480@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com >,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com > wrote:
<snip >
I guess I really do own you...
LOL
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
| |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 10:46:05
From: dugjustdug
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
Gosh, Edwin. Did Alan beat you 8 & 9?
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 18:37:04
From: Chris Bellomy
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
dugjustdug <prestigerealty@yvn.com > wrote:
: Gosh, Edwin. Did Alan beat you 8 & 9?
How could anyone win 8 & 9?
--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
|
| | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 18:07:26
From: Alan Baker
Subject: Re: Alan Baker's Eternal Shame
|
In article <1160502365.290985.62910@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com >,
"dugjustdug" <prestigerealty@yvn.com > wrote:
> Gosh, Edwin. Did Alan beat you 8 & 9?
The debating equivalent of it, yes...
--
'It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix.'
"It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix'
(Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
|
|
